PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Suzanne M Cox

Publications and source records attributed to Suzanne M Cox.

6 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2005

Disparities in mortality among high risk pregnant women in Illinois: a population based study.

PURPOSE: Researchers are increasingly studying maternal mortality in the context of maternal morbidity in order to identify risk and protective factors operating at each point along the morbidity-mortality continuum. This study examined factors associated with mortality in pregnant women with severe morbidity. In particular, the Black-White disparity was examined. METHODS: Illinois vital records data were linked to identify maternal deaths and other pregnant women with severe morbidity. Pregnancy-related deaths and high risk survivors were compared and case fatality rates were computed. Condition-specific and multivariable analyses were conducted, and time of death was examined. RESULTS: The overall risk of maternal death was 37.1 per 10,000 high risk pregnant women in Illinois from 1994 to 1998. Women who were older, African American, unmarried, or living in Chicago were at elevated risk of death. The adjusted relative risk for the Black-White disparity was 3.7 among all high risk pregnant women and 8.5 among women with hypertensive disorders. A greater proportion of African American and Hispanic women died within 7 days of delivery compared to White women. CONCLUSIONS: Medical risk status alone cannot explain disparities in maternal mortality. The Black-White disparity for risk of death persisted in both overall and condition-specific analyses.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

International Classification of Diseases-9th revision coding for preeclampsia: how accurate is it?

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the International Classification of Diseases-9th revision codes for preeclampsia and eclampsia. STUDY DESIGN: The University of Illinois Medical Center at Chicago discharge database was used to identify 135 women from 1999 through 2001 whose disease was coded as having preeclampsia or eclampsia. With American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology criteria as the gold standard, the diagnosis that was determined through chart review was compared with the International Classification of Diseases-9th revision code that was present in the discharge database. Patients were classified as true cases if the International Classification of Diseases-9th revision code matched the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists diagnosis; the positive predictive value of the code was then calculated. RESULTS: The overall positive predictive value for the complete sample was only 54%, but the positive predictive value for severe preeclampsia was 84.8%, which was high compared with mild preeclampsia (45.3%) and eclampsia (41.7%). Diagnostic (clinician) error was the most common reason for miscoding error. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that International Classification of Diseases-9th revision codes for preeclampsia/eclampsia vary greatly in their accuracy of diagnosis. Therefore, a review of medical records is required when data are being gathered on the incidence of preeclampsia and eclampsia.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

The continuum of maternal morbidity and mortality: factors associated with severity.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to examine whether sociodemographic, clinical, and other service-related factors, as well as preventability issues affect a woman's progression along the continuum of morbidity and mortality. STUDY DESIGN: This was a case-control study of pregnancy-related deaths, women with near-miss morbidity, and those with other severe, but not life threatening, morbidity. Factors associated with maternal outcome were examined. RESULTS: Provider factors (related to preventability) and clinical diagnosis were significantly associated with progression along the continuum after controlling for sociodemographic characteristics (P < .01 for both associations). CONCLUSION: In order to improve mortality rates, we must understand maternal morbidity and how it may lead to death. This study shows that important initiatives include addressing preventability, in particular, provider factors, which may play a role in moving women along the continuum of morbidity and mortality.

Case-Control Studies↗
PubMed2002

Defining a conceptual framework for near-miss maternal morbidity.

Maternal mortality is the major indicator used to monitor maternal health in the United States. For every woman who dies, however, many suffer serious life-threatening complications of pregnancy. Yet relatively little attention has been given to identifying a general category of morbidities that could be called near misses. Characterizing near-miss morbidity is valuable for monitoring the quality of hospital-based obstetric care and for assessing the incidence of life-threatening complications. Cases of near-miss morbidity also provide an appropriate comparison group both for dinical case review and for epidemiologic analysis. This paper presents an initial framework and a process for the definition and identification of near-miss morbidity that minimizes loss of information yet has practical utility. A clinical review team classified 22 of 186 women as near misses and 164 as other severe morbidity. A quantitative score classified 28 women as near misses and 156 as other severe morbidity. Precise classification of near-miss morbidity is the first step in analyzing factors that may differentiate survival from death on the continuum from morbidity to mortality. Ultimately, a methodology for the identification and analysis of near-miss morbidity will allow for integrated morbidity and mortality reviews that can then be institutionalized. The results will serve as important models for other researchers, state health agencies, and regionalized perinatal systems that are engaged in morbidity and mortality surveillance.

Chicago↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Morbidity and mortality in pregnancy: laying the groundwork for safe motherhood.

The Safe Motherhood Initiative is a global effort to reduce deaths and illnesses among women and infants. Despite the relatively low maternal mortality rate in the United States, ensuring safe motherhood is still critical. For several reasons, it is important to study maternal mortality and morbidity. First, the pregnancy-related mortality ratio has not declined; second, evidence suggests that at least half of pregnancy-related deaths may be preventable through changes in patient, provider, or system factors; and third, mortality rates are disproportionately high among certain racial and ethnic groups. In addition, deaths are only the tip of the iceberg: maternal morbidity also represents a huge burden of disease for women and their families. Broadening the research focus and prevention efforts to include the study of maternal morbidity, especially near-miss morbidity-life-threatening morbidity-can strengthen the study of maternal death. This paper presents an overview of maternal mortality and morbidity including incidence and etiology, issues and challenges for measurement, and issues of preventability. We also address specific strategies for change for health care providers, federal and state health agencies, and the public health community.

Ethnicity↗