PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

T Choobun

Publications and source records attributed to T Choobun.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Antibiotic prophylaxis for operative vaginal delivery.

BACKGROUND: Vacuum and forceps assisted vaginal deliveries are reported to increase the incidence of postpartum infections and maternal readmission to hospital compared to spontaneous vaginal delivery. Prophylactic antibiotics are prescribed to prevent these infections. However, the benefit of antibiotic prophylaxis for operative vaginal deliveries is still unclear. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness and safety of antibiotic prophylaxis in reducing infectious puerperal morbidities in women undergoing operative vaginal deliveries including vacuum and/or forceps deliveries. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register (November 2003), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library, Issue 4, 2003) and MEDLINE (1966 to November 2003). SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised trials comparing any prophylactic antibiotic regimens with placebo or no treatment in women undergoing vacuum or forceps deliveries were eligible. Participants were all pregnant women without evidence of infections or other indications for antibiotics of any gestational age undergoing vacuum or forceps delivery for any indications. Interventions were any antibiotic prophylaxis (any dosage regimen, any route of administration or at any time during delivery or the puerperium) compared with either placebo or no treatment. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Four reviewers assessed trial eligibility and methodological quality. Two reviewers extracted the data independently using prepared data extraction forms. Any discrepancies were resolved by discussion and a consensus reached through discussion with all reviewers. We assessed methodological quality of the included trial using the standard Cochrane criteria and the CONSORT statement of randomised controlled trials. We calculated the relative risks using a fixed effect model and all the reviewers interpreted and discussed the results. MAIN RESULTS: One trial, involving 393 women undergoing either vacuum or forceps deliveries, was included. This trial identified only two out of the nine outcomes specified in this review. It reported seven women with endomyometritis in the group given no antibiotic and none in prophylactic antibiotic group. This difference did not reach statistical significance, but the relative risk reduction was 93% (relative risks 0.07; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.00 to 1.21). There was no difference in the length of hospital stay between the two groups (weighted mean difference 0.09 days; 95% CI -0.23 to 0.41). REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS: The data were too few and of insufficient quality to make any recommendations for practice. Future research on antibiotic prophylaxis for operative vaginal delivery is needed to conclude whether it is useful for reducing postpartum morbidity.

Antibiotic Prophylaxis↗

Laparoscopic adnexectomy for benign tubo-ovarian disease using abdominal wall lift: a comparison to laparotomy.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the results of laparoscopic adnexectomy using an abdominal wall-lifting device compared to laparotomy. METHODS: From February 1997 to December 2001, laparoscopic adnexectomy was performed in 68 cases of benign diseases in a university hospital. Three cases (4.4%) were converted to laparotomy due to poor visualization. The control group was a similar cohort of 65 patients who underwent the same procedures using laparotomy. RESULTS: There were 59 ovarian cysts and six tubal pregnancies in each group. Mean analgesic used, hospital stay, recovery period and blood loss were 11.5 mg, 2.0 days, 1.0 week and 49 ml, compared with 151.8 mg, 4.0 days, 3.0 weeks, and 122 ml in the laparotomy group (P<0.0005). Mean operating times and hospital charges were 81.7 min and 293.9 dollars (US), compared with 77.1 min (P=0.108) and 272.7 dollars (US) (P=0.033) in the laparotomy group. No serious complications were found in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Gasless laparoscopic adnexectomy is a safe and effective technique to provide laparoscopic benefit with minimal increase in hospital charges.

Adnexa Uteri↗

Teaching instrument: a laparoscopic training model.

A laparoscopic training model with female surface anatomy has been developed. This training model is made of a plastic boutique-showing model that is equivalent to normal-size female anatomy from the neck to the upper thigh. Four holes were made on the model's abdominal wall as puncture-sites to enter the cavity, the first is 80-mm diameter at the umbilical area, and the other three 38-mm diameter holes are located on both sides of the lower abdomen and suprapubic area. The umbilical hole can be covered with a simulated abdominal wall made from 6.5-mm insulation sheet, fixed to the model using a rubber band. The other three puncture-sites were plugged with a flexible rubber diaphragm as working ports. When used as video-laparoscopy, the auto-focus camcorder is used as a telescope and is connected to a regular television set as a monitor. This model can be used for training of abdominal entry by Veress needle or trocar, laparoscopic tubal ligation (LTL), and video-eye-hand co-ordination. This model has been a training medium in our Department for 1 year and was included in the OSCE for the Board Examination of the Royal Thai College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists in the year 2000 to assess the process of Veress needle insertion.

Clinical Competence↗