PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

T A Golper

Publications and source records attributed to T A Golper.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1999

Predialysis blood pressure and mortality risk in a national sample of maintenance hemodialysis patients.

The role of predialysis blood pressure (BP) as a risk factor for the high mortality in chronic hemodialysis (HD) patients has remained controversial. The objective of the current study was to further explore in a national random sample of 4,499 US hemodialysis patients any relationship of systolic or diastolic and predialysis or postdialysis BP with mortality, while considering subgroups of patients and controlling for other patient characteristics and comorbidities. The main finding of this study is the association of a low predialysis systolic BP with an elevated adjusted mortality risk (relative mortality risk [RR] = 1.86 for systolic BP < 110, P < 0.0001). No association with an elevated mortality risk could be observed for predialysis systolic hypertension (RR = 0.98 to 0.99, not significant [NS]), except for an elevated risk of cerebrovascular deaths. Postdialysis systolic BP was associated with an elevated mortality risk both for low and high BP levels as compared with midrange BP. Further evaluation of the elevated mortality risk associated with low predialysis systolic BP indicated similar patterns for both diabetic and nondiabetic subgroups and for patients with and without congestive heart failure (CHF) or coronary artery disease, although it was more pronounced among those with CHF. The level of predialysis fluid excess did not modify these results substantially. The findings from this historical prospective national study do not argue against the treatment of hypertension and suggest greater attention to postdialysis hypertension. The strikingly elevated mortality risk with low predialysis systolic BP suggests that low predialysis BP needs to be viewed with great concern and avoided where possible.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Morbidity and mortality in redefining adequacy of peritoneal dialysis: a step beyond the National Kidney Foundation Dialysis Outcomes Quality Initiative.

The National Kidney Foundation Dialysis Outcomes Quality Initiative (NKF-DOQI) Peritoneal Dialysis (PD) Adequacy Work Group intentionally limited the scope of its work to address adequacy in terms of small-solute removal. This decision was based on the need for rigorous evidence and that mortality is the most objective parameter in the literature. This review attempts to more broadly redefine the concept of the adequacy of PD, particularly as it relates to the most common general medical problems that PD patients experience; namely, cardiovascular disease and malnutrition. Whereas we are sensitive to the developmental process of the NKF-DOQI, we are critical that the definition of adequacy may be too narrow, leading clinicians to overlook other important morbidities. We have reiterated the evidence that suggests a weekly solute clearance (Kt/Vurea) of 1.7 or greater is associated with better patient survival. The arguments to target a greater Kt/Vurea of 2.0 are challenged, yet the concept is ultimately supported. Because cardiovascular disease is the cause of death in half of all patients with end-stage renal disease, dialysis adequacy must be defined, in part, by the potential of that therapy to diminish cardiovascular maladies. Blood pressure, volume, left ventricular hypertrophy, and dyslipidemias are discussed in this context. Lastly, assumptions that increasing total solute clearance leads to improved nutrition in PD patients are challenged. We have attempted to expand on what the NKF-DOQI did not include, and we urge the dialysis community to seek the answers to the many controversies that remain. We need to redefine the adequacy of PD in a holistic manner and find outcome parameters that are not as final as death.

Cardiovascular Diseases↗
PubMed1999

Implementation of the Peritoneal Dialysis Adequacy Guidelines: a personal perspective.

I describe some of the political issues surrounding the National Kidney Foundation-Dialysis Outcomes Quality Initiative project as I perceived them. I then discuss what I would do differently, what I recommend to encourage implementation, and why regulatory concerns are well founded. I close with technical issues including expansion, simplification, and corrections.

Female↗
PubMed1998

Noncompliance in hemodialysis: predictors and survival analysis.

Noncompliance with hemodialysis (HD), depending on the definition, occurs in 2% to more than 50% of patients. To better understand predictors and outcomes of noncompliance, we evaluated patient characteristics associated with noncompliance and the impact of noncompliance on survival. Using data from two USRDS special studies, we identified 6,251 patients who were on dialysis for more than 1 year for inclusion in this study. Noncompliance was defined in four ways: skipping one or more HD sessions in a month, shortening by 10 or more minutes one or more HD sessions in a month, an interdialytic weight gain (IWG) of more than 5.7% of dry weight, or a serum phosphate (PO4) of greater than 7.5 mg/dL. Sociodemographic predictors of noncompliance were identified using logistic regression. Survival analysis was done using Cox proportional hazards models with adjustments for sociodemographics, comorbid conditions, and dose of HD. Overall, 8.5% of patients skipped HD, 20% shortened HD (7% three or more times), 10% had more than a 5.7% IWG, and 22% had a PO4 greater than 7.5. There was a significant correlation among the measures of noncompliance. Blacks (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 2.10), patients aged 20 to 39 years (AOR = 1.62), and smokers (AOR = 1.34) were significantly more likely to skip HD than whites, patients aged 40 to 59 years, and nonsmokers, respectively (P < 0.01 for each). Similar results were seen for the other measures of noncompliance, except for PO4, in which blacks were significantly less likely to be noncompliant (NC) (AOR = 0.85, P < 0.05). Compared with compliant patients, those who skipped one or more HD sessions in a month had a 25% higher risk of death (P < 0.01). Those who had greater than a 5.7% IWG had a 35% higher risk of death (P < 0.001), whereas those with a PO4 > 7.5 had a 13% higher risk of death (P < 0.05). Overall, patients who shortened HD sessions did not have a higher risk of death, but those who shortened three or more in 1 month had a 20% higher risk of death (P < 0.05). Compliance with a medical regimen is a complex issue. Noncompliance in HD often, but not always, is associated with a higher risk of an adverse outcome. This is a US government work. There are no restrictions on its use.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Quality of life during and between hemodialysis treatments: role of L-carnitine supplementation.

End-stage renal disease affects every aspect of a patient's life, including perception of health and quality of life. It is likely that a hemodialysis patient's perceptions of health-related quality of life directly influence compliance with medical, nursing, and nutritional prescriptions. Because L-carnitine supplementation is known to enhance muscle strength and energy in hemodialysis patients, we hypothesized that L-carnitine supplementation would enhance a hemodialysis patient's perception of health-related quality of life. To test this hypothesis, 1 g L-carnitine or placebo was administered orally to 101 patients immediately before and after every hemodialysis treatment for 6 months. To assess health-related quality of life from the patient's perspective, the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 instrument was administered before the study and at 1.5-month intervals for the duration of the study. In addition, a 10-item questionnaire designed to assess common intradialytic symptoms was administered at the end of each dialysis treatment. Other parameters analyzed included Kt/V(urea) and level of nutrition. In the 6-month group, oral L-carnitine supplementation had an early positive effect on general health (P < 0.02) and physical function (P < 0.03), but the perceived effect was not sustained throughout the 6 months of the study. In the 3-month group, L-carnitine supplementation improved vitality (P < 0.02) and general health (P < 0.01). There was no association between Kt/V(urea) and perceived health-related quality of life. Serum albumin concentration was directly correlated to how patients perceived the quality of their lives.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1998

Cefazolin as empiric therapy in hemodialysis-related infections: efficacy and blood concentrations.

Concern about the increasing incidence of vancomycin-resistant organisms has tempered the enthusiasm for indiscriminate vancomycin use. Cefazolin has an antibacterial activity profile similar to vancomycin against most pathogens encountered in the hemodialysis (HD) population. We evaluated the clinical efficacy and serum concentrations that were achieved during empiric cefazolin use. Fifteen consecutive HD patients (five, conventional HD; five, high-efficiency HD; and five, high-flux HD) with suspected or documented infections warranting antibiotic intervention, including access-related, respiratory tract, urinary tract, or wound infections, were enrolled. Each patient received intravenous cefazolin (20 mg/kg actual body weight rounded to the nearest 500-mg increment [range, 1 to 2 g]) after each dialysis treatment for at least three doses. Cefazolin concentrations were obtained before and immediately after the next three consecutive dialysis treatments. Thirteen patients were evaluated for efficacy and all 15 were evaluated for toxicity and cefazolin blood concentrations. All patients showed at least a short-term (3-week) clinical resolution of infection with cefazolin treatment. No central nervous system toxicities were noted and no other adverse events were expressed by the patients during the course of cefazolin treatment. Predialysis cefazolin concentrations, as determined by high-performance liquid chromatography, were 70.2 +/- 42.7 (conventional HD), 45.6 +/- 18.9 (high-efficiency HD), and 41.6 +/- 23.9 mg/L (high-flux HD) over the three dialysis sessions. Cefazolin at doses of approximately 20 mg/kg administered post-HD appears to be a safe and effective empiric therapy and yields predialysis cefazolin concentrations of 2.5 times or greater than those considered to be the minimum inhibitory concentration breakpoint (16 mg/L) for susceptible organisms. These data support the broader use of cefazolin for empiric treatment in the HD population, allowing vancomycin to be reserved for confirmed resistant organisms.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Outcomes of single organism peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis: gram negatives versus gram positives in the Network 9 Peritonitis Study.

The use of the "peritonitis rate" in the management of patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis is assuming importance in comparing the prowess of facilities, care givers and new innovations. For this to be a meaningful outcome measure, the type of infection (causative pathogen) must have less clinical significance than the number of infections during a time interval. The natural history of Staphylococcus aureus, pseudomonas, and fungal peritonitis would not support that the outcome of an episode of peritonitis is independent of the causative pathogen. Could this concern be extended to other more frequently occurring pathogens? To address this, the Network 9 Peritonitis Study identified 530 episodes of single organism peritonitis caused by a gram positive organism and 136 episodes caused by a single non-pseudomonal gram negative (NPGN) pathogen. Coincidental soft tissue infections (exit site or tunnel) occurred equally in both groups. Outcomes of peritonitis were analyzed by organism classification and by presence or absence of a soft tissue infection. NPGN peritonitis was associated with significantly more frequent catheter loss, hospitalization, and technique failure and was less likely to resolve regardless of the presence or absence of a soft tissue infection. Hospitalization and death tended to occur more frequently with enterococcal peritonitis than with other gram positive peritonitis. The outcomes in the NPGN peritonitis group were significantly worse (resolution, catheter loss, hospitalization, technique failure) compared to coagulase negative staphylococcal or S. aureus peritonitis, regardless of the presence or absence of a coincidental soft tissue infection. Furthermore, for the first time, the poor outcomes of gram negative peritonitis are shown to be independent of pseudomonas or polymicrobial involvement or soft tissue infections. The gram negative organism appears to be the important factor. In addition, the outcome of peritonitis caused by S. aureus is worse than that of other staphylococci. Thus, it is clear that all peritonitis episodes cannot be considered equivalent in terms of outcome. The concept of peritonitis rate is only meaningful when specific organisms are considered.

Aged↗
PubMed1996

Risk factors for peritonitis in long-term peritoneal dialysis: the Network 9 peritonitis and catheter survival studies. Academic Subcommittee of the Steering Committee of the Network 9 Peritonitis and Catheter Survival Studies.

To determine factors involved in peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis and catheter loss, all point prevalent peritoneal dialysis patients in Health Care Finance Administration (HCFA) end-stage renal disease (ESRD) Network 9 were followed throughout 1991 for peritonitis events and throughout 1991 to 1992 for catheter survival. Data were collected by questionnaires compiled by the dialysis facility and validated by network staff. Peritonitis was reported 1,168 times in 729 of the 1,930 patients. By gamma-Poisson regression, a significantly increased risk for peritonitis was observed for patients with previous peritonitis, black race, and those dialyzing with standard connectors or cyclers compared with disconnect systems. Decreased risks were observed for patients with longer ESRD experience and when prophylactic antibiotics were administered before catheter insertion. Postinsertion leakage, diabetes, visual problems, previous or current immunosuppression, and physical activity were not risk factors. Infection of any kind caused the removal of 68% of the 414 catheters lost. Patients with downward-directed tunnels were less likely to experience concomitant exit site/tunnel infections associated with peritonitis. Peritonitis episodes with Staphylococcus epidermidis-like organisms were more likely to resolve with a single course of antibiotics. Perhaps because of their higher infection rate, blacks were more likely than whites to use a disconnect system. In general, the outcome of peritonitis in blacks was similar to that in whites, except that blacks were less likely to be hospitalized and were less likely to die.

Catheters, Indwelling↗
PubMed1996

Relationship of dose of hemodialysis and cause-specific mortality.

A number of studies have found a relationship of lower all-cause mortality risk for ESRD patients treated with increasing dose of dialysis. The objective of this study was to determine the relationship of delivered dose of dialysis with cause-specific mortality. Data from the USRDS Case Mix Adequacy Study, which includes a national random sample of hemodialysis patients, were utilized. To minimize the contribution of unmeasured residual renal function, the sample used in this analysis (N = 2479) included only patients on dialysis for one year or more. Cox proportional hazards models, stratified for diabetes, were used to analyze the effect of delivered dose of dialysis (measured and reported by both Kt/V and URR) on major causes of death and withdrawal from dialysis, adjusting for other covariates including demographics, comorbid diseases present at start of study, functional status, laboratory values and other dialysis parameters. Patient follow-up for mortality was censored at the earliest of time of transplantation, 60 days after a switch to peritoneal dialysis or at the time of data abstraction. For each 0.1 higher Kt/V, the adjusted relative risk of death due to coronary artery disease was 9% lower (RR = 0.91, P < 0.05), due to other cardiac causes was 12% lower (RR = 0.88, P < 0.01), due to cerebrovascular disease (CVD) was 14% lower (RR = 0.86, P < 0.05), due to infection was 9% lower (RR = 0.91, P = 0.05), and due to other known causes was 6% lower (RR = 0.94, P < 0.05). There was no statistically significant relationship of Kt/V and risk of death among patients who died of malignancy (RR = 0.84, P = 0.10) or among patients whose death cause was missing (RR = 0.95, P = 0.41). The risk of withdrawal from dialysis prior to death due to any cause was 9% lower (RR = 0.91, P < 0.05) for each 0.1 higher Kt/V. The relationships of delivered dose of dialysis, as measured by URR, and cause-specific mortality were essentially similar in relative magnitude and statistical significance as the relationships observed using Kt/V as the measurement of dialysis dose, with the exception that the relationship was less significant for cerebrovascular disease and withdrawal from dialysis. The relationship of dialysis dose with risk of death due to each cause of death category except other cardiac causes and "other" causes appeared to be of greater magnitude and of greater statistical significance among diabetics than non-diabetics. These results indicate that low dose of dialysis is not associated with mortality due to just one isolated cause of death, but rather is due to a number of the major causes of death in this population. This study is consistent with hypotheses that low doses of dialysis may promote atherogenesis, infection, malnutrition and failure to thrive through a variety of pathophysiologic mechanisms. Further study is necessary to confirm these results and to test hypotheses that are developed.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Pseudomonas peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis patients: the Network #9 Peritonitis Study.

To determine risk factors for the development of Pseudomonas peritonitis (PsP) and outcomes of PsP, the authors compared peritoneal dialysis patients who developed PsP with peritoneal dialysis patients who developed non-Pseudomonas bacterial peritonitis (non-PsP). The authors also sought to determine if there were differences in patients who had resolution of PsP compared with those patients whose PsP did not resolve. The data were derived from the prospective Tristate Renal Network Peritonitis and Catheter Survival Study. Resolution in this study was defined as clearing of peritoneal dialysate on visual inspection, with up to three courses of antibiotic therapy allowed. Catheter removal, switch to hemodialysis, or death were outcomes that were considered separately from resolution because of the study design. There were 31 cases of PsP in 28 patients and 886 cases of non-PsP identified in 667 adult patients. There were no differences in race, gender, age, or incidence of diabetes between the groups. The PsP group had a 25% incidence of previous exposure to immunosuppressive agents, whereas it was 10.6% in the non-PsP group (P = 0.028). PsP infections were more frequently associated with concomitant exit and tunnel infections, higher hospitalization rates, increased incidence of catheter loss, switch to hemodialysis, and a worse rate of resolution when compared with non-PsP (all, P < 0.05). Logistic regression could not identify patients at increased risk of PsP. PsP resolved with antibiotic therapy only in 10 of 31 episodes.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Female↗
PubMed1995

Quality control in a peritoneal dialysis program.

A reliable and effective quality-control program in the peritoneal dialysis (PD) unit requires a team effort. Historically, the nursing staff has been responsible for PD program development, and in some programs the physicians are frankly uninvolved. An enthusiastic, knowledgeable, and committed physician is necessary. In the early days of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis in the United States, lack of physician understanding and commitment tarnished the image of this promising, evolving therapy. After recognizing this problem, Baxter embarked on an intensive effort to upgrade the expertise of the physicians. Concurrently, PD programs were identified with successful outcomes and "best demonstrated practice" techniques were promulgated. The key to quality control is the involvement of all members of the team, including physicians, nurses, dietitians, social workers, technicians, administrators, and patients. A commitment is needed for continuing education, continuing reevaluation of policies and procedures, and the empowerment of all team members to achieve the programmatic goals.

Education, Medical, Continuing↗
PubMed1994

Proinflammatory cytokines and hemofiltration membranes.

To determine whether the clinical improvement noted in some septic patients undergoing hemofiltration is in part due to the removal of proinflammatory mediators, in vitro hemofiltration of a 1% albumin solution containing recombinant human tumor necrosis factor alpha and interleukin-1 was performed through a variety of hemofilters. Observed sieving coefficients of these cytokines was much higher (up to 0.35) than expected, considering their molecular weights of 17 kd. In addition, binding of up to 32% of the total mass to selected membranes (polyamide and AN69) was noted. These data are consistent with the concept that either the convective or adsorptive removal of proinflammatory cytokines may play role in the clinical efficacy of hemofiltration in sepsis.

Cytokines↗