Biomedical subjects

T Juma

Publications and source records attributed to T Juma.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed1993

Foot infections in diabetics: the antibiotic choice.

The authors studied 59 diabetics with foot infections to determine the organisms responsible and the sensitivity to antibiotics. All infections were polymicrobial (aerobic and anaerobic). On average 3.2 isolates per culture were obtained from the depth of the infection. The commonest organisms in order of frequency were: Staphylococcus aureus, beta-hemolytic streptococci, Proteus sp., Bacteroides sp., enterococci, Klebsiella sp. and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. A combination of piperacillin and cloxacillin is recommended as initial therapy for foot infections in diabetic patients because it was found to be effective for 73% of the causative microorganisms.

Adult↗

PubMed1991

Necrotizing fasciitis.

Ten cases of necrotizing fasciitis are reviewed. Three patients died but only two of these deaths were due to uncontrolled septicaemia. All isolated organisms were sensitive to a combination of piperacillin and ampicillin which we now regard as the initial antibiotic combination of choice. Prompt and aggressive surgical debridement remains the cornerstone of management.

Adult↗

PubMed1991

Conserving blood in preparation for elective surgery.

A prospective study was carried out for a period of 6 months (September 1987 to 28 February 1988) to evaluate the possible misuse of blood transfusion service in the department of surgery, Amiri Teaching Hospital, Kuwait. There was a monthly wastage of 45 +/- 13 units of blood. Five hundred and eleven units of blood were crossmatched but never transfused. The time taken by the blood bank technicians in crossmatching blood which was never used amounted to 54.4% of the normal working hours. An annual loss of about US$25000.00 was calculated to have occurred.

Blood Banks↗

PubMed1990

Blood ordering habits for elective surgery: time for change.

A prospective study was carried out for 6 months to determine the efficacy of blood ordering routines for elective surgery. It was found that only 23% of procedures needed preoperative crossmatching of blood (transfusion index 'TI' greater than 0.5). There was an excessive over-ordering of blood for 77% of the operations (crossmatch/transfusion ratio greater than 2.5). In addition, the transfusion index for the latter group showed that there was no need to prepare blood preoperatively (TI less than 0.5). A transfusion tariff is worked out which abandons crossmatching for the majority of procedures (cholecystectomy, thyroidectomy and surgery for duodenal ulcer excluding gastrectomy). Instead a 'group and screen' policy is suggested.

Blood Grouping and Crossmatching↗