PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Suzanne Russo

Publications and source records attributed to Suzanne Russo.

7 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Radiation recall phenomenon secondary to capecitabine: possible role of thymidine phosphorylase.

BACKGROUND: The first reported case of radiation (XRT) recall related to capecitabine described dermatitis in a previously radiated field in a breast cancer patient (Ortman; JCO). We previously reported the first case of recall syndrome manifesting as diffuse gastritis and duodenitis related to capecitabine with prior XRT with 5-FU in a pancreatic cancer patient (Saif; JARCET). We report here another pancreatic cancer patient with a radiation recall receiving capecitabine following capecitabine-XRT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From April 2004 to June 2005, 20 patients with locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma were treated with capecitabine 1,600 mg/m2 daily with concomitant radiation (5040cGy) Monday-Friday (weekends off) for a total of 6 weeks, followed by capecitabine 2,000 mg/m2 daily for 14 days every 3 weeks. One male patient with tumor in the neck and body of pancreas and not infiltrating the duodenum dropped hemoglobin to 7.3 g/dl at the end of the ninth week, and melena on rectal examination. Specimen of primary pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma was obtained via EUS-guided biopsy before starting XRT on day 1 and utilized for RNA extraction. TP mRNA level was determined by real-time quantitative PCR (RT-Q-PCR). RESULTS: Upper endoscopy revealed gastritis consistent with radiation toxicity. Colonoscopy was negative. Transfusion of three units of packed red blood cells (PRBCs) was given. The dose of capecitabine was reduced by 25%. His anemia continued to progress, a CT scan revealed 39% decrease in the tumor size (PR). Analysis of tumor specimen prior to the start of capecitabine-XRT showed TP expression of 183.16 (high). In addition to TP, DPD was 7.40, and TNF-alpha 4,114.56. CONCLUSION: We believe this case to be the second case of radiation recall presenting as diffuse gastritis in a patient receiving capecitabine after previous treatment with XRT. Further studies, including the role of TP are warranted into the pathogenesis of this unique phenomenon.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

3-[6-(2-Dimethylamino-1-imidazol-1-yl-butyl)-naphthalen-2-yloxy]-2,2-dimethyl-propionic acid as a highly potent and selective retinoic acid metabolic blocking agent.

3-[6-(2-Dimethylamino-1-imidazol-1-yl-butyl)-naphthalen-2-yloxy]-2,2-dimethyl-propionic acid and analogs were designed and synthesized as highly potent and selective CYP26 inhibitors, serving as retinoic acid metabolic blocking agents (RAMBAs), with demonstrated in vivo efficacy to increase the half-life of exogenous atRA.

Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid↗
PubMed2006

Gemcitabine-related radiation recall in a patient with pancreatic cancer.

Radiation recall refers to inflammatory reactions triggered by chemotherapeutic agents and develops cutaneously in the previously irradiated areas. Such agents include anthracyclines, taxanes and capecitabine. Radiation recall related to gemcitabine has been reported in lung and breast cancer. Similar phenomenon associated with gemcitabine, the only FDA-approved drug for pancreatic cancer, is rarely reported. We report a patient with inoperable pancreatic cancer who developed gastrointestinal bleeding secondary to radiation-recall related to gemcitabine and review literature. A 57-year-old white male with unresectable pancreatic cancer received capecitabine in combination with radiation therapy followed by capecitabine alone given over approximately a 3-month time period. Computed tomography re-evaluation demonstrated a new liver lesion. The patient was then treated with gemcitabine and irinotecan. On day 15 of cycle 1, he reported progressive worsening of weakness and fatigue, and melena. Physical examination revealed hypotension (84/47 mmHg) and heme-positive stool on rectal examination. He denied aspirin or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use. Chemotherapy was held. Hematocrit was 20% (previously 33%). He was transfused with 3 units of packed red blood cells. An esophago-gastro-duodenal examination was performed which showed antritis and duodenitis consistent with radiation therapy. A single site of oozing was injected with epinephrine. The diffuse gastritis was aggressively treated with proton pump inhibitors. The patient's hematocrit eventually stabilized and was 30% at discharge. Gemcitabine was not resumed. Radiation recall from gemcitabine is rare, but can potentially arise in any site that has been previously irradiated. Gemcitabine should be added to the list of drugs known to cause radiation recall. Treating physicians must be aware of this potential toxicity from gemcitabine either given concomitantly or followed by radiation. We suggest discontinuing gemcitabine if radiation recall is observed. Further studies are warranted into the pathogenesis of this unique phenomenon.

Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic↗
PubMed2006

Multiple gene expression analyses in paraffin-embedded tissues by TaqMan low-density array: Application to hedgehog and Wnt pathway analysis in ovarian endometrioid adenocarcinoma.

Recent studies have shown the hedgehog and Wnt families of signaling proteins to be associated with tumor initiation, growth, and survival. However, these pathways remain unexplored in ovarian endometrioid adenocarcinoma (OEA). Here, we describe a novel TaqMan low-density array to examine the expression of 26 and 20 genes in the hedgehog and Wnt pathways, respectively, in six matched snap-frozen and formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FPE) OEA specimens. Expression values were normalized to uninvolved ovarian epithelium. Gene expression in matched frozen and FPE tissues demonstrated significant concordance (r = 0.92, P < 0.0001). However, comparison of amplified and unamplified RNA from frozen OEA tissues revealed an altered molecular profile in amplified RNA. Amplification of RNA from FPE tissues was not successful. The expression of Desert hedgehog (DHH), Indian hedgehog (IHH), Hedge-hog interacting protein (HHIP), Wnt10B, Wnt9B, and Wnt inhibitory factor (WIF1) were tumor-specific with no detectable expression in normal ovarian epithelium. In addition, several genes were significantly (P < 0.025) down-regulated in OEA, including cyclin E2, Porcupine, c-Myc, and Axin 2 (4.8-, 3.6-, 2.9-, and 1.9-fold, respectively). TaqMan low-density array provides an effective multivariate technique for examining gene expression in RNA isolated from either snap-frozen or archival FPE tissues and can identify tumor-specific genes, possibly leading to novel treatments.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

Antitumor efficacy of capecitabine and celecoxib in irradiated and lead-shielded, contralateral human BxPC-3 pancreatic cancer xenografts: clinical implications of abscopal effects.

PURPOSE: X-ray therapy (XRT) remains one of the major modalities used to treat patients diagnosed with locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. However, the effect of XRT on metastatic tumors outside the field of irradiation (abscopal effect) remains largely unknown. In the current study, we examined the effect of XRT alone and in combination with capecitabine and/or celecoxib in both irradiated and lead-shielded contralateral BxPC-3 pancreatic cancer xenografts. This chemoradiation regimen was chosen based on our molecular analysis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Athymic mice were injected bilaterally with BxPC-3 cells and treatment was initiated 28 days postimplant. During XRT (2 Gy for 5 consecutive days, administered on days 0 and 24), one flank was irradiated whereas the rest of the body (including the contralateral tumor) was lead shielded. Capecitabine (350 mg/kg) was administered on days 0 to 13 and 24 to 37. Celecoxib was initiated in the diet at 100 ppm (equivalent to 20 mg/kg/d p.o.) and administered throughout the study. RESULTS: In irradiated xenografts, capecitabine and XRT showed synergistic anitiumor efficacy (P=0.008), which was further improved with the addition of celecoxib (P<0.001). In contralateral shielded xenografts, abscopal effects were observed. Whereas monotherapy with XRT showed significant reduction in tumor area in irradiated xenografts, growth was promoted by 23% (P<0.001) in contralateral lead-shielded tumors in the same animals relative to untreated tumors. Interestingly, synergistic antiproliferative efficacy occurred in these contralateral tumors when capecitabine was administered (P<0.001), despite being outside the irradiated field. The addition of celecoxib further inhibited tumor growth (P<0.001). This trimodal combination most effectively stabilized disease in both shielded and irradiated tumors; however, tumor eradication was not observed. There were no significant changes in thymidine phosphorylase, dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, or cyclooxygenase-2 mRNA levels in irradiated or lead-shielded tumors, suggesting that efficacy cannot be predicted solely from these previously identified indicators of response. Immunohistochemistry examining the proliferation marker Ki-67 showed concordance with tumor response in both irradiated and contralateral shielded xenografts. CONCLUSIONS: These results have implications in the rational design of treatment paradigms for pancreatic cancer where metastatic disease remains the primary cause of patient morbidity and abscopal effects in tumors outside the field of irradiation may affect tumor response.

5'-Nucleotidase↗
PubMed2005

Phase I study of capecitabine with concomitant radiotherapy for patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer: expression analysis of genes related to outcome.

PURPOSE: To establish the feasibility of capecitabine with concurrent radiotherapy (XRT) in patients with locally advanced (LA) pancreatic cancer and evaluate the effect of XRT on thymidine phosphorylase (TP), dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifteen patients with LA pancreatic cancer received three-dimensional conformal XRT to a dose of 50.4 Gy with capecitabine at escalating doses from 600 to 1,250 mg/m2 bid (Monday through Friday). Following chemo-XRT, stable and responding patients were treated with capecitabine 2,000 mg/m2 orally bid for 14 days every 21 days. Tumor specimens were procured with endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration 1 week before and 2 weeks after chemo-XRT to evaluate TP, DPD, and TNF-alpha mRNA levels. RESULTS: Dose-limiting grade 3 diarrhea was observed in two of six patients treated at a capecitabine dose of 1,000 mg/m2 with XRT. Three patients (20%) achieved partial response. Mean percent difference in TP pre- and post-XRT was 119.2% (P = .1934). There was no significant differences in mean TNF-alpha, or DPD levels pre- and post-XRT (P = .1934 and .4922, respectively). TP and TNF-alpha levels were not significantly correlated both at pre- and post-XRT (P = .670 and P < .154, respectively). Median value of TP:DPD ratios at baseline was 2.65 (range, 0.36 to 11.08). No association between TP:DPD ratio and efficacy of capecitabine or severity of toxicities was identified. CONCLUSION: The recommended dose for phase II evaluation is capecitabine 800 mg/m2 bid (Monday through Friday) with concurrent XRT. This approach offers an easy alternative to intravenous fluorouracil as a radiosensitizer in these patients. Role of TP and TP:DPD ratio warrants further investigation in a larger clinical trial.

Adenocarcinoma↗