PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

T E Stewart

Publications and source records attributed to T E Stewart.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

Practising evidence-based medicine: the design and implementation of a multidisciplinary team-driven extubation protocol.

BACKGROUND: Evidence from recent literature shows that protocol-directed extubation is a useful approach to liberate patients from mechanical ventilation (MV). However, research evidence does not necessarily provide guidance on how to implement changes in individual intensive care units (ICUs). We conducted the present study to determine whether such an evidence-based strategy can be implemented safely and effectively using a multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach. METHOD: We designed a MDT-driven extubation protocol. Multiple meetings were held to encourage constructive criticism of the design by attending physicians, nurses and respiratory care practitioners (RCPs), in order to define a protocol that was evidence based and acceptable to all clinical staff involved in the process of extubation. It was subsequently implemented and evaluated in our medical/ surgical ICU. Outcomes included response of the MDT to the initiative, duration of MV and stay in the ICU, as well as reintubation rate. RESULTS: The MDT responded favourably to the design and implementation of this MDT-driven extubation protocol, because it provided greater autonomy to the staff. Outcomes reported in the literature and in the historical control group were compared with those in the protocol group, and indicated similar durations of MV and ICU stay, as well as reintubation rates. No adverse events were documented. CONCLUSION: An MDT approach to protocol-directed extubation can be implemented safely and effectively in a multidisciplinary ICU. Such an effort is viewed favourably by the entire team and is useful in enhancing team building.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Handheld computers in critical care.

BACKGROUND: Computing technology has the potential to improve health care management but is often underutilized. Handheld computers are versatile and relatively inexpensive, bringing the benefits of computers to the bedside. We evaluated the role of this technology for managing patient data and accessing medical reference information, in an academic intensive-care unit (ICU). METHODS: Palm III series handheld devices were given to the ICU team, each installed with medical reference information, schedules, and contact numbers. Users underwent a 1-hour training session introducing the hardware and software. Various patient data management applications were assessed during the study period. Qualitative assessment of the benefits, drawbacks, and suggestions was performed by an independent company, using focus groups. An objective comparison between a paper and electronic handheld textbook was achieved using clinical scenario tests. RESULTS: During the 6-month study period, the 20 physicians and 6 paramedical staff who used the handheld devices found them convenient and functional but suggested more comprehensive training and improved search facilities. Comparison of the handheld computer with the conventional paper text revealed equivalence. Access to computerized patient information improved communication, particularly with regard to long-stay patients, but changes to the software and the process were suggested. CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of this technology was well received despite differences in users' familiarity with the devices. Handheld computers have potential in the ICU, but systems need to be developed specifically for the critical-care environment.

Artificial Intelligence↗
PubMed2001

The use of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in adults with acute lung injury.

The use of HFOV in adults is still in its infancy. There is, however, much promise to support further study of this ventilatory modality. Rescue case series have shown that HFOV is effective in improving gas exchange and appears safe in this group of extremely ill patients. In addition, as evidence continues to mount regarding the importance of VILI and its mechanisms, HFOV provides a theoretically attractive alternative to conventional lung-protective ventilatory modes. When HFOV is used in adults, it should be in conjunction with an effort to recruit atelectatic lung units by employing higher mean airway pressures and weaning FIO2 before P(AW). HFOV could be used as one of a number of new therapies for the patient failing to oxygenate on CMV. Its routine use to prevent VILI cannot be recommended at this time, as no data are available. Further clinical studies potentially leading to a large randomized controlled trial of HFOV versus best conventional therapy appear worth pursuing.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Prospective trial of high-frequency oscillation in adults with acute respiratory distress syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) in adult patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and oxygenation failure. DESIGN: Prospective, clinical study. SETTING: Intensive care and burn units of two university teaching hospitals. PATIENTS: Twenty-four adults (10 females, 14 males, aged 48.5 +/- 15.2 yrs, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score 21.5 +/- 6.9) with ARDS (lung injury score 3.4 +/- 0.6, Pao2/Fio2 98.8 +/- 39.0 mm Hg, and oxygenation index 32.5 +/- 19.6) who met one of the following criteria: Pao2 < or =65 mm Hg with Fio2 > or =0.6, or plateau pressure > or =35 cm H2O. INTERVENTIONS: HFOV was initiated in patients with ARDS after varying periods of conventional ventilation (CV). Mean airway pressure (Paw) was initially set 5 cm H2O greater than Paw during CV, and was subsequently titrated to maintain oxygen saturation between 88% and 93% and Fio2 < or =0.60. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Fio2, Paw, pressure amplitude of oscillation, frequency, blood pressure, heart rate, and arterial blood gases were monitored during the transition from CV to HFOV, and every 8 hrs thereafter for 72 hrs. In 16 patients who had pulmonary artery catheters in place, cardiac hemodynamics were recorded at the same time intervals. Throughout the HFOV trial, Paw was significantly higher than that applied during CV. Within 8 hrs of HFOV application, and for the duration of the trial, Fio2 and Paco2 were lower, and Pao2/Fio2 was higher than baseline values during CV. Significant changes in hemodynamic variables following HFOV initiation included an increase in pulmonary artery occlusion pressure (at 8 and 40 hrs) and central venous pressure (at 16 and 40 hrs), and a reduction in cardiac output throughout the course of the study. There were no significant changes in systemic or pulmonary pressure associated with initiation and maintenance of HFOV. Complications occurring during HFOV included pneumothorax in two patients and desiccation of secretions in one patient. Survival at 30 days was 33%, with survivors having been mechanically ventilated for fewer days before institution of HFOV compared with nonsurvivors (1.6 +/- 1.2 vs. 7.8 +/- 5.8 days; p =.001). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that HFOV has beneficial effects on oxygenation and ventilation, and may be a safe and effective rescue therapy for patients with severe oxygenation failure. In addition, early institution of HFOV may be advantageous.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Agreement between alternative classifications of acute respiratory distress syndrome.

To examine the agreement between two classifications of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) that are used interchangeably in clinical practice and clinical research, we classified 118 patients taking part in a randomized trial with respect to the presence of ARDS using the North American-European Consensus Committee (NAECC) and the Lung Injury Severity Score (LISS) criteria. The incidence of ARDS using NAECC criteria was 55.1% (95% confidence interval, 46.1% to 64.1%), and using the LISS criteria 61.9% (95% confidence interval, 53.1% to 70.6%). The p value on the difference between these proportions was 0.07. Raw agreement, chance-corrected agreement (kappa), and chance-independent agreement (phi) on the study occurrence of ARDS using the two classifications were, respectively, 0.73 (95% CI, 0.65 to 0.81), 0.46 (95% CI, 0.32 to 0.61), and 0.63 (95% CI, 0.41 to 0.79). No single component of either index contributed to disagreement to an appreciably greater extent than other components. Baseline characteristics and outcomes were similar among patients who developed ARDS according to either classification. We conclude that NAECC and LISS classifications resulted in similar estimates of the incidence of ARDS in this clinical trial, though patients were frequently classified as having ARDS with only one model. These discordant classifications had no prognostic importance.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Interobserver variation in interpreting chest radiographs for the diagnosis of acute respiratory distress syndrome.

To measure the reliability of chest radiographic diagnosis of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) we conducted an observer agreement study in which two of eight intensivists and a radiologist, blinded to one another's interpretation, reviewed 778 radiographs from 99 critically ill patients. One intensivist and a radiologist participated in pilot training. Raters made a global rating of the presence of ARDS on the basis of diffuse bilateral infiltrates. We assessed interobserver agreement in a pairwise fashion. For rater pairings in which one rater had not participated in the consensus process we found moderate levels of raw (0.68 to 0.80), chance-corrected (kappa 0.38 to 0.55), and chance-independent (Phi 0. 53 to 0.75) agreement. The pair of raters who participated in consensus training achieved excellent to almost perfect raw (0.88 to 0.94), chance-corrected (kappa 0.72 to 0.88), and chance-independent (Phi 0.74 to 0.89) agreement. We conclude that intensivists without formal consensus training can achieve moderate levels of agreement. Consensus training is necessary to achieve the substantial or almost perfect levels of agreement optimal for the conduct of clinical trials.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Sleep in critically ill patients requiring mechanical ventilation.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To objectively measure sleep in critically ill patients requiring mechanical ventilation and to define selection criteria for future studies of sleep continuity in this population. DESIGN: Prospective cohort analysis. SETTING: University teaching hospital medical-surgical ICU. PATIENTS: Twenty critically ill (APACHE II [acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II] acute physiology score [APS], 10 +/- 5), mechanically ventilated adults (male 12, female 8, age 62 +/- 15 years) with mild to moderate acute lung injury (lung injury score, 1.8 +/- 0.9) 10 +/- 7 days after admission to the ICU. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Patients were divided into three groups based on 24-h polysomnography (PSG) findings. No patient demonstrated normal sleep. In the "disrupted sleep" group (n = 8), electrophysiologic sleep was identified and was distributed throughout the day (6:00 AM to 10:00 PM; 4.0 +/- 2.9 h) and night (10:00 PM to 6:00 AM; 3.0 +/- 1.9 h) with equivalent proportions of non-rapid eye movement (NREM) and rapid eye movement (REM) sleep. Nocturnal sleep efficiency was severely reduced (38 +/- 24%) with an increased proportion of stage 1 NREM sleep (40 +/- 28% total sleep time [TST]) and a reduced proportion of REM sleep (10 +/- 14% TST). Severe sleep fragmentation was reflected by a high frequency of arousals (20 +/- 17/h) and awakenings (22 +/- 25/h). Electrophysiologic sleep was not identifiable in the PSG recordings of the remaining patients. These were classified either as "atypical sleep" (n = 5), characterized by transitions from stage 1 NREM to slow wave sleep with a virtual absence of stage 2 NREM and reduced stage REM sleep, or "coma" (n = 7), characterized by > 50% delta or theta EEG activity with (n = 5) and without (n = 2) evidence of EEG activation either spontaneously or in response to deep painful stimuli. The combined atypical sleep and coma groups had a higher APS (13 +/- 4 vs 6 +/- 4) and higher doses of sedative medications than the disrupted sleep group. CONCLUSION: Sleep, as it is conventionally measured, was identified only in a subgroup of critically ill patients requiring mechanical ventilation and was severely disrupted. We have proposed specific criteria to select patients for future studies to evaluate potential causes of sleep disruption in this population.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Inhaled nitric oxide does not alter pulmonary or cardiac effects of fat embolism in dogs after cemented arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: We examined the effect of inhaled nitric oxide (NO) on the acute pulmonary hypertension and right ventricular (RV) dilation after fat embolism. METHODS: A bilateral cemented arthroplasty (BCA), created fat embolism in 20 dogs. In Part A, 12 dogs were randomized to an NO group (n=6, inhaled NO 40 ppm before BCA and throughout the study) or a control group (n=6). In Part B, a third group of dogs (n=8) were given NO 20-40 ppm 2-3 min after BCA when pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) increased. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and invasive hemodynamic monitoring evaluated the hemodynamic response to BCA. Postmortem, quantitative morphometry was used to estimate the number of fat emboli and diameter of lung vessel occluded by fat. RESULTS: Part A: The increase in PAP in the NO group (16 +/- 1 to 34 +/- 9 mmHg) within three minutes of BCA was not different from that in the control group (14 +/- 4 to 35 +/- 9 mmHg). Within three minutes of BCA, TEE demonstrated RV dilation in all groups (P < 0.05) but there was no difference in the change in RV area in the NO and control groups. When NO was given after BCA, no difference in PAP or RV dilation was noted from that in the control group. There were no differences, at post mortem, between the groups in the diameter of lung vessel occluded by fat CONCLUSION: Whether given before the embolic insult or two to three minutes after the onset of pulmonary hypertension, inhaled NO did not attenuate the acute pulmonary hypertension or RV dilation after cemented arthroplasty.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed1999

ARDS in patients with thermal injury.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the time to onset of the adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in patients with thermal injury requiring mechanical ventilation. Secondarily, to consider the burn-related risk factors, demographics, incidence, and mortality for ARDS in this population. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review; ARDS defined according to the American-European Consensus Conference and the Lung Injury Severity Score definitions. SETTING: Regional, tertiary referral, adult burn unit in a university teaching hospital. PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS: Patients with thermal injury requiring mechanical ventilation, admitted between 1 January 1991 and 28 February 1995. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Of 469 consecutive admissions, 126 (26.9%) received intubation and mechanical ventilation. ARDS was defined according to the American-European Consensus and Lung Injury Severity Score (score > 2.5) definitions. The mean time to onset of ARDS from admission to the burn unit was 6.9 +/- 5.2 and 8.2 +/- 10.7 days when defined by the American-European Consensus and Lung Injury Severity Score definitions respectively (p = 0.41). Of the intubated patients, 53.6 and 45.2% developed ARDS according to the American-European Consensus and Lung Injury Severity Score definitions, respectively (p = 0.19). Using multivariate logistic analysis, only age proved to be an independent risk factor for the development of ARDS (p = 0.03), although there was a trend toward an increased incidence of inhalation injury in patients with ARDS. Mortality was not significantly greater (41.8 vs 32.2%) in those with ARDS compared to those without (p = 0.27). CONCLUSIONS: According to the American-European Consensus Conference and the Lung Injury Severity Score definitions, ARDS is common in the adult burn population and has a delayed onset compared to most critical care populations. We found age to be a major predisposing factor for ARDS.

APACHE↗
PubMed1999

Long-term follow-up of survivors of acute lung injury: lack of effect of a ventilation strategy to prevent barotrauma.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the effect of a ventilation strategy to prevent barotrauma on long-term outcome in survivors of acute lung injury. DESIGN: Prospective blinded cohort analysis. SETTING: Three university-affiliated medical-surgical intensive care units. PATIENTS: A total of 28 survivors of acute lung injury, 1-2 yrs after diagnosis, from a multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial comparing pressure (peak inflation pressure < or =30 cm H2O) and volume (tidal volume < or =8 mL/kg) limited ventilation to a conventional (peak inflation pressure < or =50 cm H2O, tidal volume 10-15 mL/kg) ventilation strategy. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Physicians blinded as to treatment group evaluated 20 of 28 survivors (treatment group, 7; control group, 13). Exercise tolerance in the 6-minute walk test was comparable to patients with chronic respiratory disease and equivalent between groups (treatment group, 373+/-171 m vs. control group, 375+/-129 m; p = .84). Pulmonary function testing showed reduced diffusing capacity (treatment group, 64+/-29% predicted vs. control group, 74+/-14% predicted; p = .68) and normal volumes, flows, and blood gases. Two domains of disease-specific Health Related Quality of Life assessed by the Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire were worse for patients in the treatment group compared with the control group (Emotional Function 3.8+/-1.4 vs. 5.1+/-0.08; p = .05, Mastery 4.7+/-1.7 vs. 6.2+/-0.8; p = .03). There were no between-group differences in the scores of the Spitzer Quality of Life Index (a generic Health Related Quality of Life instrument), although they were reduced (7.5+/-1.9) and comparable to patients with chronic disease. CONCLUSIONS: We found that 1-2 yrs after the onset of their illness, survivors of acute lung injury have reductions in quality of life and exercise tolerance which are similar to patients with chronic diseases. We were unable to show that a limited ventilation strategy improves either long-term pulmonary function or quality of life in survivors of acute lung injury.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1998

Evaluation of a ventilation strategy to prevent barotrauma in patients at high risk for acute respiratory distress syndrome. Pressure- and Volume-Limited Ventilation Strategy Group.

BACKGROUND: A strategy of mechanical ventilation that limits airway pressure and tidal volume while permitting hypercapnia has been recommended for patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome. The goal is to reduce lung injury due to overdistention. However, the efficacy of this approach has not been established. METHODS: Within 24 hours of intubation, patients at high risk for the acute respiratory distress syndrome were randomly assigned to either pressure- and volume-limited ventilation (limited-ventilation group), with the peak inspiratory pressure maintained at 30 cm of water or less and the tidal volume at 8 ml per kilogram of body weight or less, or to conventional ventilation (control group), with the peak inspiratory pressure allowed to rise as high as 50 cm of water and the tidal volume at 10 to 15 ml per kilogram. All other ventilatory variables were similar in the two groups. RESULTS: A total of 120 patients with similar clinical features underwent randomization (60 in each group). The patients in the limited-ventilation and control groups were exposed to different mean (+/-SD) tidal volumes (7.2+/-0.8 vs. 10.8+/-1.0 ml per kilogram, respectively; P<0.001) and peak inspiratory pressures (23.6+/-5.8 vs. 34.0+/-11.0 cm of water, P<0.001). Mortality was 50 percent in the limited-ventilation group and 47 percent in the control group (relative risk, 1.07; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.72 to 1.57; P=0.72). In the limited-ventilation group, permissive hypercapnia (arterial carbon dioxide tension, >50 mm Hg) was more common (52 percent vs. 28 percent, P=0.009), more marked (54.4+/-18.8 vs. 45.7+/-9.8 mm Hg, P=0.002), and more prolonged (146+/-265 vs. 25+/-22 hours, P=0.017) than in the control group. The incidence of barotrauma, the highest multiple-organ-dysfunction score, and the number of episodes of organ failure were similar in the two groups; however, the numbers of patients who required paralytic agents (23 vs. 13, P=0.05) and dialysis for renal failure (13 vs. 5, P= 0.04) were greater in the limited-ventilation group than in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: In patients at high risk for the acute respiratory distress syndrome, a strategy of mechanical ventilation that limits peak inspiratory pressure and tidal volume does not appear to reduce mortality and may increase morbidity.

Barotrauma↗
PubMed1998

Inhibition of exhaled nitric oxide production during sepsis does not prevent lung inflammation.

OBJECTIVES: Increases in exhaled nitric oxide have been demonstrated to originate from the lungs of rats after septic lung injury. The aim of this study was to investigate whether treatment with the nitric oxide synthase inhibitor N-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) would prevent lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced increases in exhaled nitric oxide and whether this would have an effect on septic lung inflammation. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled animal laboratory investigation. SETTING: University laboratory. SUBJECTS: Male, anesthetized, paralyzed, and mechanically ventilated Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 27). INTERVENTIONS: Rats were mechanically ventilated with air filtered to remove nitric oxide (expiratory rate 40 breaths/min, tidal volume 3 mL, positive end-expiratory pressure 0, FIO2 0.21). They were then randomized to receive intravenous injections of either L-NAME (25 mg/kg/hr x 4 hrs) (n = 11) or saline (n = 10). Both groups were again randomized to receive either LPS (Salmonella typhosa: 20 mg/kg i.v. x 1 dose) or an equal volume of saline 5 mins later. Thereafter, exhaled gas was collected in polyethylene bags for measurements of nitric oxide concentration. After 4 hrs, the rats were killed and the lungs were preserved and examined histologically. To examine the effect of L-NAME and LPS on mean arterial blood pressure, six additional rats underwent the same ventilation protocol with cannulation of the right internal carotid artery so that systemic arterial pressures could be measured. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Exhaled gas was collected and measurements of NO concentrations were made using chemiluminescence every 20 mins for 240 mins during ventilation. A total lung injury score was calculated by determining the extent of cellular infiltrate, exudate and hemorrhage. Mean arterial pressure was recorded every 5 mins for 20 mins and then at 20-min periods for 120 mins. Exhaled nitric oxide concentrations increased in all the LPS-treated rats that did not receive L-NAME by 120 mins; a plateau was reached by 190 mins that was approximately 4 times greater than control rats not treated with LPS (p < .001). In contrast, rats treated with L-NAME and LPS did not show an increase in exhaled NO. Administration of L-NAME induced a 10-min nonsustained increase in mean arterial pressure in two rats treated with L-NAME followed by LPS. This increase in mean arterial pressure was not seen in two placebo and two LPS-treated rats that did not receive L-NAME. Lung inflammation was significantly worse in the two groups of rats which received LPS compared with the two that did not. L-NAME did not cause lung inflammation in rats that did not receive LPS; however, LPS-treated rats that received L-NAME had more inflammatory interstitial infiltrate (p < .05) and a trend toward worse lung injury than did LPS-treated rats that did not receive L-NAME. CONCLUSION: We conclude that L-NAME can inhibit the increase in exhaled NO from the lungs of septic rats, but that this inhibition does not reduce lung inflammation, and may worsen it.

Analysis of Variance↗