PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

T A Splinter

Publications and source records attributed to T A Splinter.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

Arterial occlusive events during chemotherapy for germ cell cancer.

During four courses of chemotherapy for a disseminated testicular seminoma a 30-year-old man developed three arterial occlusive events and one silent myocardial infarction. The events occurred approximately 10 days after the start of each chemotherapy course. During chemotherapy suggested pathogenetic factors were monitored without observing any significant abnormality. After completion of chemotherapy the patient remained in a complete remission and free of new thromboembolic events. A review of possible pathogenetic factors is given.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Is there a common etiology for the rising incidence of and decreasing survival with adenocarcinoma of the lung?

We studied possible explanations for the deteriorating survival for adenocarcinoma of the lung between 1975 and 1994 in relation with trends in incidence. The proportion of adenocarcinoma among men has been increasing since 1975 and for those born after 1920, while survival has decreased since 1975 and for those born since 1930. Among women, both the proportion of adenocarcinoma and survival have remained more or less constant. The rising incidence and the decreasing survival may both be related to changes in tobacco use, the increased use of low-tar filter cigarettes since the 1960s being the most likely candidate.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2001

D-TRP-6-LHRH (Triptorelin) is not effective in ovarian carcinoma: an EORTC Gynaecological Cancer Co-operative Group Study.

Between March and September 1988, 74 patients with progressive ovarian cancer after prior platinum-based therapy were treated with the luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist Triptorelin (Decapeptyl degrees). Treatment consisted of i.m. injection of 3.75 mg of microencapsulated Triptorelin on days 1, 8 and 28 followed by 4-weekly injections until tumor progression. No objective responses were observed. Eleven out of 68 evaluable patients (16%) had stable disease. The median progression-free survival was 5 months in patients with disease stabilization and 2 months for all evaluable patients. The median survival for patients with disease stabilization was 17 months, whereas for all patients it was 4 months. The treatment was well tolerated; the only reported adverse events were incidental hot flushes. This study showed that the LHRH agonist Triptorelin has only modest efficacy in patients pretreated with platinum-containing chemotherapy.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Phase II study of the combination cisplatin, etoposide, 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid in patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus.

The objective of this study was to determine the toxicity and the efficacy of the combination of cisplatin, etoposide, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and folinic acid in the treatment of patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. Patients received cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) i.v. on day 1, etoposide 125 mg/m(2) i.v. on day 1 and etoposide 200 mg/m(2) p.o. on days 3 and 5, 5-FU 375 mg/m(2)/day continuously i.v. combined with folinic acid 30 mg p.o. 6 times per day on days 1--4. Courses were repeated every 4 weeks until progression or up to a maximum of 6 courses. Patients were evaluated for response after every two courses. Sixty-nine patients received a total of 291 courses (median 4, range 1--6). The hematological toxicity consisted of leukocytopenia grade 3 or 4 in 17 and 16% of patients, respectively. Leukocytopenic fever was seen in 19% of patients. Thrombocytopenia grade 3 or 4 was seen in 13 and 7% of patients, respectively. Non-hematological toxicity consisted of nausea/vomiting grade 3 in 32%, diarrhea grade 3 in 6% and mucositis grade 3 or 4 in 23% of patients. The overall response rate was 34% (complete response 4%, partial response 30%) and the median time to progression was 7 months in 13 patients who received no additional treatment. The median survival for all patients was 9.5 months with a 1-year survival rate of 36%. Ten patients with initially locally unresectable disease (N=2) or celiac or supraclavicular lymph node metastases (N=8) who received additional treatment (esophageal resection in seven patients and radiotherapy in three patients) after they had responded to chemotherapy had a 3-year survival of 50%. We conclude that the combination cisplatin and etoposide combined with 5-FU and folinic acid is a safe and active regimen for patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. Mucositis is the most prevalent toxicity.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

The urokinase-type plasminogen activator system in resected non-small-cell lung cancer. Rotterdam Oncology Thoracic Study Group.

BACKGROUND: Urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA), its receptor (uPAR) and plasminogen activator inhibitors (PAI-1 and PAI-2), all play important roles in tumour invasion and metastasis. The tumour levels of the components of the urokinase-type plasminogen activator system (uPA-system) may help to identify individuals with a poor prognosis in postoperative non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The levels of uPA, uPAR PAI-1 and PAI-2 were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in triton-extracts, prepared from 88 NSCLC tissues (stage I-IIIa) and 74 normal lung tissues from the same patients. RESULTS: The expression levels of uPA, uPAR, PAI-1 and PAI-2 were significantly higher in tumour tissues as compared to their normal equivalents (all, P < 0.0001). Significant relations were found between gender and uPA (P = 0.04) or uPAR (P < 0.001), and between PAI-2 and pathological stage (P = 0.03). For none of the studied factors of the uPA-system a significant relation with survival was found, neither in all patients, nor in the subgroups of patients with squamous-cell lung carcinoma or adenocarcinoma. CONCLUSIONS: The expression levels of the components of the uPA-system were higher in NSCLC tissue as compared to normal lung tissue, but there were no significant relationships between their levels and survival.

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung↗
PubMed2000

Evaluation of diffusing capacity in patients with a restrictive lung disease.

BACKGROUND: In healthy volunteers, the single-breath diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) decreases and DLCO normalized per liter alveolar volume (VA; DLCO/VA) increases if VA is decreased. We hypothesized that comparison of DLCO/VA with its predicted value at predicted total lung capacity (TLC) will result in an underestimation of the diffusion disorder in patients with a restrictive lung disease, if a similar relationship exists between DLCO/VA and lung volume as found in healthy volunteers. OBJECTIVE: To test this hypothesis, we studied total gas transfer DLCO and DLCO/VA as functions of VA in patients who developed a restrictive lung disease and a diffusion disorder in a short period of time. DESIGN: An observational survey. SETTING: Pulmonary function department. PATIENTS: Thirteen patients without any initial pulmonary pathology who developed the mentioned pulmonary pathology due to bleomycin treatment. INTERVENTIONS: Bleomycin treatment. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: We performed the single-breath test at various VA levels before, during, and after bleomycin treatment. In the majority of the patients, the DLCO vs VA relationship remained parabolic, but shifted downwards during therapy. Therefore, the linear DLCO/VA vs VA relationship shifted downwards, while the negative slope was not changed, indicating the development of a decreased gas transfer. Six patients also developed a volume restriction. CONCLUSIONS: The agreement of the data with the hypothesis increased its probability. Consequently, to evaluate a diffusion disorder, DLCO/VA at a lower actual TLC of patients with a lung restriction should be compared to a reference DLCO/VA at a lung volume equal to the actual TLC.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Randomized trial of surgery versus radiotherapy in patients with stage IIIA (N2) non small-cell lung cancer after a response to induction chemotherapy. EORTC 08941.

Combined modality treatment of patients with stage III non small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has recently become widely accepted. Standard combinations are neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy or concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy. The effect of combined modality treatment on survival is dependent on both the efficacy of chemotherapy to eradicate micrometastases and optimal local control. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Lung Cancer Cooperative Group has chosen to investigate in a comparative way the side effects and the effect on survival of radiotherapy versus surgery in stage IIIA (N2) NSCLC.

Journal Article↗
PubMed1999

Phase I study of a biweekly schedule of a fixed dose of cisplatin with increasing doses of paclitaxel in patients with advanced oesophageal cancer.

We performed this dose-finding study with a fixed dose of cisplatin and increasing doses of paclitaxel given every 2 weeks to determine the maximum tolerable dose of this schedule. Sixty-four patients with advanced oesophageal cancer were treated with a cisplatin dose of 60 mg m(-2) and increasing doses of paclitaxel from 100 mg m(-2) up to 200 mg m(-2) both administered over 3 h for a maximum of six cycles in patients with stable disease or eight cycles in responding patients. Patients were retreated when the granulocytes were > 0.75 x 10(9) l(-1) and the platelets > 75 x 10(9) l(-1). The dose of paclitaxel could be increased to 200 mg m(-2) without encountering dose limiting haematological toxicity. At the dose levels 190 mg m(-2) and 200 mg m(-2) of paclitaxel cumulative sensory neurotoxicity became the dose-limiting toxicity. The dose intensity of paclitaxel calculated over six cycles rose from 50 mg m(-2) per week to 85 mg m(-2) per week. Only three episodes of granulocytopenic fever were encountered out of a total of 362 cycles of treatment. Of the 59 patients evaluable for response, 31 (52%) had a partial or complete response. In a biweekly schedule with a fixed dose of 60 mg m(-2) cisplatin it is possible to increase the dose of paclitaxel to 180 mg m(-2). At higher dose levels, neurotoxicity becomes the dose-limiting toxicity. The observed response rate warrants further investigation of this schedule.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Randomized study of paclitaxel-cisplatin versus cisplatin-teniposide in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Lung Cancer Cooperative Group.

PURPOSE: To compare two cisplatin based chemotherapy schedules in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 332 patients with advanced NSCLC were randomized to receive cisplatin 80 mg/m2 on day 1 either in combination with teniposide 100 mg/m2 on days 1, 3, and 5 (arm A) or paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 by 3-hour infusion on day 1 (arm B); cycles were repeated every 3 weeks. RESULTS: Fifteen patients were ineligible; patient characteristics were well balanced between the two arms: 71% were male, 71% had less than 5% weight loss, 89% had a World Health Organization (WHO) performance status of 0 to 1, 51% had adenocarcinoma, and 61% had stage IV disease. Hematologic toxicity was significantly more severe in arm A (leukopenia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia grade 3 or 4: 66% v 19%, 83% v 55%, 36% v 2% in arms A and B, respectively), which resulted in more febrile neutropenia (27% v 3% in arms A and B, respectively), dose reductions, and treatment delays. There were a total of nine toxic deaths, six due to neutropenic sepsis: five in arm A and one in arm B. In contrast, arthralgia/myalgia (grade 2 or 3, 4% v 17%), peripheral neurotoxicity (grade 2 or 3, 6% v 29%), and hypersensitivity reactions (1% v 7%, all grades) were significantly more frequent in arm B. The frequency and severity of other toxicities were comparable between the two arms. Responses were one complete and 44 partial on arm A (28%) and two complete and 61 partial (41%) on arm B (P = .018). There was no significant difference in survival, with median and 1-year survivals 9.9 versus 9.7 months and 41% versus 43%, respectively in arm A and B. Progression-free survival was 4.9 and 5.4 months in arm A and B, respectively. Selected centers participated in a quality-of-life (QoL) assessment, which was performed by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 and LC-13 administered at baseline and every 6 weeks thereafter. Arm B achieved a better score at week 6 for emotional, cognitive and social functioning, global health status, fatigue, and appetite loss, which was lost at 12 weeks. In conclusion, arm B appears superior to arm A with regard to response rate, side effects, and QoL. CONCLUSION: Although survival was not improved, arm B offers a better palliation for advanced NSCLC patients than arm A.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Enhanced myelotoxicity due to granulocyte colony-stimulating factor administration until 48 hours before the next chemotherapy course in patients with small-cell lung carcinoma.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) priming on peripheral-blood cell counts during standard-dose chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twelve patients with relapsed small-cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) were treated with two chemotherapy courses. Six patients received G-CSF priming only before the first course (group A) and the other six patients only before the second course (group B). Each patient served as his own control. Patients were treated with cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and etoposide (CEE), or with vincristine, ifosfamide, mesna, and carboplatin (VIMP) every 4 weeks. G-CSF was administered subcutaneously 5 microg/kg/d for 6 days until 48 hours before the first or second chemotherapy course. RESULTS: Priming caused a lowering of the WBC nadir, with a median value of 0.95 x 10(9)/L (P = .004), and of absolute neutrophil nadir, with a median value of 0.48 x 10(9)/L (P = .03). There was a trend for a lower platelet (PLT) nadir after G-CSF priming (P = .09). G-CSF priming resulted in a prolonged duration of WBC count less than 3.0 x 10(9)/L of +4.25 days (P = .04), and of WBC count less than 1.0 x 10(9)/L of +0.50 days (P = .03). The duration of neutropenia less than 0.5 x 10(9)/L seemed longer in primed courses (+3.75 days, P = .18). The duration of PLT counts less than 100 x 10(9)/L was prolonged by 1.5 days (P = .04). Hemoglobin (Hgb) levels were not influenced by G-CSF priming. CONCLUSION: G-CSF administration until 48 hours before the next chemotherapy course increases chemotherapy-associated leukocytopenia and thrombocytopenia. This may be of special concern when G-CSF is administered during dose-densified chemotherapy.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed1997

[The changing role of chemotherapy in the treatment of non-small cell lung carcinoma stage III].

Non-small cell pulmonary carcinoma stage III occurs in the Netherlands in a heterogeneous group of over 2500 patients annually. The standard treatment is radiotherapy. In view of the fact that 70-80% of the patients in the long run develop metastases, the question was studied if combination therapy (especially with chemotherapy) gives longer survival. Chemotherapy may be administered as systemic treatment preceding radiotherapy, or to enhance the effect of radiotherapy. The results of 11 of the 18 studies of combination treatment compared with monotherapy published since 1990 show a statistically significantly slightly longer survival after combination therapy (two other studies involved too few patients to demonstrate statistically significant differences). The difference was maximal after approximately 3 years.

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung↗
PubMed1997

Etoposide in malignant pleural mesothelioma: two phase II trials of the EORTC Lung Cancer Cooperative Group.

Intravenous and oral etoposide (VP 16-213) were tested in two sequential phase II trials in chemotherapy-naive patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma. In the first trial, etoposide was given intravenously (i.v.) at a dose of 150 mg/m2 on days 1, 3 and 5 every 3 weeks. The second trial investigated a daily oral dose of 100 mg for 21 days followed by a 2-week treatment-free period, and then recycling. In both trials, the treatment was given until disease progression, intolerable toxicity or patient refusal. In the i.v. trial, 49 patients were included, 2 patients were ineligible. The oral trial recruited 45 patients, 4 patients were not eligible. In both trials, the main side-effects were moderate leucopenia, alopecia, nausea and vomiting. Two partial responses (4%) and three partial responses (7%) were reported in the i.v. and oral trials, respectively. The median survival was 29 weeks and 38 weeks in the i.v. and oral trials, respectively. In conclusion, further investigation of etoposide in malignant mesothelioma is not recommended.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1997

Cisplatin/paclitaxel vs cisplatin/teniposide for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. The EORTC Lung Cancer Cooperative Group. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer.

A total of 332 patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer were randomized by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Lung Cancer Cooperative Group (EORTC) to receive one of two cisplatin (Platinol)-based chemotherapy regimens: Paclitaxel (Taxol) 175 mg/m2 given by 3-hour infusion followed by cisplatin 80 mg/m2 on day 1; Or cisplatin 80 mg/m2 on day 1, followed by teniposide (Vumon) 100 mg/m2 given on days 1, 3, and 5. Cycles were repeated every 3 weeks. Preliminary analysis of the results of this phase III trial shows that hematologic toxicity was decidedly more severe in the group treated with cisplatin/teniposide than in those given paclitaxel/cisplatin. Of 264 patients evaluable so far, responses have been observed in 47% of those given paclitaxel and in 29% of those treated with teniposide. However, extramural radiologic response evaluation is still under way, so these figures are expected to change somewhat. It appears clear that the paclitaxel-based therapy affords a benefit in terms of response and toxicity, but survival results are premature and any definite conclusions await final analysis.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1997

Introduction to the treatment of lung cancer.

Lung cancer represents the leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide. Its incidence has declined in men but is increasing in women, assuring that this largely preventable disease will continue to affect millions. In small cell lung cancer, the advent of chemotherapy in the 1970s and continued refinements in the 1980s yielded improved median survivals in patients with both limited disease and extensive disease and improved long-term survival in limited-disease patients. Reinduction chemotherapy was shown in the 1980s to improve survival in patients who had achieved a complete remission to initial chemotherapy, and a consensus subsequently developed regarding standard induction chemotherapy for patients with small cell lung cancer. The prognosis for patients with small cell lung cancer depends largely on delivering the optimal combination chemotherapy to achieve early, maximal cell kill with manageable toxicity. Future challenges include comparing newer combinations and novel schedules of administration with "standard" chemotherapy, optimizing the use of complementary treatment modalities, and refining prognostic factors to better define treatment and improve outcome. In patients with non-small cell lung cancer, single-modality treatment has been compared with combined-modality therapy in numerous randomized trials, with consistent survival benefits accrued by patients in combined-modality treatment arms. The recent availability of novel cytotoxic and cytostatic agents has prompted additional comparisons of new combination-chemotherapy regimens, with or without other treatment modalities, in patients with lung cancer. Questions for the future include defining the most effective chemotherapy to eradicate distant metastases and understanding which modalities offer superior local control.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed1997

A phase I dose finding study of a biweekly schedule of a fixed dose of cisplatin with increasing doses of paclitaxel in patients with advanced esophageal cancer.

We performed a phase I study of a fixed dose of cisplatin combined with increasing doses of paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) given in a biweekly schedule to determine the maximum tolerated dose in patients with advanced esophageal cancer. The starting dose was cisplatin 60 mg/m2 and paclitaxel 100 mg/m2, given by intravenous infusion every 2 weeks. Patients were re-treated when the granulocyte counts were greater than 0.75 x 10(9)L and the platelet counts were greater than 75 x 10(9)/L. The paclitaxel dose has been escalated to 160 mg/m2 and the maximum tolerated dose has not yet been reached. At the higher dose levels, more grade 3 and 4 granulocytopenia was observed, but no patient had to be hospitalized because of febrile neutropenia. Nonhematologic toxicity was mild at all dose levels. Increasing the dose of paclitaxel from 100 mg/m2 to 160 mg/m2 leads to an approximately 50% increase in the dose intensity, as calculated in milligrams per square meter per week (mg/m2/wk) over six cycles. Of the 31 patients evaluable for response, 17 (55%) achieved either a partial or a complete response. In conclusion, biweekly administration of cisplatin and paclitaxel, with re-treatment at a granulocyte level greater than 0.75 x 10(9)/L, is feasible and well tolerated, and has a promising response rate in patients with advanced esophageal cancer. Further accrual is ongoing to determine the maximum tolerated dose of this schedule.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Genitourinary group phase II study of chemotherapy in stage T3-4 N0-X M0 transitional cell cancer of the bladder: prognostic factor analysis.

The aim of this study was to examine prognostic factors for survival of patients with invasive bladder cancer who had received neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by further treatment. From 1986 to 1990, 149 eligible patients with T3-4 N0-X M0 bladder cancer were entered into a phase II trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, consisting of cisplatin and methotrexate. Patients received two or four courses of chemotherapy, depending on the absence or presence, respectively, of a major clinical response after two courses. 136 patients were evaluable for clinical response after two courses of chemotherapy, and 75 patients were evaluable for pathological response after two or four courses. A multivariate analysis, based on pretreatment variables and the post-treatment variables, clinical response and pathological response, showed that performance status, tumour size and clinical response after two courses of chemotherapy were the only independent prognostic factors for all eligible patients. A second multivariate analysis in the selected subgroup of patients, who underwent a cystectomy, showed that the G-cagetory and pathological response were the only independent prognostic factors. In conclusion, in this group of patients, the response to chemotherapy was a strong and independent prognostic factor in addition to other independent variables. However, it was not accurate or strong enough to allow an impact on the choice of locoregional therapy.

Aged↗
PubMed1996

Standard versus alternating non-cross-resistant chemotherapy in extensive small cell lung cancer: an EORTC Phase III trial.

Alternating chemotherapy for small cell lung cancer has been tested in several studies. Some have shown positive results that have not been confirmed in other studies. In all of the studies, however, the degree of non-cross-resistance in the regimens was questionable. The EORTC Lung Cancer Study Group developed two equipotent regimens: (i) standard (CDE)-cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, etoposide; (ii) (VIMP)-vincristine, carboplatin, ifosfamide, mesna, both non-cross-resistance. These two combinations were alternated and compared with the standard chemotherapy regimen in a group of 143 patients with extensive small cell lung cancer. Median survival was 7.6 months in the standard arm and 8.7 in the alternating arm (P = 0.243). Median time to progression was 5.8 and 6.4 months, respectively (P = 0.166). Median response duration was 7.0 and 6.8 months (P = 0.221). The use of two alternating regimens with a proven degree of non-cross-resistance did not result in any improvement in survival in patients with extensive small cell lung cancer.

Adult↗