Crossmatching for renal transplantation--a 5-year review of different cytotoxic and flow cytometric methods showing importance of the IgG anti-B-lymphocyte FACS crossmatch.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to T Horsburgh.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Eight patients received either recombinant Interleukin-2 (rIL-2) alone or rIL-2 plus 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) by constant infusion after undergoing potentially curative surgery for gastric cancer. rIL-2, given at a dose of 18 x 10(6) IU/m2/24 hours, was safely tolerated and only two episodes of WHO grade 3 toxicities occurred, both of which promptly responded to treatment and temporary interruptions of rIL-2 infusions. 5-FU infusions given at 12.5 mg/kg/24 hours did not alter the rebound lymphocytosis seen after completion of rIL-2 infusions. We conclude that the administration of rIL-2 and rIL-2 plus 5-FU to cancer patients recovering from major surgery is safe and well tolerated.
Eight patients with metastatic hypernephroma were treated with constant infusion recombinant Interleukin-2 (rIL-2), changes in renal and hepatic function and protein levels were monitored during 2 cycles of treatment. The rIL-2 infusion caused a reversible fall in ures and a non-reversible rise in creatinine. Liver function tests (bilirubin, ALT, ALP and GGT) rose during rIL-2 treatment and had returned to pretreatment levels 3 weeks after the last day of rIL-2. There was also a reversible fall in serum protein levels during rIL-2 infusion. Although constant infusion rIL-2 ameliorated much of the severe toxicities usually seen with high-dose bolus rIL-2, the non-reversible rise in serum creatinine levels is not a previously reported feature of rIL-2 therapy.
Anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody was found to enhance non-MHC restricted cellular cytotoxicity in vitro in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells from normal healthy individuals. This effect was dose dependent (maximal at 0.11 micrograms/ml) and was complete within 30 minutes. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells from 4 out of 8 cancer patients treated with Interleukin-2 were deficient in their ability to respond to anti-CD3 in vitro. In contrast, peripheral blood mononuclear cells from cancer patients who subsequently displayed a tumour response to Interleukin-2, were able to respond to anti-CD3 by enhanced non-MHC restricted cellular cytotoxicity. This study demonstrates the importance of CD3+ lymphocytes in the generation of antitumour activity following in vivo Interleukin-2 administration and the ability of CD3+ve lymphocytes to respond to anti-CD3 in vitro may indicate those patients who would benefit from Interleukin-2 therapy.