PubMed HealthSearch

Biomedical subjects

Susan Poutanen

Publications and source records attributed to Susan Poutanen.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

The Safety, Efficacy, and Feasibility of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in a Population With Bipolar Disorder During Depressive Episodes: A Pilot Parallel Arm Randomized Controlled Trial: Sécurité, efficacité et faisabilité de la transplantation de microbiote fécal chez une population atteinte de troubles bipolaires, au cours d'épisodes dépressifs : essai pilote contrôlé à répartition aléatoire et à groupes parallèles.

BackgroundThe gut microbiome has been proposed as a potential modifiable target to treat mental illness. This double-blind randomized control trial investigated fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) in bipolar disorder (BD) to assess efficacy, safety, and feasibility. The primary outcome evaluated the effectiveness of standard approved therapy for BD depression + FMT in individuals not responding to standard treatment, measured by change in the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score from baseline to week 24. Secondary outcomes included FMT's impact on anxiety, global function, side-effects, and safety. The feasibility of this novel intervention was also assessed. Microbial analysis utilized whole-genome shotgun metagenomic sequencing, comparing outcomes between allogenic (donor) and autologous (participants own) FMT.MethodsA total of 35 participants (28 women and 7 men) with at least moderate depressive-phase BD (MADRS) were randomized to receive either allogenic FMT (n = 17) or autologous FMT (n = 18) via colonoscopy and were followed for 24 weeks.ResultsMADRS scores significantly improved from baseline to the last visit in both treatment arms. There was no significant difference between allogenic FMT (16.74-point improvement) and autologous FMT (15.4-point improvement) regarding clinical efficacy (t = -0.47, p-value = .64, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -7.3-4.6). Microbiota analysis showed that allogenic FMT let to a bacterial profile similar to the healthy donor and increased bacterial diversity at the 6-month mark, whereas those receiving autologous FMT did not. The intervention was well tolerated with no significant adverse events. Recruitment, randomization, and retention metrics support feasibility of a larger trial.ConclusionFeasibility and tolerability data indicate further investigation into microbial manipulation in BD is warranted. The absence of efficacy differences between the two types of FMT, despite microbial change, highlights the importance of a true placebo in future studies, as well as the importance of understanding exactly what bacteria are linked to improvements. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT0327922Plain Language Summary TitleResults of a Double-Blind Randomized Control Trial Investigating Fecal Microbiota Transplant (FMT) as an Add-on Treatment for Depression in Bipolar Disorder and Analyzing Microbial Diversity Changes Over 24 Weeks.

Humans

Characterization of ertapenem-resistant Enterobacterales in Canadian hospitals: 17 years of the CANWARD study (2007-23).

OBJECTIVES: To review phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of ertapenem-resistant Enterobacterales isolates identified by the CANWARD study from 2007 to 2023. METHODS: Bacterial isolates were collected as part of the CANWARD surveillance study from 2007 to 2023. CLSI M7 broth microdilution antimicrobial susceptibility testing (12th edition, 2024) was performed. MICs were interpreted by CLSI M100 breakpoints (34th edition, 2024). WGS was performed to identify antimicrobial resistance markers. RESULTS: Only 134 (0.7%) of the 19 642 Enterobacterales were ertapenem-resistant. Carbapenemase producing Enterobacterales (CPE) accounted for 17.9% (n = 24) of ertapenem-resistant isolates and were predominantly Klebsiella pneumoniae (54.2%) and Escherichia coli (20.8%). KPC was the most common carbapenemase identified (62.5%). K. pneumoniae ST834, ST16 and ST258, and E. coli ST131 were the most frequent STs detected. CPE percent resistant values ranged from 20.8% to 25.0% for ceftazidime/avibactam, imipenem/relebactam and meropenem/vaborbactam. Most non-CPE ertapenem-resistant isolates were Enterobacter spp. (51.8%), E. coli (15.5%) and K. pneumoniae (10.9%). Non-CPE STs were most commonly E. cloacae ST108, ST50 and ST133, and E. coli ST131. Non-CPE percent resistant values ranged from 2.7% to 4.5% for ceftazidime/avibactam, imipenem/relebactam and meropenem/vaborbactam. At least one of an AmpC, an ESBL or porin alternations were observed in most non-CPE isolates. CONCLUSIONS: In Canada, ertapenem-resistant Enterobacterales remain uncommon (0.7%). CPE isolates demonstrated higher percent resistant values for multiple antimicrobial classes and harboured more antimicrobial resistance genes than non-CPE isolates. Continued monitoring for ertapenem-resistant Enterobacterales, particularly CPE, is important given their associated multidrug resistance to both established and newer agents.

Ertapenem