PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

T J Ebert

Publications and source records attributed to T J Ebert.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2005

Variability of duration of action of neuromuscular-blocking drugs in elderly patients.

BACKGROUND: Steroid-based, non-depolarizing neuromuscular-blocking (NMB) drugs (e.g. rocuronium, vecuronium) are characterized by organ-dependent elimination and significantly longer durations of action in elderly compared to young patients. Cisatracurium is a benzylisoquinolinium NMB drug with a duration of action not altered by ageing. The objective of the study was to determine if elderly patients had less variability in duration of action with 2 x ED95 of cisatracurium compared to equipotent doses of rocuronium or vecuronium. METHODS: Informed consent was obtained from 66 elderly patients with normal renal and liver function. Preoperative midazolam (1 mg) was given IV. The anaesthestic induction was with 5 mg kg(-1) thiopental and 2 microg kg(-1) fentanyl. The patients received 0.6 mg kg(-1) rocuronium, 0.1 mg kg(-1) vecuronium or 0.1 mg kg(-1) cisatracurium. Anaesthetic maintenance was with sevoflurane in oxygen/nitrous oxide. Neuromuscular-blocking duration of action was defined as the return of T1 twitch height to 25% of control. Variability was determined by subtracting the actual duration of action from the mean duration of action for each drug. RESULTS: The durations of action (range, min) were: cisatracurium, 37-81; vecuronium, 35-137; and rocuronium, 33-119. The median of the variability of duration was significantly less with cisatracurium (7 min) compared to vecuronium (18 min) and rocuronium (18 min) (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: When used with sevoflurane/N(2)O, there was a two-fold greater variability of duration of neuromuscular blockade in elderly patients receiving rocuronium or vecuronium compared with cisatracurium.

Aged↗
PubMed2001

High concentrations of isoflurane do not block the sympathetic nervous system activation from desflurane.

PURPOSE: The volatile anesthetic desflurane has been associated with neurocirculatory responses that have been relatively refractory to adjuvant treatment. We have employed desflurane to evaluate the integrity of the sympathetic nerve recording after establishment of the anesthetized state with another anesthetic agent. This retrospective evaluation of data from volunteers determined if higher concentrations of isoflurane that were sufficient to block the neurocirculatory response to laryngeal and tracheal stimulation would abolish the neurocirculatory response to desflurane. METHODS: Data from eight, healthy, young volunteers met our criteria for inclusion. They had been anesthetized with propofol or thiopental and intubated after neuromuscular blockade. Each subject was monitored with radial artery blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR)(ECG), and sympathetic microneurography. Isoflurane had been administered to achieve a steady state concentration of 1.5 MAC (minimum alveolar concentration) while oxygenation and carbon dioxide were monitored with pulse oximetry and infrared spectrometry, respectively. A deep level of anesthesia was confirmed when laryngoscopy and endotracheal tube movement failed to elicit a neurocirculatory response. A brief exposure to 11% desflurane in the inspired gas was then provided. RESULTS: The responses to desflurane included significant increases in HR, range 32-84 b/min, and BP, range 15-72 mm Hg (P < 0.05). Sympathetic nerve activity increased substantially in the three volunteers with functional nerve recordings. CONCLUSION: In healthy volunteers receiving 1.5 MAC isoflurane, which was sufficient to block the neurocirculatory response to laryngoscopy and tracheal stimulation, there were striking increases in sympathetic outflow, HR and BP when 11% desflurane was substituted for isoflurane.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Sedative, analgesic and cognitive effects of clonidine infusions in humans.

This placebo-controlled, randomized study evaluated, on separate days, the dose-response relationship for 1 h infusions of clonidine 1, 2 and 4 microg kg(-1) h(-1), in eight healthy volunteers aged 22-30 yr. Response end-points included sedation (bispectral index, visual analogue scale and observer assessment of sedation), analgesia to a cold pressor test, memory (recall of word lists), cognitive function (digit symbol substitution test (DSST)), respiratory function (respiratory rate, end-tidal carbon dioxide, oxygen saturation) and haemodynamic stability (heart rate and mean arterial pressure). Clonidine infusions resulted in significant and progressive sedation, but all subjects were easily awoken to perform tests and evaluations. Statistically significant analgesia, memory impairment and reduced performance on the DSST occurred during 4 microg kg(-1) h(-1) infusions (resulting in a plasma concentration of 2 ng ml(-1). There were no statistically significant changes in cardiorespiratory variables throughout the study.

Adrenergic alpha-Agonists↗
PubMed2001

Speed of recovery and side-effect profile of sevoflurane sedation compared with midazolam.

BACKGROUND: Sedation for surgical procedures performed with regional or local anesthesia has usually been achieved with intravenous medications, whereas the use of volatile anesthetics has been limited. The use of sevoflurane for sedation has been suggested because of its characteristics of nonpungency, rapid induction, and quick elimination. The purpose of this investigation was to assess the quality, recovery, and side effects of sevoflurane sedation compared with midazolam. METHODS: One hundred seventy-three patients undergoing surgery with local or regional anesthesia were enrolled in a multicenter, open-label, randomized investigation comparing sedation with sevoflurane versus midazolam. Sedation level was titrated to an Observer's Assessment of Alertness--Sedation score of 3 (responds slowly to voice). Recovery was assessed objectively by Observer's Assessment of Alertness--Sedation, Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST), and memory scores, and subjectively by visual analog scales. RESULTS: Significantly more patients in the sevoflurane group had to be converted to general anesthesia because of excessive movement (18 sevoflurane and 2 midazolam; P = 0.043). Of remaining patients, 141 were assessable for efficacy and recovery data (93 sevoflurane and 48 midazolam). Sevoflurane and midazolam produced dose-related sedation. Sevoflurane patients had higher DSST and memory scores during recovery. Seventy-six percent (sevoflurane) compared with 35% (midazolam) returned to baseline DSST at 30 min postoperatively (P < 0.05). More frequent excitement-disinhibition was observed with sevoflurane (15 [16%] vs. midazolam; P = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Sevoflurane for sedation produces faster recovery of cognitive function as measured by DSST and memory scores compared with midazolam. However, sevoflurane for sedation is complicated by a high incidence of intraoperative excitement.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Lack of degradation of sevoflurane by a new carbon dioxide absorbent in humans.

BACKGROUND: Potent inhaled anesthetics degrade in the presence of the strong bases (sodium hydroxide or potassium hydroxide) in carbon dioxide (CO2) absorbents. A new absorbent, Amsorb (Armstrong Medical Ltd., Coleraine, Northern Ireland), does not employ these strong bases. This study compared the scavenging efficacy and compound A production of two commercially available absorbents (soda lime and barium hydroxide lime) with Amsorb in humans undergoing general anesthesia. METHODS: Four healthy volunteers were anesthetized on different days with desflurane, sevoflurane, enflurane, and isoflurane. End-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2) and anesthetic concentrations were measured with infrared spectroscopy; blood pressure and arterial blood gases were obtained from a radial artery catheter. Each anesthetic exposure lasted 3 h, during which the three fresh (normally hydrated) CO2 absorbents were used for a period of 1 h each. Anesthesia was administered with a fresh gas flow rate of 2 l/min of air:oxygen (50:50). Tidal volume was 10 ml/kg; respiratory rate was 8 breaths/min. Arterial blood gases were obtained at baseline and after each hour. Inspired concentrations of compound A were measured after 15, 30, and 60 min of anesthetic administration for each CO2 absorbent. RESULTS: Arterial blood gases and ETCO2 were not different among three CO2 absorbents. During sevoflurane, compound A formed with barium hydroxide lime and soda lime, but not with Amsorb. CONCLUSIONS: This new CO2 absorbent effectively scavenged CO2 and was not associated with compound A production.

Absorption↗
PubMed2000

Induction characteristics with 3% and 8% sevoflurane in adults: an evaluation of the second stage of anaesthesia and its haemodynamic consequences.

The second stage of anaesthesia was examined during 3 and 8% sevoflurane induction to see if any shortening of its duration was at the expense of cardiovascular stability. Fourteen volunteers underwent consecutive, randomly ordered inductions. Pupil size, skin sympathetic activity, plasma catecholamines, blood pressure and heart rate were measured. Eight per cent sevoflurane produced significantly shorter times to loss of consciousness (mean 68 s (SD 18) vs. mean 150 s (SD38)) and durations of second stage (mean 58 s (SD 38) vs. mean 91 s (SD 46)). Blood pressure, heart rate and sympathetic nerve responses were the same in both groups. Compared with baseline, skin sympathetic activity was greatest during pre-oxygenation (not significant) and unaltered during second stage. Both groups showed significantly increased plasma norepinephrine and heart rate and decreased blood pressure from baseline. Eight per cent sevoflurane induction produced a shorter second stage than 3% with equal cardiovascular stability and the same sympathetic response.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Sedative, amnestic, and analgesic properties of small-dose dexmedetomidine infusions.

This research determined the safety and efficacy of two small-dose infusions of dexmedetomidine by evaluating sedation, analgesia, cognition, and cardiorespiratory function. Seven healthy young volunteers provided informed consent and participated on three occasions with random assignment to drug or placebo. Heart rate, blood pressure, respiratory rate, ETCO(2), O(2) saturation, and processed electroencephalogram (bispectral analysis) were monitored. Baseline hemodynamic measurements were acquired, and psychometric tests were performed (visual analog scale for sedation; observer's assessment of alertness/sedation scale; digit symbol substitution test; and memory). The pain from a 1-min cold pressor test was quantified with a visual analog scale. After a 10-min initial dose of saline or 6 microg. kg(-1). h(-1) dexmedetomidine, volunteers received 50-min IV infusions of saline, or 0.2 or 0.6 microg. kg(-1). h(-1) dexmedetomidine. Measurements were repeated at the end of infusion and during recovery. The two dexmedetomidine infusions resulted in similar and significant sedation (30%-60%), impairment of memory (approximately 50%), and psychomotor performance (28%-41%). Hemodynamics, oxygen saturation, ETCO(2), and respiratory rate were well preserved throughout the infusion and recovery periods. Pain to the cold pressor test was reduced by 30% during dexmedetomidine infusion. Small-dose dexmedetomidine provided sedation, analgesia, and memory and cognitive impairment. These properties might prove useful in a postoperative or intensive care unit setting. IMPLICATIPNS: The alpha(2) agonist, dexmedetomidine, has sedation and analgesic properties. This study quantified these effects, as well as cardiorespiratory, memory and psychomotor effects, in healthy volunteers. Dexmedetomidine infusions resulted in reversible sedation, mild analgesia, and memory impairment without cardiorespiratory compromise.

Adrenergic alpha-Agonists↗
PubMed2000

The effects of increasing plasma concentrations of dexmedetomidine in humans.

BACKGROUND: This study determined the responses to increasing plasma concentrations of dexmedetomidine in humans. METHODS: Ten healthy men (20-27 yr) provided informed consent and were monitored (underwent electrocardiography, measured arterial, central venous [CVP] and pulmonary artery [PAP] pressures, cardiac output, oxygen saturation, end-tidal carbon dioxide [ETCO2], respiration, blood gas, and catecholamines). Hemodynamic measurements, blood sampling, and psychometric, cold pressor, and baroreflex tests were performed at rest and during sequential 40-min intravenous target infusions of dexmedetomidine (0.5, 0.8, 1.2, 2.0, 3.2, 5.0, and 8.0 ng/ml; baroreflex testing only at 0.5 and 0.8 ng/ml). RESULTS: The initial dose of dexmedetomidine decreased catecholamines 45-76% and eliminated the norepinephrine increase that was seen during the cold pressor test. Catecholamine suppression persisted in subsequent infusions. The first two doses of dexmedetomidine increased sedation 38 and 65%, and lowered mean arterial pressure by 13%, but did not change central venous pressure or pulmonary artery pressure. Subsequent higher doses increased sedation, all pressures, and calculated vascular resistance, and resulted in significant decreases in heart rate, cardiac output, and stroke volume. Recall and recognition decreased at a dose of more than 0.7 ng/ml. The pain rating and mean arterial pressure increase to cold pressor test progressively diminished as the dexmedetomidine dose increased. The baroreflex heart rate slowing as a result of phenylephrine challenge was potentiated at both doses of dexmedetomidine. Respiratory variables were minimally changed during infusions, whereas acid-base was unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing concentrations of dexmedetomidine in humans resulted in progressive increases in sedation and analgesia, decreases in heart rate, cardiac output, and memory. A biphasic (low, then high) dose-response relation for mean arterial pressure, pulmonary arterial pressure, and vascular resistances, and an attenuation of the cold pressor response also were observed.

Adrenergic alpha-Agonists↗
PubMed2000

Absence of bronchodilation during desflurane anesthesia: a comparison to sevoflurane and thiopental.

BACKGROUND: Bronchospasm is a potential complication in anyone undergoing general anesthesia. Because volatile anesthetics relax bronchial smooth muscle, the effects of two newer volatile anesthetics, desflurane and sevoflurane, on respiratory resistance were evaluated. The authors hypothesized that desflurane would have greater bronchodilating effects because of its ability to increase sympathetic nervous system activity. METHODS: Informed consent was obtained from patients undergoing elective surgery with general anesthesia. We recorded airway flow and pressure after thiopental induction and tracheal intubation (baseline) and for 10 min after beginning volatile anesthesia ( approximately 1 minimum alveolar concentration inspired). Respiratory system resistance was determined using the isovolume technique. RESULTS: Fifty subjects were randomized to receive sevoflurane (n = 20), desflurane (n = 20), or thiopental infusion (n = 10, 0.25 mg. kg-1. h-1). There were no differences between groups for age, height, weight, smoking history, and American Society of Anesthesiologists physical class. On average, sevoflurane reduced respiratory resistance 15% below baseline, whereas both desflurane (+5%) and thiopental (+10%) did not decrease respiratory resistance. The respiratory resistance changes did not differ in patients with and without a history of smoking during sevoflurane or thiopental. In contrast, administration of desflurane to smokers resulted in the greatest increase in respiratory resistance. CONCLUSIONS: Sevoflurane causes moderate bronchodilation that is not observed with desflurane or sodium thiopental. The bronchoconstriction produced by desflurane was primarily noted in patients who currently smoked. (Key words: Bronchospasm; respiratory resistance; volatile anesthetics.)

Anesthesia, General↗
PubMed2000

Renal responses to low-flow desflurane, sevoflurane, and propofol in patients.

BACKGROUND: The contributing factors that result in significant, postoperative proteinuria and glucosuria after low-flow isoflurane and sevoflurane anesthesia are unknown. The present study compared renal responses after anesthesia with desflurane (negligible metabolism), sevoflurane, or intravenous propofol. METHODS: Informed consent was obtained from 52 patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-III (aged 36-81 yr). Patients with diabetes or renal insufficiency were excluded. Desflurane (n = 20) or sevoflurane (n = 22), without nitrous oxide, was given at 1 l/min fresh gas flow for elective surgical procedures lasting more than 2 h; 10 patients received propofol without nitrous oxide as the primary anesthetic. Blood and urine chemistries were obtained before surgery. Blood and 24-h urine collections were obtained for 3 days after surgery and were analyzed for liver and renal indices. RESULTS: Length of surgery averaged approximately 300 min (range, 136-750 min), minimum alveolar concentration-hour averaged 4.3 (range, 1.2-11.0), and infusion rates of propofol were 99-168 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1). Plasma creatinine concentration did not change, plasma blood urea nitrogen decreased significantly, and significant increases in urine glucose, protein, and albumin occurred similarly in all groups. Mean (+/- SD) postoperative urine glucose values for day 1 after desflurane, sevoflurane, and propofol were 1.4 +/- 3.0, 1.1 +/- 2.1, and 1.9 +/- 2.6 g/d (normal, < 0.5 g/d). The average daily protein/creatinine ratios for postoperative days 2-3 after desflurane, sevoflurane, and propofol were 240 +/- 187, 272 +/- 234, and 344 +/- 243 (normal, < 150 mg/g). Regardless of anesthetic, there were significantly greater urine protein concentrations after surgical procedures in central versus peripheral regions. CONCLUSIONS: Alterations in postoperative renal function were common and unrelated to the choice of anesthetic. These findings implicate nonanesthetic factors in producing changes in biochemical indices of renal excretory function.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Propofol, but not etomidate, reduces desflurane-mediated sympathetic activation in humans.

PURPOSE: The administration of desflurane to humans can lead to substantial activation of the neurohumoral axis. Propofol can inhibit the sympathetic response to stress. This study compared the neurocirculatory effects of induction of anesthesia with propofol with those of etomidate on desflurane-mediated sympathetic activation. METHODS: After informed consent, awake baseline recordings of heart rate (HR), mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), and efferent sympathetic nerve activity (SNA, peroneal nerve) were obtained from healthy volunteers randomly assigned to receive either 2.5 mg x kg(-1) propofol (n=8) or 0.3 mg x kg(-1) etomidate (n=7). Two minutes after i.v. induction, desflurane 3.6% was added to the inspired gas, and increased in consecutive minutes to 7% and 10.9%. Ventilation via mask was continued for an additional seven minutes. Normocarbia was maintained while neurocirculatory parameters were continuously recorded. RESULTS: There were no differences between groups at baseline. The administration of desflurane via mask after etomidate led to increases in HR, MAP and SNA. Propofol significantly reduced the MAP response and delayed and attenuated the sympatho-excitation. CONCLUSION: Propofol induction reduced the sympathetic activation and hypertension associated with desflurane.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

A review of recovery from sevoflurane anaesthesia: comparisons with isoflurane and propofol including meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Sevoflurane has a lower blood:gas partition coefficient than isoflurane and thus should be associated with a more rapid recovery from anaesthesia. METHODS: A review and meta-analysis were employed to examine the recovery profiles of adult patients following anaesthesia, comparing sevoflurane to isoflurane and sevoflurane to propofol. RESULTS: There were significant differences in times to several recovery events that favoured sevoflurane to isoflurane anaesthesia, including time to emergence, response to commands, extubation, and orientation. Likewise, there were significant differences in times to the same recovery events following anaesthesia with sevoflurane versus propofol. There were no differences in time to recovery room discharge when comparing sevoflurane to isoflurane or propofol. CONCLUSION: The observed differences between sevoflurane and isoflurane or propofol anaesthesia support the postulate that the use of sevoflurane is associated with a more rapid recovery from anaesthesia than either isoflurane or propofol.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Absence of renal and hepatic toxicity after four hours of 1.25 minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration sevoflurane anesthesia in volunteers.

UNLABELLED: Sevoflurane is degraded by CO2 absorbents to Compound A. The delivery of sevoflurane with a low fresh gas flow increases the generation of Compound A. The administration of Compound A to rats can produce injury to renal tubules that is dependent on both the dose and duration of exposure to Compound A. The present study evaluated renal and hepatic function in eight volunteers after a 1-L/min delivery of 3% (1.25 minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration) sevoflurane for 4 h. Volunteers gave their informed consent and provided 24-h urine collections before and for 3 days after sevoflurane anesthesia. Urine samples were analyzed for glucose, protein, albumin, and alpha- and pi-glutathione-S-transferase. Daily blood samples were analyzed for markers of renal and liver injury or dysfunction. Circuit Compound A and plasma fluoride concentrations were determined. During anesthesia, the average maximal inspired Compound A concentration was 39 +/- 6 (mean +/- SD). The median mean arterial pressure, esophageal temperature, and end-tidal CO2 were 62 +/- 6 mmHg, 36.5 +/- 0.3 degrees C, and 30.5 +/- 0.5 mm Hg, respectively. Two hours after anesthesia, the plasma fluoride concentration was 50 +/- 9 micromol/L. All markers of hepatic and renal function were unchanged after anesthesia (repeated-measures analysis of variance P > 0.05). Low-flow sevoflurane was not associated with renal or hepatic injury in humans based on unchanged biochemical markers of renal and liver function. IMPLICATIONS: Sevoflurane delivered in a 3% concentration with a fresh gas flow of 1 L/min for 4 h generated an average maximal Compound A concentration of 39 ppm but did not result in any significant increase in sensitive markers of renal function or injury, including urinary protein, albumin, glucose, and alpha- and pi-glutathione-S-transferase.

Alanine Transaminase↗
PubMed1998

Absence of biochemical evidence for renal and hepatic dysfunction after 8 hours of 1.25 minimum alveolar concentration sevoflurane anesthesia in volunteers.

BACKGROUND: Sevoflurane is degraded by carbon dioxide absorbents to a difluorovinyl ether (compound A) that can cause renal and hepatic injury in rats. The present study applied sensitive markers of renal and hepatic function to determine the safety of prolonged (8 h), high concentration (3% end-tidal) sevoflurane anesthesia in human volunteers. METHODS: Thirteen healthy male volunteers provided informed consent to undergo 8 h of 1.25 minimum alveolar concentration sevoflurane anesthesia delivered with a fresh gas flow of 2 l/min. Glucose, protein, albumin, N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase (NAG), and alpha- and pi-glutathione-S-transferase (GST) levels were analyzed in urine collected at 24 h before and for 3 days after sevoflurane anesthesia. Daily blood samples were analyzed for creatinine, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, and bilirubin concentrations. Circuit compound A and plasma fluoride concentrations were measured. RESULTS: During anesthesia, average and maximum inspired compound A concentrations were 27 +/- 7 and 34 +/- 6 (mean +/- SD) and median mean blood pressure, esophageal temperature, and end-tidal carbon dioxide levels were 63 mmHg, 36.8 degrees C, and 32 mmHg, respectively. The average serum inorganic fluoride concentration 2 h after anesthesia was 66.2 +/- 14.7 microM. Results of tests of hepatic function and renal function (BUN, creatinine concentration) were unchanged after anesthesia. Glucose, protein, albumin, and NAG excretion were not significantly increased after anesthesia. Urine concentrations of alpha-GST and pi-GST were increased on day 1 after anesthesia and alpha-GST was increased on day 2 after anesthesia but returned to normal afterward. CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged (8 h), high concentration (3%) sevoflurane anesthesia administered to volunteers in a fresh gas flow of 2 l/min does not result in clinically significant changes in biochemical markers of renal or hepatic dysfunction.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Cysteine conjugate beta-lyase-dependent metabolism of compound A (2-[fluoromethoxy]-1,1,3,3,3-pentafluoro-1-propene) in human subjects anesthetized with sevoflurane and in rats given compound A.

BACKGROUND: Sevoflurane undergoes Baralyme- or soda lime-catalyzed degradation in the anesthesia circuit to yield compound A (2-[fluoromethoxy]-1,1,3,3,3-pentafluroro-1-propene), which is nephrotoxic in rats and undergoes metabolism via the cysteine conjugate beta-lyase pathway in those animals. The objective of these experiments was to test the hypothesis that compound A undergoes beta-lyase-dependent metabolism in humans. METHODS: Human volunteers were anesthetized with sevoflurane (1.25 minimum alveolar concentration, 3%, 2 l/min, 8 h) and thereby exposed to compound A. Urine was collected at 24-h intervals for 72 h after anesthesia. Rats, which served as a positive control, were given compound A intraperitoneally, and urine was collected for 24 h afterward. Human and rat urine samples were analyzed by 19F nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry for the presence of compound A metabolites. RESULTS: Analysis of human and rat urine showed the presence of the compound A metabolites S-[2(fluoromethoxy)-1,1,3,3,3-pentafluoropropyl]-N-acetyl-L- cysteine, (E)- and (Z)-S-[2-(fluoromethoxy)-1,3,3,3-tetrafluoro-1-propenyl]-N-acetyl- L-cysteine, 2-(fluoromethoxy)-3,3,3-trifluoropropanoic acid, 3,3,3-trifluorolactic acid, and inorganic fluoride. The presence of 2-(fluoromethoxy)3,3,3-trifluoropropanoic acid and 3,3,3-trifluorolactic acid in human urine was confirmed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. CONCLUSIONS: The formation of compound A-derived mercapturates shows that compound A undergoes glutathione S-conjugate formation. The identification of 2-(fluoromethoxy)-3,3,3-trifluoropropanoic acid and 3,3,3-trifluorolactic acid in the urine of humans anesthetized with sevoflurane shows that compound A undergoes beta-lyase-dependent metabolism. Metabolite formation was qualitatively similar in both human volunteers anesthetized with sevoflurane, and thereby exposed to compound A, and in rats given compound A, indicating that compound A is metabolized by the beta-lyase pathway in both species.

Anesthetics, Inhalation↗
PubMed1998

Desflurane-mediated sympathetic activation occurs in humans despite preventing hypotension and baroreceptor unloading.

BACKGROUND: Increasing concentrations of desflurane result in progressive decreases in blood pressure (BP) and, unlike other currently marketed, potent volatile anesthetics, heightened sympathetic nervous system activity. This study aimed to determine whether baroreflex mechanisms are involved in desflurane-mediated sympathetic excitation. METHODS: Healthy volunteers were anesthetized with desflurane (n = 8) or isoflurane (n = 9). Heart rate (HR; measured by electrocardiograph), blood pressure (BP; measured by arterial catheter), and efferent sympathetic nerve activity (SNA; obtained from percutaneous recordings from the peroneal nerve) were monitored. Baroreflex sensitivity was evaluated at baseline while volunteers were conscious and during 0.5, 1, and 1.5 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) anesthesia via bolus injections of nitroprusside (100 microg) and phenylephrine (150 microg) to decrease and increase BP. To prevent the BP decline with increasing depths of anesthesia, phenylephrine was infused to maintain mean BP at the 0.5 MAC level. RESULTS: The HR, BP, and SNA were similar between the groups at the conscious baseline measurement. Efferent SNA did not change during higher MAC of isoflurane, but it increased progressively as desflurane concentrations were increased beyond 0.5 MAC, despite maintaining BP at the 0.5 MAC value with phenylephrine infusions (P < 0.05). Cardiac baroslopes (based on changes in HR) were progressively and similarly decreased with increasing concentrations of isoflurane and desflurane (P < 0.05). Sympathetic baroslopes (based on SNA) decreased with increasing isoflurane concentrations but were maintained with increasing concentrations of desflurane; the response was significantly different between groups. CONCLUSIONS: The increase in basal levels of SNA with increasing concentrations of desflurane persisted despite "fixing" BP and thus is probably not due to hypotension and unloading of the baroreceptors. Further, the preservation of reflex increases in SNA to nitroprusside during desflurane indicates that desflurane preserves one component of the baroreflex in humans when BP is "fixed."

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Recovery from sevoflurane anesthesia: a comparison to isoflurane and propofol anesthesia.

BACKGROUND: Sevoflurane has a lower blood:gas partition coefficient than isoflurane, which may cause a more rapid recovery from anesthesia; it also might cause faster emergence times than for propofol-based anesthesia. We evaluated a database that included recovery endpoints from controlled, randomized, prospective studies sponsored by Abbott Laboratories that compared sevoflurane to isoflurane or propofol when extubation was planned immediately after completion of elective surgery in adult patients. METHODS: Sevoflurane was compared to isoflurane in eight studies (N=2,008) and to propofol in three studies (N=436). Analysis of variance was applied using least squares method mean values to calculate the pooled mean difference in recovery endpoints between primary anesthetics. The effects of patient age and case duration also were determined. RESULTS: Sevoflurane resulted in statistically significant shorter times to emergence (-3.3 min), response to command (-3.1 min), orientation (-4.0 min) and first analgesic (-8.9 min) but not time to eligibility for discharge (-1.7 min) compared to isoflurane (mean difference). Times to recovery endpoints increased with increasing case duration with isoflurane but not with sevoflurane (patients receiving isoflurane took 4-5 min more to emerge and respond to commands and 8.6 min more to achieve orientation during cases longer than 3 hr in duration than those receiving sevoflurane). Patients older than 65 yr had longer times to orientation, but within any age group, orientation was always faster after sevoflurane. There were no differences in recovery times between sevoflurane and propofol. CONCLUSIONS: Recovery from sevoflurane was 3-4 min faster than with isoflurane in all age groups, and the difference was magnified in longer-duration surgical cases (> 3 hr).

Adolescent↗