PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

T K Li

Publications and source records attributed to T K Li.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

Genetic and environmental influences on alcohol metabolism in humans.

This manuscript represents the proceedings of a symposium at the 2000 RSA Meeting in Denver, Colorado. The organizer/chair was Ting-Kai Li. The presentations were: (1) Introduction to the Symposium, by Ting-Kai Li; (2) ALDH2 polymorphism and alcohol metabolism, by Shih-Jiun Yin; (3) ALDH2 promoter polymorphism and alcohol metabolism, by David W. Crabb; (4) Use of BrAC clamping to estimate alcohol elimination rates: Application to studies of the influence of genetic and environmental determinants, by Sean O'Connor; and (5) Effect of food and food composition on alcohol elimination rates as determined by clamping, by Vijay A. Ramchandani.

Alcohol Dehydrogenase↗
PubMed2000

A genome screen of maximum number of drinks as an alcoholism phenotype.

The Collaborative Study on the Genetics of Alcoholism (COGA) is a multicenter research program to detect and map susceptibility genes for alcohol dependence and related phenotypes. The measure M of "maximum number of drinks consumed in a 24-hour period" is closely related to alcoholism diagnosis in this dataset and provides a quantitative measure to grade nonalcoholic individuals. Twin studies have shown log(M) to have a heritability of approximately 50%. Genome screens for this trait were performed in two distinct genotyped samples (wave 1 and wave 2), and in the combined sample. MAPMAKER/SIBS was used to carry out Haseman-Elston based regression analyses. On chromosome 4, an unweighted all-pairs multipoint LOD of 2.2 was obtained between D4S2407 and D4S1628 in wave 1; in wave 2, the region flanked by D4S2404 and D4S2407 gave a LOD of 1.5. In the combined sample, the maximal LOD was 3.5 very close to D4S2407. This evidence for linkage is in the region of the alcohol dehydrogenase gene cluster on chromosome 4. These findings on chromosome 4 are consistent with a prior report from COGA in which strictly defined nonalcoholic subjects in wave 1 were analyzed. The present analysis on log(M) allows more individuals to be included and thus is potentially more powerful.

Alcohol Drinking↗
PubMed2000

Human topoisomerase I poisoning by protoberberines: potential roles for both drug-DNA and drug-enzyme interactions.

Protoberberines represent a structural class of organic cations that induce topoisomerase I-mediated DNA cleavage, a behavior termed topoisomerase I poisoning. We have employed a broad range of biophysical, biochemical, and computer modeling techniques to characterize and cross-correlate the DNA-binding and topoisomerase poisoning properties of four protoberberine analogues that differ with respect to the substituents on their A- and/or D-rings. Our data reveal the following significant features: (i) The binding of the four protoberberines unwinds duplex DNA by approximately 11 degrees, an observation consistent with an intercalative mode of interaction. (ii) Enthalpically favorable interactions, such as stacking interactions between the intercalated ligand and the neighboring base pairs, provide <50% of the thermodynamic driving force for the complexation of the protoberberines to duplex DNA. Computer modeling studies on protoberberine-DNA complexes suggest that only rings C and D intercalate into the host DNA helix, while rings A and B protrude out of the helix interior into the minor groove. (iii) All four protoberberine analogues are topoisomerase I-specific poisons, exhibiting little or no topoisomerase II poisoning activity. (iv) Modifications of the D-ring influence both DNA binding and topoisomerase I poisoning properties. Specifically, transference of a methoxy substituent from the 11- to the 9-position diminishes both DNA binding affinity and topoisomerase I poisoning activity, an observation suggesting that DNA binding is important in the poisoning of topoisomerase I by protoberberines. (v) Modifications of the A-ring have a negligible impact on DNA binding affinity, while exerting a profound influence on topoisomerase I poisoning activity. Specifically, protoberberine analogues containing either 2,3-dimethoxy; 3,4-dimethoxy; or 3, 4-methylenedioxy substituents all bind DNA with a similar affinity. By contrast, these analogues exhibit markedly different topoisomerase I poisoning activities, with these activities following the hierarchy: 3,4-methylenedioxy > 2,3-dimethoxy >> 3, 4-dimethoxy. These differences in topoisomerase I poisoning activity may reflect the differing abilities of the analogues to interact with specific functionalities on the enzyme, thereby stabilizing the enzyme in its cleavable state. In the aggregate, our results are consistent with a mechanistic model in which both ligand-DNA and ligand-enzyme interactions are important for the poisoning of topoisomerase I by protoberberines, with the DNA-directed interactions involving ring D and the enzyme-directed interactions involving ring A. It is reasonable to suggest that the poisoning of topoisomerase I by a broad range of other naturally occurring and synthetic ligands may entail a similar mechanism.

Antioxidants↗
PubMed2000

Family-based study of the association of the dopamine D2 receptor gene (DRD2) with habitual smoking.

A recent study showed an association between the dopamine D2 receptor gene (DRD2) and smoking. The purpose of this study was to determine if the familial transmission of smoking is linked to variation at the DRD2 locus in a genetically informative sample. Subjects were identified in alcohol treatment centers and their relatives were recruited for study. All subjects were interviewed to assess alcohol dependence, smoking habits, and psychiatric disorders. Two polymorphisms within the DRD2 gene were analyzed, including the TaqIA polymorphism. The sample consisted of 138 nuclear families with at least one offspring with habitual smoking, and analysis was by the transmission disequilibrium test (TDT), which avoids problems due to population stratification. There was no significant difference in the frequency between DRD2 alleles transmitted and not transmitted to habitual smokers. There also was no evidence for unequal transmission of DRD2 alleles for the phenotypes "ever smoker" or comorbid alcohol dependence and habitual smoking. This study does not support linkage of the DRD2 with smoking.

Chromosome Mapping↗
PubMed2000

Ethanol locomotor sensitization, but not tolerance correlates with selection for alcohol preference in high- and low-alcohol preferring mice.

RATIONALE: Some theories have advanced a role for both locomotor sensitization and tolerance in the reinforcing properties of drugs. The present studies used selected lines of mice to assess genetic correlations among ethanol drinking, ethanol locomotor sensitization, and tolerance to the depressant effects of ethanol. OBJECTIVES: Ethanol-naive high- and low-alcohol preferring (HAP and LAP) selected lines of mice were tested for locomotor sensitization to ethanol and acquisition of acute functional tolerance to ethanol using the static dowel test. METHODS: For the locomotor sensitization study, mice received four i.p. injections of one of five doses of ethanol (0-3.5 g/kg) at 48-h intervals. On the sensitization test day, 48 h after the last drug administration day, all mice received a 2.0-g/kg ethanol injection. Other mice from the same lines were subjected to a two-injection (3.75 g/kg total), acute functional tolerance procedure assessing disruption of balance on a static dowel. RESULTS: Lines differed neither in the acute locomotor activating nor depressant effects of ethanol. Additionally, neither line's response to the depressant effect of 3.5 g/kg ethanol changed with repeated injection. However, locomotor sensitization was seen in HAP but not LAP mice that had received 2.75 g/kg or 3.5 g/kg ethanol during repeated administration. Both HAP and LAP mice acquired equivalent acute functional tolerance, as measured by an increase in blood ethanol concentration between the first and second recovery measures. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, these findings imply that high ethanol consumption in mice appears to be genetically related to ethanol locomotor sensitization. Additionally, ethanol locomotor sensitization does not appear to be related to tolerance to the depressant effects of ethanol. These findings support a role for sensitization in high alcohol-seeking behavior in mice.

Alcohol Drinking↗
PubMed2000

An assessment of novelty-seeking behavior in alcohol-preferring and nonpreferring rats.

This study examined novelty-seeking behavior in rat populations selectively bred for high and low alcohol-drinking behavior. In Experiment 1, and "odor-enhanced" novel environment produced greater behavioral activation in P compared to NP rats. In Experiment 2, the activity of high alcohol-drinking P and HAD rats was enhanced to a greater extent following the presentation of novel odors in a familiar arena, compared to the NP and LAD rats. The results suggest that, when measuring locomotor activity, alcohol-preferring rats are more reactive to novelty than their nonpreferring counterparts. Experiments 3 and 4, however, did not support the hypothesis that novelty seeking is associated with genetic vulnerability to high alcohol-drinking behavior. When measuring nose-poking behavior in response to novel odors and preference for a novel vs. a familiar chamber, behavior of the preferring lines did not differ from that of the nonpreferring lines, although P rats were more active in the place-preference paradigm. The overall results indicate that the relationship between novelty and alcohol drinking is only modestly associated, and is observed under specific conditions. Moreover, this study underscores the importance of using multiple measures when assessing complex behaviors such as novelty seeking.

Alcohol Drinking↗
PubMed2000

Acoustic startle and fear-potentiated startle in alcohol-preferring (P) and -nonpreferring (NP) lines of rats.

The objective of the present study was to determine whether alcohol-preferring P and -nonpreferring NP rats differ in their acoustic startle response and in fear-potentiated startle. In Experiment 1, male P and NP rats were tested on the startle response to acoustic stimuli ranging from 90-115 dB. Experiments 2 and 3 examined fear-potentiated startle and extinction of the response. In Experiment 2, rats received two light foot shock training sessions separated by 3-4 h. Testing consisted of ten acoustic startle (115 dB) and fear-potentiated startle (light preceding the acoustic startle) presentations administered every 24 h for 9 consecutive days. To test potentiated startle learning under reduced training conditions, a single training session was administered in Experiment 3, and a single within-session extinction test of 50 startle and 50 potentiated startle trials occurred the following day. Results of Experiment 1 indicated that P and NP rats did not differ in startle at any of the acoustic intensities tested. Following fear-potentiated startle conditioning in Experiment 2, however, both acoustic startle and potentiated startle responding were consistently greater in P than NP rats over most of the first 6 test days with P rats having approximately a 100% greater acoustic startle and 50-100% greater potentiated startle response. Moreover, following a single training session in Experiment 3, only P rats showed significant fear-conditioned startle. Additionally, P rats exhibited a 50-100% elevated acoustic startle response over that observed in NP rats. Taken together, the data indicate that, although experimentally naive male P and NP rats show similar acoustic startle responses, P rats become more responsive to both startle-alone and potentiated startle stimuli following fear conditioning. The change in general startle reactivity of the P rat following aversive conditioning, along with facilitated light foot shock learning, suggests that stress exposure may be an important variable in examining associations between anxiety and alcohol drinking behavior.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed2000

Effects of 5-HT(3) receptor antagonists on daily alcohol intake under acquisition, maintenance, and relapse conditions in alcohol-preferring (P) rats.

Previous research indicated that 5-HT(3) antagonists can reduce ethanol drinking in rats, but drinking conditions and other environmental manipulations influenced the efficacy of these antagonists. The current experiments were conducted to examine the effects of the 5-HT(3) antagonists MDL 72222 (MDL) or ICS 205-930 (ICS) on 24-h ethanol (10% v/v) consumption during acquisition, maintenance, and following a period of deprivation in selectively bred high alcohol-preferring (P) male rats. In an analysis of the acquisition of ethanol consumption, daily injections of MDL (1 mg/kg; s.c.) or ICS (1 or 5 mg/kg) were administered to separate groups of P rats during the initial 10 days of ethanol exposure. To examine the maintenance of ethanol drinking, these same groups of rats were allowed access to ethanol for 21 days with no pharmacological manipulations, and were then administered either saline or the 5-HT(3) antagonist. To examine the effects of a 5-HT(3) antagonist on relapse of ethanol drinking, another group of P rats was allowed access to ethanol for 6 weeks and was then deprived of ethanol for 3 weeks. Prior to ethanol reinstatement, rats were treated chronically (seven daily injections) or acutely with MDL (1 mg/kg), saline, or received no injections. MDL (1 mg/kg) and ICS (1 or 5 mg/kg) reduced ethanol intake during acquisition (60-80%) and during maintenance drinking (35-70%) in P rats pretreated with saline during acquisition. However, in rats pretreated with MDL or ICS during acquisition, there was a significant reduction in the effectiveness of either MDL or ICS to reduce ongoing ethanol drinking. Neither acute nor chronic treatment with 1 mg/kg MDL altered the 80% increase in ethanol consumption observed on the first day of reinstatement following a 3-week deprivation period. However, in a follow-up study, acute treatment with MDL (3 mg/kg) or ICS (5 mg/kg) did prevent the 80% increase in ethanol consumption observed on the first day of reinstatement. Overall, the results suggest that 5-HT(3) receptors are involved in the acquisition and maintenance of 24-h ethanol drinking, and that neuroadaptations may occur as a result of chronic treatment with 5-HT(3) antagonists, or during prolonged alcohol deprivation, which alter the involvement of these receptors in regulating alcohol drinking in the P rat.

Alcohol Drinking↗
PubMed2000

Identification of quantitative trait loci influencing alcohol consumption in the high alcohol drinking and low alcohol drinking rat lines.

Selective breeding has been employed to develop high-alcohol-drinking (HAD) and low-alcohol-drinking (LAD) rat lines from the heterogeneous N/Nih rat. Within-family selection and a rotational breeding design were used to discourage inbreeding (Li et al, 1993). To identify quantitative trait loci (QTLs) contributing to alcohol consumption, reciprocal HAD and LAD matings in conjunction with F1 intercrosses were used to create 459 F2 progeny. Using selective genotyping of 151 F2 progeny with extreme alcohol consumption scores and a novel least squares method developed by Haley et al (1994), five chromosomal regions (1, 5, 10, 12, and 16) were identified with lod scores greater than 2.0. Genotyping of the entire sample of 459 F2 progeny produced maximum lod scores of 3.5 on chromosome 5, 2.4 on chromosome 10, 4.7 on chromosome 12 and 2.9 on chromosome 16. The evidence of linkage to chromosome 1 diminished substantially to a maximum lod score of 0.5 when all F2 progeny were genotyped. This study is the first genome-wide study for QTLs underlying alcohol consumption that has employed noninbred lines. Further localization of these QTLs will likely provide insight and candidate genes for the study of human alcoholism.

Alcohol Drinking↗
PubMed2000

Clinical perspectives for the study of craving and relapse in animal models.

Several major clinical models of alcoholism in which craving plays a role are summarized and key questions are raised regarding the course of craving in the emergence of alcoholism, how it varies in different stages of the disorder (e.g. active alcoholic, withdrawal, protracted abstinence) and what craving may contribute to major signs and symptoms of alcoholism. Turning to animal models, a plea is made for development of a standardized definition of human craving that can be represented and operationalized in animal models. Until there is scientific consensus on such a definition, four ways are elucidated in which animal model research can contribute to advances in our knowledge of human craving and the role it plays in addictive behavior: (1) engaging both basic and clinical researchers to identify parallel constructs of craving and predictors of craving for adoption in comparative human and animal model studies; (2) conducting exploratory research on craving in animal models using relapse to drinking as the dependent measure; (3) identifying mechanisms that underlie clinical signs and symptoms of alcoholism in animal models; and (4) identifying genetic models in basic research that account for variations in response to alcohol that may also occur in humans. This latter point is made in a discussion of the genetic contribution to voluntary alcohol consumption, the alcohol deprivation effect, tolerance and dependence, as illustrated by differences between alcohol-preferring (P) rats and -nonpreferring (NP) rats. The review concludes with four questions and issues that need to be among those that guide future research on craving.

Alcohol-Related Disorders↗
PubMed2000

Involvement of nicotinic receptors in alcohol self-administration.

BACKGROUND: Alcohol and nicotine, in the form of tobacco, are commonly co-abused. Nicotinic receptors also have been implicated in alcohol action. We designed the present study to examine the possible involvement of nicotinic receptors in alcohol self-administration. METHODS AND RESULTS: Pretreatment with lower doses (0.1-0.4 mg/kg) of nicotine, administered acutely or chronically, did not affect alcohol consumption, whereas a higher dose (0.8 mg/kg) initially suppressed alcohol consumption but stimulated alcohol consumption on repeated treatment. We observed the same pattern of nicotine effects on alcohol self-administration using an operant procedure. A dose of 0.8 mg/kg of nicotine initially suppressed operant responding for alcohol. Such suppression of alcohol self-administration was more pronounced during the first 20 min of the 60 min operant session. Responding for alcohol in the nicotine treated group, however, was significantly increased above the saline treated group by the 5th day of treatment. Mecamylamine, a noncompetitive nicotinic receptor antagonist, reduced alcohol consumption, whereas dihydro-beta-erythroidine (DHbetaE), a competitive nicotinic receptor antagonist, did not modify alcohol consumption. CONCLUSIONS: The stimulation of alcohol intake induced by nicotine treatment and the suppression of alcohol intake induced by mecamylamine provide evidence for the involvement of nicotinic receptors in alcohol consumption and/or self-administration. The failure of DHbetaE to reduce alcohol consumption, however, suggests that ethanol-nicotine interaction is mediated by other nicotinic receptor subtypes rather than alpha4beta2 receptor subtype, or that mecamylamine acts through a nonnicotinic mechanism.

Alcohol Drinking↗
PubMed2000

Mechanism of action of camptothecin.

Camptothecin (CPT) class of compounds has been demonstrated to be effective against a broad spectrum of tumors. Their molecular target has been firmly established to be human DNA topoisomerase I (topo I). CPT inhibits topo I by blocking the rejoining step of the cleavage/religation reaction of topo-I, resulting in accumulation of a covalent reaction intermediate, the cleavable complex. The primary mechanism of cell killing by CPT is S-phase-specific killing through potentially lethal collisions between advancing replication forks and topo-I cleavable complexes. Collisions with the transcription machinery have also been shown to trigger the formation of long-lived covalent topo-I DNA complexes, which contribute to CPT cytotoxicity. Two novel repair responses to topo-I-mediated DNA damage involving covalent modifications of topo-I have been discovered. The first involves activation of the ubiquitin/26S proteasome pathway, leading to degradation of topo-I (CPT-induced topo-I downregulation). The second involves SUMO conjugation to topo-I. The potentials roles of these new mechanisms for repair of topo-I-mediated DNA damage in determining CPT sensitivity/resistance in tumor cells are discussed.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

Pharmacogenetics of responses to alcohol and genes that influence alcohol drinking.

OBJECTIVE: There is now compelling evidence for genetic influence on susceptibility to alcoholism. This article presents results from studies qualifying alcoholism as a pharmacogenetic disorder of the brain. METHOD: Studies from the author's research group and other investigators, of human subjects and experimental animal models, are reviewed. Included are experiments on the pharmacogenetics (elimination and metabolism) and pharmacodynamics (initial response, tolerance and dependence) of ethanol. RESULTS: Studies in humans have reliably shown that the genes for the principal enzymes of alcohol metabolism influence drinking behavior and alcoholism risk. Notably, the functional genetic variants of alcohol dehydrogenase that exhibit high alcohol oxidizing activity, and the genetic variant of aldehyde dehydrogenase that exhibits low acetaldehyde oxidizing activity, protect against heavy drinking and alcoholism. Extensive studies of inbred and selectively bred experimental rodent models with alcohol drinking preference, tolerance development and alcohol withdrawal susceptibility have shown strong genetic influence on these responses to ethanol. Neuroanatomical, neurochemical and genetic studies have shown the involvement of serotonin, dopamine, glutamate, gamma-aminobutyric acid and opioid pathways in these actions of ethanol. Genetic studies, including association and genome-wide survey studies in both humans and rodents, implicate serotonin 1b receptor, dopamine D2 receptor, tryptophan hydroxylase and neuropeptide Y as candidate targets of genetic susceptibility in these pharmacodynamic actions of ethanol. CONCLUSIONS: There are genetic predisposing factors for alcoholism. Nonspecific susceptibility factors include personality traits characterized by behavioral inhibition (e.g., novelty-seeking and impulsivity). These genetically influenced traits interact with other, also genetically influenced, traits involved in the metabolism and pharmacodynamic effects of alcohol, and this interaction forms the basis for nominating alcoholism as a pharmacogenetic disease. Clearly, there are also many environmental factors that influence drinking behavior. Individuals have different sets of susceptibility genes and experience different kinds of environmental provocation. These factors underlie the heterogeneity and complexity of the clinical phenotype of alcoholism.

Alcohol Dehydrogenase↗
PubMed2000

Alcohol deprivation effect is prolonged in the alcohol preferring (P) rat after repeated deprivations.

BACKGROUND: The alcohol deprivation effect (ADE) is a temporary increase in the ratio of ethanol/total fluid intake and the voluntary intake of ethanol solutions over baseline drinking conditions when ethanol access is reinstated after a period of alcohol deprivation. The ADE has been posited to be an animal model for alcohol craving. The current study examined the effects of initial deprivation length and number of deprivation exposures on the ADE in alcohol-preferring (P) rats. METHODS: Adult female P rats received 24-hr free-choice access to 10% (v/v) ethanol and water for 6 weeks. Rats were then randomly assigned to five groups deprived of ethanol for 0 (control), 2, 4, 6, or 8 weeks (W). All deprived groups were then given 24-hr access to ethanol for 2 weeks before being deprived of ethanol for another 2 weeks. RESULTS: After the initial ethanol deprivation period, the deprived groups displayed a similar 2-fold ADE (e.g., 4-W group; 4.6 +/- 0.5 for baseline vs. 10.5 +/- 0.3 g/kg/day for the 1st reinstatement day) during the initial 24-hr period. Ethanol consumption began to return to control levels 48 (7.1 +/- 0.4 g/kg/day) and 72 (6.4 +/- 0.4 g/kg/day) hrs later. In addition, each deprived group showed increases in the ratio of ethanol/total fluid intake upon reinstatement, and there was a tendency for sustained higher ethanol intake ratios during the first 3 postexposure days for the 4-, 6-, and 8-W groups, but only during the first 2 reinstatement days for the 2-W group. The second deprivation did not increase the magnitude of the ADE over that observed in the first deprivation during the initial 24-hr period of re-exposure, but it did prolong the duration of the ADE into the 2nd and 3rd reinstatement day for the 2-, 4-, and 6-W groups and into the 5th reinstatement day for the 8-W group. CONCLUSIONS: Equivalent robust ADEs can be seen in P rats with deprivation periods of 2-8 W, which suggests that the ADE has a rapid onset and is not affected by the durations of deprivation that were tested. The duration of the ADE was prolonged in P rats exposed to a second deprivation period, suggesting that factors associated with the ADE phenomenon could be strengthened by repeated deprivations.

Alcohol Drinking↗
PubMed2000

Analysis of heritability of hormonal responses to alcohol in twins: beta-endorphin as a potential biomarker of genetic risk for alcoholism.

BACKGROUND: Hormonal responses to alcohol have been reported to differ in subjects with and without a family history of alcoholism which suggests that alcohol-induced hormonal changes might be used to identify individuals who are at elevated genetic risk for developing alcoholism. However, before a biological response can be used as a marker of genetic risk for disease, it must first be demonstrated that the response is, in fact, heritable. The present study was designed to determine whether hormonal responses to alcohol are heritable. METHODS: The adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), beta-endorphin (beta-E), cortisol (CORT), and prolactin (PRL) responses to alcohol were examined in male and female identical (monozygotic or MZ) and fraternal (dizygotic or DZ) twin pairs. Male subjects consumed 0.35 g ethanol/kg body weight (BW) and females consumed 0.325 g ethanol/kg BW in each of two alcohol drinking sessions administered 1 hr apart (total dose of 0.7 g/kg BW in males and 0.65 g/kg BW in females). Plasma hormone content was analyzed in samples collected before (resting conditions) and at 15, 60, 75, 120, 180, and 240 min after onset of drinking. Hormonal responses to alcohol were examined with twin analyses using the TWINAN90 program. A separate analysis was performed for each of the four hormones. A subset of subjects from each zygosity was seen on two separate occasions to establish retest reliability. Heritability of hormonal responses to alcohol was estimated using the intraclass correlation approach before and after removing the contribution of covariates that have the potential of influencing the plasma levels of these hormones. RESULTS: Resting plasma levels of all four hormones were within the expected range, and the beta-E, ACTH, and PRL responses to the alcohol challenge evidenced good test-retest reliability. Of the four hormones examined, the only one that showed significant heritability after alcohol drinking was beta-E. Heritability estimates were not altered for any of the four hormones after removal of the variance contributed by covariates, such as gender and age. CONCLUSIONS: Taken together with other recent findings, the results suggest that the beta-E response to alcohol may represent a new biomarker that can be used to identify individuals who are at elevated genetic risk for developing alcoholism.

Adult↗