PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Susan W Liebman

Publications and source records attributed to Susan W Liebman.

14 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Visualization of aggregation of the Rnq1 prion domain and cross-seeding interactions with Sup35NM.

Factors triggering the de novo appearance of prions are still poorly understood. In yeast, the appearance of one prion, [PSI(+)], is enhanced by the presence of another prion, [PIN(+)]. The [PSI(+)] and [PIN(+)] prion-forming proteins are, respectively, the translational termination factor Sup35 and the yet poorly characterized Rnq1 protein that is rich in glutamines and asparagines. The prion domain of Rnq1 (RnqPD) polymerizes more readily in vitro than the full-length protein. As is typical for amyloidogenic proteins, the reaction begins with a lag phase, followed by exponential growth. Seeding with pre-formed aggregates significantly shortens the lag. A generic antibody against pre-amyloid oligomer inhibits the unseeded but not the self-seeded reaction. As revealed by electron microscopy, RnqPD polymerizes predominantly into spherical species that eventually agglomerate. We observed infrequent fiber-like structures in samples taken at 4 h of polymerization, but in overnight samples SDS treatment was required to reveal fibers among agglomerates. Polymerization reactions in which RnqPD and the prion domain of Sup35 (Sup35NM) cross-seed each other proceeded with a shortened lag that only depends weakly on the protein concentration. Cross-seeded Sup35NM fibers appear to sprout from globular RnqPD aggregates as seen by electron microscopy. RnqPD spherical aggregates appear to associate with and, later occlude, Sup35NM seed fibers. Our kinetic and morphological analyses suggest that, upon cross-seeding, the aggregate provides the surface on which oligomers of the heterologous protein nucleate their subsequent amyloid formation.

Amyloid↗
PubMed2006

"Prion-proof" for [PIN+]: infection with in vitro-made amyloid aggregates of Rnq1p-(132-405) induces [PIN+].

Prions are self-propagating, infectious protein conformations. The mammalian prion, PrP(Sc), responsible for neurodegenerative diseases like bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE; "mad cow" disease) and Creutzfeldt-Jakob's disease, appears to be a beta-sheet-rich amyloid conformation of PrP(c) that converts PrP(c) into PrP(Sc). However, an unequivocal demonstration of "protein-only" infection by PrP(Sc) is still lacking. So far, protein only infection has been proven for three prions, [PSI(+)], [URE3] and [Het-s], all of fungal origin. Considerable evidence supports the hypothesis that another protein, the yeast Rnq1p, can form a prion, [PIN(+)]. While Rnq1p does not lose any known function upon prionization, [PIN(+)] has interesting positive phenotypes: facilitating the appearance and destabilization of other prions as well as the aggregation of polyglutamine extensions of the Huntingtin protein. Here, we polymerize a Gln/Asn-rich recombinant fragment of Rnq1p into beta-sheet-rich amyloid-like aggregates. While the method used for [PSI(+)] and [URE3] infectivity assays did not yield protein-only infection for the Rnq1p aggregates, we did successfully obtain protein-only infection by modifying the protocol. This work proves that [PIN(+)] is a prion mediated by amyloid-like aggregates of Rnq1p, and supports the hypothesis that heterologous prions affect each other's appearance and propagation through interaction of their amyloid-like regions.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed2006

An engineered nonsense URA3 allele provides a versatile system to detect the presence, absence and appearance of the [PSI+] prion in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Common methods to identify yeast cells containing the prion form of the Sup35 translation termination factor, [PSI+], involve a nonsense suppressor phenotype. Decreased function of Sup35p in [PSI+] cells leads to read-through of certain nonsense mutations in a few auxotrophic markers, e.g. ade1-14. This read-through results in growth on adenine-deficient media. While this powerful tool has dramatically facilitated the study of [PSI+], it is limited to a narrow range of laboratory strains and cannot easily be used to screen for cells that have lost the [PSI+] prion. Therefore we have engineered a nonsense mutation in the widely used URA3 gene, termed the ura3-14 allele. Introduction of the ura3-14 allele into an array of genetic backgrounds, carrying a loss-of-function URA3 mutation and [PSI+], allows for growth on media lacking uracil, indicative of decreased translational termination efficiency. This ura3-14 allele is able to distinguish various forms of the [PSI+] prion, called variants, and is able to detect the de novo appearance of [PSI+] in strains carrying the prion form of Rnq1p, [PIN+]. Furthermore, 5-fluoroorotic acid, which kills cells making functional Ura3p, provides a means to select for [psi-] derivatives in a population of [PSI+] cells marked with the ura3-14 allele, making this system much more versatile than previous methods.

Alleles↗
PubMed2006

Biochemical and genetic methods for characterization of [PIN+] prions in yeast.

The glutamine- and asparagine-rich Rnq1p protein in Saccharomyces cerevisiae can exist in the cell as a soluble monomer or in one of several aggregated, infectious, prion forms called [PIN(+)]. Interest in [PIN(+)] is heightened by its ability to promote the conversion of other proteins into a prion or an aggregated amyloid state. However, little is known about the function of Rnq1p, which makes it difficult to assay the phenotypes associated with its normal vs. prion forms. In this chapter, we describe methods used to detect [PIN(+)] and distinguish between different variations of the prion. Genetic methods are based on the ability of the [PIN(+)] prion to facilitate the appearance of another yeast prion, [PSI(+)], which has an easily detectable phenotype. Biochemical methods exploit the fact that the [PIN(+)] prion exists in the yeast cytosol in the form of large aggregates, composed of SDS-stable subparticles. Sucrose gradient centrifugation, agarose SDS electrophoresis and GFP fusions are used to distinguish between aggregates and subparticles from different [PIN(+)] variants.

Blotting, Western↗
PubMed2006

Analysis of amyloid aggregates using agarose gel electrophoresis.

Amyloid aggregates are associated with a number of mammalian neurodegenerative diseases. Infectious aggregates of the mammalian prion protein PrP(sc) are hallmarks of transmissible spongiform encephalopathies in humans and cattle (Griffith, 1967; Legname et al., 2004; Prusiner, 1982; Silveira et al., 2004). Likewise, SDS-stable aggregates and low-n oligomers of the Abeta peptide (Selkoe et al., 1982; Walsh et al., 2002) cause toxic effects associated with Alzheimer's disease (Selkoe, 2004). The discovery of prions in lower eukaryotes, for example, yeast prions [PSI(+)], [PIN(+)], and [URE3] suggested that prion phenomena may represent a fundamental process that is widespread among living organisms (Chernoff, 2004; Uptain and Lindquist, 2002; Wickner, 1994; Wickner et al., 2004). These protein structures are more stable than other cellular protein complexes, which generally dissolve in SDS at room temperature. In contrast, the prion polymers withstand these conditions, while losing their association with their non-prion partners. These bulky protein particles cannot be analyzed in polyacrylamide gels, because their pores are too small to allow the passage and acceptable resolution of the large complexes. This problem was first circumvented by Kryndushkin et al. (2003), who used Western blots of protein complexes separated on agarose gels to analyze the sizes of SDS-resistant protein complexes associated with the yeast prion [PSI(+)]. Further studies have used this approach to characterize [PSI(+)] (Allen et al., 2005; Bagriantsev and Liebman, 2004; Salnikova et al., 2005), and another yeast prion [PIN(+)] (Bagriantsev and Liebman, 2004). In this chapter, we use this method to assay amyloid aggregates of recombinant proteins Sup35NM and Abeta42 and present protocols for Western blot analysis of high molecular weight (>5 MDa) amyloid aggregates resolved in agarose gels. The technique is suitable for the analysis of any large proteins or SDS-stable high molecular weight complexes.

Amyloid↗
PubMed2005

Tracking the elusive prion.

Prion diseases are infectious neurodegenerative fatal disorders. There are currently no treatments or cures. Considerable evidence suggests that the infectious agent is an abnormally folded protein that promotes or seeds its normal cellular isoform to fold into the infectious form. However, the precise mechanism and factors involved in this conversion remain unknown. A major stumbling block to further investigation has been the inability to seed the formation of new infectious material in vitro. Now, however, infectious material has been generated in a cell-free system. Although this system uses cell lysate rather than pure proteins, it nevertheless opens the door to the elucidation of targets of intervention and the development of useful diagnostic and therapeutic approaches.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Specificity of prion assembly in vivo. [PSI+] and [PIN+] form separate structures in yeast.

The yeast prions [PSI+] and [PIN+] are self-propagating amyloid aggregates of the Gln/Asn-rich proteins Sup35p and Rnq1p, respectively. Like the mammalian PrP prion "strains," [PSI+] and [PIN+] exist in different conformations called variants. Here, [PSI+] and [PIN+] variants were used to model in vivo interactions between co-existing heterologous amyloid aggregates. Two levels of structural organization, like those previously described for [PSI+], were demonstrated for [PIN+]. In cells with both [PSI+] and [PIN+] the two prions formed separate structures at both levels. Also, the destabilization of [PSI+] by certain [PIN+] variants was shown not to involve alterations in the [PSI+] prion size. Finally, when two variants of the same prion that have aggregates with distinct biochemical characteristics were combined in a single cell, only one aggregate type was propagated. These studies demonstrate the intracellular organization of yeast prions and provide insight into the principles of in vivo amyloid assembly.

Amyloid↗
PubMed2004

Effects of Q/N-rich, polyQ, and non-polyQ amyloids on the de novo formation of the [PSI+] prion in yeast and aggregation of Sup35 in vitro.

Prions are infectious protein conformations that are generally ordered protein aggregates. In the absence of prions, newly synthesized molecules of these same proteins usually maintain a conventional soluble conformation. However, prions occasionally arise even without a homologous prion template. The conformational switch that results in the de novo appearance of yeast prions with glutamine/aspargine (Q/N)-rich prion domains (e.g., [PSI+]), is promoted by heterologous prions with a similar domain (e.g., [RNQ+], also known as [PIN+]), or by overexpression of proteins with prion-like Q-, N-, or Q/N-rich domains. This finding led to the hypothesis that aggregates of heterologous proteins provide an imperfect template on which the new prion is seeded. Indeed, we show that newly forming Sup35 and preexisting Rnq1 aggregates always colocalize when [PSI+] appearance is facilitated by the [RNQ+] prion, and that Rnq1 fibers enhance the in vitro formation of fibers by the prion domain of Sup35 (NM). The proteins do not however form mixed, interdigitated aggregates. We also demonstrate that aggregating variants of the polyQ-containing domain of huntingtin promote the de novo conversion of Sup35 into [PSI+]; whereas nonaggregating variants of huntingtin and aggregates of non-polyQ amyloidogenic proteins, transthyretin, alpha-synuclein, and synphilin do not. Furthermore, transthyretin and alpha-synuclein amyloids do not facilitate NM aggregation in vitro, even though in [PSI+] cells NM and transthyretin aggregates also occasionally colocalize. Our data, especially the in vitro reproduction of the highly specific heterologous seeding effect, provide strong support for the hypothesis of cross-seeding in the spontaneous initiation of prion states.

Alleles↗
PubMed2004

The Sup35 domains required for maintenance of weak, strong or undifferentiated yeast [PSI+] prions.

The Sup35 protein can exist in a non-infectious form or in various infectious forms called [PSI+] prion variants (or prion strains). Each of the different [PSI+] prion variants converts non-infectious Sup35 molecules into that prion variant's infectious form. One definition of a 'prion domain' is the minimal fragment of a prion protein that is necessary and sufficient to maintain the prion form. We now demonstrate that the Sup35 N region (residues 1-123), which is frequently referred to as the 'prion domain', is insufficient to maintain the weak or strong [PSI+] variants per se, but appears to maintain them in an 'undifferentiated' [PSI+] state that can differentiate into weak or strong [PSI+] variants when transferred to the full-length Sup35 protein. In contrast, Sup35 residues 1-137 are necessary and sufficient to faithfully maintain weak or strong [PSI+] variants. This implicates Sup35 residues 124-137 in the variant-specific maintenance of the weak or strong [PSI+] forms. Structure predictions indicate that the residues in the 124-137 region form an alpha-helix and that the 1-123 region may have beta structure. In view of these findings, we discuss a plausible molecular basis for the [PSI+] prion variants as well as the inherent difficulties in defining a 'prion domain'.

Animals↗
PubMed2003

Guanidine reduces stop codon read-through caused by missense mutations in SUP35 or SUP45.

Sup35 and Sup45 are essential protein components of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae translation termination factor. Yeast cells harbouring the [PSI(+)] prion form of Sup35 have impaired stop codon recognition (nonsense suppression). It has long been known that the [PSI(+)] prion is not stably transmitted to daughter cells when yeast are grown in the presence of mM concentrations of guanidine hydrochloride (GuHCl). In this paper, Mendelian suppressor mutations whose phenotypes are likewise hidden during growth in the presence of millimolar GuHCl are described. Such GuHCl-remedial Mendelian suppressors were selected under conditions where [PSI(+)] appearance was limiting, and were caused by missense mutations in SUP35 or SUP45. Clearly, anti-suppression caused by growth in the presence of GuHCl is not sufficient to distinguish missense mutations in SUP35 or SUP45, from [PSI(+)]. However, the Mendelian and prion suppressors can be distinguished by subsequent growth in the absence of GuHCl, where only the nonsense suppression caused by the [PSI(+)] prion remains cured. Recent reports indicate that GuHCl blocks the inheritance of [PSI(+)] by directly inhibiting the activity of the protein remodelling factor Hsp104, which is required for the transmission of [PSI(+)] from mother to daughter cells. However, the nonsense suppressor activity caused by the GuHCl-remedial sup35 or sup45 suppressors does not require Hsp104. Thus, GuHCl must anti-suppress the sup35 and sup45 mutations via an in vivo target distinct from Hsp104.

Alleles↗
PubMed2003

Destabilizing interactions among [PSI(+)] and [PIN(+)] yeast prion variants.

The yeast Sup35 and Rnq1 proteins can exist in either the noninfectious soluble forms, [psi-] or [pin-], respectively, or the multiple infectious amyloid-like forms called [PSI+] or [PIN+] prion variants (or prion strains). It was previously shown that [PSI+] and [PIN+] prions enhance one another's de novo appearance. Here we show that specific prion variants of [PSI+] and [PIN+] disrupt each other's stable inheritance. Acquiring [PSI+] often impedes the inheritance of particular [PIN+] variants. Conversely, the presence of some [PIN+] variants impairs the inheritance of weak [PSI+] but not strong [PSI+] variants. These same [PIN+] variants generate a single-dot fluorescence pattern when a fusion of Rnq1 and green fluorescent protein is expressed. Another [PIN+] variant, which forms a distinctly different multiple-dot fluorescence pattern, does not impair [PSI+] inheritance. Thus, destabilization of prions by heterologous prions depends upon the variants involved. These findings may have implications for understanding interactions among other amyloid-forming proteins, including those associated with certain human diseases.

Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal↗
PubMed2002

Interactions among prions and prion "strains" in yeast.

Prions are "infectious" proteins. When Sup35, a yeast translation termination factor, is aggregated in its [PSI(+)] prion form its function is compromised. When Rnq1 is aggregated in its [PIN(+)] prion form, it promotes the de novo appearance of [PSI(+)]. Heritable variants (strains) of [PSI(+)] with distinct phenotypes have been isolated and are analogous to mammalian prion strains with different pathologies. Here, we describe heritable variants of the [PIN(+)] prion that are distinguished by the efficiency with which they enhance the de novo appearance of [PSI(+)]. Unlike [PSI(+)] variants, where the strength of translation termination corresponds to the level of soluble Sup35, the phenotypes of these [PIN(+)] variants do not correspond to levels of soluble Rnq1. However, diploids and meiotic progeny from crosses between either different [PSI(+)], or different [PIN(+)] variants, always have the phenotype of the parental variant with the least soluble Sup35 or Rnq1, respectively. Apparently faster growing prion variants cure cells of slower growing or less stable variants of the same prion. We also find that YDJ1 overexpression eliminates some but not other [PIN(+)] variants and that prions are destabilized by meiosis. Finally, we show that, like its affect on [PSI(+)] appearance, [PIN(+)] enhances the de novo appearance of [URE3]. Surprisingly, [PSI(+)] inhibited [URE3] appearance. These results reinforce earlier reports that heterologous prions interact, but suggest that such interactions can not only positively, but also negatively, influence the de novo generation of prions.

Base Sequence↗