PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

T H Wasserman

Publications and source records attributed to T H Wasserman.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMed1990

Accelerated fractionation radiation therapy for liver metastases: selection of an optimal patient population for the evaluation of late hepatic injury in RTOG studies.

The palliation of hepatic metastases represents a major therapeutic problem in oncology. The generally unfavorable prognosis of patients with liver metastasis may complicate the evaluation of the efficacy and toxicity of various therapeutic modalities. The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) is evaluating new accelerated fractionation schemes for hepatic irradiation. In designing this study it became necessary to identify a favorable subpopulation of patients with an expected median survival of 6 months in whom the late effects of treatment could be evaluated. Data from two RTOG liver metastases studies (7605 and 8003) were analyzed using multi-variate techniques. Cases with a serum bilirubin level of greater than 1.5 mg%, performance score of less than 50, and gastric or pancreatic primary carcinomas were initially excluded because of the adverse influence of these factors on survival. One hundred and ninety cases met the criteria for inclusion in this analysis. A loglinear model was used to identify the patient characteristics associated with a favorable prognosis for survival. These included a performance score of 80-100, colorectal carcinoma primary, and no extrahepatic metastases. A logistic regression equation was derived and confirmed that the probability of surviving at least 6 months depended on the effects of performance score, primary site and the presence or absence of extra-hepatic metastases. Patients with all three favorable factors constituted 30% of the evaluable study population and had a predicted survival of 50% at 6 months. A patient population with these characteristics will be used to study the late effects of accelerated fractionated radiation therapy on the liver.

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMed1990

Final report of the phase I trial of the hypoxic cell radiosensitizer SR 2508 (etanidazole) Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 83-03.

In a Phase I trial SR 2508 was administered by rapid intravenous infusion to 102 patients receiving radiation therapy. The dose-limiting toxicity was peripheral sensory neuropathy (PN) which was related to the cumulative dose administered. The highest single daily dose, 3.7 g/m2, was tolerated without toxicity. The lowest cumulative toxic dose was 21.6 g/m2, and the highest non-toxic dose was 40.8 g/m2. Grade 1 neuropathies were mild and self-limited; grade 2 neuropathies were long-lasting and debilitating. In a retrospective analysis, the risk of developing neurotoxicity was related to the cumulative drug exposure calculated by the area-under-the-curve (AUC) of plasma concentration versus time. There was an increased incidence of neuropathy in patients with a cumulative AUC of greater than or equal to 36 mM-hr. At a total dose of 34 g/m2 over 6 weeks, the incidence of Grade 1 neuropathy was approximately 30%; no grade 2 neuropathy occurred at this dose and schedule. Additional toxicities observed included nausea and vomiting (6%), skin rash (4%), and transient arthralgias (3%). One patient had transient abnormalities in liver function tests of unknown etiology. (In a more recent Phase II trial neutropenia has been observed which may be related to SR2508). Approximately three times more SR 2508 is tolerable compared to misonidazole, and it appears that severe neuropathy can be avoided by monitoring individual patient pharmacokinetic parameters. Evaluation of the efficacy of this hypoxic cell sensitizer is in progress.

Adult↗
PubMed1989

Radiation therapy alone or combined with misonidazole in the treatment of locally advanced non-oat cell lung cancer: report of an RTOG prospective randomized trial.

From September 1979 to February 1983, 268 patients with unresectable, locally advanced (RTOG Stage III), non-small cell lung cancer were randomized to receive radiation therapy alone (RT) (50 Gy large field and 10 Gy boost), or combined with misonidazole (400 mg/m2 2-4 hr prior to RT daily for 5-6 weeks to a maximum dose of 12 g/m2 or until tumor progression). One hundred twenty-three patients who received irradiation alone and 116 given RT + misonidazole were evaluable for toxicity, time to tumor progression, and survival as of April 1987. The distribution of patient characteristics was similar in both treatment groups; 59% of the patients had a Karnofsky score of 90 or better, 53% had adenocarcinoma or large cell tumors, and 47% had Stage T3 tumors. Complete tumor regression was reported for 33 (27%) patients treated with radiation therapy alone and 24 (21%) who received misonidazole + RT. Median survival was 8 months with RT alone and 7.4 months with misonidazole + RT. Ninety-five percent of the patients have died. Seventy percent of the patients treated with radiation alone and 77% of those treated with misonidazole + RT died of progressive disease. Three patients treated with radiation alone and two with RT + misonidazole died subsequent to radiotherapy-related pneumonitis or pulmonary fibrosis. There was no significant improvement in response rates, local control, or survival for patients who received daily misonidazole along with irradiation compared with patients treated by irradiation alone.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1988

Additivity of radiosensitization by the combination of SR 2508 (etanidazole) and Ro 03-8799 (pimonidazole) in a murine tumor system.

The nitroimidazole radiosensitizers SR 2508 and Ro 03-8799 have different dose-limiting toxicities in man and hence can be used in combination. Such therapy will be beneficial only if their radiosensitizing properties are additive, which this study sought to determine using clinically relevant radiosensitizer concentrations in the EMT6 tumor in the flanks of BALB/c mice. 240 mg/kg of each drug gave tumor concentrations (+/- 2 se) 55 min after i.v. administration of the combination of 50.4 +/- 10.6 micrograms/g (236 +/- 50 nmol/g) for SR 2508 and 39.7 +/- 9.0 micrograms/g (137 +/- 31 nmol/g) for Ro 03-8799. The radiosensitization by both agents administered both singly and in combination at 240 mg/kg and singly at 480 mg/kg was measured, giving sensitizers 30 min before 20 Gy of 250 kV X rays. Tumor response was assayed by clonogenic cell survival. SER values (with 95% confidence limits) were 1.28 (1.20-1.37) for 240 mg/kg SR 2508, 1.20 (1.10-1.30) for 240 mg/kg Ro 03-8799, 1.46 (1.33-1.59) for 240 mg/kg of both drugs in combination, 1.46 (1.38-1.55) for 480 mg/kg SR 2508 and 1.46 (1.31-1.62) for 480 mg/kg Ro 03-8799. These data confirm the additivity of radiosensitization by the two drugs administered in combination.

Animals↗
PubMed1988

Use of a colorimetric microtiter (MTT) assay in determining the radiosensitivity of cells from murine solid tumors.

We assessed the use of a colorimetric assay for determination of radiosensitivity for cells taken directly from murine solid tumors. The assay uses microtier plates and measures the ability of viable cells to reduce a tetrazolium salt (MTT) to an insoluble form, a formazan salt. We established the dependency of the assay on the cell number and time of assay for two murine tumors (EMT-6 and RIF-1). We compared the MTT assay to the standard clonogenic assay and had good agreement of surviving fraction after radiation doses of 2 and 4 Gy. It is possible, therefore, to adapt the MTT assay for use with cell suspensions prepared directly from fresh murine tumors. This may provide a methodology for the determination of the clinical radiosensitivity of tumors including fresh clinical tumor specimens.

Animals↗
PubMed1987

Relationship between the neurotoxicity of the hypoxic cell radiosensitizer SR 2508 and the pharmacokinetic profile.

Complete pharmacological data from 71 patients treated on the phase I trial of SR 2508 were analyzed to see if the dose-limiting toxicity of peripheral neuropathy is related to the individual patient's pharmacokinetic profile. In a retrospective analysis, the risk of toxicity was best predicted by using the bivariate model of total drug exposure and the time over which the treatment course was given. Drug exposure [area under the curve (AUC)] for a single treatment was calculated by the integral over time of the serum concentration of SR 2508. Since the AUC was constant during the course of a patient's treatment, the total drug exposure (total-AUC) was estimated by the product of the AUC times the number of drug administrations. While the clinical efficacy of hypoxic cell sensitizers remains to be proven, SR 2508 is better tolerated than its predecessors, misonidazole and desmethylmisonidazole, as three times the amount of SR 2508 can be given. If this model is confirmed in the current phase II and III trials, the probability of developing neuropathy would be predictable for an individual patient from measurements made at the time of the first drug dose, allowing for the adjustment of drug schedule to avoid all but minor toxicity.

Dose-Response Relationship, Drug↗
PubMed1987

A comparison of misonidazole sensitized radiation therapy to radiation therapy alone for the palliation of hepatic metastases: results of a Radiation Therapy Oncology Group randomized prospective trial.

Between May 1980 and July 1983, the RTOG conducted a randomized prospective study comparing external radiation therapy and misonidazole to radiation therapy alone for patients with hepatic metastases. Two hundred fourteen patients were accessioned to this study of whom 187 were evaluable. Radiation therapy was delivered to the whole liver to a dose of 21.0 Gy in 7 fractions. Misonidazole was administered orally, 1.5 gm/m2 daily 4-6 hr before each treatment. Patients in the two treatment groups were evenly distributed with respect to stratification variables including primary site, extent of metastatic disease, and Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS). End points examined included amelioration of hepatic pain, improvement of KPS and alkaline phosphatase, decrease in liver and tumor size, and survival. The addition of misonidazole did not significantly improve the therapeutic response to radiation therapy in any of the parameters studied. Hepatic irradiation was effective in relieving abdominal pain with 80% of the symptomatic patients achieving improvement following therapy. Pain was completely relieved in 54% of these patients. Patients with liver metastases from colon carcinoma improved more frequently than those with metastases from other primary tumor sites (p = 0.02). Relief of pain occurred more frequently in patients treated with radiation therapy and misonidazole (87%) compared with radiation therapy alone (74%) (p = 0.08). Palliation of pain was prompt, occurring within a median of 1.7 weeks from the initiation of treatment, and 94% of patients who improved did so within 6 weeks of treatment. The median duration of response was 13.0 weeks in the symptomatic patients; 52% of those surviving 3 months remained improved. KPS improved in 28% of patients. Serial CT scans revealed a partial response in 7% and a marginal response in 13% of patients. One patient had a complete response to treatment. The median survival of patients treated in this series was 4.2 months with no difference between the two treatment groups. Patients with metastases from colon carcinoma and an initial KPS of 80 or more (48% of the patient population) had a median survival of 5.8 months with radiation therapy alone compared with 6.6 months with radiation therapy and misonidazole (p = 0.36). There was no significant treatment related morbidity. Radiation therapy remains an excellent palliative tool for the management of patients with symptomatic hepatic metastases. Further research must continue to identify new methods of selectivity enhancing the tumor response to radiation therapy.

Alkaline Phosphatase↗
PubMed1987

Large fraction irradiation with or without misonidazole in advanced non-oat cell carcinoma of the lung: a phase III randomized trial of the RTOG. Radiation Therapy Oncology Group.

The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) investigated the use of misonidazole as an hypoxic cell sensitizer in a Phase III prospective randomized trial employing radiotherapy, 600 cGy twice weekly to a total of 3600 cGy with and without misonidazole in the treatment of locally advanced non-metastatic squamous cell, adeno, or large cell carcinoma of the lung. Between January 1980 and July 1983, 117 patients from 21 institutions were enrolled. One-hundred eight patients were evaluable; 53 in the combined treatment arm and 55 in the radiation alone arm. Grade 3 or worse complications associated with radiation occurred in 17% of patients. Esophageal toxicity accounted for the majority of complications. Two (4%) patients in the radiotherapy plus misonidazole group experienced grade 3 peripheral neurotoxicity. Complete or partial responses were produced in 58% of the patients with radiotherapy alone and 36% of those treated with radiotherapy plus misonidazole (p = 0.08). At the time of first progression, over 50% of the patients had persistent local disease. Median survival was 7 months regardless of treatment. Misonidazole in the dose and schedule employed did not enhance the effect of radiotherapy on either local tumor control or overall survival in patients with advanced lung cancer.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1987

Diagnosis and management of plasmacytomas.

Although no optimal dose-response relationship has been defined for the local control of extramedullary plasmacytomas, the author recommends high local doses of 5000 cGy or more and field sizes sufficient to cover the primary mass, all its extensions as evident by CT scan, and the regional lymph nodes. Plasmacytomas of bone also should be treated aggressively.

Bone Neoplasms↗
PubMed1986

Phase I trial of the hypoxic cell radiosensitizer SR-2508: the results of the five to six week drug schedule.

Sixty-five patients were entered on the long schedule of the Phase I trial of SR-2508. The planned total doses ranged from 30 to 40.8 g/m2 using various treatment schema including daily, split course, and every-other-day schedules. The individual dose size was 2 g/m2 for 56 patients and 1.7 g/m2 for nine. In contrast to misonidazole and desmethylmisonidazole, more SR-2508 can be administered as the duration of therapy is lengthened. All six patients on the 30 g/m2 step tolerated the drug without toxicity. This total dose was not achievable in the three week schedule. Additionally, a number of patients did not develop neuropathy at a cumulative dose of 40.8 g/m2. Although the analysis is not yet complete, a given patient's drug exposure as measured by their total AUC (mMxhr), defined as the area-under-the-curve of serum concentration of SR-2508 vs. time for a single dose times the number of doses given, is useful in predicting toxicity for that patient. The recommended starting schedule for the Phase II and III trials is 34 g/m2 over a 6 week period (2 g/m2 every other day). A total AUC of approximately 39 mMxhr should be tolerable. The drug regimen must be altered for patients who have a high AUC. Therefore, it is mandatory to have an accurate and rapid pharmacokinetic analysis for each patient. The clinical efficacy of the hypoxic cell sensitizers remains to be proven. However, using the guidelines derived from the Phase I trial, SR-2508 should be a relatively safe drug, producing minor or no toxicity.

Drug Administration Schedule↗
PubMed1986

Non-Hodgkin's lymphomas following radiation therapy alone for Hodgkin's disease.

We have recently treated three patients who developed a non-Hodgkin's lymphoma after therapy with radiation alone for Hodgkin's disease. The secondary non-Hodgkin's lymphomas occurred 4 years (two patients) and 11.5 years after receiving irradiation. Thirteen additional cases have been reported and are reviewed with attention to the subsequent histology and response to treatment of these secondary non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. The pathogenesis is unknown, but, may be therapy-related or part of the natural history of the lymphocyte predominance subtype of Hodgkin's disease. Possible mechanisms will be discussed. A subset of the patients with secondary lymphomas following radiation therapy alone are curable with chemotherapy. New sites of disease after apparent control of Hodgkin's disease require pathology for confirmation of the disease process and appropriate therapy.

Adult↗
PubMed1985

Radiation fibrosis: differentiation from recurrent tumor by MR imaging.

Magnetic resonance (MR) images of 21 patients who had undergone radiation therapy were analyzed and compared with those of 15 patients who had untreated tumors. T2-weighted images (TR = 1,500 msec, TE = 90 msec) were most helpful in distinguishing recurrent tumor from radiation fibrosis. Radiation fibrosis, like muscle, usually remained low in signal intensity on T2-weighted images, while tumor demonstrated higher signal intensity. In no patient was the signal intensity of tumor the same or less than muscle on the T2-weighted images. However, relatively high signal intensity on T2-weighted images is not specific for tumor recurrence and may be seen in acute radiation pneumonitis, infection, hemorrhage, and even pulmonary radiation fibrosis.

Adult↗
PubMed1985

Thoracic wall involvement by Hodgkin disease and non-Hodgkin lymphoma: CT evaluation.

Thoracic computed tomographic (CT) scans of 250 patients with newly diagnosed or recurrent lymphoma revealed thoracic wall involvement in 24 patients (11 with Hodgkin disease, 13 with non-Hodgkin lymphoma). Thoracic wall involvement occurred without contiguous mediastinal or parenchymal involvement in 17 patients. Of these, 13 patients had masses beneath the pectoralis muscles or within the breast, and four had masses arising from the ribs. Five additional patients had mediastinal masses with thymic involvement and parasternal extension through the thoracic wall. Pulmonary parenchymal lymphoma with thoracic wall invasion was noted in the remaining two patients. In five of nine patients receiving radiation therapy, treatment plans were modified by CT demonstration of thoracic wall lymphoma.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1984

Clinical trials with hypoxic cell sensitizers: time to retrench or time to push forward?

Results of world-wide clinical trials with misonidazole are discussed. An attempt is made to assess the reasons for the lack of positive results and the cost-benefit analysis is critically reviewed. The data on the clinical investigations of the second generation misonidazole analogues SR-2508 and RO-03-8799 are presented. Emphasis is placed on future work such as tumor selection for clinical trials, reduction of drug toxicity and methods to increase the drug radiosensitizing properties. Because of the large amount of knowledge, experience, productivity and good scientific clinical data accummulated with nitroimidazoles over the past five years, it is recommended that this is the time to push forward with the work on the newest, more efficient compounds.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗