Biomedical subjects

T K Chiu

Publications and source records attributed to T K Chiu.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2001

Intrinsic bending and deformability at the T-A step of CCTTTAAAGG: a comparative analysis of T-A and A-T steps within A-tracts.

Introduction of a T-A or pyrimidine-purine step into a straight and rigid A-tract can cause a positive roll deformation that kinks the DNA helix at that step. In CCTTTAAAGG, the central T-A step has an 8.6 degrees bend toward the major groove. We report the structural analysis of CCTTTAAAGG and a comparison with 25 other representative crystal structures from the NDB containing at least four consecutive A or T bases. On average, more local bending occurs at the disruptive T-A step (8.21 degrees ) than at an A-T step (5.71 degrees ). In addition, A-tracts containing an A-T step are more bent than are pure A-tracts, and hence A-A and A-T steps are not equivalent. All T-A steps examined exhibit positive roll, bending towards the major groove, while A-T steps display negative roll and bend slightly towards the minor groove. This illustrates how inherent negative and positive roll are, respectively, at A-T and T-A steps within A-tracts. T-A steps are more deformable, showing larger and more variable deformations of minor groove width, rise, cup, twist, and buckle. Standard deviations of twist, rise, and cup for T-A steps are 6.66 degrees, 0.55 A, and 15.90 degrees, versus 2.28 degrees, 0.21 A, and 2.99 degrees for A-T steps. Packing constraints determine which local values of these helical parameters an individual T-A step will adopt. For instance, with CCTTTAAAGG and three isomorphous structures, CGATTAATCG, CGATATATCG, and CGATCGATCG, crystal packing forces lead to a series of correlated changes: widened minor groove, large slide, low twist, and large rise. The difference in helical parameters between A-T steps lying within A-tracts, versus A-T steps within alternating AT sequences, demonstrates the importance of neighboring steps on the conformation of a given dinucleotide step.

AT Rich Sequence↗

PubMed2000

1 A crystal structures of B-DNA reveal sequence-specific binding and groove-specific bending of DNA by magnesium and calcium.

The 1 A resolution X-ray crystal structures of Mg(2+) and Ca(2+) salts of the B-DNA decamers CCAACGTTGG and CCAGCGCTGG reveal sequence-specific binding of Mg(2+) and Ca(2+) to the major and minor grooves of DNA, as well as non-specific binding to backbone phosphate oxygen atoms. Minor groove binding involves H-bond interactions between cross-strand DNA base atoms of adjacent base-pairs and the cations' water ligands. In the major groove the cations' water ligands can interact through H-bonds with O and N atoms from either one base or adjacent bases, and in addition the softer Ca(2+) can form polar covalent bonds bridging adjacent N7 and O6 atoms at GG bases. For reasons outlined earlier, localized monovalent cations are neither expected nor found.Ultra-high atomic resolution gives an unprecedented view of hydration in both grooves of DNA, permits an analysis of individual anisotropic displacement parameters, and reveals up to 22 divalent cations per DNA duplex. Each DNA helix is quite anisotropic, and alternate conformations, with motion in the direction of opening and closing the minor groove, are observed for the sugar-phosphate backbone. Taking into consideration the variability of experimental parameters and crystal packing environments among these four helices, and 24 other Mg(2+) and Ca(2+) bound B-DNA structures, we conclude that sequence-specific and strand-specific binding of Mg(2+) and Ca(2+) to the major groove causes DNA bending by base-roll compression towards the major groove, while sequence-specific binding of Mg(2+) and Ca(2+) in the minor groove has a negligible effect on helix curvature. The minor groove opens and closes to accommodate Mg(2+) and Ca(2+) without the necessity for significant bending of the overall helix. The program Shelxdna was written to facilitate refinement and analysis of X-ray crystal structures by Shelxl-97 and to plot and analyze one or more Curves and Freehelix output files.

Anisotropy↗

PubMed1999

Absence of minor groove monovalent cations in the crosslinked dodecamer C-G-C-G-A-A-T-T-C-G-C-G.

The structure of a crosslinked B -DNA dodecamer of sequence C-G-C-G-A-A-T-T-C-G-C-G has been solved to a resolution of 1.43 A. The dithiobis-propane crosslink, -CH2-CH2-CH2-S-S-CH2-CH2-CH2-, bridges N7 atoms of adenine bases 6 and 18 in the two central base-pairs within the major groove. The crosslink is sufficiently long that no bending is induced in the helix, which is essentially isostructural with the native unlinked dodecamer at 1.9 A. A constellation of solvent peaks tentatively fitted as a spermine molecule in that earlier analysis is now seen at higher resolution to be a well-defined octahedral magnesium hexahydrate complex in the major groove. One end of the duplex curves around that complex to produce a roll-bend near base-pairs 3-5, and an overall bend in helix axis, as has long been noted. Two other magnesium complexes connect the helices and help to knit the crystal lattice together. No evidence exists for partial sodium or potassium ion substitution for solvent water molecules within the minor groove spine of hydration, as had been suggested previously: not coordination geometry and environment, nor B values, nor calculated valence values, nor difference map analyses. Indeed, the very numbers that have been claimed in support of partial substitution by sodium or potassium ions are reproduced with the present crystals, which by chemical analysis contains only one trace sodium ion per 160 bp, and one potassium ion per 41 bp. In contrast, our crystals contain one Mg2+ per base-pair, meaning that phosphate group charge neutrality is accomplished by divalent cations, not monovalent ions. Three of these magnesium cations per duplex are localized and visible in the X-ray analysis, and nine are disordered and invisible. Hence although binding of monovalent cations within the minor groove of A -tracts on occasion may be a consequence of groove narrowing, it cannot be the cause of that narrowing. Cations, contrary to what has been claimed, are not in charge.

Cations↗

PubMed1997

Defining GC-specificity in the minor groove: side-by-side binding of the di-imidazole lexitropsin to C-A-T-G-G-C-C-A-T-G.

BACKGROUND: Polyamide drugs, such as netropsin, distamycin and their lexitropsin derivatives, can be inserted into a narrow B-DNA minor groove to form 1:1 complexes that can distinguish AT base pairs from GC, but cannot detect end-for-end base-pair reversals such as TA for AT. In contrast, 2:1 side-by-side polyamide drug complexes potentially are capable of such discrimination. Imidazole (Im) and pyrrole (Py) rings side-by-side read a GC base pair with the Im ring recognizing the guanine side. But the reason for this specific G-Im association is unclear because the guanine NH2 group sits in the center of the groove. A 2:1 drug:DNA complex that presents Im at both ends of a GC base pair should help unscramble the issue of imidazole reading specificity. RESULTS: We have determined the crystal structure of a 2:1 complex of a di-imidazole lexitropsin (DIM), an analogue of distamycin, and a DNA decamer with the sequence C-A-T-G-G-C-C-A-T-G. The two DIM molecules sit antiparallel to one another in a broad minor groove, with their cationic tails widely separated. Im rings of one drug molecule stack against amide groups of the other. DIM1 rests against nucleotides C7A8T9G10 of strand 1 of the helix, whereas DIM2 rests against G14G15C16C17 on strand 2. All DIM amide nitrogens donate hydrogen bonds to N and O atoms on the floor of the DNA groove and, in addition, the two Im rings on DIM2 accept hydrogen bonds from guanine N2 amines, thereby providing specific reading. The guanine N2 amine can bond to Im on its own side of the groove, but not on the cytosine side, because of limits on close approach of the two Im rings and the geometry of sp2 hybridization about the amide nitrogen. CONCLUSIONS: Im and Py rings distinguish AT from GC base pairs because of steric factors involving the bulk of the guanine amine, and the ability of Im to form a hydrogen bond with the amine. Side-by-side Im and Py rings differentiate GC from CG base pairs because of tight steric contacts and sp2 hybridization at the amine nitrogen atom, with the favored conformations being G/Im,Py/C and C/Py,Im/G. Discrimination between AT and TA base pairs may be possible using bulkier rings, such as thiazole to select the A end of the base pair.

Binding Sites↗

PubMed1997

Helix bending as a factor in protein/DNA recognition.

Normal vectors perpendicular to individual base pairs are a powerful tool for studying the bending behavior of B-DNA, both in the form of normal vector plots and in matrices that list angles between vectors for all possible base pair combinations. A new analysis program, FREEHELIX, has been written for this purpose, and applied to 86 examples of sequence-specific protein/DNA complexes whose coordinates are on deposit in the Nucleic Acid Data Base. Bends in this sample of 86 structures almost invariably follow from roll angles between adjacent base pairs; tilt makes no net contribution. Roll in a direction compressing the broad major groove is much more common than that which compresses the minor groove. Three distinct types of B-DNA bending are observed, each with a different molecular origin: (1) Localized kinking is produced by large roll at single steps or at two steps separated by one turn of helix. (2) Smooth, planar curvature is produced by positive and negative roll angles spaced a half-turn apart, with random side-to-side zigzag roll at intermediate points, rather than a tilt contribution that might have been expected theoretically. (3) Three-dimensional writhe results from significant roll angles at a continuous series of steps. Writhe need not change the overall direction of helix axis, if it is continued indefinitely or for an integral number of helical turns. A-DNA itself can be formally considered as possessing uniform, continuous writhe that yields no net helix bending. Smooth curvature is the most intricate deformation of the three, and is least common. Writhe is the simplest deformation and is most common; indeed, a low level of continuous writhe is the normal condition of an otherwise unbent B-DNA helix of general sequence. With one exception, every example of major kinking in this sample of 86 structures involves a pyrimidine-purine step: C-A/T-G, T-A, or C-G. Purine-purine steps, especially A-A, show the least tendency toward roll deformations.

Animals↗

PubMed1996

How proteins recognize the TATA box.

The crystal structure of a complex of human TATA-binding protein with TATA-sequence DNA has been solved, complementing earlier TBP/DNA analyses from Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Arabidopsis thaliana. Special insight into TATA box specificity is provided by considering the TBP/DNA complex, not as a protein molecule with bound DNA, but as a DNA duplex with a particularly large minor groove ligand. This point of view provides explanations for: (1) why T.A base-pairs are required rather than C.G; (2) why an alternation of T and A bases is needed; (3) how TBP recognizes the upstream and downstream ends of the TATA box in order to bind properly; and (4) why the second half of the TATA box can be more variable than the first.

Amino Acid Sequence↗