PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

T Eubanks

Publications and source records attributed to T Eubanks.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Failed antireflux surgery: what have we learned from reoperations?

HYPOTHESIS: Factors that lead to failures in antireflux procedures can be identified, and dealing with them at the initial operation may decrease the number of such failures. DESIGN: Analysis of symptoms, 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring, manometry, upper gastrointestinal tract radiographs, and correlation with operative anatomic findings. SETTING: University referral center. PATIENTS: Forty-eight patients who previously underwent antireflux surgery (Nissen fundoplication, 29; Hill fundoplication, 7; Angelchik prosthesis, 1; multiple, 5; unknown, 6) and had symptoms of foregut disease. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Determination of the cause of failure of previous operations and identification of factors that may prevent recurrence. RESULTS: Fourteen patients (29%) presented with symptoms of an incompetent cardia (heartburn and regurgitation), 15 patients (31%) presented with symptoms of defective esophageal emptying (dysphagia), 13 (27%) had symptoms of both, and 6 (13%) had other symptoms. All patients were initially treated medically and/or with dilation. A reoperation was performed in 31 patients (65%) whose symptoms persisted. Reoperation was completed laparoscopically in 28 patients (90%). At reoperation we identified 3 main types of failure: type 1, patients in whom the gastroesophageal junction was herniated through the hiatus, either with the wrap (IA) or without it (IB). There were 13 patients (43%) classified as having type IA, and 5 patients (16%) classified as having type IB. Type II failure involved a paraesophageal component resulting from a redundant wrap in 5 patients (16%), and type III involved a malformation (defective position or construction) of the wrap in 2 patients (6%). The remainder had a failed Hill fundoplication (3 patients), a herniated Angelchik prosthesis (1 patient), and normal postoperative anatomy (2 patients). CONCLUSIONS: Failure of the crural closure and malformation of the wrap are the main reasons for failure of antireflux procedures. Use of proper surgical techniques including meticulous closure of the crura and appropriate construction and fixation of the wrap at the first operation will help prevent recurrence.

Female↗

Does botulinum toxin injection make esophagomyotomy a more difficult operation?

BACKGROUND: Some patients with achalasia treated by botulinum toxin injection still require an esophagomyotomy. In this study, we analyzed the impact of botulinum toxin injection on the technical aspects and outcome of esophagomyotomy. METHODS: We studied 57 patients, with a mean age of 46 years (range, 12-97) who were treated between January 1995 and March 1998 by esophagomyotomy performed via minimally invasive techniques by one team. Operative reports, videotapes, and clinical outcome were analyzed to define the technical difficulties, perforations, and outcome. RESULTS: Fifteen of the 57 patients had received one or more injections of botulinum toxin (botox group) preoperatively. Difficulties in dissection of the submucosal plane were encountered in eight of the 15 cases (53.3%), and a mucosal laceration (perforation) occurred in two cases (13.3%). Forty-two of the 57 patients had not received any injections (non-botox group). In three patients (7%), difficulties in identifying or following the submucosal plane were encountered, although 29 patients had one or more previous dilations, and perforation occurred in one case (2.4%). All mucosal injuries were repaired laparoscopically, and the patients recovered without obvious sequelae. Dysphagia improved significantly after the operation in both groups (botox group, from preoperative score of 3. 8 to a postoperative score of 0.7; non-botox, from a score of 3.4 preoperatively to 0.5 postoperatively). Regurgitation also improved in both groups (botox, 2.7 preoperatively, 0.92 postoperatively; non-botox group, 2.0 preoperatively, 0.56 postoperatively). CONCLUSIONS: Injection of botulinum toxin significantly increases the technical difficulties and thus the potential risk of esophagomyotomy. The immediate results were equally good for both groups in our series, but the long-term sequelae of repeated injections are unknown. Laparoscopic Heller myotomy is a safe and effective procedure even after unsuccessful treatment with botulinum toxin.

Anti-Dyskinesia Agents↗