PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

T Hartshorn

Publications and source records attributed to T Hartshorn.

4 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Duplex ultrasound scanning is reliable in the detection of endoleak following endovascular aneurysm repair.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the value of duplex ultrasound scanning (DUSS) in the routine follow up of patients following EVAR. METHODS: Imaging was reviewed for 310 consecutive patients undergoing EVAR at a single centre. Concurrent ultrasound and CT scans were defined as having occurred within 6 months of each other. There were 244 paired concurrent DUSS and CT scans which were used for further analysis. These modalities were compared with respect to sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and level of agreement (by Kappa statistics) using CT as the 'gold standard'. RESULTS: DUSS failed to detect a number of endoleaks which were seen on CT and the sensitivity of this test was therefore poor (67%). However, the specificity of DUSS compared more favourably with a value of 91%. Positive predictive values ranged from 33-100% but negative predictive values were more reliable with values of 91-100% at all time points post operatively. There were no type I leaks, or endoleaks requiring intervention which were missed on DUSS. Overall, there was a 'fair' level of agreement between the two imaging modalities using Kappa statistics. CONCLUSION: Although DUSS is not as sensitive as CT scanning in the detection of endoleak, no leaks requiring intervention were missed on DUSS in this study. DUSS is much cheaper than CT and avoids high doses of radiation. DUSS therefore remains a valuable method of follow up after EVAR and can reduce the need for repeated CT scans.

Aneurysm↗
PubMed1998

Comparison of computed tomography and duplex imaging in assessing aortic morphology following endovascular aneurysm repair.

BACKGROUND: Computed tomography (CT) has been used to assess patients following endovascular aneurysm repair to determine the need for secondary endoluminal or operative procedures. This prospective study compared CT and duplex imaging to evaluate aneurysm morphology following endoluminal aortic grafting. METHODS: Twenty patients were evaluated at regular intervals following successful endoluminal aneurysm repair. CT and duplex scanning were compared in their ability to determine aneurysm and aortic diameter, the presence of perigraft extravasation (endoleaks) and technical defects in the endograft. RESULTS: In 20 patients who were assessed 6 months after operation, duplex imaging identified four endoleaks (two early, two late; one proximal, three distal). In three cases, the aneurysm diameter progressively increased after operation. In patients with a thrombosed aneurysm sac, the aneurysm regressed at a median of 0.40 (range 0.13-0.8) cm per year. The CT findings were similar (median regression 0.43 (range 0-1.0) cm per year), although CT was unable to predict the site of the leak as accurately as duplex imaging. CT demonstrated that the diameter of the juxtarenal aorta increased following endografting. CONCLUSION: Duplex imaging is a less invasive, less costly alternative to CT in the follow-up of patients after endoluminal aortic surgery. Increase in size of the aneurysm sac following endovascular aneurysm repair strongly suggests the presence of an endoleak.

Aged↗