PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

T Griffin

Publications and source records attributed to T Griffin.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Peripheral blood mononuclear and tumor cell pharmacodynamics of the novel epothilone B analogue, ixabepilone.

BACKGROUND: We previously demonstrated that peak microtubule bundle formation (MBF) in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) occurs at the end of drug infusion and correlates with drug pharmacokinetics (PK). In the current study, a new expanded evaluation of drug target effect was undertaken. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced solid malignancies were treated with ixabepilone 40 mg/m2 administered as a 1-h i.v. infusion every 3 weeks. Blood, plasma, and tumor tissue sampling was carried out to characterize pharmacodynamics and PK. RESULTS: Forty-seven patients were treated with 141 cycles of ixabepilone. In both PBMCs (n=27) and tumor cells (n=9), peak MBF occurred at the end of infusion; however, at 24-72 h after drug infusion, the number of cells with MBF was significantly greater in tumor cells, relative to PBMCs. A Hill model (EC50=109.65 ng/ml; r2=0.94) was fitted, which demonstrated a relationship between percentage of PBMCs with MBF and plasma ixabepilone concentration. The percentage of PBMCs with MBF at the end of infusion also correlated with severity of neutropenia (P=0.050). CONCLUSIONS: Plasma ixabepilone concentration and severity of neutropenia correlate with the level of MBF in PBMCs. Therefore, this technically straightforward assay should be considered as a complement to the clinical development of novel microtubule-binding agents.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

A phase I and pharmacologic study of capecitabine and paclitaxel in breast cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Based on preclinical studies demonstrating that treatment with paclitaxel upregulates intratumoral thymidine phosphorylase (dTHdPase), which catalyzes the final step in the conversion of the oral fluoropyrimidine capecitabine to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), as well as the overlapping spectra of activity for these agents, particularly in metastatic breast cancer, this phase I study evaluated the feasibility of administering capecitabine on an intermittent schedule in combination with paclitaxel in previously-treated patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer. The study also sought to recommend doses for subsequent disease-specific studies, identify clinically significant pharmacokinetic interactions, and detect preliminary antitumor activity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Nineteen previously treated women with metastatic breast cancer whose prior treatment included neither paclitaxel or capecitabine received one hundred one courses of capecitabine and paclitaxel. Paclitaxel was administered as a three-hour intravenous (i.v.) infusion at a fixed dose of 175 mg/m2 and capecitabine was administered as 2 divided daily doses for 14 days followed by a seven-day rest period every 3 weeks. The dose of capecitabine was increased from a starting dose of 1650 mg/m2/d. The plasma sampling scheme in the first course permitted characterization of the pharmacokinetics of each agent given alone and concurrently to detect major pharmacokinetic interactions. RESULTS: Palmar plantar erythrodysesthesia (hand foot syndrome) and neutropenia were the principal dose-limiting toxicities (DLT). Other toxicities included diarrhea and transient hyperbilirubinemia. Three of eight new patients treated with capecitabine 2000 mg/m2/d and paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 experienced DLT in the first course, whereas none of eleven new patients treated with capecitabine 1650 mg/m2/d and paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 developed DLT. Pharmacokinetic studies indicated that capecitabine did not grossly affect the pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel, and there were no major effects of paclitaxel on the pharmacokinetics of capecitabine and capecitabine metabolites. However, AUC values for the major 5-FU catabolite, fluorobeta-alanine (FBAL), were significantly lower in the presence of paclitaxel. Two complete and seven partial responses (56% response rate) were observed in sixteen patients with measurable disease; four of six patients whose disease was previously treated with high-dose chemotherapy and hematopoietic stem-cell support had major responses. Seven of nineteen patients had stable disease as their best response. CONCLUSIONS: Recommended combination doses of capecitabine on an intermittent schedule and paclitaxel are capecitabine 1650 mg/m2/d orally for 14 days and paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 i.v. every 3 weeks. The favorable preclinical interactions between capecitabine and paclitaxel, as well as the acceptable toxicity profile and antitumor activity in patients with metastatic breast cancer, support further clinical evaluations to determine an optimal role for the combination of capecitabine and paclitaxel in breast cancer and other relevant malignancies.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2001

Between joy and sorrow: being a parent of a child with developmental disability.

AIM: This study explored the experiences of parents who have children with significant developmental disability. BACKGROUND: Prevailing societal and professional assumptions of parental crisis and maladjustment in response to the 'tragedy' of having a disabled child did not accord with the authors' practice experience. Whilst parents confronted numerous difficulties, most of them appeared to manage with optimism and remarkable resourcefulness. RESEARCH DESIGN: The study, using an interpretive methodology informed by phenomenology, intensively explored the experiences of six parents of children with significant developmental disability. FINDINGS: Although they experienced much anguish and sorrow, the parents also spoke of hope, love, strength and joy. Interpretation of the parents' experiences revealed the themes of 'joy and sorrow', 'hope and no hope' and 'defiance and despair', mediated by 'the tensions'. CONCLUSIONS: This phenomenological interpretation provides insight and understanding into the parents' experiences and has implications for practice, education and research in nursing.

Adaptation, Psychological↗
PubMed2001

Comparison of outcome predictions made by physicians, by nurses, and by using the Mortality Prediction Model.

BACKGROUND: Critical care nurses must collaborate with physicians, patients, and patients' families when making decisions about aggressiveness of care. However, few studies address nurses' ability to predict outcomes. OBJECTIVES: To compare predictions of survival outcomes made by nurses, by physicians, and by using the Mortality Prediction Model. METHODS: Predictions of survival and function and attitudes toward aggressiveness of care based on the predictions were recorded on questionnaires in the emergency department by emergency and intensive care unit physicians and by intensive care unit nurses at the time of admission to the unit between February and September 1995 for 235 consecutive adult nontrauma patients. Scores on the Mortality Prediction Model were calculated on admission. Data on 85 of the 235 patients were analyzed by using descriptive, chi 2, and correlational statistics. Nurses' predictions of function were compared with patients' actual outcomes 6 months after admission. RESULTS: Nurses' predictions of survival were comparable to those of emergency physicians and superior to those obtained by using the objective tool. Years of nursing experience had no relationship to attitudes toward aggressiveness of care. Nurses accurately predicted functional outcomes in 52% of the followed-up cases. Intensive care physicians were more accurate than nurses and emergency physicians in predicting survival. All predictions made by clinicians were superior to those obtained by using the model. CONCLUSIONS: Nurses can predict survival outcomes as accurately as physicians do. Greater sensitivity and specificity are necessary before clinical judgment or predictive tools can be considered as screens for determining aggressiveness of care.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

[A comparative randomized phase-II study of Xeloda (capecitabine) and paclitaxel in patients with breast cancer progressing after anthracycline antibiotics].

A randomized study of the effectiveness of treatment with capecitabine (Xeloda) (22) and paclitaxel (taxol) (19) was carried out in breast cancer patients resistant to anthracycline antibiotic drugs. Capecitabine and paclitaxel showed comparable effectiveness, although the former appeared less toxic, particularly, in hematologic complication situations. Therefore, it may be administered to out-patients who previously received several courses of chemotherapy.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Cerebral spinal fluid involvement by Hodgkin's disease diagnosed by CSF cytology and immunocytochemistry.

A 39-yr-old man with stage IV Hodgkin's disease (HD) involving bone marrow was being evaluated for autologous bone marrow transplantation when he developed diplopia, prompting a lumbar puncture tap for cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) examination. Cytologic examination of the CSF revealed numerous Reed-Sternberg (RS) cells in a polymorphous inflammatory background of small lymphocytes, monocytes, rare plasma cells, and eosinophils. However, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies of the brain and spinal cord failed to reveal evidence of leptomeningeal disease or intracranial masses. Repeat CSF examination again demonstrated cytologic evidence of HD. Immunocytochemical stains established that the RS cells and mononuclear Hodgkin's cells were positive for CD30 and CD20 but negative for CD15; this phenotype was identical to that of RS cells in the initial diagnostic bone marrow biopsy, confirming CSF involvement by HD. The patient was treated with intrathecal methotrexate, 15 mg, 6 days after his bone marrow transplant. After treatment, all subsequent CSF cytology specimens were negative for tumor. In this case of disseminated HD, cytologic examination allowed for early detection of CNS involvement by lymphoma prior to development of radiographically detectable lesions.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Efficacy and safety of a loading-dose regimen versus a no-loading-dose regimen of metrifonate in the symptomatic treatment of Alzheimer's disease: a randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled trial. Metrifonate Study Group.

This prospective, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study assessed the safety and efficacy of 2 dosage regimens of once-daily metrifonate in patients with probable Alzheimer's disease (AD) of mild-to-moderate severity. A total of 395 patients were randomized to receive placebo (n = 134) or metrifonate in 1 of 2 regimens. The loading-dose group (n = 133) received a daily loading dose of metrifonate 100 mg or 150 mg (by weight) for 2 weeks, followed by a daily maintenance dose of metrifonate 50 mg for 4 weeks; the no-loading-dose group (n = 128) received the daily maintenance dose of metrifonate 50 mg for 6 weeks. The primary measure of efficacy was the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog); secondary measures of efficacy included the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), the Clinician's Interview Based Impression of Change with Caregiver Input (CIBIC-Plus), the Clinician's Interview Based Impression of Severity with Caregiver Input (CIBIS-Plus), and the ADAS-Noncognitive Subscale (ADAS-Noncog). Safety was assessed by the prevalence of premature study termination and treatment-emergent adverse events, as well as by changes in vital signs, findings on electrocardiographic and neurologic examinations, and abnormalities on laboratory tests. At 4 weeks of treatment, defined by the protocol as the target efficacy determination, the mean ADAS-Cog scores of the intent-to-treat population (last observation carried forward) favored the loading-dose group versus the placebo group, but the difference was not statistically significant. However, at week 6, the difference in mean ADAS-Cog scores was statistically significant compared with placebo. At neither week 4 nor week 6 was there a statistically significant difference in the mean ADAS-Cog scores of the no-loading-dose and placebo groups. For the CIBIC-Plus, the treatment difference between the placebo and loading-dose groups significantly favored metrifonate at week 6 but not at week 4, whereas the treatment difference between the placebo and no-loading-dose groups was statistically significant at both time points. For the MMSE, CIBIS-Plus, and ADAS-Noncog, treatment differences for both groups versus placebo did not reach statistical significance at either week 4 or 6. Assessment of the frequency of adverse events in metrifonate-treated patients revealed that the no-loading-dose regimen was better tolerated than the loading-dose regimen. Given the overall similar efficacy and more favorable safety profile associated with the no-loading-dose regimen versus the loading-dose regimen observed in this study, the no-loading-dose regimen appears to be the better strategy for initiating metrifonate treatment in patients with probable AD of mild-to-moderate severity.

Acetylcholinesterase↗
PubMed1999

A phase I trial of topical topitriol (calcitriol, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3) to prevent chemotherapy-induced alopecia.

This study evaluated the toxicity and efficacy of topical topitriol (calcitriol, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3) to prevent chemotherapy-induced alopecia (CIA). Patients with breast cancer scheduled to receive FAC chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil, adriamycin and cyclophosphamide) were eligible for the study. Initially, the first six patients were randomized in a double-blind fashion to have received topitriol or placebo with all subsequent patients being treated with topitriol. Topitriol cream (0.0025 or 0.005%; 25 and 50 microg/g concentration) was administered topically twice a day. Three different doses and schedules of administration were evaluated including: 500 and 1000 microg daily for 7 days prior to chemotherapy, and 2000 microg daily for 5 days prior and 5 days post-chemotherapy. Fourteen patients were treated (12 with topitriol and two with placebo) at three different dose levels. All patients developed grade 2 alopecia between day 20 and 30 after chemotherapy, demonstrating the lack of efficacy of topical topitriol on this schedule of administration to prevent CIA. Eight patients exposed to topitriol developed a toxic maculopapular dermatitis in areas exposed to the drug. In conclusion, topical topitriol at the doses and schedules evaluated in this trial was ineffective to prevent CIA and induced a local dermatitis in areas exposed to the drug.

Administration, Topical↗
PubMed1999

Why do dental implants fail? Part II.

Dental implant failure has led to continuous innovations of various implant systems and to different interceptive treatment modalities. These concerns have also led to selection of implant designs that best suit the various types of bone. A checklist has been created to facilitate collection of data on the different factors associated with dental implant failure. The data gathered from this list are the basis of a multinational statistical analysis. This analysis will provide accurate information about the percentage of each element causing implant failure. Different causes of failure, such as host factors, surgical placement, and improper implant selection, were reviewed in Part I of this two-part series. This article discusses failure categories in terms of etiology, failure mode, failure type, failure origin, failure timing, responsible personnel, and different tissue types.

Dental Implantation, Endosseous↗
PubMed1999

Multicenter phase II study of capecitabine in paclitaxel-refractory metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Capecitabine is a novel, oral, selectively tumor-activated fluoropyrimidine carbamate. This large multicenter phase II trial tested the efficacy and safety of twice-daily oral capecitabine at 2,510 mg/m2/d given for 2 weeks followed by a 1-week rest period and repeated in 3-week cycles, in patients with paclitaxel-refractory metastatic breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were to have received at least two but not more than three prior chemotherapeutic regimens, one of which had to have contained paclitaxel given for metastatic disease. One hundred sixty-three patients were entered onto the study at 25 centers, and 162 patients received capecitabine. One hundred thirty-five patients had bidimensionally measurable disease, and 27 patients had assessable disease. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 20% (95% confidence interval, 14% to 28%). All responding patients were resistant to or had failed paclitaxel, and all had received an anthracycline. Three complete responses were seen, with complete response durations of 106, 109, and 194+ days. Median duration of response was 8.1 months, median survival time was 12.8 months, and the median time to disease progression was 93 days. The most common treatment-related adverse events were hand-foot syndrome, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, and fatigue. Diarrhea (14%) and hand-foot syndrome (10%) were the only treatment-related adverse events that occurred with grade 3 or 4 intensity in more than 10% of patients. CONCLUSION: Capecitabine is an active drug in the treatment of paclitaxel-refractory metastatic breast cancer. It has a favorable toxicity profile with the added advantage of being an oral drug administered at home.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of the oral fluoropyrimidine capecitabine in combination with paclitaxel in patients with advanced solid malignancies.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility of administering the oral fluoropyrimidine capecitabine in combination with paclitaxel, to characterize the principal toxicities of the combination, to recommend doses for subsequent disease-directed studies, and to determine whether significant pharmacokinetic interactions occur between these agents when combined. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-six courses of capecitabine and paclitaxel were administered to 17 patients in a two-stage dose-escalation study. Paclitaxel was administered as a 3-hour intravenous (IV) infusion every 3 weeks, and capecitabine was administered continuously as two divided daily doses. During stage I, capecitabine was escalated to a target dose of 1,657 mg/m(2)/d, whereas the paclitaxel dose was fixed at 135 mg/m(2). In stage II, paclitaxel was increased to a target dose of 175 mg/m(2), and the capecitabine dose was the maximum established in stage I. Pharmacokinetics were characterized for each drug when given alone and concurrently. RESULTS: Myelosuppression, predominately neutropenia, was the principal dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Other toxicities included hand-foot syndrome, diarrhea, hyperbilirubinemia, skin rash, myalgia, and arthralgia. Two patients treated with capecitabine 1,657 mg/m(2)/d and paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) developed DLTs, whereas none of six patients treated with capecitabine 1,331 mg/m(2)/d and paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) developed DLTs during course 1. Pharmacokinetic studies indicated that capecitabine and paclitaxel did not affect the pharmacokinetic behavior of each other. No major antitumor responses were noted. CONCLUSION: Recommended combination doses of continuous capecitabine and paclitaxel are capecitabine 1,331 mg/m(2)/d and paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2)/d IV every 3 weeks. Favorable preclinical mechanistic interactions between capecitabine and paclitaxel, as well as an acceptable toxicity profile without clinically relevant pharmacokinetic interactions, support the performance of disease-directed evaluations of this combination.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1999

Interferon-gamma and CXC chemokine induction by interleukin 12 in renal cell carcinoma.

Interleukin 12 (IL-12) is known to play an important role in the development of an antitumor response. Its activity has been shown to be dependent upon the intermediate production of IFN-gamma and the influx into the tumor of CD8 lymphocytes. In a murine model, tumor regression induced by IL-12 treatment correlated with IFN-gamma, IP-10, and Mig expression in the tumor bed and was abrogated by antibodies to both chemokines. Here we examined the effects of rHuIL-12 on IFN-gamma and CXC chemokine gene expression in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in an attempt to determine whether a similar series of molecular events leading to IL-12-mediated tumor regression in mice is also detectable in humans. As in the murine RENCA model, cultured RCC cells themselves could be induced by IFN-gamma to synthesize IP-10 and Mig mRNA. Explanted RCC produced IFN-gamma and IP-10 mRNA in response to IL-12 treatment, which was consistent with the finding that biopsied RCC tumors from IL-12-treated patients also variably expressed augmented levels of those molecules after therapy. Although Mig mRNA was present in the majority of biopsied tumors prior to treatment, both the Mig and IP-10 chemokines as well as IFN-gamma were induced in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells of IL-12-treated patients. Skin biopsies of IL-12-treated patients also all synthesized IP-10 mRNA. This study demonstrates that recombinant human IL-12 therapy of patients with RCC has the potential to induce the expression of gene products within the tumor bed that may contribute to the development of a successful antitumor response.

Animals↗
PubMed1999

Why do dental implants fail? Part I.

Many factors are attributed to failure of the dental implant, either directly or indirectly. The focus of this article is to define the causation of dental implant failure, as well as to present an evaluation of the implant literature regarding etiology, classification, management, and treatment of implant failures. This article will highlight the initial signs of implant failure with a view of some clinical cases in terms of classification and degrees of implant failure. Finally, a dental implant failure checklist is formulated to guide the practitioner in defining the cause of implant failure, be it infective or noninfective, and to establish percentages and frequency of occurrence. The checklist applies to all implant systems and will help to determine the factors responsible for causation and the repair procedures, whether they are at the surgical or restorative phases. The definition of implant failure is set forth in terms of ailing, failing, failed, and surviving implants, and the appropriate treatments and dispositions are outlined.

Bone Diseases↗