Biomedical subjects

T J Pavy

Publications and source records attributed to T J Pavy.

23 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

PubMed1993

Comparison of the 25-gauge Whitacre with the 24-gauge Sprotte spinal needle for elective caesarean section: cost implications.

Spinal anaesthesia provides rapid, safe anaesthesia for Caesarean section. The pencil-point spinal needles (Sprotte and Whitacre) are reported to have a low incidence of post-dural puncture headache (PDPH). As the 25G Whitacre is less expensive than the 24G Sprotte needle, this prospective, randomized, double-blind study was designed to compare the incidence of PDPH and ease of insertion of these needles in 304 ASA 1 and 2 women having elective Caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia. Each patient was assessed daily for five consecutive days following Caesarean section by an investigator blinded to the needle used. The results indicate that the two needles have a similar ease of insertion, number of failed insertions, and failed subarachnoid blockade. An inability to insert the spinal needles occurred in two patients in each group. Therefore, 150 patients in each group completed the study. The incidence of PDPH with the 24G Sprotte needle was 4.0% (6/150) compared with 0.66% (1/150) with the 25G Whitacre (NS). There was no correlation between the occurrence of PDPH and the difficulty of needle insertion, presence of transient hypotension or the effectiveness of anaesthesia delivered. This study indicates that both needles are comparable with respect to ease of insertion and incidence of PDPH. As the Whitacre needle is less expensive it is a reasonable alternative to the more expensive Sprotte needle.

Adult↗

PubMed1993

Patient-controlled epidural analgesia in labour: varying bolus dose and lockout interval.

This double-blind prospective study was designed to determine the best dose variables for patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) and to compare bolus-only PCEA with continuous infusion epidural analgesia (CIEA) during the first stage of labour. Five groups of parturients self-administered 0.125% bupivacaine with 1:400,000 epinephrine and fentanyl 2.5 micrograms.ml-1 using PCA pumps programmed as follows: Group A, 2 ml bolus/10 min lockout interval (LI); Group B, 3 ml bolus/15 min LI; Group C, 4 ml bolus/20 min LI; Group D, 6 ml bolus/30 min LI; Group E, 8 ml.hr-1 continuous infusion. Hourly assessments included: VAS scores for pain and satisfaction, sensory and motor block, bupivacaine and fentanyl consumption. Blood samples were collected at birth for maternal and fetal fentanyl concentrations. Data from 68 patients showed no differences among groups in pain relief or maternal satisfaction. Most patients received excellent analgesia and those requiring extra epidural supplements were evenly distributed across groups. There was higher consumption of bupivacaine and fentanyl in Group E than in any of the other four groups: bupivacaine mg.hr-1, mean (SD), 9.4 (2.7) in Group E vs 5.2 (1.7) in Groups A-D inclusive (P < 0.0001); fentanyl microgram.hr-1, 19.6 (4.6) in group E vs 12.6 (7.5) in Groups A-D inclusive (P < 0.05). Motor block was minimal, whereas sensory levels were higher at the 3- and 4-hour assessments in Groups D and E than in all other groups (P < 0.05). Plasma fentanyl concentrations were < 0.5 ng.ml-1 in all samples and no sequelae from fentanyl were observed, apart from mild pruritus.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗

PubMed1982

Midazolam, a new intravenous induction agent for anaesthesia.

In an open non-comparative clinical trial 64 patients older than 18 years with American Society of Anesthesiologists ratings of I and II were studied. Under standardized conditions of premedication, anaesthesia was induced by injecting midazolam (Ro 21-3981) 0,15 or 0,3 mg/kg body weight intravenously. After endotracheal intubation with suxamethonium 1 mg/kg, anaesthesia was maintained with nitrous oxide in oxygen and enflurane or halothane. There were statistically significant cardiovascular changes during and/or after intubation but there were no clinical consequences. Midazolam allows rapid induction of and recovery from anaesthesia. There was no retrograde amnesia and high proportion of the patients assessed the induction of anaesthesia as favourable. The local tolerance was very good. Midazolam seems to be a good alternative for induction of balanced anaesthesia.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Patient-controlled epidural analgesia in labor: the addition of clonidine to bupivacaine-fentanyl.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Epidural clonidine has not been evaluated as a component of patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) solutions during labor. A randomized, double-blind trial was conducted to investigate the efficacy and side effects of PCEA using bupivacaine and fentanyl, with or without clonidine. METHODS: Seventy-five healthy parturients in active labor were assigned to a PCEA solution of 0.0625% bupivacaine and fentanyl 2 microg/mL (4 mL demand bolus, 15 min lockout), with or without clonidine 4.5 microg/mL. The primary outcome measure was parturient rating of analgesia; others assessments included pain scores, drug utilization, supplementation and side effects. RESULTS: Thirty-one parturients received clonidine (group BFC) and 38 received control solution (group BF). Eight (6 group BF, 2 group BFC, P = .28) failed to achieve satisfactory epidural analgesia. There was a trend for parturient ratings of pain relief to be higher in group BFC, with significantly more reporting excellent first-stage analgesia (81% v. 57%, P<.05). Pain scores were similar. Clonidine (median dose, 28 microg/h) reduced total bupivacaine and fentanyl use (P<.01), and reduced supplementation (P<.01). Maternal blood pressure (BP) and recordings of systolic BP below 100 mm Hg did not differ. Group BFC had higher sedation scores (P<.01), but no one appeared oversedated. Shivering was reduced in group BFC (P<.01). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of clonidine to epidural bupivacaine and fentanyl for PCEA in labor improved analgesia, reduced the supplementation rate, and reduced shivering. Increased sedation and lower BP were not clinically important.

Adjuvants, Anesthesia↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Assessment of wound infiltration with bupivacaine in women undergoing day-case gynecological laparoscopy.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The effectiveness of local anesthetic wound infiltration for treatment of postoperative pain appears to be variable and partly dependent on the surgical procedure. Although evidence was lacking, it was common practice at our institution to infiltrate the trocar wound of patients undergoing day-case laparoscopic procedures with long acting local anesthetic agents. The aim of this study was to investigate the analgesic efficacy, and the influence of the timing, of local anesthetic infiltration into surgical wounds for day-case diagnostic gynecological laparoscopy. METHODS: A double-blind, randomized trial was conducted on 100 women having general anesthesia for day-case gynecological laparoscopy. Ninety-two patients who had been randomized to 1 of 4 groups for trocar wound infiltration with 30 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine or saline either before or after surgery completed the study. Incisional pain, pain on pressing the umbilicus, severity of nausea, and patient satisfaction with anesthetic technique were all assessed postoperatively until discharge and on the following day through a telephone interview. A P value of <.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: There was no difference between groups in the mean pain scores or analgesic requirements for incisional pain, pain on pressing firmly on the umbilicus, or for patient satisfaction. There was a trend for those patients who had received bupivacaine to use less postoperative morphine (P =.079). CONCLUSIONS: Wound infiltration with local anaesthetic did not significantly reduce pain or opioid requirement after gynecological laparoscopy.

Adult↗