Biomedical subjects

T Karatzas

Publications and source records attributed to T Karatzas.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2002

Liver resection for metastatic non-colorectal non-neuroendocrine hepatic neoplasms.

AIMS: Major liver surgery can be performed safely and hepatic resection for metastatic disease is increasingly carried out. However, the role of liver resection for hepatic metastases from non-colorectal, non-neuroendocrine (NCNN) cancers is unknown. Our aim was to evaluate our experience from hepatectomies for NCNN metastases. A retrospective study of 170 patients with liver resection performed the last 8 years was performed in two liver units in affiliated university hospitals. METHODS: Eighteen patients underwent liver resection for NCNN tumours. Origins included kidney (n=6), breast (n=4), gastric tumours (n=4), intestinal leiomyosarcoma (n=2) and malignant melanoma and in one patient a metastatic papillary of unknown origin was found. Eleven patients underwent a hepatic lobectomy and seven had local resections. Ten hepatectomies were performed at the same time with the primary tumour resection (synchronous resections) with five of those in an en bloc fashion with the primary tumour. RESULTS: There were no post-operative deaths and the peri-operative morbidity was minimal. During a median follow-up time of 3.2 years, 14 patients are alive with one of them having developed pulmonary metastases. CONCLUSION: In carefully selected patients with NCNN liver metastasis, liver resection can prolong survival as well and improve quality of life.

Adult↗

PubMed1999

Transplantation of islets of Langerhans in patients with insulin-requiring diabetes mellitus undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation--the Miami experience.

Most patients with cirrhosis of the liver have detectable insulin resistance. In 60-80% of patients with cirrhosis, impaired glucose tolerance can be uncovered; approximately 20% of these patients eventually develop overt diabetes. Theoretically, insulin resistance and glucose intolerance could be improved or reversed by orthotopic liver transplantation alone or in association with a simultaneous transplant of pancreatic islet cells from the same donor. To investigate these possibilities we initiated a pilot study of simultaneous liver and pancreatic islet cell transplantation in seven patients with diabetes and liver cirrhosis. Donor bone marrow cells were also infused to enhance the acceptance of the grafts. Seven patients who received only orthotopic liver transplantation and donor bone marrow cells were used as historical controls. The preliminary results of this pilot trial suggest that islet cell transplantation in conjunction with orthotopic liver transplantation improves glucose metabolism in patients with liver cirrhosis in association with reduced insulin requirements and HbA1c levels. These results were evident in spite of pre- and post-transplant basal C-peptide levels that were unchanged. Further evaluation of the effects of orthotopic liver transplantation with or without islet cell transplantation will require a randomized prospective trial including accurate metabolic evaluation with the euglycemic insulin clamp technique.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1997

The effects of chimeric cells following donor bone marrow infusions as detected by PCR-flow assays in kidney transplant recipients.

40 recipients of first cadaver kidney transplants were given perioperative donor vertebral bone marrow infusions (DBMC), compared with 100 controls who did not receive donor bone marrow. The immunosuppressive regimen included OKT3, Tacrolimus, and steroid maintenance therapy, and, in some patients, newly introduced mycophenolate mofetil. This report describes the 24-mo actuarial follow-up and several immunological monitoring studies including sequential measurements of donor bone marrow lineage subset chimerism by the recently reported PCR-flow assay. This is a sensitive in situ PCR detection system for donor versus recipient histocompatibility genes as well as cell surface CD epitope markers using flow cytometry. The results indicate (a) the stabilization of the donor CD3+ and CD34+ cells in recipient peripheral blood at levels below 1% between 6 mo and 1 yr postoperatively, with a 10-fold higher level of donor cell chimerism of these lineages in recipient iliac crest marrow; (b) significantly lower levels of chimerism in peripheral blood up to 6 mo postoperatively in patients who had early acute (reversible) rejection episodes compared with those who did not; (c) a higher degree of chimerism seen in patients who were class II MHC HLA DR identical with their donors; (d) the identification of a high proportion of the donor bone marrow derived CD3 dimly staining subset of T cells (to which regulatory functions have been ascribed) in recipient peripheral blood and especially in recipient bone marrow; and (e) an unexpectedly increased susceptibility to clinically significant infections (primarily viral), and even death in the DBMC-infused group, compared with controls, but no graft losses because of rejection in the DBMC-infused group. Mixed lymphocyte culture assays showed a trend toward a greater number of nonspecifically low reactors in the DBMC group, as well as a greater number of nonspecifically high reactors in the controls (P = 0.058). The autologous mixed lymphocyte reaction also indicated a trend towards nonspecific immune activation in the DBMC group. Finally, anti-cytomegaloviral IgG antibody reactivity was significantly inhibited in the DBMC group 4-6 mo postoperatively (P = < 0.05). In the controls, there were no donor cell lineages detected by PCR-flow in the peripheral blood. These rather unexpected findings, indicating a more depressed cellular and humoral immune capacity in the DBMC cadaver kidney transplant recipients in this relatively early follow-up period, are discussed relevant to chimerism, MHC restriction, and suppressor activity brought about by specialized DBMC subsets, which still need to be defined.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1997

Human islet allografts in patients with type 2 diabetes undergoing liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Most patients with cirrhosis have insulin resistance and impaired glucose tolerance, and 20% eventually develop diabetes. Although diabetes in this setting may be reversible after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLTx), immunosuppressive agents administered after transplantation could exacerbate this disease. We report the results of the first pilot trial of islet cell transplantation (ICTx) in patients with diabetes undergoing OLTx. METHODS: Five patients with diabetes and liver cirrhosis underwent OLTx and ICTx. Donor bone marrow cells were also infused to enhance the acceptance of the graft. We identified seven patients who received only OLTx and donor bone marrow cells as historical controls. RESULTS: Preliminary results suggest that ICTx in conjunction with OLTx may improve glucose metabolism (insulin requirement, hemoglobin A1c) in patients with liver cirrhosis. However, there was virtually no change in pre- and posttransplant basal C-peptide levels in the recipients of OLTx + ICTx. CONCLUSIONS: We are planning to further evaluate the effect of OLTx with or without ICTx in a randomized prospective trial, using euglycemic insulin clamp studies.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1997

High-dose donor bone marrow infusions to enhance allograft survival: the effect of timing.

BACKGROUND: The development of strategies to enhance survival of transplanted organs and to potentially lower or even discontinue immunosuppressive therapy would represent a significant advance in posttransplant patient care. The aim of this clinical trial was to determine the effect of timing and dose of peripheral donor bone marrow cell (DBMC) infusion on graft and patient survival after liver transplantation. METHODS: DBMC, obtained from vertebral bodies, were administered in 101 recipients of liver allografts (OLTX). There were 107 patients for whom DBMC could not be obtained; they received OLTX alone (controls). A total of 5 x 10(8)/kg DBMC were infused at day 0 (group 1; n=9); at days 0 and 11 (group 2; n=26); or at days 5 and 11 (group 3; n=26). In group 4 (n=40), patients received up to five infusions of 2 x 10(8)/kg DBMC at days 5, 14, 21, 28, and 90 after OLTX. RESULTS: When the results from patients receiving two or more DBMC infusions (groups 2, 3, and 4) are considered, both patient and graft survival were significantly improved compared with the control group (P=0.02 and P=0.01, respectively). In groups 3 and 4, 88.5% and 95% of patients were alive with mean follow-up of 536 and 265 days, respectively, compared with 77.6% of patients in the control group (average follow-up of 452 days) (P=0.02). Graft survival was also significantly improved in groups 3 (88.5%) and 4 (92.5%), compared with the controls (72%) (P=0.007). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that dose and timing of DBMC infusions may be important variables affecting allograft survival. A randomized prospective trial is now in progress to compare group 3 DBMC infusion protocol with controls receiving OLTX alone.

Adult↗

PubMed1997