PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

T A Bickle

Publications and source records attributed to T A Bickle.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1997

The type IC hsd loci of the enterobacteria are flanked by DNA with high homology to the phage P1 genome: implications for the evolution and spread of DNA restriction systems.

EcoR124l, EcoDXXl and Ecoprrl are the known members of the type IC family of DNA restriction and modification systems. The first three are carried on large, conjugative plasmids, while Ecoprrl is chromosomally encoded. The enzymes are coded by three genes, hsdR, hsdM and hsdS. Analysis of the DNA sequences upstream and downstream of the type IC hsd loci shows that all are highly homologous to each other and also to sequences present in the bacteriophage P1 genome. The upstream sequences include functional phd and doc genes, which encode an addiction system that stabilizes the P1 prophage state, and extend to and beyond pac, the site at which phage DNA packaging begins. Downstream of the hsd loci, P1 DNA sequences begin at exactly the same place for all of the systems. For EcoDXXl and Ecoprrl the P1 homology extends for thousands of base pairs while for EcoR124l and IS1 insertion and an associated deletion have removed most of the P1-homologous sequences. The significance of these results for the evolution of DNA restriction and modification systems is discussed.

Bacteriophage P1↗
PubMed1996

Regulation of the activity of the type IC EcoR124I restriction enzyme.

Restriction-modification (R-M) systems must regulate the expression of their genes so that the chromosomal genome is modified at all times by the methyltransferase to protect the host cell from the potential lethal action of the cognate restriction endonuclease. Since type I R-M systems can be transferred to non-modified Escherichia coli cells by conjugation or transformation without killing the recipient, they must have some means to regulate their restriction activity upon entering a new host cell to avoid restriction of unprotected host DNA and cell death. This is especially true for EcoR124I, a type IC family member, which is coded for by a conjugative plasmid. Control of EcoR124I restriction activity is most likely at the post-translational level as the transfer of the EcoR124I system into a recipient cell that already expressed the HsdR subunit of this system was not a lethal event. Additionally, the kinetics of restriction activity upon transfer of the genes coding for the EcoR124I RM system to a recipient cell are the same, irrespective of the modification state of the recipient cell or the presence or absence of the EcoR124I HsdR subunit in the new host cells. The mechanism controlling the restriction activity of a type IC R-M system upon transfer to a new host cell is different from that controlling the chromosomally coded type IA and IB R-M systems. The previously discovered hsdC mutant, which affects the establishment of the type IA system EcoKI, was shown to affect the establishment of the type IB system EcoAI, but to have no influence on EcoR124I.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed1996

DNA cleavage by the type IC restriction-modification enzyme EcoR124II.

Type I restriction-modification systems bind to non-palindromic, bipartite recognition sequences. Although these enzymes methylate specific adenine residues within their recognition sequences, they cut DNA at sites up to several thousand base-pairs away. We have investigated the mechanism of how EcoR124II, a type IC restriction-modification system, selects the cleavage site. Restriction studies with different DNA constructs revealed that circular DNA requires only one non-methylated recognition sequence to be cut, whereas linear DNA needs at least two such sites. Cleavage of linear DNA is independent of site orientation. Further investigations of the linear substrates revealed a mechanism whereby the double-strand break is introduced between two recognition sequences. We propose a model for the selection of restriction sites by type I enzymes where two EcoR124II complexes bind to two recognition sequences. Lack of methylation at a site stimulates the enzyme to translocate DNA on both sides of the recognition sequence. Thus the two complexes approach each other and, at the point where they meet, they interact to introduce a double-strand break in the DNA.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed1996

Generation of new DNA binding specificity by truncation of the type IC EcoDXXI hsdS gene.

The hsdS subunit of a type IC restriction-modification enzyme is responsible for the enzyme's DNA binding specificity. Type I recognition sites are characterized by two defined half-sites separated by a non-specific spacer of defined length. The hsdS subunit contains two independent DNA binding domains, each targeted towards one DNA half-site. We have shown previously that the 5' half of hsdS can code for a functional substitute of the full-length hsdS. Here we demonstrate that the 3' half of the gene, when fused to the appropriate transcriptional and translational start signals, also codes for a peptide which imparts DNA binding specificity to the enzyme. About half the natural hsdS size, the mutant peptide contains a single DNA recognition domain flanked by one copy of each internal repeat found in the full-length hsdS. Deletion of either repeat sequence results in loss of activity. Like the 5' hsdS mutant, the 3' mutant recognizes an interrupted palindrome, GAAYN(5)RTTC, suggesting that two truncated subunits participate in DNA recognition. Co-expression of the 5' hsdS mutant and the 3' hsdS mutant along with hsdM regenerates the wild-type methylation specificity. Thus, there is a free assortment of subunits in the cell.

Adenine↗
PubMed1996

ATPase activity of the type IC restriction-modification system EcoR124II.

We have investigated the ATPase activity of the type IC restriction-modification (R-M) system EcoR124II. As with all type I R-M systems EcoR 124II requires ATP hydrolysis to cut DNA. We determined the KM for ATP to be 10(-5) to 10(-4) M. By measuring ATP hydrolysis under different conditions and by simultaneously monitoring DNA restriction, methylation and ATP hydrolysis we propose that the order of events during restriction is: (1) binding of EcoR124II to a non-methylated recognition sequence, (2) start of DNA-dependent ATP hydrolysis which continues even after restriction is complete, (3) restriction of DNA, (4) methylation of the product. Non-cleavable DNA substrates, such as recognition site containing oligonucleotides, also support ATP hydrolysis. Methylation can also occur prior to ATP hydrolysis and prevent DNA degradation.

Adenosine Triphosphatases↗
PubMed1996

Posttranscriptional regulation of EcoP1I and EcoP15I restriction activity.

Efficient establishment of a DNA restriction-modification (R-M) system in a non-modified cell requires a tight control of the potentially lethal activity of the restriction enzyme. The type III R-M systems EcoP1I and EcoP15I can be transferred to non-modified Escherichia coli cells by transfection, conjugation or transformation and become established without difficulty. Modification activity is expressed immediately after the R-M genes enter the cell, whereas the expression of restriction activity is delayed until complete protection of the cellular DNA is achieved by methylation. We have shown by Western blot analysis that the expression of the modification polypeptide subunit positively regulates the amount of restriction subunit present in the cell. The finding that ribosomal alterations affected the expression of restriction activity pointed to additional control at the translational level. The analysis of EcoP1I expression in E. coli strains mutated in either of the ribosomal proteins S12 (rpsL) or S4 (rpsD) suggests that the level of in vivo restriction activity can be modulated both by a decrease in the efficiency of translation and by varying ribosomal accuracy conditions. In addition, we have preliminary evidence from in vivo gene fusion studies that the res gene may code for more than one gene product.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMed1995

Type III restriction endonucleases translocate DNA in a reaction driven by recognition site-specific ATP hydrolysis.

Type III restriction/modification systems recognize short non-palindromic sequences, only one strand of which can be methylated. Replication of type III-modified DNA produces completely unmethylated recognition sites which, according to classical mechanisms of restriction, should be signals for restriction. We have shown previously that suicidal restriction by the type III enzyme EcoP15I is prevented if all the unmodified sites are in the same orientation: restriction by EcoP15I requires a pair of unmethylated, inversely oriented recognition sites. We have now addressed the molecular mechanism of site orientation-specific DNA restriction. EcoP15I is demonstrated to possess an intrinsic ATPase activity, the potential driving force of DNA translocation. The ATPase activity is uniquely recognition site-specific, but EcoP15I-modified sites also support the reaction. EcoP15I DNA restriction patterns are shown to be predetermined by the enzyme-to-site ratio, in that site-saturating enzyme levels elicit cleavage exclusively between the closest pair of head-to-head oriented sites. DNA restriction is blocked by Lac repressor bound in the intervening sequence between the two EcoP15I sites. These results rule out DNA looping and strongly suggest that cleavage is triggered by the close proximity of two convergently tracking EcoP15I-DNA complexes.

Adenosine Triphosphatases↗
PubMed1994

The Escherichia coli prr region encodes a functional type IC DNA restriction system closely integrated with an anticodon nuclease gene.

The prr locus was originally described as coding a ribonuclease that is activated after phage T4 infection to cut within the anticodon of a specific tRNA, inactivating protein synthesis and thus blocking phage development. Wild-type T4 phage has two genes coding the enzymes polynucleotide kinase and RNA ligase, whose only function seems to be to repair the damage done by the anticodon nuclease. As the only apparent function of the prr ribonuclease is to combat phage infection, it can be considered as an RNA-based restriction enzyme. In non-infected cells, the prr enzyme is kept inactive in a complex with three other proteins which were predicted on the basis of DNA homologies to be the subunits of a type IC DNA restriction and modification system. Unlike other type IC systems so far characterized, prr is chromosomally rather than plasmid coded. However, sequences upstream from prr also have homology with sequences from the plasmid R124 and the prophage P1. We have now investigated the prr system and shown that it is indeed a bona fide type IC system which we call EcoprrI, and which is active both in vivo and in vitro. The system is fully functional even in the absence of the anticodon nuclease and seems to be a typical type I enzyme. EcoprrI recognizes the sequence CCA(N7)RTGC. One peculiarity is that, with low efficiency, EcoprrI will recognize and methylate variants of its recognition sequence such as CCT(N7)ATGC, which is methylated in one strand of the DNA only.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1993

Macroevolution by transposition: drastic modification of DNA recognition by a type I restriction enzyme following Tn5 transposition.

We have characterized a novel mutant of EcoDXXI, a type IC DNA restriction and modification (R-M) system, in which the specificity has been altered due to a Tn5 insertion into the middle of hsdS, the gene which encodes the polypeptide that confers DNA sequence specificity to both the restriction and the modification reactions. Like other type I enzymes, the wild type EcoDXXI recognizes a sequence composed of two asymmetrical half sites separated by a spacer region: TCA(N7)RTTC. Purification of the EcoDXXI mutant methylase and subsequent in vitro DNA methylation assays identified the mutant recognition sequence as an interrupted palindrome, TCA(N8)TGA, in which the 5' half site of the wild type site is repeated in inverse orientation. The additional base pair in the non-specific spacer of the mutant recognition sequence maintains the proper spacing between the two methylatable adenine groups. Sequencing of both the wild type and mutant EcoDXXI hsdS genes showed that the Tn5 insertion occurred at nucleotide 673 of the 1221 bp gene. This effectively deletes the entire carboxyl-terminal DNA binding domain which recognizes the 3' half of the EcoDXXI binding site. The truncated hsdS gene still encodes both the amino-terminal DNA binding domain and the conserved repeated sequence that defines the length of the recognition site spacer region. We propose that the EcoDXXI mutant methylase utilizes two truncated hsdS subunits to recognize its binding site. The implications of this finding in terms of subunit interactions and the malleability of the type I R-M systems will be discussed.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed1993

nif gene expression studies in Rhodobacter capsulatus: ntrC-independent repression by high ammonium concentrations.

The expression of nif genes in Rhodobacter capsulatus depends on the two regulatory genes, rpoN and nifA, encoding a nif-specific alternative sigma factor of RNA polymerase and a nif-specific transcriptional activator, respectively. The expression of the rpoN gene itself is also RPON/NIFA dependent. In order to better characterize the regulation of nif gene induction, chromosomal nifH-, rpoN-, nifA1- and nifA2- lacZ fusions were constructed and the expression of these different nif-lacZ fusions was determined under photoheterotrophic conditions at different starting ammonium concentrations. The two nifA genes were found to be induced first, followed by nifH and finally by rpoN upon weak, medium and strong nitrogen starvation, respectively. This induction profile and the correlation between the expression of the different nif genes suggested that nifA1 expression is the limiting factor for nif gene induction. This hypothesis was tested by construction of different nifA1 overexpressing mutants. Contrary to the current model of nif gene expression in R. capsulatus, which predicted constitutive nif gene expression in such mutants, a strong repression of nifH and rpoN was found at high ammonium concentration. The low nifH expression under these conditions is unaffected by nifA2 and is not increased in a ntrC mutant, ruling out any role of NTRC as a mediator of this repression. This finding implies an additional, so far unidentified, regulation by fixed nitrogen in R. capsulatus. Changing the expression level of rpoN indicated that low levels of RPON are already sufficient for full nifH induction. The nifA1 and rpoN expression mutants were also tested for diazotrophic growth. Similar generation times were determined for the mutants and for the wild type, but diazotrophic growth of the nifA1 over-expressing ntrC mutant RCM14 did not start until after a prolonged lag phase of two to three days.

Bacterial Proteins↗
PubMed1993

Biology of DNA restriction.

Our understanding of the evolution of DNA restriction and modification systems, the control of the expression of the structural genes for the enzymes, and the importance of DNA restriction in the cellular economy has advanced by leaps and bounds in recent years. This review documents these advances for the three major classes of classical restriction and modification systems, describes the discovery of a new class of restriction systems that specifically cut DNA carrying the modification signature of foreign cells, and deals with the mechanisms developed by phages to avoid the restriction systems of their hosts.

Bacteria↗
PubMed1992

Type III restriction enzymes need two inversely oriented recognition sites for DNA cleavage.

Type III restriction/modification enzyme recognize short, non-palindromic sequences that can be methylated on only one strand, with the paradoxical consequence that during replication of what is in effect hemimethylated DNA totally unmodified sites arise. Why the unmodified sites are not subject to suicidal restriction was not clear. Here we show that restriction requires two unmodified recognition sites that can be separated by different distances but which must be in inverse orientation. All of the unmodified sites in newly replicated DNA are of course in the same orientation, which explains why they are not restricted. This result may be of relevance to other manifestations of anisotropy in double-stranded DNA, such as genetic imprinting.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed1992

Recombination of constant and variable modules alters DNA sequence recognition by type IC restriction-modification enzymes.

EcoR124 and EcoDXXI are allelic type I restriction-modification (R-M) systems whose specificity genes consist of common structural elements: two variable regions are separated by a constant, homologous region containing a number of repetitive sequence elements. In vitro recombination of variable and constant elements has led to fully active, hybrid R-M systems exhibiting new and predictable target site specificities. Methylation of synthetic DNA sequences with purified, hybrid modification methylases was used to confirm the proposed recognition sequences. The results clearly demonstrate the correlation between protein domains and target site specificity. Our data suggest that a bacterial population may switch the recognition sequences of its type I R-M system by single recombination events and thus is able to maintain a prokaryotic analogue of the immune system of variable specificity.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed1992

Mapping and characterization of the promoter elements of the regulatory nif genes rpoN, nifA1 and nifA2 in Rhodobacter capsulatus.

The promoter elements responsible for the expression of the regulatory nif genes rpoN, nifA1 and nifA2 of Rhodobacter capsulatus were mapped by exonuclease-III-mediated deletions and by primer extension analysis. The rpoN promoter maps 600 bp upstream of rpoN and has the characteristic features of a -24/-12 promoter. The upstream activator sequence (UAS) displays two mismatches with the NIFA consensus sequence and is located 37 bp upstream of a perfect -24/-12 promoter element. The spacing and/or the helical phasing of these two promotor elements was found to be important for promoter function. In addition, an UAS half-site may contribute to optimal promoter function. The rpoN UAS can partially substitute for the UAS of the nifE promoter. An open reading frame with homology to Klebsiella pneumoniae NIFU was identified between the rpoN promoter and rpoN and termed nifU2 since another nifU-like gene (nifU1) is located in a conventional nifUSVW operon in nif region A. Thus, rpoN, encoding an alternative sigma factor for RNA polymerase, is cotranscribed with a nifU analogous gene from an rpoN-dependent promoter. Mapping of the promoter elements involved in the expression of nifA copy 1 and copy 2 identified a novel promoter type. A conserved distal promoter element is likely to represent the binding site of NTRC in R. capsulatus. The DNA region preceding the mapped 5' ends of the nifA transcripts displays much less homology. The distance between the distal and proximal elements is about 100 bp.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1991

Increased protein flexibility leads to promiscuous protein--DNA interactions in type IC restriction-modification systems.

We have investigated the role of a four amino acid element that is repeated twice and three times, respectively, in the specificity polypeptides of the two allelic restriction-modification systems EcoR124 and EcoR124/3. We had earlier shown that this difference in amino acid sequence between the two systems is solely responsible for the different DNA sequence specificities of the two systems. The effect of single amino acid substitutions and small insertion and deletion mutations on restriction activity and modification specificity was determined in vivo by phage infection assays and in vitro by methylation of DNA with purified modification methylases. Mutant restriction-modification systems with changes in the number and the length of the central amino acid repeats exhibited decreased restriction activity and in some cases relaxed substrate specificity. Our data strongly support the idea that the repetitive amino acid motif in the specificity polypeptides forms part of a flexible interdomain linker. It may be responsible for positioning on the DNA the two major specificity polypeptide domains which are thought to contact independently the half sites of the split recognition sequences typical for all type I restriction-modification systems.

Alleles↗
PubMed1991

Expression of regulatory nif genes in Rhodobacter capsulatus.

Translational fusions of the Escherichia coli lacZ gene to Rhodobacter capsulatus nif genes were constructed in order to determine the regulatory circuit of nif gene expression in R. capsulatus, a free-living photosynthetic diazotroph. The expression of nifH, nifA (copies I and II), and nifR4 was measured in different regulatory mutant strains under different physiological conditions. The expression of nifH and nifR4 (the analog of ntrA in Klebsiella pneumoniae) depends on the NIFR1/R2 system (the analog of the ntr system in K. pneumoniae), on NIFA, and on NIFR4. The expression of both copies of nifA is regulated by the NIFR1/R2 system and is modulated by the N source of the medium under anaerobic photosynthetic growth conditions. In the presence of ammonia or oxygen, moderate expression of nifA was detectable, whereas nifH and nifR4 were not expressed under these conditions. The implications for the regulatory circuit of nif gene expression in R. capsulatus are discussed and compared with the situation in K. pneumoniae, another free-living diazotroph.

Amino Acid Sequence↗