PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

T F Tomb

Publications and source records attributed to T F Tomb.

12 recordsLinked to original sources

Comparison of mass concentrations determined with personal respirable coal mine dust samplers operating at 1.2 liters per minute and the Casella 113A gravimetric sampler (MRE).

Measuring respirable dust concentrations in coal mine environments is currently done using approved personal respirable dust sampling equipment operating at a flow rate of 2.0 liters per minute (Lpm). Measurements made with approved coal mine dust sampling equipment are converted to equivalent concentrations that would be obtained with a Mining Research Establishment (MRE) instrument known as the Casella 113A gravimetric sampler, using a conversion factor of 1.38. NIOSH has recently recommended that coal mine dust samplers (CMDS) used to measure respirable dust levels in mine environments be operated at 1.2 Lpm and measured concentrations be multiplied by 0.91 to obtain an equivalent MRE concentration. The purpose of this recommendation is to reduce systematic error caused by the variation in mine dust distributions. This paper presents and discusses data collected in the laboratory and in underground coal mines to evaluate the recommended 1.2 Lpm flow rate and 0.91 conversion factor. Comparative measurements were obtained in the laboratory with the CMDS operating at 2.0 and 1.2 liters per minute and the MRE, using aerosols of coal and limestone dust of varying particle size distribution. Similar comparative measurements were made in a number of underground coal mines at locations with environments having particle size distributions representative of different underground mining operations. It was concluded from this study that there is no significant change in the variability associated with the constant factor used to convert respirable dust measurements, obtained with approved respirable CMDS, to equivalent MRE measurements when the flow rate of the CMDS is reduced from 2.0 to 1.2 Lpm.

Coal↗

Comparison of respirable coal mine dust concentrations measured with an MRE and a newly-developed, two-stage impactor sampler.

The design and laboratory evaluation of a two-stage aerosol sampler using an impaction plate for removing particles above 10 micron, has been reported. The unit was developed to provide an alternative to the two-stage sampling head used on approved coal mine personal respirable dust samplers. The new device offers the potential of increasing the analytical accuracy of samples, and of providing a device more suitable to the mining community for use in their mandated dust sampling program. This paper describes the underground sampling program conducted to establish the factor for converting respirable dust concentrations measured with this device to equivalent concentrations measured with an Isleworth 113A gravimetric dust sampler (MRE). This study demonstrated that the use of the impactor sampling head provides a viable alternative to the currently used sampling head. The results showed that comparative measurements could be linearly related for MRE dust measurements ranging from 0.5 to 5.5 mg/m3. The factor determined for converting measurements made with the new head to equivalent MRE measurements was approximately 0.5.

Coal↗

Comparison of recommended respirable mass dust sampling devices.

The draft, "Revised Guide for Respirable Mass Sampling," prepared by the AIHA-ACGIH Aerosol Hazards Committee, recommends five respirable mass sampling devices that sample in accordance with the "Los Alamos" respirable dust criterion. The spectrum of recommended sampling rates for these devices ranges from 1.8 to 430. liters per minute. A study was conducted to determine if simultaneous measurements with these devices yielded comparable respirable mass concentrations. The penetration characteristics of the first stage separators were also evaluated and compared.

Air Pollutants↗

Effect of altitude on personal respirable dust sampler calibration.

Air sampling instruments often are used at altitudes other than the altitude at which they were calibrated. This investigation quantitates the effect of personal samplers and provides empirical relationships for adjusting the calibration mark for use at any altitude.

Altitude↗

A new two-stage respirable dust sampler.

The design and laboratory evaluation of a new two-stage aerosol sampler is described. The first stage of the sampler employs an integral flat plat impactor to remove particles greater than 10 micrometers; particles that penetrate the impactor are collected on a 37 mm membrane filter with 5-micrometer pore size. The theoretical design parameters and experimental calibration data developed for the impactor sampling heads at flowrates of 2.0 and 3.0 liter per minute are presented, and their collection characteristics compared to those of present two-stage respirable dust samplers. The advantages and disadvantages of the two-stage impactor sampler are discussed.

Aerosols↗