PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Susan M Gribble

Publications and source records attributed to Susan M Gribble.

6 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Micro-array analyses decipher exceptional complex familial chromosomal rearrangement.

Recently there has been an increased interest in large-scale genomic variation and clinically in the consequences of haploinsufficiency of genomic segments or disruption of normal gene function by chromosome rearrangements. Here, we present an extraordinary case in which both mother and daughter presented with unexpected chromosomal rearrangement complexity, which we characterized with array-CGH, array painting and multicolor large insert clone hybridizations. We found the same 12 breakpoints involving four chromosomes in both mother and daughter. In addition, the daughter inherited a microdeletion from her father. We mapped all breakpoints to the resolution level of breakpoint spanning clones. Genes were found within 7 of the 12 breakpoint regions, some of which were disrupted by the chromosome rearrangement. One of the rearrangements disrupted a locus, which has been discussed as a quantitative trait locus for fetal hemoglobin expression in adults. Interestingly, both mother and daughter show persistent fetal hemoglobin levels. We detail the most complicated familial complex chromosomal rearrangement reported to date and thus an extreme example of inheritance of chromosomal rearrangements without error in meiotic segregation.

Child↗
PubMed2005

Heterogeneous duplications in patients with Pelizaeus-Merzbacher disease suggest a mechanism of coupled homologous and nonhomologous recombination.

We describe genomic structures of 59 X-chromosome segmental duplications that include the proteolipid protein 1 gene (PLP1) in patients with Pelizaeus-Merzbacher disease. We provide the first report of 13 junction sequences, which gives insight into underlying mechanisms. Although proximal breakpoints were highly variable, distal breakpoints tended to cluster around low-copy repeats (LCRs) (50% of distal breakpoints), and each duplication event appeared to be unique (100 kb to 4.6 Mb in size). Sequence analysis of the junctions revealed no large homologous regions between proximal and distal breakpoints. Most junctions had microhomology of 1-6 bases, and one had a 2-base insertion. Boundaries between single-copy and duplicated DNA were identical to the reference genomic sequence in all patients investigated. Taken together, these data suggest that the tandem duplications are formed by a coupled homologous and nonhomologous recombination mechanism. We suggest repair of a double-stranded break (DSB) by one-sided homologous strand invasion of a sister chromatid, followed by DNA synthesis and nonhomologous end joining with the other end of the break. This is in contrast to other genomic disorders that have recurrent rearrangements formed by nonallelic homologous recombination between LCRs. Interspersed repetitive elements (Alu elements, long interspersed nuclear elements, and long terminal repeats) were found at 18 of the 26 breakpoint sequences studied. No specific motif that may predispose to DSBs was revealed, but single or alternating tracts of purines and pyrimidines that may cause secondary structures were common. Analysis of the 2-Mb region susceptible to duplications identified proximal-specific repeats and distal LCRs in addition to the previously reported ones, suggesting that the unique genomic architecture may have a role in nonrecurrent rearrangements by promoting instability.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed2005

Molecular cytogenetic analyses of breakpoints in apparently balanced reciprocal translocations carried by phenotypically normal individuals.

To test the hypothesis that translocation breakpoints in normal individuals are simple and do not disrupt genes, we characterised the breakpoints in 13 phenotypically normal individuals incidentally ascertained with an apparently balanced reciprocal translocation. Cases were karyotyped, and the breakpoints were refined by fluorescence in situ hybridisation until breakpoint-spanning clones were identified. 1 Mb array-CGH was performed as a whole genome analysis tool to detect any imbalances in chromatin not directly involved in the breakpoints. Breakpoint-associated imbalances were not found in any of the patients analysed in this study. However, breakpoints which disrupted known genes were identified in two patients, with RYR2 disrupted in one patient and COL13A1 in the other. In a further eight patients, Ensembl mapping data suggested that a gene might be disrupted by a breakpoint. In one further patient, the translocation was shown to be nonreciprocal. This study shows that apparently balanced reciprocal translocations in phenotypically normal patients do not have imbalances at the breakpoints, in contrast to phenotypically abnormal patients where the translocation breakpoints are often associated with cryptic imbalances. However, phenotypically normal individuals, and phenotypically abnormal individuals may have genes disrupted and therefore inactivated by one of the breakpoints. The significance of these disruptions remains to be determined.

Cell Line↗
PubMed2004

Cloning of a new familial t(3;8) translocation associated with conventional renal cell carcinoma reveals a 5 kb microdeletion and no gene involved in the rearrangement.

This study describes the molecular cloning of a familial translocation, t(3;8)(p14.2;q24.2), that segregates with the conventional renal cell carcinoma (conventional RCC). We had previously reported the family history and, through loss of heterozygosity and comparative genomic hybridization, detected the loss of the 3p chromosome arm and somatic mutation in the retained von Hippel-Lindau gene in some members of the family. With the help of array painting and sequence tagged site-PCR on flow-sorted derivative chromosomes, we have cloned the breakpoints of the translocation. We have studied the junctions on both derivative chromosomes at the genomic and expression levels. The analysis of the sequence revealed a 5 kb microdeletion at the chromosome 3 breakpoint together with a high density of repetitive motifs (Alu, short interspersed nuclear element) and an AT-rich region. Both chromosome 3 and 8 rearranged regions were very poor in gene content. We tested an expressed sequence tag, two predicted genes, one novel gene and LRIG1, a gene located more than 200 kb apart from the breakpoint on chromosome 3. None of these genes, except LRIG1, showed expression in any of the tested tissues (including normal adult and fetal kidney, sporadic kidney tumours and tumour samples from the proband's family). Taken together, all these data suggest that, rather than deregulation of specific genes that may be rearranged by the translocation, the proposed three-step model of tumour development (translocation, loss of the 3p chromosome, and mutation in a tumour suppressor gene located within that region) could be the biological mechanism that takes place in this familial form of conventional RCC.

Carcinoma, Renal Cell↗
PubMed2003

Genomic imbalances in CML blast crisis: 8q24.12-q24.13 segment identified as a common region of over-representation.

The acute phase of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is accompanied by secondary chromosomal changes. The additional changes have a non-random pattern; however, highly abnormal (marker) chromosomes are reported in some 20% of abnormal karyotypes. These marker chromosomes have proved to be beyond the resolution of conventional G-banding analysis. We used molecular cytogenetic techniques to determine the structure of complex chromosome markers in 10 CML-derived cell lines after our investigations of CML patients in blast crisis. Multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization identified a multitude of structural chromosome aberrations. In addition, genomic gains identified by comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) were mapped to highly complex marker chromosomes in more than one cell line. The most common genomic loss detected by CGH affected chromosome 9, whereas the most common genomic gains affected, in order of frequency, the sequences of 8q, 6, and 13q. The smallest discrete amplification on 8q was identified in cell line MEG-01. This amplicon contains sequences represented by the marker D8S263/RMC08P029 but did not contain the proximal MYC gene or a more distal marker, D8S256/RMC08P025. We determined the size of the amplicon to be less than the chromosome segment 8q24.12-q24.13. The use of region- and locus-specific probes to analyze the organization of highly complex marker structures aided the identification of preferentially amplified genomic regions. The resultant amplifications could harbor gene(s) driving disease progression.

Allelic Imbalance↗