PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

T A Tatham

Publications and source records attributed to T A Tatham.

10 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1998

A history of postponing shock does not appear to alter the discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine.

Previous research has shown that the rate of punished lever pressing of monkeys is typically decreased by cocaine administration. However, cocaine increases punished responding in monkeys with a history of responding maintained by the postponement of shock presentation. This raises the question of whether other behavioral effects of cocaine differ following a history of postponing shock. The present experiment examined whether a history of postponing shock alters the discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine. Three squirrel monkeys were trained to discriminate cocaine (0.56 mg/kg, intramuscular) from saline. Presses on the left lever produced food following saline injections whereas presses on the right lever were reinforced following administration of cocaine. Occasional test sessions were conducted in which cocaine (0.1-0.56 mg/kg), midazolam (0.03-0.56 mg/kg) or pentobarbital (0.3-5.6 mg/kg) was injected prior to the session and responding on either lever was reinforced. Discrimination training was discontinued during a second experimental phase in which responding was maintained by shock postponement. Pulling a chain postponed mild shocks for 25 s, whereas shocks occurred every 5 s in the absence of responding. Next, the drug discrimination dose-response curves were redetermined. The dose-response curves for all drugs before and after the shock postponement history were similar. This outcome suggests that the influence of a history of shock postponement is specific to punished responding.

Animals↗
PubMed1997

Punishment alters the discriminative stimulus effects of midazolam.

Experiment 1 examined the effects of punishment on the discriminative stimulus (DS) effects of midazolam (M) and pentobarbital (P) in 3 pigeons. Sessions began with a fixed-interval (FI) 3-min schedule of food reinforcement. After 40 min, either saline (S) or 0.56 mg/kg of M was injected. A drug-discrimination (DD) component began 10 min later. Pecking the left key produced grain after S injections, whereas pecking the right key produced grain after M. Dose-response curves for M and P were obtained under these conditions and also when every 30th peck during the FI was punished by shock. The introduction of punishment increased sensitivity to the DS effects of M and P. Experiment 2 examined whether a punishment history increases sensitivity to the DS effects of M. After DD training and testing, pecking was punished for 10 sessions. This history shifted the M dose-response curve to the left for 3 of 4 pigeons. These results emphasize the contribution of behavioral variables to the DS effects of drugs. Environmental variables appear to play a prominent role in guiding sensitivity to the subjective effects of drugs.

Animals↗
PubMed1995

The discriminative stimulus effects of methamphetamine in pigeons.

This experiment was designed to elucidate the neurotransmitter systems that mediate the discriminative stimulus effects of methamphetamine. Four pigeons were trained to peck one key following saline injections and a second key following methamphetamine injections (1.0 or 1.7 mg/kg, IM). Substitution tests revealed drug-appropriate responding following administration of the psychomotor stimulants methamphetamine, amphetamine and cocaine, the dopamine (DA) reuptake inhibitor bupropion, norepinephrine (NE) reuptake inhibitors imipramine and tomoxetine, and the serotonin (5-HT) releaser fenfluramine. Saline-key responding occurred following administration of the D1 agonist SKF-38393, the D1 antagonist SCH-23390, the alpha 2 receptor agonist clonidine, the alpha 1 antagonist prazosin, a nonselective beta-antagonist propranolol and the selective 5-HT reuptake inhibitor fluoxetine. The D2/D3 agonist quinpirole produced drug-appropriate responding in two pigeons and partial substitution in the remaining two pigeons. The 5HT1A agonist 8-OH-DPAT produced drug-appropriate responding at higher doses (0.3-1.0 mg/kg), whereas much lower doses (0.003-1.0 mg/kg) antagonized the methamphetamine stimulus. The stimulus effects of methamphetamine were attenuated by pretreatment with prazosin, SCH-23390 and eticlopride, whereas pretreatment with propranolol and the 5-HT3 antagonist, MDL 72222, failed reliably to attenuate drug key responding. These results suggest that NE and DA reuptake inhibition and 5-HT release mediate the discriminative stimulus effects of methamphetamine as do the 5-HT1A and DA D1 and D2 receptors.

Animals↗
PubMed1994

Shock postponement reverses the effects of cocaine on the punished pecking of pigeons.

The effects of cocaine on punished and unpunished key peck responding of pigeons was examined before and after a history of treadle pressing maintained by shock postponement. In one schedule component, the first peck after 3 min produced grain. The alternate component was similar, but every 30 responses was also punished by a mild shock. Punished responding occurred at approximately 25% of the rate of unpunished responding. Cocaine (0.1-10.0 mg/kg IM) did not affect or decrease punished responding; unpunished responding was not systemically affected. Next, a foot treadle was installed and treadle presses postponed shocks for 25 s; shocks occurred every 5 s in the absence of pressing. The treadle was removed when shocks were reliably postponed. Next, the multiple schedule of key pecking was reinstated. At least one dose of cocaine now increased punished pecking; unpunished responding was not systematically altered. These results complement related findings with monkeys and show that pigeons are suitable subjects for studying the reversal of the effects of cocaine on punished responding by a history of postponing shock.

Animals↗
PubMed1993

Centrally acting drugs act as conditioned stimuli in a conditioned suppression of drinking task.

An experiment was conducted to test whether centrally acting drugs could act as conditioned stimuli (CS) in a classical conditioning paradigm in which electric shock acted as the unconditioned stimulus (US) and suppression of drinking was used as an indicator of a conditioned response (CR). Thirsty rats were allowed to drink water during daily classical conditioning sessions which took place in their home cages. The CS was either a drug injected before the session or a "cocktail" of sensory stimuli (light + tone + vibration) turned on at the beginning of the session. Part way through some sessions the animals received electric foot shock as the US. Two different drugs and the sensory cocktail were used as CSs in a discriminated classical conditioning paradigm in which one drug or stimulus (the CS+) predicted the subsequent occurrence of shock, and the other two conditions acted as CS- stimuli and predicted absence of shock. After an average of 5.7 pairings of the CS+ with shock, conditioned suppression of drinking was observed; the CR occurred only during tests preceded by the CS+ drug or stimulus. At one time or another during the experiment, pentobarbital, phencyclidine, morphine, and pentylenetetrazol were employed as the CS+. Each acquired the ability to elicit a CR, although pentobarbital was noticeably less effective than the other three drugs. All conditioning trials took place in hanging metal cages, but the CR generalized into plastic cages with sawdust floors. Each rat received three successive phases of conditioning with a different CS+ condition employed in each phase; each phase of conditioning was followed by extinction of the CR.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Animals↗
PubMed1993

Effects of fixed and variable ratios on human behavioral variability.

The effect that ratio schedules of reinforcement had upon variability of responding was investigated in college students. Subjects were paid $0.02 contingent upon completion of eight presses, distributed in any combination across two push buttons; 256 different sequences were possible. Sequence emission was reinforced according to fixed- and variable-ratio schedules. Ratio requirements of 1, 2, 4 and 8 were presented in alternate components of a multiple schedule. The variability engendered by variable-ratio schedules was also compared to that engendered by fixed ratios. Variability increased with ratio size, irrespective of whether the schedule requirement was fixed or variable. The data demonstrate the similarity between the determinants of human and nonhuman variability, and they illustrate the role of ratio size in determining variability in operant behavior.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

Human choice in "counterintuitive" situations: fixed- versus progressive-ratio schedules.

College undergraduates were given repeated opportunities to choose between a fixed-ratio and a progressive-ratio schedule of reinforcement. Completions of a progressive-ratio schedule produced points (exchangeable for money) and incremented that response requirement by 20 responses with each consecutive choice. In the reset condition, completion of a fixed ratio produced the same number of points and also reset the progressive ratio back to its initial value. In the no-reset condition, the progressive ratio continued to increase by increments of 20 throughout the session with each successive selection of this schedule, irrespective of fixed-ratio choices. Subjects' schedule choices were sensitive to parametric manipulations of the size of the fixed-ratio schedule and were consistent with predictions made on the basis of minimizing the number of responses emitted per point earned, which is a principle of most optimality theories. Also, the present results suggest that if data from human performances are to be compared with results for other species, humans should be exposed to schedules of reinforcement for long periods of time, as is commonly done with nonhuman subjects.

Adult↗
PubMed1989

Variable-ratio conditioning history produces high- and low-rate fixed-interval performance in rats.

Four rats were exposed to an A-B-A-B series of 30 sessions each of variable-ratio 20 (A) and fixed-interval 30-s (B) schedules. Four other rats received 120 sessions of fixed-interval 30 s. The rats with a history of variable-ratio responding subsequently showed primarily high or low response-rate patterns on the fixed-interval schedule without evidence of classical scalloping (i.e., increased rates of responding throughout the interreinforcement interval), except infrequently in 1 rat. The rats exposed to only the fixed-interval 30-s schedule displayed the expected sequence of scalloping giving way to lower rate break-run or simply low-rate responding over time. This experiment shows that when naive rats are exposed to even a simple history of reinforcement (in this case, a variable-ratio 20), their subsequent fixed-interval performance is very different from comparable performance in naive rats, and might be said to be more similar to the responding of adult humans. The argument is made that care should be taken in comparing the fixed-interval performance of humans and nonhumans because humans have a complex history of reinforcement, whereas laboratory nonhumans are typically naive.

Animals↗
PubMed1988

Pigeons' choices in situations of diminishing returns: fixed- versus progressive-ratio schedules.

In two different discrete-trial procedures, pigeons were faced with choices between fixed-ratio and progressive-ratio schedules. The latter schedules entail diminishing returns, a feature analogous to foraging situations in the wild. In the first condition (no reset), subjects chose between a progressive-ratio schedule that increased in increments of 20 throughout a session and a fixed-ratio schedule that was constant across blocks of sessions. The size of the fixed ratio was varied parametrically through an ascending and then a descending series. In the reset condition, the same fixed-ratio values were used, but each selection (and completion) of the fixed ratio reset the progressive-ratio schedule back to its minimal value. In the no-reset procedure, the pigeons tended to cease selecting the progressive ratio when it equaled or slightly exceeded the fixed-ratio value, whereas in reset, they chose the fixed ratio well in advance of that equality point. These results indicate sensitivity to molar as well as to molecular reinforcement rates, and those molar relationships are similar to predictions based on the marginal value theorem of optimal foraging theory (e.g., Charnov, 1976). However, although previous results with monkeys (Hineline & Sodetz, 1987) appeared to minimize responses per reinforcement, the present results corresponded more closely to predictions based on sums-of-reciprocals of distance from point of choice to each of the next four reinforcers. Results obtained by Hodos and Trumbule (1967) with chimpanzees in a similar procedure were intermediate between these two relationships. Variability of choices, as well as median choice points, differed between the reset and no-reset conditions.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Animals↗