PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Susanne Bremer

Publications and source records attributed to Susanne Bremer.

16 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2005

The detection of differentiation-inducing chemicals by using green fluorescent protein expression in genetically engineered teratocarcinoma cells.

The murine embryonal teratocarcinoma cell line, P19, was genetically manipulated in order to provide preliminary information on compounds that induce differentiation. Without chemical induction, P19 cells remain in an undifferentiated state, but can be induced to differentiate into specific cell types. For example, dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO) induces cardiac and skeletal muscle differentiation, whereas retinoic acid stimulates neuronal differentiation. P19 cells were transfected with a construct containing a segment of the murineTert (mTert) promoter sequence combined with the green fluorescent protein (GFP) gene, which acts as a reporter gene. mTert expression, the reverse transcriptase component of murine telomerase, is closely linked to telomerase activity and is down-regulated during differentiation. Three retinoids and DMSO induced the differentiation of P19 cells, which was determined by a reduction in mTert_GFP expression, detected by flow cytometry and confocal microscopy as independent methods of detection. A test substance, ethanol, and a control substance, saccharin, did not cause a decrease in mTert_GFP expression. In addition, it could be demonstrated that the mTert_GFP test detects developmentally relevant effects at non-cytotoxic concentrations. The ID50 values derived for the reduction of mTert_GFP expression were lower than the IC50 values detected with the MTT test, by a factor of 21.4 for all-trans retinoic acid, 12.7 for 9-cis retinoic acid, 29.6 for 13-cis retinoic acid, and 8.7 for DMSO. In comparison to the IC50 value for the P19 cell line, a similar IC50 value was obtained with 3T3 cells for ethanol, but there was a 2-fold increase for DMSO. The retinoids were not cytotoxic to 3T3 cells at the concentrations tested. This newly developed test is capable of detecting differentiation-inducing compounds at non-cytotoxic concentrations within 4 days. It offers a method for detecting chemicals with specific toxicological mechanisms, such as the retinoids, which could provide additional information in embryotoxicity testing as different promoters could be employed. Here, we report the use of this novel test system for the successful analysis of DMSO and three retinoids with different in vivo teratogenic potentials.

Animal Testing Alternatives↗
PubMed2005

Developmental toxicity testing from animal towards embryonic stem cells.

Developmental toxicology is the study of undesirable effects on the development of the organism, which may result from exposure before conception, from the period of prenatal development, or postnatally during the time of sexual maturation. The principal manifestations of developmental toxicity include: embryolethality, malformations, growth retardation, and functional impairment. In 2001, the European Commission published the future chemicals policy entitled "White Paper: Strategy for a Future Chemicals Policy". The new regulation requires a toxicological evaluation with strong emphasis on reproductive toxicity, by using in vitro methods, especially for those chemicals marketed at more than 1 ton per year. For this reason, the establishment of in vitro models capable of detecting major undesirable manifestations in the fetus, are urgently required. The aim of the present review is to explore the capacity of existing in vitro systems, based on embryonic stem (ES) cells, to identify embryotoxicity with a focus on specific effects such as teratogenicity and growth retardation. In addition, we discuss the possibility to adapt the mouse ES cells based tests to human ES cells, avoiding inter-species variations in developmental toxicity studies and address related ethical issues. Considering the different manifestations of developmental toxicity, only a battery of in vitro tests will provide the necessary information for regulatory developmental toxicity assessment.

Animal Testing Alternatives↗
PubMed2004

Detection of tissue-specific effects by methotrexate on differentiating mouse embryonic stem cells.

BACKGROUND: Pluripotent embryonic stem (ES) cells offer a unique possibility to monitor the differentiation of several cell types in vitro. This study attempts to identify marker genes during in vitro cell differentiation of murine ES cells and allow a prediction of chemical effects on cell differentiation of specific target tissues. The study focused on the expression pattern of key genes involved in cardiomyocyte and osteoblast differentiation: Oct-4, Brachyury, Nkx2.5, alpha myosin heavy chain, Cbfa1, and Osteocalcin. METHODS: Methotrexate was selected due to its well-characterized teratogenic effects. Several in vivo studies have demonstrated the specific interactions of methotrexate with bone formation whereas the cardiovascular system is not specifically affected after exposure to low concentration. The capability of murine ES cells to differentiate in vitro into cardiomyocytes as well as into osteoblasts have been used to demonstrate the target cell specificity in vitro, at non-cytotoxic concentration. RESULTS: Exposure of differentiating ES cells did not result in any gene profile modification of the selected cardiomyocyte specific genes, whereas the expression of osteoblast specific key genes, Cbfa1 and Osteocalcin, decreased. At the latter stages of skeletal differentiation we observed a 30% decrease in gene expression for Cbfa1 and a 60% decrease for Osteocalcin, with reference to the control. Early marker genes for undifferentiated cells and mesodermal cells were not modified after methotrexate treatment. CONCLUSIONS: These results show the possibility to integrate specific in vitro tests for teratogenicity in a test strategy for developmental toxicity.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Validation of the embryonic stem cell test in the international ECVAM validation study on three in vitro embryotoxicity tests.

A detailed report is presented on the performance of the embryonic stem cell test (EST) in a European Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods (ECVAM)-sponsored formal validation study on three in vitro tests for embryotoxicity. Twenty coded test chemicals, classified as non-embryotoxic, weakly embryotoxic or strongly embryotoxic on the basis of their in vivo effects in animals and/or humans, were tested in four laboratories. The outcome showed that the EST can be considered to be a scientifically validated test, which is ready for consideration for use in assessing the embryotoxic potentials of chemicals for regulatory purposes.

Animal Testing Alternatives↗
PubMed2004

A modular approach to the ECVAM principles on test validity.

The European Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods (ECVAM) proposes to make the validation process more flexible, while maintaining its high standards. The various aspects of validation are broken down into independent modules, and the information necessary to complete each module is defined. The data required to assess test validity in an independent peer review, not the process, are thus emphasised. Once the information to satisfy all the modules is complete, the test can enter the peer-review process. In this way, the between-laboratory variability and predictive capacity of a test can be assessed independently. Thinking in terms of validity principles will broaden the applicability of the validation process to a variety of tests and procedures, including the generation of new tests, new technologies (for example, genomics, proteomics), computer-based models (for example, quantitative structure-activity relationship models), and expert systems. This proposal also aims to take into account existing information, defining this as retrospective validation, in contrast to a prospective validation study, which has been the predominant approach to date. This will permit the assessment of test validity by completing the missing information via the relevant validation procedure: prospective validation, retrospective validation, catch-up validation, or a combination of these procedures.

Animal Testing Alternatives↗
PubMed2003

ECVAM's response to the changing political environment for alternatives: consequences of the European Union chemicals and cosmetics policies.

The European Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods (ECVAM) has restructured its services by directly targeting the animal tests that need to be replaced. In view of the short time-lines for making available and implementing validated methods, ECVAM is offering to steer the process by bringing together the inputs of stakeholders and encouraging the early involvement of regulators. In essence, steering groups formed by ECVAM senior staff, and complemented with external experts, will carry out the project management and will coordinate the various inputs.

Administration, Topical↗
PubMed2002

Development of a testing strategy for detecting embryotoxic hazards of chemicals in vitro by using embryonic stem cell models.

The importance of developing in vitro tests for embryotoxicity is discussed, and ECVAM's work with its collaborators is summarised. Studies are in progress to find new endpoints for use in the scientifically validated embryonic stem (ES) cell test, so that the potential for chemical effects on endodermal, mesodermal and/or ectodermal differentiation can be identified. This involves, inter alia, the use of genetically modified ES cells.

Animal Testing Alternatives↗
PubMed1998

[Results of the first phase of the ECVAM project "prevalidation and validation of three in vitro embryotoxicity tests"]

The results of the experimental prevalidation of three in vitro embryotoxicity tests in an ECVAM study are reported: the rat whole embryo culture assay (WEC), the micromass assay (MM) and the embryonic stem cell test (EST). Three test chemicals assigned to the three classes of embryotoxicity, non-, moderate- and strong embryotoxic, and also a positive and a negative control chemical were repeatedly tested in each test in two laboratories. The data obtained were evaluated independently by a biostatistician. It could be shown that the standard protocols (SOPs) for the three in vitro embryotoxicity tests could be transferred to a second laboratory and that reproducible results were obtained. The three methods were able to discriminate the test chemicals according to their embryotoxic potential. In addition, within the scope of this study, a test chemical database for in vitro embryotoxicity testing was established that will be used in the following formal validation of the three in vitro tests.

Journal Article↗
PubMedDate not supplied

The integrated project ReProTect: a novel approach in reproductive toxicity hazard assessment.

Validated alternative test methods are urgently needed for safety testing of drugs, chemicals and cosmetics. Whereas some animal tests for topical toxicity have been successfully replaced by alternative methods, systemic toxicity testing requires new test strategies in order to achieve an adequate safety level for the consumer. Substantial numbers of animals are required for the current in vivo assays for drugs, chemicals and cosmetics and a broad range of pioneering alternative methods were already developed. These prerequisites motivate the development of a tiered testing strategy based on alternative tests for reproductive toxicity hazard. In the Integrated Project ReProTect, a consortium set up by the European Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods (ECVAM) takes the lead to manage the development of a testing strategy in the area of reproductive toxicity. The reproductive cycle can be broken down into well-defined sub-elements, namely male and female fertility, implantation and pre/postnatal development. In this project, in vitro, in silico and sensor technologies will be developed, leading to testing strategies, that shall be implemented and disseminated.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Detection of the embryotoxic potential of cyclophosphamide by using a combined system of metabolic competent cells and embryonic stem cells.

In order to develop a method for detecting metabolism-mediated embryotoxicity, differentiating embryonic stem (ES) cells were exposed to the well-known proteratogen, cyclophosphamide (CPA). CPA was tested in a scientifically validated embryonic stem-cell test (EST), and in the newly developed reporter-gene assay for developmental cardiotoxicity. Both assays gave false-negative results. Because no metabolic competence (cytochrome P450 [CYP] activity) was found in the ES cells under the selected culture conditions, a simple biotransformation system was combined with the reporter-gene assay. As the metabolic pathway of CPA is well characterised, the genetically engineered mammalian cell line V79, transfected with CYP2B1 cDNA, was selected as a biotransformation system. CYP2B1 is responsible for transforming CPA into teratogenically active metabolites. The supernatants of genetically engineered V79 cells were analysed in the reporter-gene assay for developmental cardiotoxicity. In preliminary experiments, the combined system was able to detect the embryotoxic potential of the proteratogen, CPA.

Animals↗
PubMedDate not supplied

The ECVAM international validation study on in vitro embryotoxicity tests: results of the definitive phase and evaluation of prediction models. European Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods.

From 1996 to 2000, ZEBET (Centre for Documentation and Evaluation of Alternative Methods to Animal Experiments at the BgVV, Berlin, Germany) coordinated the European Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods (ECVAM) prevalidation and validation study on three embryotoxicity tests: a) a test employing embryonic stem cell lines (EST); b) the micromass (MM) test; and c) the postimplantation rat whole-embryo culture assay (WEC test). The main objectives of the study were to assess the performance of these three in vitro tests in discriminating between non- embryotoxic, weakly embryotoxic and strongly embryotoxic compounds. Phase I of the study (1997) was designed as a prevalidation phase, for test protocol optimisation, and for the establishment of a comprehensive database of in vivo and in vitro data on embryotoxic compounds. Phase II (1998-2000) involved a formal validation trial, conducted under blind conditions on 20 test compounds selected from the database, which were coded and distributed to the participating laboratories. In the preliminary phase of the validation study, six chemicals out of the 20, which showed embryotoxic potential, were tested. These results were used to define new biostatistically based prediction models (PMs) for the MM and WEC tests, and to evaluate those developed previously for the EST. As a next step, the PMs were evaluated by using the results for the remaining 14 chemicals of the definitive phase of the validation study. The three in vitro embryotoxicity tests proved to be applicable to testing a diverse group of chemicals with different embryotoxic potentials (non-embryotoxic, weakly embryotoxic, and strongly embryotoxic). The reproducibility of the three in vitro embryotoxicity tests were acceptable according to the acceptance criteria defined by the Management Team. The concordances between the embryotoxic potentials derived from the in vitro data and from the in vivo data were good for the EST and the WEC (PM2) test, and sufficient for the MM test and the WEC (PM1) tests according to the performance criteria defined by the Management Team before the formal validation study. When applying the PM of the EST to the in vitro data obtained in the definitive phase of the formal validation study, chemicals were classified correctly in 78% of the experiments. For the MM and the WEC tests, the PMs provided 70% and 80% (PM2) correct classifications, respectively. And, very importantly, an excellent predictivity (100%, except for PM1 of the WEC test, with 79%, considered as good) was obtained with strong embryotoxic chemicals in each of the three in vitro tests.

3T3 Cells↗