PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

T Indow

Publications and source records attributed to T Indow.

9 recordsLinked to original sources

A critical review of Luneburg's model with regard to global structure of visual space.

Visual space (VS) is a coherent self-organized dynamic complex that is structured into objects, backgrounds, and the self. As a concrete example of geometrical properties in VS, experimental results on parallel and (equi) distance alleys in a frameless VS were reviewed, and Luneburg's interpretation on the discrepancy between these 2 alleys was sketched with emphasis on the 2 hypotheses involved: VS is a Riemannian space of constant curvature (RCC) and the a priori assumed correspondence between VS and the physical space in which stimulus points are presented. Dissociating these 2 assumptions, the author tried to see to what extent the global structure of VS under natural conditions is in accordance with the hypothesis of RCC and to make explicit the logic underlying RCC. Several open questions about the geometry of VS per se have been enumerated.

Humans↗

Alleys on an extensive apparent frontoparallel plane: a second experiment.

Small light points were presented, in the dark, around a point in the center which was fixed at a distance of about 3 m from the subject. In experiment 1, the subject adjusted the positions of points so that all were frontoparallel and in three horizontal series, each consisting of five points, with the middle series level with the eyes, to satisfy the following conditions: (i) the three series must appear straight and horizontally parallel; (ii) the points of each of the five triplets must appear equally separated vertically; (iii) the three points of each triplet must appear to move horizontally along straight and parallel paths; (iv) the three points of each triplet must appear to move horizontally with a constant vertical separation. The most distant points were about 0.51 rad to the left and right of center, and about 0.22 rad above and below. In experiment 2, with the configuration of points obtained in experiment 1, the subject assessed ratios of all perceptual distances between points and also from the subject to all points. From experiment 1 (three subjects used), Gaussian curvature K and a constant related to depth perception (sigma) were estimated under the assumption that the frontoparallel plane is a Riemannian plane of constant curvature K and that Luneburg's mapping functions between visual space and physical space hold. The analysis was made according to equations different from those used previously. The results of experiment 2 (two subjects used) were analyzed by a new computer program in which no preassumed mapping functions are necessary for the estimation of K. From both analyses it is clear that there is no need to assume any other value of K than 0 (Euclidean) to describe the geometry of the frontoparallel plane. This presents a striking contrast to the results from experiments on parallel and equidistance alleys running toward the subject on the horizontal plane.

Attention↗

Parallel-alleys and distance-alleys on horopter plane in the dark.

On each of three frontoparallel planes at distances of about 98, 186, and 276 cm from the subject, two series of light points running horizontally in the dark, one above the other, were constructed by six subjects: a P-alley in which the two series appear as two straight lines that are parallel, and a D-alley in which each pair of points appear equally separated in the vertical direction. Luneburg's mapping functions between visual space and physical space have been used to obtain estimates of K (curvature) and sigma (a constant related to depth perception). In addition, ratios of perceptual distances were assessed by four out of the six subjects with eleven triplets of points on the alleys and values of K were estimated (and the fits of theoretical equations were tested) without the use of the mapping functions. In contrast to experiments with P-alleys and D-alleys on the horizontal plane, K was not unequivocally negative in either of the two experiments.

Depth Perception↗