PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

T H Rockwood

Publications and source records attributed to T H Rockwood.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

Factors influencing patient satisfaction with GI endoscopy.

BACKGROUND: A modified Group Health Association of America-9 survey (mGHAA-9) was recently proposed for measurement of patient satisfaction with endoscopy. It is unknown whether the mGHAA-9 addresses the issues most important to this outcome. METHODS: A 15-item survey of factors potentially important to patient satisfaction with endoscopy was developed, including the 6 core mGHAA-9 items. Respondents were asked to rank the factors from 1 to 15 (1 = most important to l5 = least important to satisfaction). Two groups were surveyed: (1) patients with prior endoscopy experience and (2) physician endoscopists. Item rank distributions overall and by patient age, gender, and procedure experience were examined. RESULTS: Of 559 outpatients surveyed, 437 (78%) provided complete responses. The mean patient age was 59 years (48.7% female, 45.3% male, 6% not stated). The number 1 ranked factor was the endoscopist's technical skills (median ranking (mr) = 1), an item included in the mGHAA-9. Pain control, a factor not assessed by the mGHAA-9, was second (mr = 4), and ranked number 1 by 16% of patients. Item rankings were consistent across patient subgroups. Relative to patients, endoscopists underprioritized preprocedure and postprocedure communication. CONCLUSIONS: The mGHAA-9 has inadequate content validity for measurement of patient satisfaction with endoscopy because it does not assess pain control. However, endoscopy satisfaction measurement with a single, universally applied instrument appears feasible.

Adult↗

Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale: quality of life instrument for patients with fecal incontinence.

PURPOSE: This goal of this research was to develop and evaluate the psychometrics of a health-related quality of life scale developed to address issues related specifically to fecal incontinence, the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale. METHODS: The Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale is composed of a total of 29 items; these items form four scales: Lifestyle (10 items), Coping/Behavior (9 items), Depression/Self-Perception (7 items), and Embarrassment (3 items). RESULTS: Psychometric evaluation of these scales demonstrates that they are both reliable and valid. Each of the scales demonstrate stability over time (test/retest reliability) and have acceptable internal reliability (Cronbach alpha >0.70). Validity was assessed using discriminate and convergent techniques. Each of the four scales of the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale was capable of discriminating between patients with fecal incontinence and patients with other gastrointestinal problems. To evaluate convergent validity, the correlation of the scales in the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale with selected subscales in the SF-36 was analyzed. The scales in the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale demonstrated significant correlations with the subscales in the SF-36. CONCLUSIONS: The psychometric evaluation of the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale showed that this fecal incontinence-specific quality of life measure produces both reliable and valid measurement.

Adaptation, Psychological↗

Patient and surgeon ranking of the severity of symptoms associated with fecal incontinence: the fecal incontinence severity index.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this research was to develop and evaluate a severity rating score for fecal incontinence, the Fecal Incontinence Severity Index. METHODS: The Fecal Incontinence Severity Index is based on a type x frequency matrix. The matrix includes four types of leakage commonly found in the fecal incontinent population: gas, mucus, and liquid and solid stool and five frequencies: one to three times per month, once per week, twice per week, once per day, and twice per day. The Fecal Incontinence Severity Index was developed using both colon and rectal surgeons and patient input for the specification of the weighting scores. RESULTS: Surgeons and patients had very similar weightings for each of the type x frequency combinations; significant differences occurred for only 3 of the 20 different weights. The Fecal Incontinence Severity Index score of a group of patients with fecal incontinence (N = 118) demonstrated significant correlations with three of the four scales found in a fecal incontinence quality-of-life scale. CONCLUSIONS: Evaluation of the Fecal Incontinence Severity Index indicates that the index is a tool that can be used to assess severity of fecal incontinence. Overall, patient and surgeon ratings of severity are similar, with minor differences associated with the accidental loss of solid stool.

Adaptation, Psychological↗

A comparison of suicidal and nonsuicidal elders referred to a community mental health center program.

Sociodemographics, clinical characteristics, and life stressors of community-dwelling suicidal risk and nonsuicidal risk elders referred to a community aging and mental health provider were compared in this study. Information was collected through case manager surveys and agency records on 683 older adults referred to the Elder Services Program of Spokane Mental Health in 1994 and the first 6 months of 1995. This sample included 109 individuals who were clinically judged to be at suicide risk by case managers at the time of initial assessment. Comparisons between suicidal risk and nonsuicidal risk elders indicated that suicidal elders were younger, more likely to be separated or divorced, and more likely to report a previous history of suicidal behavior. Results of a logistic regression analysis indicated that living alone, depression or anxiety disorder, and higher levels of emotional disturbance predicted suicide risk status. In addition, medical problems, family conflict, and relationship loss predicted suicide risk status in this particular sample. Individuals at suicide risk were also more likely to have a family physician than others. Implications of findings for identification and treatment of suicidal elders are discussed.

Age Factors↗

A model gatekeeper program to find the at-risk elderly.

This article describes the client characteristics and services needs of community-dwelling older adults found through a unique case-finding model developed at the Spokane Mental health Center. The model trains the employees of community businesses and corporations who work with the public to serve as community gatekeepers by identifying and referring community-dwelling older adults who may be in need of aging and/or mental health services. These community case-finders perform a gatekeeping function for older adults that is similar to that performed by schools and the workplace for younger persons. Information was collected on 777 individuals aged 60 and older referred over an 18-month period (January 1, 1994, to June 30, 1995) to the Spokane Mental Health Clinical Case Management Program in Spokane, Washington, which provides aging and mental health services to older adults residing in the county. Findings indicate that 40% of clients referred were found by community-based gatekeepers. Clients referred by gatekeepers were more frequently socially isolated, economically disadvantaged, and less likely to have a physician. Gatekeeper clients were also more likely to be women and to be younger than others referred to the agency. Gatekeeper clients were receiving fewer services at referral and were identified as needing more services at intake. Gatekeepers find a distinct population of community-dwelling older adults who are not found by more traditional referral sources. The need to integrate this model within a comprehensive clinical case management system is discussed.

Aged↗

Reliability of electron beam computed tomography to detect coronary artery calcification.

Electron beam computed tomography (CT) provides a safe, rapid, and noninvasive means to detect the presence and quantitate the deposition of calcium in the coronary arteries. To examine the reproducibility of a coronary calcification screen using electron beam CT, 50 subjects underwent two studies, averaging 12 minutes between studies. The number, volume, and calcification scores were determined for each artery as well as a total score of coronary calcification. Thirty-four of the 50 subjects had evidence of coronary calcification. The reliability score for total coronary artery calcification was 0.99. The reliability score for the total number of lesions and total volume was at or above 0.98. There were 8 cases in which a negative calcium score on retest was positive or where a positive calcium score on retest was negative. In both instances, the amount of calcium detected was very small. Therefore, evidence suggests that electron beam CT is reliable in the detection of coronary artery calcification and may be a useful tool for the early detection of coronary atherosclerosis before flow impairment.

Calcinosis↗