Biomedical subjects

T L Alvarez

Publications and source records attributed to T L Alvarez.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2000

Disparity vergence double responses processed by internal error.

Disparity vergence eye movements occasionally exhibit two high-velocity components to a single step stimulus (Alvarez, T. L., Semmlow, J. L. & Yuan, W. (1998). Journal of Neurophysiology, 79, 37-44). This research investigates the neural strategy used to trigger the second component of double high-velocity vergence eye movements. Vergence doubles evoked by an experimental protocol that induces post-movement visual error were compared to doubles that occur normally. The second component of a visually evoked response double occurred later, and with slower dynamics, than that of a naturally occurring double. These differences in timing and dynamics indicate that natural double responses are mediated, at least in part, by a mechanism other than visual feedback. The faster dynamics and timing of natural doubles suggest that an internal monitoring process triggers these movements.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1999

Short term modification of disparity vergence eye movements.

Dynamics of disparity vergence eye movements can be modified by adaptive stimuli that generate large transient disparities. These modifications were observed for convergence as well as divergence eye movements. After modification, the peak velocities of the step responses for convergence and divergence were substantially higher than in normal baseline responses, a change observed in all four subjects studied. The change in peak velocity of a step response occurred very rapidly after presentation of the adaptive stimuli. Main sequence plots showed that first-order dynamic characteristics increased for post-adaptive responses with respect to normal step responses. Hence, response modification could be quantified as a change in gain accompanied with an increase in the effective response time constant. The adaptive responses to convergent and divergent 'disappearing' step stimuli revealed that the adaptation process modifies the high-velocity component of both disparity convergence and divergence eye movements. Moreover, a gain change in this component alone could account for both the gain and the time constant modifications seen in the overall response. A process of recovery or de-adaptation was also observed for both convergence and divergence eye movements. This observed short-term modification demonstrates a unique control mechanism for vergence eye movements that is effective in either direction.

Adaptation, Ocular↗

PubMed1999

Dynamics of the disparity vergence step response: a model-based analysis.

A new method to analyze the dynamics of vergence eye movements was developed based on a reconstruction of the presumed motor command signal. A model was used to construct equivalent motor command signals and transform an associated vergence transient response into an equivalent set of motor commands. This model represented only the motor components of the vergence system and consisted of signal generators representing the neural burst and tonic cells and a plant representing the ocular musculature and dynamics of the orbit. Through highly accurate simulations, dynamic vergence responses could be reduced to a set of five model parameters, each relating to a specific feature of the internal motor command. This dynamic analysis tool was applied to the analysis of inter-movement variability in vergence step responses. Model parameters obtained from a large number of response simulations showed that the width of the command pulse was tightly controlled while its amplitude, rising slope, and falling slope were less tightly regulated. Variation in the latter three parameters accounted for the most of the movement-to-movement variability seen in vergence step responses. Unlike version movements, pulse width did not increase with increased stimulus amplitude, although the other command signal parameters were substantially influenced by stimulus amplitude.

Computer Simulation↗

PubMed1998

Evidence for separate control of slow version and vergence eye movements: support for Hering's Law.

When a visual stimulus changes direction and distance simultaneously, Hering's Law argues that the resulting eye movements are the result of combined version and vergence control processes. Recently, it has been suggested that slow asymmetrical eye movements might be guided by monocular control processes wherein each eye is driven by its own retinal image. Experimental results presented here show behavioral differences between slow version and slow vergence eye movements, indicating that different control processes drive the two "pure" responses. Specifically, version tracking of constant velocity stimuli (i.e., smooth pursuit) is more precise, showing less variation in tracking velocity than movements of equal velocity produced by vergence stimuli. When the two stimuli are combined, the variability in tracking is consistent with the addition of the two components in proportion to their respective stimuli. These results provide support for Hering's Law, at least for low velocity, smooth tracking movements (i.e., slow version and slow vergence.

Adult↗

PubMed1998

Closely spaced, fast dynamic movements in disparity vergence.

Conflicting theories exist describing how symmetrical vergence responses, the inward or outward turning of the eyes, are mediated. Classical theories describe vergence control as mediated by visual feedback. Extensive experimental evidence indicates that two distinct control components comprise the vergence response, and a recent theory supports the concept that one of these components is not visually guided. Occasionally, saccadic eye movements will respond to a single step stimulus with two closely spaced saccades, a behavior that is indicative of its switching control structure. If a portion of the vergence response is controlled in a manner analogous to saccades, then occasional double fast dynamic components might be expected. During this study, eye movements were recorded in response to symmetrical vergence stimuli of 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 degrees steps. The left and right eye movements were subtracted to yield a net vergence response, and only convergent responses were investigated. Double fast dynamic components associated with high-velocity movements were observed in all four subjects studied. In double high-velocity component responses, the average peak velocity of both fast dynamic movements was always considerably less than the average peak velocity found when the response to the same stimulus was made with only a single component. Response amplitudes of single and double movements showed that if the primary component of a double response did not reach >/=80% of the stimulus amplitude, a secondary component would be generated to aid the movement. Plots of peak velocity as a function of response amplitude for both double and single movements followed the main sequence for vergence eye movements demonstrating that the first-order dynamic characteristics of all high-velocity components were the same. The time at which maximum velocity occurred (relative to stimulus onset) was also the same for both single component responses and the first component of double responses. The similarity in dynamics and timing implies that the high-velocity components were processed by the same controller mechanism. The existence of double high-velocity movements is indicative of an internal, switching mechanism similar to that found in saccades and is difficult to explain with theories that rely on visual feedback control alone.

Calibration↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Dynamic details of disparity convergence eye movements.

Classically, the primary tool for quantifying the dynamics of vergence and other eye movements has been the main sequence. The main sequence is a plot of peak velocity versus response amplitude and is particularly useful for comparing the dynamics of a large number of eye movements over a range of response amplitudes. However, the main sequence represents only the equivalent first-order behavior of a response and does not describe its dynamics in detail. Since the main sequence is based on only two points on the dynamic trajectory, it is sensitive to measurement artifacts and noise. A new methodology is presented which quantifies the equivalent second-order dynamics of eye movements using a larger region of the transient response. These new indexes were applied to vergence eye movements and were found to differentiate between subtle, but important differences in movement dynamics.

Biomedical Engineering↗