PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Susanne Gross

Publications and source records attributed to Susanne Gross.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Epithelial tight junction proteins as potential antibody targets for pancarcinoma therapy.

Recombinant monoclonal antibodies are beginning to revolutionize cancer therapy. In combination with standard chemotherapy, high response rates have been reported with antibodies of the human IgG1 isotype for treatment of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and breast cancer. It is becoming apparent that targets for antibody-based therapies do not necessarily need to be absent from normal tissues but can be present there either in low copy numbers or with binding epitopes shielded from the therapeutic antibody. Here, we studied whether claudin proteins that form tight junctions in normal epithelia are still expressed on carcinoma cells and whether their extracellular domains can be recognized by antibodies. We show that mRNAs of claudins 1, 3, 4, and 7 are all expressed in different human carcinoma cell lines, while claudin 8 was selectively expressed in breast and pancreas cancer lines. Chicken polyclonal antibodies were raised against peptides contained within predicted extracellular domains of claudins 1, 3, and 4. Affinity-purified IgG fractions for claudins 3 and 4 were monospecific and bound to human breast and colon carcinoma lines, but not to a line of monocytic origin. Claudin 3 antibodies also homogeneously stained human renal cell carcinoma tissue and micrometastatic tumor cells as identified by cytokeratin staining in bone marrow biopsies of breast cancer patients. Fluorescence-activated cell sorting and immunocytochemistry indicated that claudin antibodies bound to the surface of tumor cells. By analogy to other tumor-associated antigens that are differentially accessible to antibodies on tumor vs normal tissue, we propose that certain claudin proteins have potential as targets for novel antibody-based therapies of carcinomas.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Refractive lens exchange with an array multifocal intraocular lens.

PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate safety, efficacy, predictability, stability, complications, and patient satisfaction after refractive lens exchange (clear lens extraction) followed by posterior chamber implantation of a multifocal intraocular lens (IOL). METHODS: Fifty eyes of 25 patients (mean age 51 years, range 44 to 62 years) with preoperative spherical equivalent refraction between -15.50 and +5.75 D and cylinder between 0 and 1.50 D underwent bilateral implantation of a zonal progressive multifocal IOL (Array, AMO). RESULTS: Eyes were divided into group A (n=24; myopia, average preoperative spherical equivalent refraction -7.11 +/- 3.25 D (-1.75 to -15.50 D), and group B (n=26; hyperopia, average preoperative spherical equivalent refraction +3.04 +/- 1.04 D). Follow-up was 6 months in all eyes. Postoperatively, all eyes of both groups were within +/-1.00 D of target refraction. No eye in group A and three eyes in group B sustained a loss of one line of BSCVA. Forty-seven eyes (94%) remained unchanged or gained one or more lines of their preoperative BSCVA. In all eyes, postoperative UCVA was 20/40 or better. When compared to preoperative, uncorrected near visual acuity improved (statistically significant). All patients achieved uncorrected binocular visual acuity of 20/30 and J4 or better. Patient satisfaction was extremely high; no intra- or postoperative complications were reported. CONCLUSION: Six-month results of implantation of the AMO Array multifocal IOL for refractive lens exchange demonstrated safety, efficacy, and predictability in correcting high ametropia and significant improvement of uncorrected near and distance visual acuity.

Adult↗