PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Suzanne M Miller

Publications and source records attributed to Suzanne M Miller.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

A brief smoking cessation intervention for Chinese and Korean American smokers.

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated changes in smoking-related beliefs and behavior following a brief, culturally adapted smoking cessation intervention for Chinese and Korean smokers. METHOD: From May 2002 to March 2003, 66 smokers residing in or around southeastern Pennsylvania were randomly assigned to a theory-based smoking cessation intervention or general health counseling. Participants completed assessments of perceived risks of smoking, pros and cons of quitting, quitting self-efficacy, and distress at baseline and follow-up time points. Sessions were conducted in the participant's native language (Korean, Cantonese, or Mandarin). Both groups received nicotine replacement therapy. RESULTS: Overall, 38% of participants reported quitting smoking at 3-month follow-up. Quit rates were higher (52.6% among Chinese, 60.0% among Korean) in the intervention condition compared to the control condition (23.5% among Chinese, 40.0% among Korean) at 1-month, but not 3-month, follow-up. There was a main effect of treatment condition for self-efficacy with intervention participants reporting significantly higher levels of self-efficacy compared to control participants. Further, a treatment x time interaction was observed for cons of quitting, reflecting fewer cons in the intervention group than the control group at 1-month and 3-month follow-up. CONCLUSION: A culturally adapted intervention for Chinese and Korean Americans can be effective in changing specific smoking-related cognitions and behavior. This study represents a promising first step toward advancing our understanding of the associations between smoking-related cognitions and behavior among Asian American smokers.

Adolescent↗

Coping with ovarian cancer risk: the moderating effects of perceived control on coping and adjustment.

OBJECTIVE: Although perceived control and coping have been studied across various health conditions, these relationships have been less well studied in the context of coping with cancer risk over time. The present study was a longitudinal study of the effects of perceived control and problem-focused coping on changes in psychological adjustment and behavioural outcomes among women at increased risk for ovarian cancer. DESIGN AND METHODS: Eighty women enrolled in a familial cancer risk assessment programme participated in this study. Assessments of problem-focused coping, perceived control and distress were collected upon entry into the programme and again at 3-month follow-up. Behavioural adherence to screening during the 12-month period following programme entry was obtained from clinic records. RESULTS: Using hierarchical regression analysis, we observed a significant interaction between perceived control and problem-focused coping for psychological distress, beta=0.94, p<.05. Specifically, problem-focused coping was associated with increasing distress over time among women who perceived high control. A significant control by coping interaction was also observed for behavioural adherence to pelvic ultrasound and CA125 screening, such that women who perceived high control and utilized problem-focused coping were less likely to undergo screening. CONCLUSIONS: Under conditions of high perceived control, problem-focused coping was associated with increasing distress as well as poorer behavioural adherence. Thus, perceived control and problem-focused coping may not always yield positive psychological or behavioural health outcomes. These findings contribute to a greater understanding of how problem-focused coping and perceived control may influence the course of adjustment to cancer risk over time.

Adaptation, Psychological↗

Facilitating informed decision making about breast cancer risk and genetic counseling among women calling the NCI's Cancer Information Service.

Despite increased interest among the public in breast cancer genetic risk and genetic testing, there are limited services to help women make informed decisions about genetic testing. This study, conducted with female callers (N = 279) to the National Cancer Institute's (NCI's) Atlantic Region Cancer Information Service (CIS), developed and evaluated a theory-based, educational intervention designed to increase callers' understanding of the following: (a) the kinds of information required to determine inherited risk; (b) their own personal family history of cancer; and (c) the benefits and limitations of genetic testing. Callers requesting information about breast/ovarian cancer risk, risk assessment services, and genetic testing were randomized to either: (1) standard care or (2) an educational intervention. Results show that the educational intervention reduced intention to obtain genetic testing among women at average risk and increased intention among high-risk women at 6 months. In addition, high monitors, who typically attend to and seek information, demonstrated greater increases in knowledge and perceived risk over the 6-month interval than low monitors, who typically are distracted from information. These findings suggest that theoretically designed interventions can be effective in helping women understand their cancer risk and appropriate risk assessment options and can be implemented successfully within a service program like the CIS.

Breast Neoplasms↗

Enhanced counseling for women undergoing BRCA1/2 testing: impact on subsequent decision making about risk reduction behaviors.

The authors evaluated the impact of an enhanced counseling intervention, designed to promote well-informed decision making for follow-up risk reduction options for ovarian cancer, among high-risk women undergoing BRCA1/2 testing (N = 77). Following standard genetic counseling, participants received either an enhanced counseling session--designed to help participants anticipate their reactions to possible test outcomes and plan for postresult consequences--or a general health information control session. One week after disclosure of test results, women in the enhanced counseling group experienced a greater reduction in avoidant ideation, suggesting more complete processing of risk feedback. At the 6-month follow-up, intervention respondents reported seeking out more information about prophylactic oophorectomy and were more likely to have actually undergone preventive surgery. The results indicate that the use of enhanced counseling can play an important role in decision making about risk reduction behaviors following BRCA1/2 testing.

Comprehension↗

A randomized pilot study of cognitive-behavioral therapy versus basic health education for smoking cessation among cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Previously, we have linked theoretically based cognitive and emotional variables to the ability of cancer patients to quit smoking. PURPOSE: In this study, we evaluated the impact of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), which addressed these theoretically derived cognitive and emotional variables linked to tobacco use in this population, for promoting smoking cessation in a sample of cancer patients and assessed longitudinal predictors of smoking cessation. METHODS: Cancer patients (N=109) were randomized to either the theoretically based CBT intervention or to a general health education (GHE) condition, and all patients received nicotine replacement therapy. RESULTS: Contrary to our expectation, no significant difference in 30-day point-prevalence abstinence between the CBT and GHE conditions was detected at either a 1-month (44.9 vs. 47.3%, respectively) or 3-month (43.2% vs. 39.2%, respectively) follow-up evaluation. Higher quit motivation and lower cons of quitting were related to smoking cessation. CONCLUSIONS: Implications for the implementation of smoking cessation behavioral treatments in the oncologic context are discussed, as are directions for future research in this area.

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy↗

Comparing cancer patients who enroll in a smoking cessation program at a comprehensive cancer center with those who decline enrollment.

BACKGROUND: Despite the availability of smoking interventions for cancer patients, many eligible patients decline enrollment into such programs. We examined reasons patients provide for declining smoking treatment and compared treatment decliners to enrollees. METHODS: Eligible cancer patients (N = 231) were offered smoking cessation treatment. During recruitment, demographic, medical (eg, cancer stage), and smoking-related behavioral (eg, readiness to quit) data were collected, and decliners stated a reason for refusal. Patients who enrolled in the cessation program (N = 109) were compared with those who declined (N = 122) in terms of recruitment data, and reasons for declining were compiled. RESULTS: Decliners were significantly more likely to: (1) have head and neck cancer (vs lung cancer); (2) exhibit fewer physical symptoms (eg, shortness of breath); (3) report a lower readiness to quit smoking; (4) indicate no intention to quit smoking; and (5) smoke fewer cigarettes. A preference to quit without professional assistance was the most common reason for declining treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlight important differences between patients who enroll in a smoking cessation program and those who decline and underscore the need for motivational interventions to facilitate enrollment into smoking interventions for cancer patients.

Attitude to Health↗

Characteristics of cancer patients entering a smoking cessation program and correlates of quit motivation: implications for the development of tobacco control programs for cancer patients.

Even though survival and quality of life are adversely affected by smoking among cancer patients, about one-third of cancer patients who smoked prior to their diagnosis continue to smoke. One barrier to the provision of smoking cessation treatments to cancer patients is the paucity of data on the characteristics of cancer patients who continue to smoke and a lack of data on correlates of quit motivation in this population. This descriptive study assessed demographic, medical, smoking history, and psychological characteristics of cancer patients in a smoking cessation program (N=111) and examined these characteristics as correlates of quit motivation. Methods used by patients to quit smoking were also queried. We found that: (1) most patients are Caucasian, married, diagnosed with head and neck (versus lung) cancer, highly addicted to nicotine, and in the contemplation or preparation stage of change; (2) most patients attempt to quit smoking without formal treatment, although 33-50% have used the transdermal nicotine patch, nicotine gum, or bupropion; (3) depressive symptoms, low quitting self-efficacy, low perceived risk, and low perceived benefits of quitting are prevalent among patients, but most patients do not endorse the perceived disadvantages of quitting or fatalistic beliefs; and (4) quit motivation is associated with higher quitting self-efficacy, risk perceptions, and perceived benefits of quitting, lower tobacco use and nicotine addiction, and shorter time since diagnosis. These findings can help guide the development of smoking cessation interventions for cancer patients.

Aged↗

Current research promises and challenges in behavioral oncology: report from the American Society of Preventive Oncology annual meeting, 2002.

The Behavioral Oncology Interest Group of the American Society of Preventive Oncology held a Roundtable session on March 10, 2002, at the American Society of Preventive Oncology annual meeting in Bethesda, Maryland, to discuss the current state-of-the-science in behavioral approaches to cancer prevention and control and to delineate priorities for additional research. Four key areas were considered: (a) behavioral approaches to cancer genetic risk assessment and testing; (b) biological mechanisms of psychosocial effects on cancer; (c) the role of risk perceptions in cancer screening adherence; and (d) the impact of tailored and targeted interventions on cancer prevention and control research. The evidence reviewed indicates that behavioral approaches have made significant contributions to cancer prevention and control research. At the same time, there is a need to more closely link future investigations to the underlying base of behavioral science principles and paradigms that guide them. To successfully bridge the gap between the availability of effective new cancer prevention and control technologies and the participants they are meant to serve will require the development of more integrative conceptual models, the incorporation of more rigorous methodological designs, and more precise identification of the individual and group characteristics of the groups under study.

Genetic Counseling↗

Gender differences in patients needs and concerns to diagnostic tests for possible cancer.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the difference between the concerns of men and women prior to undergoing diagnostic tests for cancer. METHODS: A convenience sample of 129 outpatients completed a survey. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were found between male and female patients; however, patients evaluated for gender-specific cancers reported a significantly (P < .01) higher mean score for concerns related to sexuality, reproductive ability, and intimate relationships. Almost half (46%) of the patients reported not receiving any or not enough information before the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Men and women have similar concerns; however, there are significant differences in the concerns of patients undergoing a procedure for a gender-specific versus a non-gender-specific cancer. Some patients reported inadequate procedural information, suggesting that improvements are needed in communication and health education efforts.

Aged↗

Cervical cancer.

Behavioral and psychosocial factors affect all aspects of cervical cancer control, from prevention to posttreatment rehabilitation. Behavioral scientists gathered at the Second International Conference on Cervical Cancer (Houston, TX, April 11-14, 2002) reviewed selected studies of behavioral factors related to cervical cancer, including women's receptivity to emerging cervical cancer screening and diagnostic technologies, factors that influence adherence to follow-up colposcopy recommendations, and cervical cancer survivors' quality of life. Researchers reported that reduced distress during examinations with new technology may improve adherence to cervical cancer screening recommendations. Until new technology becomes mainstream, research shows that distress is reduced and adherence improves when health care providers match interventions to patients' informational processing styles. Investigations of survivors' quality of life report conflicting findings, but studies indicate that survivors experience anger over reproductive loss, loss of interest in sex, and perhaps a greater vulnerability to sexual dysfunction compared with survivors of other cancers. Survivors also report a need for posttherapy support programs. Primary prevention of cervical cancer should remain a priority as research in behavioral interventions and barriers to screening, especially among vulnerable populations, moves forward.

Behavior↗

The effects of avoidance on cytotoxic/suppressor T cells in women with cervical lesions.

The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between avoidant and intrusive ideation about cancer risk and immune responses among women with mild cervical dysplasia. Participants were 54 women undergoing diagnostic follow-up (i.e. colposcopy) for an abnormal Pap smear test result. Baseline assessments, collected prior to the colposcopy appointment, included demographic and medical history, levels of depression, and the intrusion and avoidance subscales of the Revised Impact of Events Scale. In addition, a sample of blood was obtained at baseline and 6-month follow-up for immune assessments. Hierarchical regression analyses revealed that higher levels of cognitive and behavioral avoidance at baseline predicted a significantly lower percentage of circulating cytotoxic/suppressor T cells (CD3(+)/CD8(+)) at 6-month follow-up, after controlling for baseline levels of cytotoxic/suppressor T cells and potential confounding variables (e.g. age, smoking status). Baseline intrusive ideation was unrelated to changes in percentage of cytotoxic/suppressor T cells. Avoidant ideation, but not intrusive ideation or depression, appears to be associated with alterations in immunologic measures in women with cervical lesions. The findings suggest that it may be important to evaluate the impact of cognitive and behavioral avoidance on progression of precancerous cervical lesions.

Adolescent↗

Psychosocial correlates of intention to undergo prophylactic oophorectomy among women with a family history of ovarian cancer.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to examine sociodemographic and psychosocial correlates of intention to undergo prophylactic oophorectomy among women with a family history of ovarian cancer. METHODS: Participants were 76 women enrolled in a familial cancer risk assessment program. Psychosocial assessments were collected upon entry into the program and included measures of perceived risk of developing ovarian cancer, perceived benefits and limitations of prophylactic oophorectomy, and psychological distress. In addition, respondents were asked whether they intended to undergo prophylactic oophorectomy in the following 12 months. RESULTS: Thirty-four percent reported intention to have surgery within 12 months. Logistic regression analyses indicated that intention to undergo surgery was associated with several psychosocial factors including greater perceived risk of developing ovarian cancer and greater perceived benefits of surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Women who have heightened risk perceptions and who perceive there to be many benefits of surgery may be more inclined to undergo the procedure, possibly without fully considering the potential limitations and consequences of surgery. These findings suggest the need for education and risk counseling designed to facilitate informed decision making among not only high-risk women, but also women who perceive themselves to be at increased risk.

Adult↗

Psychological issues related to the use of spiral CT for lung cancer early detection.

Although the NCI is presently investigating whether enhanced detection of lung tumors via spiral CT reduces lung cancer mortality, use of this technology for lung cancer screening is already widespread in the US. Few data are available concerning level of interest in, or awareness of, spiral CT for lung cancer screening, correlates of participation in screening, or potential reactions to screening results (i.e. smoking cessation) among high-risk individuals. One-hundred-and-seventy-two current or former smokers with no personal cancer history were queried about their awareness of spiral CT for lung cancer screening, received information about the procedure, and completed a survey that assessed interest in screening, correlates of screening interest (i.e. demographic, health, psychological), and expected effects of screening results on smoking. Seventy-seven percent of respondents were unaware of spiral CT for lung cancer screening and 62% expressed high interest in screening. Screening interest was positively related to screening self-efficacy, knowledge of asymptomatic illness, and perceived lung cancer risk. In the face of a positive scan, 52% of smokers said that they would quit, 43% said they would consider quitting, and 3% would continue smoking. If the scan was negative, 19% of smokers said that they would quit, 61% said they would consider quitting, and 20% would continue smoking. Finally, 59% of smokers were interested in smoking cessation counseling, with screening. These findings can help guide the design of psychological interventions to promote the utilization of spiral CT for early lung cancer detection as well as the development of protocols to promote behavior change within lung cancer screening programs, should future studies indicate that spiral CT screening can effectively reduce the overall lung cancer mortality rate.

Adult↗

Longitudinal predictors of continued tobacco use among patients diagnosed with cancer.

Even though continued smoking by cancer patients adversely affects survival and quality of life, about one third of patients who smoked prior to their diagnosis continue to smoke after their diagnosis. The implementation of smoking cessation treatments for cancer patients has been slowed by the lack of data on correlates of tobacco use in this population. Thus, this longitudinal study assessed demographic, medical, addiction, and psychological predictors of tobacco use among 74 head, neck, and lung cancer patients. Multivariable binary logistic regression analyses, with outcome categorized as smoker or nonsmoker, indicated that the likelihood that patients would be a smoker was associated with lower levels of perceived risk and a higher level of quitting cons. Multivariable nominal logistic regression, with outcome classified as continuous smoker, continuous quitter, relapser, or follow-up quitter, indicated that: (a). patients categorized as continuous smokers reported significantly lower quitting self-efficacy than follow-up quitters and continuous quitters, (b). relapsers reported a significantly lower level of quitting self-efficacy than either follow-up quitters or continuous quitters, and (c). continuous smokers exhibited a significantly lower level of risk perceptions than continuous abstainers. These findings can be useful for the development and evaluation of treatments to promote smoking cessation among cancer patients.

Adult↗

Characteristics of female smokers attending a lung cancer screening program: a pilot study with implications for program development.

Anticipating the development of lung cancer early detection programs, we examined the: (1) feasibility of a lung cancer early detection program; (2) characteristics of enrollees (e.g. motivation to quit smoking); (3) correlates of enrollee motivation to quit smoking; and (4) rates of smoking cessation following screening. Brief surveys were completed before and after screening, which involved sputum cytology, chest X-ray, bronchoscopy, spiral CT, and a meeting with an oncologist to discuss smoking cessation. Of the 168 eligible women who were heavy smokers recruited via newspaper and cancer center advertisements, 55 agreed to undergo screening. Enrollees showed low-to-moderate levels of quit motivation and high levels of nicotine addiction; enrollees were interested in a range of smoking cessation treatments; 20% of enrollees exhibited clinical-levels of emotional distress; 64% of enrollees reported low levels of self-efficacy (i.e. self-confidence) to quit; 24% of enrollees reported low levels of quitting pros and 25% reported high levels of quitting cons; 31% of enrollees showed high levels of fatalistic beliefs about cancer; and all enrollees recognized their elevated lung cancer risk. Greater motivation to quit smoking was related to: greater age, lower nicotine addiction, fewer health symptoms, and higher quitting self-efficacy and quitting pros. Finally, 16% of enrollees quit smoking after screening. Overall, many women eligible for screening refused to undergo comprehensive screening that included bronchoscopy and spiral CT. Screening may represent an opportunity for quitting smoking, although more intensive smoking cessation interventions that target nicotine addiction and self-efficacy may be needed to maximize the health benefits of an early detection program.

Adult↗

Correlates of tobacco use among smokers and recent quitters diagnosed with cancer.

Smoking after a cancer diagnosis shortens survival time, increases risk of recurrence and the development of another primary tumor, reduces treatment efficacy, and increases treatment complications. Nevertheless, many patients who smoked prior to their illness continue to smoke after diagnosis and treatment. The development of effective smoking cessation interventions for cancer patients has been slowed by the lack of data concerning psychological correlates of smoking in this population. This study, with 74 cancer patients, showed that smoking and lower readiness to quit was associated with: having relatives at home who smoke, a longer time between diagnosis and assessment, completion of medical treatment, greater nicotine dependence, lower self-efficacy, quitting pros, and risk perceptions, and higher quitting cons, fatalistic beliefs, and emotional distress. Thus, smoking cessation treatments for cancer patients should include pharmacotherapy, relapse prevention, and counseling designed to facilitate self-efficacy, quitting pros, and risk awareness and to reduce the quitting cons, fatalism, and distress.

Female↗

Implementation of a comprehensive cancer control program at the worksite: year one summary report.

The worksite is an ideal forum for cancer risk assessment. We describe here the baseline characteristics of a large cohort. Participants completed surveys that assessed a variety of risk factors and behavioral mediators. Personalized feedback letters identified cancer risks. A total of 4395 surveys were received. Cancer prevalence was 6.5% (range, 4.3% to 11.2%). The most common risk factors were lack of exercise (41%; 32% to 68%), obesity (28%; 24% to 39%), and smoking (14%; 13% to 32%). Cardiovascular risk was also common (25%; 15% to 48%). Screening was fair to good for all cancers except colon cancer. The perceived risk for cancer was less than that for cardiovascular disease (P < 0.0001). Most smokers were in the pre-contemplation phase, whereas action/maintenance phases predominated for breast and colon cancer screening. Modifiable cancer risk factors can be identified in the majority of workers. Inaccurate risk perception is an important target for future interventions.

Adult↗