PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Suzanne Window

Publications and source records attributed to Suzanne Window.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Parenting programmes for behavioural problems: where do tertiary units fit in a comprehensive service?

Children with behavioural problems are often referred to child mental health services without rationalization of criteria or referral routes. The aims of the present study were to establish the psychosocial characteristics of children with behavioural problems referred to a tertiary Day Resource, and to compare these with children referred for similar problems to a specialist outpatient child mental health service and a family support community service. Demographic data, the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire and the Health of the Nations Outcome scales for Children and Adolescents were used. Families attending the Day Resource were found to have more involvement with other agencies, and children showed higher levels of clinical severity and complexity. Most of this difference was accounted for by attentional difficulties, as well as communication and physical health problems. These findings confirmed the hypothesis that families seen at tertiary service level presented with more complex psychosocial needs and frequent child comorbidity, thereby justifying the multimodal treatment package developed at that service level. It is concluded that there is a need for this level of parenting interventions, but only for complex cases that have not responded to community interventions.

Adolescent↗

Evaluation of a family support service: short-term outcome.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the short-term impact of two types of family support services (FSS) for children with behavioural problems (N = 51 and 49 respectively). These were compared with children (N = 40) matched for presenting problems and referred to specialist CAMHS in a locality without FSS. Pre and postintervention measures were the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOSCA), the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ), and a service utilization checklist. Although all three groups were associated with decrease of child behavioural scores, the two family support services provided an earlier response and resulted in significantly higher reduction of HoNOSCA and SDQ scores. The two FSS types implemented different 'levels' of interventions, as FSS-B resulted in a more favourable short-term outcome and appeared to operate more closely to specialist services, while FSS-A appeared to adopt a more preventive role. Family support services have an important role within a comprehensive child mental health service, but the specificity of their interventions for different target client groups requires further investigation.

Child↗