PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

T E Davidson

Publications and source records attributed to T E Davidson.

3 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1996

In vivo three-dimensional sonographic measurement of organ volume: validation in the urinary bladder.

The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of in vivo measurement of organ volume using 3DUS and compare the results to 2D sonographic methods using the urinary bladder as the target organ and voided urine volume for validation. Fifty normal volunteers were studied. 2D volume measurements were based on length, width, and depth data and assumed a regular geometric model. 3D volume measurements were based on masked slices with the voxels integrated over the entire bladder. Voided urine volumes ranged from 35 ml to 701 ml. Residual urine volume was present in 48% of the subjects and ranged from 1% to 14% of the voided volume. 2D volume estimates for all 50 subjects had a mean absolute value of the error of 27.5% +/- 17.8%. 3D volume measurements had a mean absolute value of the error of 4.3% +/- 3.7% (transverse) and 5.6% +/- 3.8% (longitudinal). 3DUS provided more accurate volume measurements than 2DUS, particularly for irregularly shaped organs.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1995

Distance and volume measurement using three-dimensional ultrasonography.

The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of distance and volume measurements obtained by three-dimensional ultrasonography. A tissue-mimicking phantom was scanned using a prototype three-dimensional sonographic imaging system to verify distance measurements. Measurements were taken from the reconstructed three-dimensional sonographic data and compared to the real distances. Volume measurements were obtained by scanning 30 balloons of various shapes, sized 23 ml to 2400 ml. Each balloon was scanned twice in two orientations; three different masks were accomplished for each volume. Each volume measurement of 180 three-dimensional sonographic measurements was compared to conventional two-dimensional ultrasonographic volume estimates and to the actual, measured balloon size. Distance measurements had a mean error of 0.02 +/- 3.65% (range, -4.27 to 7.18%). Two-dimensional sonographic volume estimates using traditional scanner based methods had a mean error of 13.7 +/- 10.1%. Three-dimensional sonographic volume measurements had a mean error of 2.2 +/- 2.9% for regular and irregular objects over the entire range of volumes. The masking required 10 to 30 min. The field of view varied from 10 to 24 cm with a mean object depth of 9.8 cm. Three-dimensional ultrasonographic methods can provide accurate volume measurements of regular and irregular objects and offer improved accuracy compared to traditional two-dimensional methods.

Equipment Design↗