PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

T Gudbjartsson

Publications and source records attributed to T Gudbjartsson.

9 recordsLinked to original sources

Pulmonary sequestration--a review of 8 cases treated with lobectomy.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Pulmonary sequestration (PS) is a rare congenital malformation where non-functioning lung tissue is separated from the bronchial tree and vascularised with an aberrant artery from the systemic circulation. The aim of this report was to study all patients who were treated for PS at Lund University Hospital between 1994 and 2004, with emphasis on clinical presentation of the disease and evaluate the results of surgical treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 8 cases were identified, 7 females and one male, with a mean age of 7.3 years (range 25 days -17 years) at the time of diagnosis. RESULTS: Out of 8 patients, seven presented with respiratory symptoms and two with congestive heart failure. Five patients had other congenitial malformations; including scimitar syndrome and congenital heart disease. All the patients underwent a successful lobectomy. There were no major postoperative complications. At a medium follow-up of 77 months all of the fully treated children were doing well. CONCLUSION: Respiratory and cardiovascular symptoms are the most common symptoms related to PS. The wide range of clinical symptoms may cause diagnostic problems, especially in children and young adults with concomitant congenital heart disease. Therefore PS should be considered as a differential diagnosis in children with unexplained respiratory symptoms or with signs of congestive heart failure. In patients with PS, lobectomy seems to be a good therapeutic option.

Adolescent↗

The Fenyö-Lindberg scoring system for appendicitis increases positive predictive value in fertile women--a prospective study in 455 patients randomized to either laparoscopic or open appendectomy.

BACKGROUND: Suspected appendicitis is one of the most common indications for acute laparotomy or laparoscopy. The negative laparotomy and laparoscopy rates are high, often in the range of 15-30%, and especially high in some groups of patients such as women of child-bearing age and young patients. Different scoring systems have been introduced in order to improve diagnostic accuracy. The aim of the present study was to analyse the outcome of the Fenyö-Lindberg scoring system in a prospectively randomized multicenter trial and to analyze how well the score performed in stratified subgroups. METHODS: The variables of the Fenyö-Lindberg scoring system were collected in a prospective study comparing laparoscopic and open surgery in suspected appendicitis and with four participating centers. None of the hospitals had used the scoring system previously. Since surgeons were unfamiliar with the score, they could not use it as a diagnostic aid. When comparing the score with the clinical outcome, retrospectively, the investigators interpreting the score were blinded regarding the surgical outcome. RESULTS: Positive predictive value (PPV) of the Fenyö-Lindberg score was higher than that of the surgeon's clinical diagnosis in the patient cohort [0.90 vs 0.79 (p < 0.001)]. The score demonstrated an improvement of PPV in women [0.83 vs 0.70 (p < 0.01)]. PPV was increased in women between 15 and 50 years of age. In women aged 15-30 years and 31-50 years PPV increased from 0.69 to 0.82 and 0.68 to 0.86, respectively (p < 0.01). Both the sensitivity (0.77) and the specificity (0.69) of the score were, however, low. CONCLUSION: The Fenyö-Lindberg score is an inexpensive clinical tool that may improve the diagnostic accuracy for acute appendicitis in women of childbearing age, which is a group of patients where the diagnostic accuracy usually is low and where the arsenal of diagnostic tools such as computed tomography is limited because of radiation. The low specificity of the score in women of childbearing age must, however, be kept in mind.

Adolescent↗

Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy in overweight patients.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) has been associated with a faster recovery and less postoperative pain than the open technique. However, few data are available on the clinical outcome of LA in overweight patients. METHODS: A group of 106 patients with a body mass index (BMI) > 26.4, representing the upper quintile of 500 prospectively randomized patients, were included in the study. They were randomized to undergo either laparoscopic or open appendectomy (OA). Operating and anesthesia times, postoperative pain, complications, hospital stay, functional index (1 week postoperatively), sick leave, and time to full recovery were documented. RESULTS: In OA, the operating time for overweight patients was significantly longer than that for patients in the normal weight range (40 vs 35 min, p < 0.05). In LA, there was no difference in operating time between the normal and overweight patients. Overweight patients who underwent LA had longer operating and anesthesia times than their OA counterparts (55 vs 40 min, p < 0.001; and 125 vs 100 min, p < 0.001, respectively). Postoperative pain was significantly greater in overweight patients who underwent OA than in those treated with the laparoscopic technique. Postoperative pain was also significantly greater in overweight patients subjected to OA than in patients of normal weight after 4 weeks; the clinical significance may, however, be of less importance since the values are low (0.26 vs 0.09, p < 0.05). There were no significant differences between the two operating techniques in terms of complications. Hospital stay was longer for overweight patients than for normal-weight patients undergoing OA (3.0 vs 2.0, p < 0.01). The functional index did not differ between any group of patients. Sick leave was longer for overweight patients who underwent OA than for normal-weight patients treated with the same technique (17 vs 13 days, p < 0.01). In the laparoscopic group, however, there were no differences between the overweight and normal-weight patients. Time to full recovery was greater in overweight patients subjected to OA than in the overweight patients in the LA group (22 vs 15 days, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In this study, overweight patients who were submitted to LA had less postoperative pain and a faster postoperative recovery than overweight patients who had OA. LA also abolished some of the negative effects that overweight had on operating time, hospital stay, and sick leave with the open technique. However, anesthesia and operating times were significantly longer in LA for both overweight patients and those with a normal BMI.

Adolescent↗

Conversion from laparoscopic to open appendicectomy: a possible drawback of the laparoscopic technique?

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the reasons for, and outcome of, conversion from laparoscopic to open appendicectomy and to identify factors that may predict the need for conversion. DESIGN: Subgroup analysis from a randomised multicentre study. SETTING: One university hospital and four county hospitals, Sweden. SUBJECTS: A total of 500 patients were randomised to laparoscopic (n = 244) or open (n = 256) appendicectomy. Thirty operations (12%) were converted to open appendicectomy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Reasons for conversion, outcome, and preoperative predictive variables. RESULTS: Difficult anatomy or the presence of an abscess were the main reasons for conversion (25/30). The incidence of perforated appendicitis was higher among patients who required conversion compared with both the open and laparoscopic group. Operating time, anaesthetic time, and duration of hospital stay were longer after conversion. Time to full recovery and length of sick leave were also longer, except for patients with perforated appendicitis. There was no difference in the complication rate. No predictive factors were identified. CONCLUSION: The main reasons for conversion were difficult anatomy and the presence of an abscess. After conversion patients recovered more slowly than those operated on laparoscopically or by primary open operation.

Adolescent↗

Islet perturbations in rats fed a high-fat diet.

The islet response to a high-fat diet, which induces insulin resistance, was investigated in Sprague-Dawley rats. It was found that the insulin response to glucose (15 or 25 mg/min, i.v.) was not different between rats given a high-fat diet and control rats after 2 weeks but was significantly reduced in rats fed high-fat diets after 4 (by 46+/-9%; p<0.001) and 8 weeks (by 68+/-12%; p<0.001). However, after 2 weeks of a high-fat diet, stimulated insulin secretion from isolated islets incubated for 60 min in 5.6, 8.3, and 11.1 mM glucose was impaired. When islets isolated from rats given a high-fat diet for 2 weeks were perifused, it was evident that the first-phase insulin secretion was impaired (seen during the first 6 min after increase of glucose from 3.3 to 8.3 mM). Insulin gene expression, examined by quantitative in situ hybridization, was impaired after 2 weeks of high-fat diet (52% decrease in mRNA-labeling; p<0.001). Islet hypertrophy was not evident in rats given high-fat diet, as determined by areas of either islet profiles in dark-field images or isolated islets. Islet innervation, as revealed by immunostaining for vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) and neuropeptide Y (NPY), was increased after 2, 4, and 8 weeks of high-fat diet. Thus induction of insulin resistance by high-fat diet in Sprague-Dawley rats results after 2 weeks in impaired glucose-stimulated insulin secretion in vitro, impaired insulin gene expression, and hyperinnervation of the islets without any sign of islet hypertrophy, whereas the in vivo insulin response to glucose, although normal after 2 weeks, is impaired after 4 weeks.

Animals↗

A population-based analysis of survival and incidental diagnosing of renal cell carcinoma patients in Iceland, 1971-1990.

The significance of incidental diagnosing in relation to survival of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients is not known. A retrospective, population-based study was carried out in order to evaluate the survival of RCC patients, with emphasis on incidental diagnosing. Included in the study were all patients diagnosed with RCC in Iceland between 1971 and 1990. The tumours were classified and the extent of the disease staged by Robson's method. Crude probability of survival was evaluated for every stage, and multivariate analysis applied in order to determine prognostic factors. Out of 408 patients, 15% were diagnosed incidentally between 1971 and 1980 and 20% between 1981 and 1990 (p > 0.1), most often by intravenous urography. Only 5 tumours were detected incidentally by ultrasound techniques and 4 by CT scans. Crude five-year survival was 76% for stage I disease and 11% for stage IV disease. After correction for staging by multivariate analysis, incidental diagnosis and the year of diagnosis were not independent significant prognostic factors for mortality. As in many other studies, our data indicate that incidentally diagnosed RCCs are at a lower stage at the time of diagnosis. On the other hand, the results of our population-based study show that ultrasound and CT scanning have not significantly increased the number of incidentally diagnosed tumours. It is therefore not very surprising that surviving of RCC patients in Iceland has remained the same for the last two decades.

Adolescent↗

[Colorectal liver metastasis. An evidence based review on surgical treatment.].

Liver metastases are common in patients with colorectal cancer, liver resection being the only well documented curative treatment. In this evidence based review, improved results after liver resection are presented and stated how patients are best selected for surgery using specific selection criteria.

English Abstract↗