Biomedical subjects

T D Jaskowski

Publications and source records attributed to T D Jaskowski.

13 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2000

Evaluation of a PCR probe capture assay for the detection of Toxoplasma gondii. Incorporation of uracil N-glycosylase for contamination control.

Toxoplasma gondii is a cyst-forming parasite of clinical relevance in humans primarily because of the neurologic abnormalities it can cause. In some clinical circumstances, it is desirable to detect the pathogen directly. We modified a commercially available Toxoplasma polymerase chain reaction (PCR) probe capture assay by incorporating uracil N-glycosylase (UNG) to prevent carryover amplicon contamination. In addition, UNG inactivation and DNA denaturation were accomplished chemically to simplify the DNA hybridization to the capture probe. The incorporation of UNG effectively eliminated carryover contamination; the probe capture assay showed a log increase in detection sensitivity compared with standard agarose gel electrophoresis. To assess sensitivity and possible inhibition of amplification, different sample types were spiked with Toxoplasma organisms. After DNA extraction and PCR amplification, a sensitivity of 2 tachyzoites for the assay was determined in buffered saline, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), serum, and amniotic fluid; 20 tachyzoites for whole blood; and 200 tachyzoites for brain tissue. An additional 20 human serum and CSF samples submitted for Toxoplasma serologic testing were run by the PCR method. Of these, only an IgM-positive CSF sample was PCR positive. The Toxoplasma PCR probe capture assay showed good sensitivity and was not substantially inhibited by several different clinically relevant samples.

Amniotic Fluid↗

PubMed1999

Comparison of capillary zone and immunosubtraction with agarose gel and immunofixation electrophoresis for detecting and identifying monoclonal gammopathies.

Capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE) and immuno-subtraction electrophoresis (ISE) were evaluated for ability to detect and immunotype monoclonal proteins, compared with agarose gel electrophoresis (AGE) and immunofixation electrophoresis (IFE), respectively. Six hundred seventeen serum samples were analyzed with CZE and AGE to determine sensitivity and specificity in detecting IFE-confirmed monoclonal gammopathies. Both techniques detected all monoclonal spikes due to IgM (n = 8), IgG (n = 38), and free light chains (n = 3). Agarose gel electrophoresis, however, detected only 11 of 14 (79%) IgA monoclonal spikes detected with CZE. In a second study, 78 serum samples, 48 of which had a monoclonal gammopathy confirmed with IFE, were evaluated with ISE. Only 60% to 75% of the monoclonal gammopathies were correctly immunotyped with ISE by 4 readers blinded to the IFE immunotype. Thus CZE was more sensitive than AGE in detecting low concentrations of monoclonal proteins, but ISE is less accurate than IFE in determining the immunotype of the monoclonal gammopathy.

Autoanalysis↗

PubMed1999

Comparison of three different methods for measuring classical pathway complement activity.

The complement system plays an important role in host defense against infection and in most inflammatory processes. The standard 50% hemolytic complement (CH50) assay is the most commonly used method of screening patient sera for functional activity of the classical complement pathway. Our objective in this study was to compare two newer methods (the enzyme immunoassay and the liposome immunoassay) to a commercial CH50 assay for measuring total classical complement activity. We conclude that both newer methods compare well with a CH50 assay and are equally sensitive in screening routine clinical sera.

Adult↗

PubMed1999

Heterophile antibodies to bovine and caprine proteins causing false-positive human immunodeficiency virus type 1 and other enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay results.

Heterophile antibodies are a well-recognized cause of erroneous results in immunoassays. We describe here a 22-month-old child with heterophile antibodies reactive with bovine serum albumin and caprine proteins causing false-positive results to human immunodeficiency virus type 1 and other infectious serology testing.

Animals↗

PubMed1998

Comparison of an inhalant allergy immunoassay with allergen specific IgE determinations in human serum.

The diagnosis of inhalant allergy can be elusive, with symptoms resembling viral or bacterial infection, as well as immunologic deficiency. In this study an inhalant allergy immunoassay was investigated as a possible screen to rule in or out respiratory inhalant allergy in patients with allergic-type symptoms. The results of this screen were compared in 192 serum specimens submitted to our laboratory for specific IgE allergy testing and 73 blood bank samples. When the discrepant results of the inhalant allergy immunoassay were resolved by Western blot, a final sensitivity of 94.7% and specificity of 97.5% was calculated. We have found this inhalant allergy immunoassay to be an effective screen for detecting inhalant allergies, and believe it to be a useful tool for the primary care physician or non-allergist trying to differentiate inhalant allergens from chronic sinusitis or other causes of sinopulmonary congestion.

Allergens↗

PubMed1997

Detection of Epstein-Barr viral DNA in serum using rapid-cycle PCR.

Our study describes the comparison of a rapid nested PCR assay to standard serology techniques for the detection of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) in serum. The sera of 81 patients with suspected EBV infection were analyzed; 54 were positive for one or more of the standard serology markers, i.e., IgM viral capsid antigen (VCA), IgG-VCA, Epstein-Barr nuclear antigen 1 (EBNA-1), and early antigen (EA), and 27 were negative for all serology markers. The sera from 15 normal healthy blood donors were also included. No EBV DNA was detected in any of the 15 blood donor samples or in any of the 27 samples with negative serology results. Eleven samples (20%) of the 54 with positive EBV serology results were positive for EBV DNA. Of these samples, 9 were EBV IgM-VCA positive and anti-EBNA negative, suggesting acute infection. One of the 11 samples had high titers of IgM-VCA, IgG-VCA, anti-EBNA, and anti-EA. The last of the 11 samples was from a patient with acute infectious mononucleosis without sufficient sample volume for EBV serology testing. Seventeen of the total 96 samples from the study were IgM-VCA positive and anti-EBNA negative and 9 of these 17 samples (53%) tested positive for EBV DNA. These data suggest that the detection of EBV DNA by PCR in serum may be a useful indicator of active infection rather than latent virus.

Antibodies, Viral↗

PubMed1997

Immunoglobulin A antibodies to Helicobacter pylori.

Serological testing for immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies to Helicobacter pylori has proven useful in supporting the diagnosis of infection with this organism, but the clinical value of IgA antibodies in H. pylori-related gastritis remains controversial. The purpose of our study was to determine the frequency of IgA-positive IgG-negative patients with symptoms of gastrointestinal (GI) disorders, thus assessing the clinical utility of IgA testing for H. pylori-related gastritis. It was found previously that the frequency of infected individuals in this category (IgA positive and IgG negative) is about 2%, but a large number of IgG-negative patients with GI disorders suggestive of H. pylori infection have not been investigated until now.

Antibodies, Bacterial↗

PubMed1996

Screening for antinuclear antibodies by enzyme immunoassay.

Indirect fluorescent antibody (IFA) ia most widely used method in clin clinical laboratories to screen for autoantibodies against a wide variety of nuclear antigens. Recently, a number of antinuclear antibody (ANA) enzyme immunoassay (EIA) screens have become commercially available and claim to be an alternative method to screen for ANAs. Given the subjectivity of technical interpretation of IFA and the high number of ANA negative samples, a suitable EIA method for ANA screening would be beneficial to clinical laboratories with large samples volumes. Five ANA EIA screens were compared (Elias, Helix, Sanofi, TheraTest and Zeus) to IFA using a human epithelial cell line (HEp-2). Sera from 601 patients submitted to our reference laboratory for autoimmune testing, and from 202 normal healthy blood donors, were included in this study. Samples with discordant results between IFA and EIA were further analyzed using single antigen EIAs for SSA, SSB, Sm, RNP, Scl-70, histones, dsDNA, and ssDNA. Analyses were based on clinically significant IFA titers of > or equal to 1:160 as positive and <1:40 as negative. When compared to IFA, agreement, sensitivity and specificity for each ANA EIA screen were as follows: Elias: 87.0%, 69.5% and 97.9%; Helix: 94.6%, 90.2%, and 97.3%; Sanofi: 95.0%, 93.7%, and 95.9%; TheraTest: 95.3%, 97.7%, and 93.5%; Zeus: 87.1%, 96.2%, and 81.4%, respectively. In conclusion, screening for ANAs by EIA using several commercial assays was both sensitive and specific when compared to IFA. Moreover, the EIA is objective and much less labor intensive when screening a large number of clinical specimens. None of the EIAs were 100% sensitive and, thus, may fail to detect a few of the nonspecific ANAs that demonstrate atypical as well as classical IFA patterns. The advantages of employing these nonsubjective assays to screen out the vast majority of ANA negative sera is clear. The authors still recommend confirming titers and patterns of sera with positive EIA screens using classical IFA methods employing HEp-2 cells.

Antibodies, Antinuclear↗

PubMed1996

Polymerase chain reaction detection of Lyme disease: correlation with clinical manifestations and serologic responses.

The authors have developed a simple, nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay for amplification of an outer surface protein A (OspA) gene fragment of Borrelia burgdorferi using rapid temperature cycling and ethidium bromide detection on agarose gels, and applied it to the diagnosis of Lyme disease in humans. With denaturing and annealing temperature spikes instead of holds, cycle times were less than 20 minutes for a 30-cycle amplification. Using this rapid cycle PCR technique, as few as 5 spirochetes per mL of phosphate buffered saline were detected. In addition, B burgdorferi DNA was detected from spirochetes that had been spiked into one of several types of human body fluids including serum, synovial fluid, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). A number of clinical samples, which had been tested for Lyme immunoglobulin M (IgM) and immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody were also examined. In 29 serologic positive samples (14 IgG and IgM positive, 9 IgM alone and 6 IgG alone), B burgdorferi DNA was not detected. In contrast, nine serum samples and one synovial fluid from patients with definite clinical features of Lyme disease were found to be negative by EIA and Western blot analysis for IgG and IgM antibody, but contained B burgdorferi DNA, as detected by PCR. Polymerase chain reaction analysis of serum and synovial fluid may be of significant diagnostic value in Lyme disease, especially in the absence of a serologic response in early, partially treated and seronegative chronic disease. This is the first study to report an association between PCR positivity and the absence of a serologic response to Lyme borreliosis.

Base Sequence↗

PubMed1995

Comparison of three commercially available enzyme immunoassays for the screening of autoantibodies to extractable nuclear antigens.

The initial screening test used in the diagnosis of connective tissue diseases is based on the detection of antinuclear antibodies (ANA) by indirect immunofluorescence (IFA). When the ANA screen is positive, it is often useful to determine the specificity of the autoantibody to a series of extractable nuclear antigens (ENA), a procedure that has been classically performed by double immunodiffusion. Testing large numbers of clinical specimens for autoantibodies to ENA by double diffusion techniques can be time-consuming and expensive. ENA screening systems that employ enzyme immunoassay (EIA) technology have recently become commercially available. We compared three EIA ENA assays to classic Ouchterlony double diffusion techniques. Furthermore, the sensitivity of each antigen and methodology (including ANA immunofluorescence using HEp-2 cells) was tested using ENA positive sera possessing single autoantibodies. Two of the three EIAs that detected immunoglobulin G type autoantibodies to Smith (Sm), ribonucleoprotein (RNP), Sjögren's syndrome-associated antigens Ro (SSA) and La (SSB), were provided by INOVA and Sigma Diagnostics. A third EIA, which also included scleroderma-associated antigen 70 (SCL-70/DNA-topoisomerase I) and histidyl-tRNA synthetase (Jo-1) in addition to the four previously stated antigens, was provided by Clark Laboratories. This latter ENA screen detected IgG, IgA, and IgM type autoantibodies. Included in the study were sera covering a wide variety of anti-nuclear and other autoantibodies. Sensitivity was 100% for all EIA ENA screens when compared to Ouchterlony double diffusion and specificity exceeded 95% in each case. Sensitivity studies showed Ouchterlony to be less sensitive than EIA when detecting low levels of autoantibodies to ENA.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adolescent↗

PubMed1995

An evaluation of the effectiveness of three immunoglobulin G (IgG) removal procedures for routine IgM serological testing.

Three procedures for the removal of immunoglobulin G (IgG) from human serum were evaluated for their effectiveness in eliminating false-positive results caused by rheumatoid factor and in removing IgG from serum to reduce competing-IgG interference in IgM enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) testing. The procedures investigated employed two anti-human IgG diluents and a recombinant protein G-filled tube. The anti-human IgG was more effective than the protein G method in eliminating false-positive results caused by rheumatoid factor and removed 5.4% more IgG from serum samples in the normal range (< 1,700 mg/dl) and up to 16.4% more of the IgG from samples with elevated levels (> 1,700 mg/dl). The recombinant protein G removed less IgM than the anti-human IgG diluents; however, this difference did not affect the results of the ELISA. For these reasons, the in-house-developed anti-human IgG diluent proved to be the most effective and economical for IgM serological testing.

Animals↗

PubMed1995

Comparison of commercially available enzyme immunoassay with traditional serological tests for detection of antibodies to Coccidioides immitis.

A newly released commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was evaluated for its ability to detect immunoglobulin M (IgM) and IgG antibodies against the tube precipitin and complement fixation (CF) antigens of Coccidioides immitis. The ELISA was compared with more traditional diagnostic assays, CF, latex agglutination (LA), and immunodiffusion (ID). When the IgM-specific portion of the ELISA was compared with LA, there was an agreement of 81.8%, a specificity of 75.0%, and a sensitivity of 84.6%. For the determination of the presence of IgG antibodies, the results of the IgG-specific part of the ELISA were compared with the combined results of ID and CF. After resolution of discrepant results, there was an agreement of 95.6%, a specificity of 98.3%, and a sensitivity of 92.6%. When the results of the IgG- and IgM-specific portions of the ELISA combined were compared with the results of the three traditional assays (CF, LA, and ID) there was an agreement of 96.7%, a specificity of 98.5%, and a sensitivity of 94.8%. The ELISA proved to be a reliable assay for the detection of antibodies against the tube precipitin and CF antigens and did not suffer from the objectivity required to interpret the results of the traditional assays and anticomplement interference associated with the traditional assays.

Antibodies, Fungal↗

PubMed1994

Comparison of three commercially available assays for detection of varicella-zoster virus antibody.

Three commercially available diagnostic assays for the detection of antibodies to varicella-zoster virus were evaluated to determine which would be the most suitable for our clinical laboratory. Three different methods were examined: an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), latex agglutination (LA), and an indirect fluorescent-antibody technique. For the 141 serum specimens tested, the ELISA had an agreement of 90.1% and LA had an agreement of 92.2% with the indirect immunofluorescent-antibody technique. The ELISA had a lower sensitivity (85.6%) than LA (100.0%), but suffered from a low specificity (78.4%) compared with the ELISA (98.0%).

Aged↗