The effects of community and migrant health centers on rural communities.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to T C Ricketts.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The authors assessed the relationship between having a regular doctor and access to care, as measured by a set of preventive and primary care utilization indicators recommended by the Institute of Medicine. The 1987 National Medical Expenditure Survey was used in the analyses (n = 30,012). The results of the regression analyses suggest that individuals with any type of regular source of care had better access than those without a regular source of care. Persons with a regular doctor had better access to primary care than those with a regular site but no regular doctor. However, the apparent advantage of having a regular doctor over a regular site disappeared when only those individuals reporting a physician's office, clinic, or health maintenance organization as their regular source of care were compared. These results suggest that policies that promote the doctor-patient relationship will increase access, although the gains may be negligible for individuals who use mainstream primary care sites (physician's office, clinic, or health maintenance organization) versus sites such as walk-in clinics or emergency rooms.
This study sought to determine if county-level demographic, health care resource, policy, and competitive factors are associated with the movement of obstetrician-gynecologists (ob-gyns) into and out of rural areas. County-level descriptive data from the Area Resource File, the American Medical Association Physician Masterfile, and the American Hospital Association Guide were used for hospital descriptions. This was a correlational study that measured the association of ecologic indicators of nonmetropolitan counties with indicators of gain or loss of ob-gyns. Descriptive statistics characterize the supply and movement of ob-gyns by size and location of the counties. Multinomial logistic regression models describe the net effect of the ecologic indicators on physician movement. During the period 1985 to 1990, a total of 962 patient care ob-gyns moved out of 531 nonmetropolitan counties, and 979 ob-gyns moved into 528 counties. Counties in the southern Atlantic states experienced the greatest net inflow, whereas Illinois, Missouri, and Texas had the greatest net outflow. Counties that retained ob-gyns during this period were in the mid-range of population. Positive correlates of outward migration were adjacency to a metropolitan county and loss of hospital bed supply; negative correlates with outward migration were the supply of hospital beds and total population. Inward migration was positively correlated with retention or gain of county family physicians and with adjacency; negative correlates were overall population and total family physician supply. The movement of ob-gyns in nonmetropolitan counties is influenced by state policies, local resources, and relative location. No clear evidence shows that there are competitive relations between family physician supply and ob-gyn supply.
This article assesses the extent to which managed competition could be successful in rural areas. Using 1990 Medicare hospital patient origin data, over 8 million rural residents were found to live in areas potentially without provider choice. Almost all of these areas were served by providers who compete for other segments of their market. Restricting use of out-of-State providers would severely limit opportunities for choice. These findings suggest that most residents of rural States would receive cost benefits from a managed competition system if purchasing alliances are carefully defined, but consideration should be given to boundary issues when forming alliances.
Alliances are the organizations of the future. This article builds on the lessons from industry identifying important areas requiring definition and basic understanding of alliance structure, process, and outcome in health care services.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
This study analyzes the 1993 National Directory of HMOs to determine the extent to which rural counties are included in health maintenance organization (HMO) service areas. Two specific questions are addressed: (1) How do the patterns of service areas differ across HMO model types? (2) What are the characteristics that distinguish rural counties served by HMOs from those that are not? Although a majority of rural counties are in HMO service areas, substantially fewer are served by non-individual practice association (non-IPA) models. Access to HMO services is found to decrease with county population density, and adjacency to metropolitan areas is an important predictor of inclusion in service areas.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVE: To learn from physicians in the National Health Service Corps (referred to as NHSC or the Corps) scholarship program about their experiences in rural health professional shortage areas (HPSAs), to contrast their experiences with those of other physicians working in rural HPSAs, and to learn how NHSC physicians' retention is associated with the quality of their experiences. DESIGN: Cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: Two groups of primary care physicians who moved to rural HPSAs nationwide from 1987 through 1990 were surveyed in 1991: group 1 consisted of all 675 physicians in the NHSC scholarship program, and group 2 consisted of a stratified random sample of 1000 non-Corps physicians. Response rates were 73.7% and 69.1%, respectively. Analyses used comparable subsets of 417 NHSC and 206 non-NHSC respondents. RESULTS: Among NHSC physicians, 51% initially anticipated working in underserved areas longer than 10 years, although only 14% expected to remain more than 5 years in their assigned practices. Three quarters of the Corps group felt there were few acceptable practice sites available to them, one third likely would have preferred urban sites, and two thirds were matched in states where they had not lived or trained earlier. Corps physicians felt their spouses' and children's needs were less well satisfied in their communities than non-Corps physicians. Corps physicians reported lower satisfaction in their work and personal lives and demonstrated poorer retention. Group differences in satisfaction and retention remained after controlling for various features of physicians and sites where they worked. Among NHSC physicians, retention was dramatically lower for those less well matched to their communities and those less satisfied. CONCLUSIONS: The needs and preferences of NHSC physicians and families are not well accommodated. Low morale and poor retention are endemic among NHSC physicians. The NHSC is challenged by twin goals of meeting the immediate needs of underserved communities and providing personally and professionally satisfying environments where physicians can pursue long-term careers.
One reason for the shortage of primary care physicians in rural areas may be these physicians' reluctance to compete for patients with federally subsidized Community Health Centers (CHCs). Yet little is known about the relationship between private practice physicians and physicians in federally subsidized practices who share service areas. We used surveys from a two-state subset of a nationally representative sample to compare practice characteristics of three types of physicians: those who work in CHCs; those in private practice within CHC service areas; and private practice physicians in other rural areas. We found that rural physicians who compete with CHCs earn incomes comparable to physicians in rural areas who do not compete with CHCs, and that the percentage of Medicaid and uninsured patients seen in private physician practices does not increase when a CHC is not in the county. We conclude that CHCs do not provide competitive barriers to physicians in private practice, although we do not know if the presence of a CHC inhibits new private physicians from entering practices in these communities.
OBJECTIVE: This study inquires whether retention in rural practice settings is longer for graduates of public medical schools and community hospital-based residencies, and for those who participated in rural rotations as medical students and residents. These questions are addressed separately for "mainstream" rural physicians and physicians serving in the National Health Service Corps (NHSC). DESIGN: Design is a prospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: Study subjects were 202 primary care physicians who graduated from U.S. allopathic medical schools from 1970-1980, and who in 1981 were working in a nationally representative sample of externally subsidized rural practices. Nearly half were serving in the NHSC. Physicians were first identified in 1981 as part of an earlier study. INTERVENTION: In 1990, study subjects were re-located and sent a follow-up mail survey inquiring about their medical training backgrounds and their careers from the time of graduation until 1990. We examined associations between four features of physicians' medical training and their subsequent retention in rural practice settings. RESULTS: Among those not in the NHSC, rural retention duration did not differ for those from public versus private medical schools, those who trained in community hospitals versus university hospital-based residencies, or for those who completed versus did not complete rural rotations as students or residents. Among NHSC physicians, no retention duration differences were noted for those with rural experiences as students or residents, or for those trained in community hospital residencies. Contrary to common wisdom, public school graduates in the NHSC remained in rural areas for shorter periods than private school graduates. CONCLUSIONS: These findings call into question whether current rural-focused medical education initiatives prepare rural physicians in ways able to influence their retention in rural settings. For purposes of enhancing the rural practice retention of its alumni, the NHSC should not selectively award scholarships to students from public medical schools.
The primary study objectives were to 1) determine how many physicians entered primary care practice in rural and urban counties of North Carolina in the 1981 to 1989 period and 2) estimate their length of tenure in these areas. The secondary objective was to identify the physician's demographic, training, and practice characteristics that influence geographic location of practice and length of tenure. A cohort of 1,947 physicians was identified from the North Carolina Board of Medical Examiners database, which included all active, nonfederal primary care physicians who began their initial practice in North Carolina in 1981 or later. The primary outcome was time in practice in a given rural or urban county. Selected data on physician demographic, training and practice characteristics were also available in the database. Approximately one third of physicians beginning their initial North Carolina practice selected a rural county for the location. Almost half of these primary care physicians were still in the county of their initial practice in 1989. An additional 20% of these physicians had changed practice location within the State, of which half chose a similar type of county to that of their initial practice. Length of tenure was similar across geographic locations of the medical practice, with the average length of tenure being 4.6 and 4.4 years among physicians in rural and urban counties, respectively. The strongest predictors of tenure were practice organizational characteristics with physicians in either an office-based solo practice or partnership having longer tenures.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
This study used logistic regression to identify differences in community-level characteristics of small, rural hospitals that provided obstetrical services compared to those that did not. The hypothesis was that community characteristics, such as demographics, geographic location, and socioeconomic status influence the ability of rural hospitals to sustain obstetrical services locally. The sample included small (fewer than 100 beds) non-federal, general, acute-care hospitals that were the only hospitals in their nonmetropolitan counties with fewer than 50,000 people in 1989 (n = 963). Data came from the Area Resource File and the American Hospital Association 1989 Survey. The results suggest that: 1) hospitals in the South are much less likely to offer obstetrical services; 2) hospitals in counties with higher socioeconomic status, measured by unemployment rate and percentage of the population who are white, have an increased likelihood of providing obstetrics; 3) hospital ownership has a relatively strong association with the provision of obstetrical services; and 4) the same characteristics that predict a hospital has obstetrical services do a poor job at predicting which hospitals do not offer those services. These results encourage researchers to examine areas where hospitals do not provide obstetrical care, and to investigate the dynamic between community characteristics and provider and consumer behavior. This study suggests to policymakers that targeting vulnerable communities and promoting regional and alternative modes of delivering obstetrical services may be effective means to ensuring that rural women have equitable access to obstetrical care.
The use of nonphysician providers, such as nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and certified nurse midwives, in rural areas is critically important due to the continued primary care access problems. This study examines the major factors influencing the use of nonphysician providers in rural community and migrant health centers based on a 1991 national survey of the centers. This study demonstrates that the employment of nonphysician providers in rural community and migrant health centers is significantly influenced by both supply and demand factors. Among supply factors, there is a significant and positive relationship between the number of total staff and the number of nonphysician providers employed. There is a significant but inverse relationship between the number of physicians and the number of nonphysician providers employed, indicating nonphysician providers primarily serve as substitutes for physicians in rural community and migrant health centers. The supply of nonphysician providers, as measured by the number of affiliated training programs, is significantly related to the employment of nonphysician providers. The demand variable, geographic location, and the centers' staffing policies are also significant determinants of the use of nonphysician providers.
During the 1980s a rapid rise in the costs of malpractice coverage for obstetrical services caused many practitioners to stop delivering babies. Other factors also influenced the decision by physicians to exclude obstetrics from their practices, including: increases in malpractice claims made against obstetrical providers and the subsequent fear of being sued; closures of hospital obstetrics units; issues involving Medicaid; and the daily stresses inherent in providing obstetrical care. Rural areas were particularly vulnerable to these factors. North Carolina was not unlike other states in recognizing a severe drop in access to obstetrical services in many communities, and policies were proposed to address this problem through tort reform, malpractice subsidies, and Medicaid program expansion. The exodus of obstetrical providers seemed especially critical in rural areas, and this article presents a metropolitan-nonmetropolitan analysis of the results of a survey of all obstetricians and gynecologists active and licensed to practice in North Carolina. The analysis is focused on provider responses to proposed policies and also examines the clinical support networks for these physicians to determine if this might also be an area for future policy activity. Important differences were found between rural and urban providers in terms of intensity of obstetrical practice, adequacy of backup, Medicaid participation and caseload, ideas about tort reform, and recent changes in obstetrical practice. The results indicate that policies to increase demand or income can help solve the rural obstetrical access problem but that states should pay equal attention to the clinical support system for practitioners.
Rising malpractice insurance rates have led to a decrease in the number of physicians who provide rural obstetrical care. North Carolina has responded with the Rural Obstetrical Care Incentive (ROCI) Program, which provides up to $6,500 per year to physicians who provide obstetrical care to the rural poor in conjunction with a local health department. This study finds some evidence that the program has led to an increase in the satisfaction that physician participants feel toward the prenatal care available at the local health department; that participants are increasing their provision of obstetrical care to Medicaid patients compared to other physicians in the state; and that the percentage of women delivering after receiving inadequate prenatal care is decreasing in the original ROCI counties, at a time when other rural counties are experiencing an increase in this measure. Other states should consider the ROCI program as one aspect of a rural health strategy.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Rural-urban comparisons have identified higher age-, race-, and sex-adjusted cancer incidence and mortality rates in urban populations for most anatomic sites, suggesting that rural populations are at lower risk from cancer. Conversely, findings that rural cancer patients are diagnosed at later stages of disease, that higher proportions of rural cancer cases are unstaged at diagnosis, and that rural cancer patients are at a more advanced stage of illness when referred to home health care agencies, suggest that rural cancer patients are disadvantaged when compared to their urban counterparts. This paper summarizes rural-urban patterns of cancer mortality, incidence, and survivorship since 1950; outlines rural-urban differences in utilization of health care services; questions the appropriateness of using rural-urban comparisons of cancer mortality and incidence to evaluate access to cancer care; and suggests potential approaches to the question of whether rural residents have access to cancer care comparable to that available to urban residents.