Expandable metal stents for the treatment of cancerous obstruction of the gastrointestinal tract.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to T H Baron.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: Previous studies indicate that photodynamic therapy provides effective relief from biliary obstruction in advanced cholangiocarcinoma. This report describes a method of applying photodynamic therapy in the biliary tract by using accessories available in the United States. METHODS: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography was performed to define the proximal and distal extent of intraductal tumor. Patients were injected with 2 mg/kg of sodium porfimer. Forty-eight hours later a commercially available cylindrical diffusing laser fiber was inserted into an 8F biliary catheter equipped with a 0.038 inch side-hole at its distal tip. After positioning of a 0.035 inch guidewire proximal to the biliary stricture, the preloaded catheter was advanced over the guidewire by using the monorail technique. Laser light was applied at a power of 400 mW/cm fiber for a total energy of 180 J/cm.(2) RESULTS: Fourteen treatments were performed on 6 patients with tumors of Bismuth types IV (n = 2), III (n = 3), or II (n = 1). By using the preloaded biliary catheter, adequate positioning of the laser fiber was achieved in all patients. A fracture of the diffuser tip occurred during 1 of the treatments. Two patients developed acute cholangitis and 2 patients experienced skin phototoxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Photodynamic therapy for cholangiocarcinoma is safe and technically feasible with a preloaded biliary catheter and a monorail technique for catheter positioning.
OBJECTIVE: In some patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), a localized, high-grade (dominant) stricture may be the principal cause of symptoms and hyperbilirubinemia. The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the beneficial effects and risk of balloon dilation alone versus dilation followed by stenting in PSC patients with dominant strictures. METHODS: Charts from a group of 1009 patients with PSC seen over 10 yr were reviewed to identify those patients who had undergone endoscopic or percutaneous therapeutic intervention. Procedural and clinical data were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 71 PSC patients, median age of 49 yr (range 18-78 yr) were identified. Thirty-four patients were treated with endoscopic balloon dilation alone, and 37 patients were treated with balloon dilation plus stent placement. Stents were placed percutaneously (n = 19), endoscopically (n = 14), or using both interventions (n = 4). Both groups were comparable at baseline with regards to age, symptoms, and bilirubin level. The median duration of follow-up after intervention was similar in both groups. The number of intervention-related complications (30 vs 6, p = 0.001) as well as the incidence of acute cholangitis (p = 0.004) were more common in the stent group compared to the balloon dilation group. There were more complications related to percutaneous stent placement than endoscopic placement (23 vs 7. p = 0.001). There was no significant difference between the two groups with regards to improving cholestasis. CONCLUSIONS: There was no additional obvious benefit from stenting after balloon dilation in the treatment of dominant strictures in PSC patients. Stenting was associated with more complications, and its role after dilation should be assessed in a randomized trial rather than being accepted as routinely indicated in this setting.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of digital image analysis (DIA) for distinguishing between benign and malignant strictures of the biliary tract. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Our pathology databank was used to identify all biliary brush cytology specimens obtained during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography between June 1997 and June 1999. Corresponding medical records were reviewed to determine whether patients had benign or malignant strictures. Strictures were further classified into benign strictures with negative routine cytology, malignant strictures with negative routine cytology, and malignant strictures with positive routine cytology. Papanicolaou-stained smears of available brush cytology specimens were destained and then restained with Feulgen dye. Nuclear images were quantified for DNA content without knowledge of stricture type. DNA histograms were generated and ploidy results compared with the class of stricture. RESULTS: We analyzed 27 specimens from 69 confirmed benign or malignant strictures. Assuming that the presence of any aneuploid cells indicated malignancy, the sensitivity of DIA was 85%. Furthermore, aneuploid cells were detected by DIA in 13 of 16 specimens in which routine cytology was unrevealing. CONCLUSION: Ploidy assessment by DIA has potential to enhance the sensitivity of diagnosing malignant strictures compared with routine cytology alone.
The use of self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) in the colon is now becoming more commonplace. These devices can be employed to decompress large bowel that has become obstructed from either benign or malignant disease. Many studies in the past year have validated the use of colonic SEMS to allow preoperative bowel preparation in resectable patients, or as an alternative to surgery in those requiring palliative therapy alone. Laser therapy has also gained new ground in recent months because it has been shown to help in recanulation of obstructed bowel to aid in SEMS placement. In addition, laser therapy alone can be used to treat some colonic lesions that had formerly been treated surgically.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Expandable metal biliary stents are reserved for patients with unresectable malignant biliary obstruction. Occasionally, these stents may cause complications necessitating removal. We describe successful endoscopic removal of a biliary Wallstent one year after insertion in a patient who initially underwent placement of an expandable metal biliary stent for presumed biliary malignancy. The stent was removed after a stent related bleeding duodenal ulcer formed.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVE: The safety and efficacy of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the evaluation and management of biliary tract complications after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) have been previously demonstrated. However, the role of ERCP in evaluating asymptomatic OLT patients with abnormal liver enzymes with a previously normal biliary tree remains poorly defined. We sought to assess the utility of ERCP in this subset of patients. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of-asymptomatic OLT patients with abnormal liver enzymes evaluated by ERCP was undertaken. In addition to ERCP, all these patients had a diagnostic abdominal Doppler ultrasound, and a percutaneous liver biopsy. All patients had choledochocholedochostomy at the time of transplant and normal T-tube cholangiograms 3 months postoperatively. A radiologist, blinded to clinical findings, interpreted the ultrasound as normal, biliary dilation, or vascular abnormalities. The same radiologist interpreted ERCP findings. A pathologist, blinded to clinical findings, graded liver biopsies as normal, diagnostic, or abnormal but nondiagnostic. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients underwent 23 ERCPs. Twenty-two of the 23 ERCPs were normal (96%), and one abnormal ERCP finding did not explain the liver enzyme abnormality. Liver biopsy was diagnostic in 13 of 22 (57%) and in each case the ERCP was normal. The remaining 10 liver biopsies were abnormal but nondiagnostic. Ultrasound was abnormal in five of 22 cases, but in the three cases suggesting biliary dilation, the ERCP was interpreted as normal. CONCLUSION: Routine use of ERCP in evaluation of asymptomatic OLT patients with liver function test abnormalities and normal cholangiograms at 3 months was not diagnostically useful. In this subset of patients, liver biopsy was usually abnormal and frequently diagnostic and should be the initial invasive diagnostic procedure.
Metallic stents are currently an established component of the endoluminal treatment of stenoses within the blood vessels, bile ducts, esophagus, trachea, and bronchi. With the development of newer stent designs and delivery systems and the general momentum toward minimally invasive therapies, metallic stent placement has expanded into the nonsurgical therapy for gastroduodenal and colorectal obstructions. The use of metallic stents within the stomach, duodenum, or colon is intended not to be curative but to provide nonsurgical palliation for the symptoms of gastric or colonic obstruction. This palliation may be intended for the life of the patient in the case of unresectable disease or as a temporizing procedure prior to a definitive surgical procedure. In the latter clinical scenario, the benefits of a minimally invasive intestinal decompression procedure include (a) quick and noninvasive relief of the intestinal obstruction in an acutely ill patient that obviates a more extensive procedure; (b) allowance of time to improve a patient's overall medical condition and thus to allow a patient to better tolerate the definitive surgical procedure; and (c) reduction of the complexity of the definitive procedure by eliminating the need for staged procedures and allowing the definitive procedure to be performed at one setting.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the results of direct percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy (DPEJ) as a method for jejunal feeding. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of all patients who were referred for DPEJ between October 1998, when the procedure was implemented at our institution, and January 2000. Medical records were reviewed to assess technical success, complications, and the need for repeat procedures. Patient satisfaction with DPEJ was also evaluated by means of standardized telephone interviews. RESULTS: In 26 (72%) of 36 patients, DPEJ placement was successful. During the mean follow-up of 107 days, none of the patients with DPEJ required reintervention for tube malfunction or displacement. Two patients developed a persistent enterocutaneous fistula following the removal of the DPEJ tube. No other procedure-related complications were noted. Fifteen (78%) of 19 patients who responded to follow-up questions reported an overall satisfaction rating of 8 or higher on a 10-point scale (1, completely dissatisfied, to 10, completely satisfied). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that DPEJ is an effective and safe method for providing jejunal tube feeding. A low reintervention rate along with high patient satisfaction makes DPEJ an attractive alternative to the more commonly placed jejunostomy feeding tubes.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.