PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

T H Stanley

Publications and source records attributed to T H Stanley.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMed1990

Transdermal scopolamine reduces nausea and vomiting after outpatient laparoscopy.

The authors evaluated the effect of transdermal scopolamine on the incidence of postoperative nausea, retching, and vomiting after outpatient laparoscopy in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. A Band-Aid-like patch containing either scopolamine or placebo was placed behind the ear the night before surgery. Anesthesia was induced with fentanyl (0.5-2 micrograms/kg iv), thiopental (3-5 mg/kg iv), and succinylcholine (1-1.5 mg/kg iv) and maintained with isoflurane (0.2-2%) and nitrous oxide (60%) in oxygen. Scopolamine-treated patients had less nausea, retching, and vomiting compared with placebo-treated patients (P = 0.0029). Severe nausea and/or vomiting was present in 62% of the placebo group but only 37% of those getting the scopolamine patch. Repeated episodes of retching and vomiting were also less frequent in the scopolamine group compared with the placebo group (23% vs. 41%; P = 0.0213) as was the need for additional antiemetic therapy (13% vs. 32%; P = 0.0013). Patients in the scopolamine group were also discharged from the hospital sooner (4 +/- 1.3 vs. 4.5 +/- 1.5 h; P = 0.0487). Side effects were more frequent among those patients treated with the scopolamine patch (91% vs. 45%; P less than 0.05) but were not troublesome. The authors conclude that transdermal scopolamine is a safe and effective antiemetic for outpatients undergoing laparoscopy.

Administration, Cutaneous↗
PubMed1990

Frequent hypoxemia and apnea after sedation with midazolam and fentanyl.

More than 80 deaths have occurred after the use of midazolam (Versed), often in combination with opioids, to sedate patients undergoing various medical and surgical procedures. We investigated the respiratory effects of midazolam (0.05 mg.kg-1) and fentanyl (2.0 micrograms.kg-1) in volunteers. The incidence of hypoxemia (oxyhemoglobin saturation less than 90%) and apnea (no spontaneous respiratory effort for 15 s) and the ventilatory response to carbon dioxide were evaluated. Midazolam alone produced no significant respiratory effects. Fentanyl alone produced hypoxemia in half of the subjects and significant depression of the ventilatory response to CO2, but did not produce apnea. Midazolam and fentanyl in combination significantly increased the incidence of hypoxemia (11 of 12 subjects) and apnea (6 of 12 subjects), but did not depress the ventilatory response to CO2 more than did fentanyl alone. Adverse reactions linked to midazolam and reported to the Department of Health and Human Services highlight apnea- and hypoxia-related problems as among the most frequent adverse reactions. Seventy-eight per cent of the deaths associated with midazolam were respiratory in nature, and in 57% an opioid had also been administered. All but three of the deaths associated with the use of midazolam occurred in patients unattended by anesthesia personnel. We conclude that combining midazolam with fentanyl or other opioids produces a potent drug interaction that places patients at a high risk for hypoxemia and apnea. Adequate precautions, including monitoring of patient oxygenation with pulse oximetry, the administration of supplemental oxygen, and the availability of persons skilled in airway management are recommended when benzodiazepines are administered in combination with opioids.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1990

Differences in magnitude and duration of opioid-induced respiratory depression and analgesia with fentanyl and sufentanil.

The magnitude and duration of analgesia and respiratory depression induced by fentanyl (1.0, 2.0, and 4.0 micrograms/kg) and sufentanil (0.1, 0.2, and 0.4 microgram/kg) after intravenous administration over 30 s were measured in 30 healthy young adult male volunteers divided into three groups and studied in a double-blind, randomized fashion. Each volunteer received one dose of fentanyl or sufentanil and no sooner than 48 h later, the corresponding equipotent dose of the other opioid. End-tidal CO2 and ventilatory and occlusion pressure responses to CO2 rebreathing were used to measure drug-induced respiratory effects. Analgesic effects were assessed by changes in the pain threshold to electric shock applied to the forearm. Plasma levels of fentanyl and sufentanil were measured by radioimmunoassay. Testing and sampling intervals were 5, 30, 60, 90, 120, 240, 300, and 360 min after drug administration. The magnitude and duration of depression of the ventilatory and occlusion pressure response were significantly less with sufentanil compared with fentanyl, irrespective of dose. Ventilatory and occlusion pressure responses returned to control values by 30 and 30 min, respectively, after sufentanil and by 240 and 120 min, respectively, after fentanyl. Statistically significant elevations of the pain threshold were, however, greater and longer lasting after sufentanil compared with fentanyl. Pain threshold returned to control values 180 min after sufentanil but only 90 min after fentanyl. These results suggest that sufentanil may provide better patient comfort with less respiratory depression than does fentanyl.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1990

Rectal methohexital: concentration and length of the rectal catheters.

In the study, the authors evaluated the concentration of rectal methohexital (1% vs 10%) and the length of the rectal catheter (3.8 vs 12.7 cm), on sleep-success rate, administration-sleep time, methohexital plasma concentrations, and recovery time in 85 healthy children scheduled for elective ophthalmic or ear, nose, or throat operations lasting approximately 1 h. At a dose of 25 mg/kg, the 1% solution of rectal methohexital was associated with a significant (P less than 0.05) higher sleep-success rate (95% vs 70%), shorter administration-sleep time (5.7 +/- 1.9 vs 7.0 +/- 2.0 min), higher methohexital plasma concentrations at 20 min (6.5 vs 4.7 ng/mL) and at 30 min (5.3 vs 3.7 ng/mL), and prolonged recovery time (53.2 +/- 31.1 vs 32.4 +/- 18.5 min). The length of the rectal catheters did not significantly affect sleep-success rate, administration-sleep time, methohexital plasma concentrations, or recovery time. The use of 25 mg/kg of 1% rectal methohexital solution to induce anesthesia in children is superior to the use of 25 mg/kg of 10% methohexital solution for induction of anesthesia in children, particularly in operations 1 h or longer in duration.

Anesthesia Recovery Period↗
PubMed1989

Comparison of oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate and an oral solution of meperidine, diazepam, and atropine for premedication in children.

The safety and efficacy of premedication with oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate (OTFC) was compared with that of an orally administered solution of meperidine, diazepam, and atropine and no premedication in 59 children about to undergo elective operations. The patients were randomly assigned to receive no premedication (n = 19); 0.25 ml/kg of the oral solution (containing meperidine, 1.5 mg/kg, diazepam, 0.2 mg/kg, and atropine, 0.02 mg/kg, n = 20); or OTFC (15-20 micrograms/kg, n = 20). Children had activity (sedation) and anxiety scores, vital signs (including systolic and diastolic arterial blood pressures and heart and respiratory rates) and pulse oximetry determined oxygen saturation measured before and at 10-min intervals after premedication until they were taken to the operating room. Quality of induction and recovery was evaluated using scoring schedules; recovery times were measured and side effects noted. OTFC was readily accepted and provided significant reductions in preoperative activity (sedation) and anxiety starting after 30 min. After OTFC, sedation and anxiolysis were significantly greater than in children having no premedication but similar to children having the oral solution for premedication. Vital signs and oxygen saturations remained unchanged preoperatively in all groups. Induction and recovery evaluations and recovery times were similar in the three groups, although children having OTFC had the lowest requirements for narcotics in the recovery room. OTFC caused an 80% incidence of mild preoperative facial pruritus and a higher overall incidence of postoperative vomiting (37%) than premedication with the oral solution (5%) or no premedication (18%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1989

Oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate (lollipop) premedication in human volunteers.

The authors determined whether fentanyl incorporated into a candy lollipop, oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate (OTFC), would cross mucosal tissues of the mouth in sufficient quantities during and after dissolution to produce sedation and/or analgesia. Associated respiratory and circulatory changes, side effects, and plasma concentrations of fentanyl were also measured. The evaluations were done in 28 adult volunteers who received fentanyl citrate in doses of 5, 4, 2, 1, and 0.5 mg in OTFC and rapidly sucked the lollipops (N = 20) or allowed them to passively dissolve (N = 8). Rapid consumption of OTFC resulted in more rapid onset of a pleasant feeling (first subjective sensation) but not more rapid onset of objective sedation or analgesia than passive dissolution. There was a significant correlation between dose of OTFC and magnitude of sedation (P less than 0.001, Spearman rank correlation = -0.82). Higher doses of OTFC produced greater and longer lasting analgesia and respiratory depression and a higher incidence of nausea and vomiting than lower doses, but pruritus (33%-87%) was not related to the dose of OTFC. Heart rate and arterial blood pressures were not changed by any dose of OTFC. The data indicate that low doses of OTFC (0.5 and 1 mg, equivalent to 5-20 micrograms.kg-1 of fentanyl citrate) produce analgesia and sedation with minimal side effects and little respiratory depression in adult volunteers and deserve further evaluation in patients.

Absorption↗
PubMed1989

Oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate premedication in children.

The authors evaluated the safety and efficacy of four doses of oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate (OTFC) as a premedicant in 44 children about to undergo elective operations. The patients received 5-10, 10-15, 15-20, or 20-25 micrograms.kg-1 of OTFC in the holding area and had activity (sedation) scores, vital signs (including systolic and diastolic arterial blood pressures, heart, and respiratory rates), and pulse oximetry determined oxygen saturation measured before and at 15-min intervals after premedication until they were taken to the operating room. Cooperation during anesthetic induction, and quality and speed of recovery room emergence were measured and side effects noted. OTFC was readily accepted and provided significant (dose dependent) reductions in preoperative activity starting after 30 min. Onset of sedation was related to dose of OTFC but time to peak effect was not. Vital signs remained unchanged preoperatively in all groups but patients receiving 20-25 micrograms.kg-1 had oxygen saturations that were significantly lower than patients in the other groups 30 min after beginning OTFC consumption. Three of the 12 patients receiving the highest dose of OTFC experienced transient oxygen saturation less than 90% which, however, was easily treated by commands to take a breath. Anesthetic inductions were rated good or excellent in 80% of the patients and recovery times were similar irrespective of the OTFC dose. OTFC caused dose-independent preoperative pruritus in 90% or more of patients and pruritus (33%-70%), nausea (30%-58%), and vomiting (50%-83%) postoperatively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adolescent↗
PubMed1989

The effects of oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate premedication on preoperative behavioral responses and gastric volume and acidity in children.

The authors compared the safety, efficacy, and effects on gastric volume and pH of oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate (OTFC) premedication and of placebo lollipop and no premedication in 55 children undergoing elective operations. The patients were randomly assigned to receive no premedication (group A, N = 18); OTFC containing 15-20 micrograms/kg of fentanyl citrate (group B, N = 18); or a placebo lollipop (group C, N = 19). Activity (sedation) and anxiety scores, vital signs (including systolic and diastolic arterial blood pressures, heart and respiratory rates), and pulse oximetry determined oxygen saturation were measured before and at 10-min intervals after premedication until the patients were taken to the operating room. Gastric contents were aspirated via an orogastric tube and analyzed for volume and pH after induction of anesthesia. Quality of induction and recovery were evaluated using scoring schedules; recovery times were measured and side effects recorded. OTFC was readily accepted and provided levels of sedation and anxiolysis significantly greater after 10 min than after no premedication or the placebo lollipop. Arterial blood pressures, heart rate, and oxygen saturations were not different among the three groups. In patients given OTFC, respiratory rates were significantly lower after 10 min than they were in patients having no premedication.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1988

Comparison of sufentanil-oxygen and fentanyl-oxygen anesthesia for mitral and aortic valvular surgery.

The cardiovascular responses, speed of anesthetic induction, incidence of chest wall rigidity, need for anesthetic supplements (phentolamine, N2O, and nitroprusside) to control intraoperative hypertension, and speed of postoperative recovery were measured and compared in 44 patients undergoing aortic and mitral valvular replacement with fentanyl-O2 or sufentanil-O2 anesthesia. After a lorazepamatropine premedication and pancuronium pretreatment, fentanyl was administered intravenously at a rate of 400 micrograms/min and sufentanil at 200 micrograms/min until patients were unconscious; at this time they were given succinylcholine and their tracheas were intubated. After intubation, an amount of fentanyl or sufentanil equal to the dose producing unconsciousness was infused over the next 30 minutes, at which time the operation began. Additional fentanyl or sufentanil was given whenever systolic arterial blood pressure (SBP) increased more than 15% over preanesthetic values. When three successive supplemental doses of the narcotic failed to effectively decrease SBP, phentolamine was used to control pressure before and during bypass; after bypass, N2O (25% to 50%) or, if N2O was ineffective, nitroprusside was used. Average time of induction was 3.4 +/- 0.3 for fentanyl and 1.0 +/- 0.2 min (mean +/- SD) for sufentanil. Chest wall rigidity occurred in 36% of patients in both groups. Total doses of fentanyl and sufentanil required for the entire operation were 113 +/- 11 and 9.0 +/- 0.4 micrograms/kg (mean +/- SD), respectively. Heart rate, cardiac output, and mean right atrial pressure remained unchanged throughout the study in both groups. Mean arterial blood pressure (MBP) and SBP were significantly decreased during induction and after intubation in patients receiving sufentanil, but not fentanyl.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Anesthesia, Intravenous↗
PubMed1988

Preservation of the ischemic canine myocardium: a comparison of hypothermia, lidoflazine, and ketanserin.

The purpose of this study was to determine whether ketanserin protects the globally ischemic canine heart and whether such protection, if present, is independent of that provided by hypothermia or calcium channel blockade with lidoflazine. Forty mongrel dogs, anesthetized with halothane, were divided into eight groups of five and subjected to one hour of global myocardial ischemia during hypothermic (30 degrees C; groups 1 to 4) or normothermic (37 degrees C; groups 5 to 8) cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Dogs in groups 1 and 5 served as controls with respect to prebypass myocardial protective therapy, and received only placebo (a normal saline bolus) prior to CPB. Before bypass, dogs in groups 2 and 6 received lidoflazine, 1.25 mg/kg intravenously (IV); those in groups 3 and 7 received ketanserin, 5 mg IV bolus, followed by a continuous infusion at 33 microg/min during bypass. Animals in groups 4 and 8 were given both lidoflazine and ketanserin according to the dosing schedules above. No type of pharmacologic or mechanical cardiovascular support was provided after termination of CPB. Postbypass hemodynamic performance and survival of the unsupported animal were assumed to reflect the degree of myocardial protection during CPB. One minute after bypass, mean arterial pressure and cardiac output were decreased in all groups. Cardiac output was lower in groups 5 to 8 (normothermic CPB) than in groups 1 to 4 (hypothermic CPB). After CPB, left ventricular filling pressures were elevated in all groups kept normothermic and in group 3 (hypothermic CPB plus ketanserin). By 15 minutes after CPB, there were no survivors in groups 5, 7, and 8. Sixty percent of animals in group 6 (normothermic CPB plus lidoflazine) survived to the end of the study. Relative odds of survival were increased 110-fold by hypothermia and sevenfold by lidoflazine. Conversely, treatment with ketanserin was associated with an increased likelihood of nonsurvival. It is concluded that, at the doses studied, ketanserin does not protect the canine myocardium against ischemic injury and may exert a detrimental effect when combined with calcium channel blockade in this setting.

Animals↗
PubMed1988

Fentanyl pretreatment modifies anaesthetic induction with etomidate.

Haemodynamic changes and side-effects of induction of anaesthesia with etomidate were evaluated in 60 ASA Class I or II patients. The objective was to find an optimal pre-induction dose of fentanyl which eliminated haemodynamic changes and side-effects during induction and intubation without introducing other problems. Patients were randomly assigned to four groups according to the pretreatment dose of fentanyl (Group I = 2 ml normal saline; Group II = 100 micrograms of fentanyl; Group III = 250 micrograms of fentanyl; Group IV = 500 micrograms of fentanyl) administered intravenously five minutes prior to induction of anaesthesia with etomidate, 0.3 mg/kg. There was an increasing incidence of apnoea (53, 87, 87 and 100% in Groups I-IV respectively) and a decreasing incidence of myoclonus (60, 33, 13 and 0% in Groups I-IV respectively) and injection pain (53, 13, 7 and 0% in Groups I-IV respectively), P less than 0.002 chi-square test for linear trends, with increasing fentanyl dosage. The incidences of postoperative nausea and vomiting were similar in the four groups. There were also significant linear regression relationships (P less than 0.01 ANOVA for linear regression) between increasing doses of fentanyl administered before etomidate and the prevention of increases in systolic blood pressure and heart rate during the induction-intubation sequence. The data demonstrate that increasing pre-induction doses of fentanyl are more effective at minimising side-effects and preventing increases in systolic arterial blood pressure and heart rate but also increase the incidence of apnoea during induction. The results suggest that 500 micrograms of fentanyl is an ideal pretreatment dose in fit patients prior to anaesthetic induction with etomidate.

Adult↗
PubMed1988

Anesthesiology update: the preanesthetic evaluation.

Ideal anesthetic management consists of the preanesthetic attainment of a state in which a diagnostic or therapeutic procedure or surgical operation can be performed with as little physiologic and psychologic trauma as possible, and the likelihood of a speedy and uneventful postoperative course is enhanced. Significant impairment of cardiovascular, respiratory, renal and other organ system functions is common in patients facing surgery. Thus, it is imperative that preoperative evaluation be complete. Signs of congestive heart failure, myocardial ischemia or infarction or both, hypertension, electrolyte abnormalities, and cardiac arrhythmias should be aggressively sought and treated before surgery. In addition, before the induction of anesthesia, information must be obtained about the specific associated pathologies (cardiac and otherwise), drugs being used to treat these conditions, and the adequacy of the current therapies. The preoperative evaluation does not begin with the anesthesiologist's visit, but with the evaluation and care given by the primary physician. A team approach is advisable in complex cases. Appropriate consultations, including that of the anesthesiologist, should be made in a timely fashion. Except in emergency situations, the temptation to send incompletely evaluated and treated patients to the operating room should be resisted. Good preoperative preparation will improve the chances for a successful outcome.

Cardiovascular Diseases↗