PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

T L DeWeese

Publications and source records attributed to T L DeWeese.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Reversal of GSTP1 CpG island hypermethylation and reactivation of pi-class glutathione S-transferase (GSTP1) expression in human prostate cancer cells by treatment with procainamide.

Among the many somatic genome alterations present in cancer cells, changes in DNA methylation may represent reversible "epigenetic" lesions, rather than irreversible "genetic" alterations. Cancer cell DNA is typically characterized by increases in the methylation of CpG dinucleotides clustered into CpG islands, near the transcriptional regulatory regions of critical genes, and by an overall reduction in CpG dinucleotide methylation. The transcriptional "silencing" of gene expression associated with such CpG island DNA hypermethylation presents an attractive therapeutic target: restoration of "silenced" gene expression may be possible via therapeutic reversal of CpG island hypermethylation. 5-Aza-cytidine (5-aza-C) and 5-aza-deoxycytidine (5-aza-dC), nucleoside analogue inhibitors of DNA methyltransferases, have been widely used in attempts to reverse abnormal DNA hypermethylation in cancer cells and restore "silenced" gene expression. However, clinical utility of the nucleoside analogue DNA methyltransferase inhibitors has been limited somewhat by myelosuppression and other side effects. Many of these side effects are characteristic of nucleoside analogues that are not DNA methyltransferase inhibitors, offering the possibility that nonnucleoside analogue DNA methyltransferase inhibitors might not possess such side effects. Human prostate cancer (PCA) cells characteristically contain hypermethylated CpG island sequences encompassing the transcriptional regulatory region of GSTP1, the gene encoding the pi-class glutathione S-transferase (GSTP1), and fail to express GSTP1 as a consequence of transcriptional "silencing." Inactivation of GSTP1 by CpG island hypermethylation, the most common somatic genome alteration yet reported for human PCAs, occurs early during human prostatic carcinogenesis and results in a loss of GSTP1 "caretaker" function, leaving prostate cells with inadequate defenses against oxidant and electrophile carcinogens. We report here that the drug procainamide, a nonnucleoside inhibitor of DNA methyltransferases, reversed GSTP1 CpG island hypermethylation and restored GSTP1 expression in LNCaP human PCA cells propagated in vitro or in vivo as xenograft tumors in athymic nude mice.

Animals↗

A phase I trial of CV706, a replication-competent, PSA selective oncolytic adenovirus, for the treatment of locally recurrent prostate cancer following radiation therapy.

CV706 is a prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-selective, replication-competent adenovirus that has been shown to selectively kill human prostate cancer xenografts in preclinical models. To study the safety and activity of intraprostatic delivery of CV706, a Phase I dose-ranging study for the treatment of patients with locally recurrent prostate cancer after radiation therapy was conducted. Twenty patients in five groups were treated with between 1 x 10(11) and 1 x 10(13) viral particles delivered by a real-time, transrectal ultrasound-guided transperineal technique using a three-dimensional plan. The primary end point was the determination of treatment-related toxicity. Secondary objectives included evaluation of the antitumor activity of CV706 and monitoring for other correlates of antineoplastic action. In this study, CV706 was found to be safe and was not associated with irreversible grade 3 or any grade 4 toxicity. No grade >1 alterations in liver function tests associated with CV706 administration were observed. Posttreatment prostatic biopsies and detection of a delayed "peak" of circulating copies of virus provided evidence of intraprostatic replication of CV706. The study defined the timing of CV706 shedding into blood and urine as well as the appearance of circulating Ad5 neutralizing antibodies. Finally, this study documents the serum PSA response of treated patients and reveals a dose response showing that all five patients who achieved a > or =50% reduction in PSA were treated with the highest two doses of CV706. This study represents the first clinical translation of a prostate-specific, replication-restricted adenovirus for the treatment of prostate cancer. Taken together, this study documents that intraprostatic delivery of CV706 can be safely administered to patients, even at high doses, and the data also suggest that CV706 possesses enough clinical activity, as reflected by changes in serum PSA, to warrant additional clinical and laboratory investigation.

Adenoviridae↗

Acute and late radiotherapy toxicity in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the incidence of gastrointestinal complications in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) receiving radiotherapy (RT) and to identify possibly avoidable factors associated with these complications. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty-four patients were identified and their records reviewed; all had a history of IBD before receiving RT to fields encompassing some portion of the gastrointestinal tract (Crohn's disease) or to the abdomen or pelvis (ulcerative colitis or IBD not otherwise specified). RESULTS: Five of 24 patients (21%) experienced Grade > or =3 acute gastrointestinal toxicity; all 5 received concurrent chemotherapy. Two of 24 patients (8%) experienced Grade > or =3 late gastrointestinal toxicity. There were no significant correlations between complications and IBD type, prior IBD-related surgery, use of medications for IBD, or status of IBD. CONCLUSION: Patients with IBD may have an increased risk for severe acute RT-related gastrointestinal complications that is more modest than generally perceived, because all patients who had Grade > or =3 acute complications in this study had received concurrent chemotherapy (p = 0.04). Further study is needed to assess this risk, as well as the impact of RT on these patients' future gastrointestinal morbidity.

Adolescent↗

GSTP1 CpG island hypermethylation is responsible for the absence of GSTP1 expression in human prostate cancer cells.

GSTP1 CpG island hypermethylation is the most common somatic genome alteration described for human prostate cancer (PCA); lack of GSTP1 expression is characteristic of human PCA cells in vivo. We report here that loss of GSTP1 function may have been selected during the pathogenesis of human PCA. Using a variety of techniques to detect GSTP1 CpG island DNA hypermethylation in PCA DNA, we found only hypermethylated GSTP1 alleles in each PCA cell in all but two PCA cases studied. In these two cases, CpG island hypermethylation was present at only one of two GSTP1 alleles in PCA DNA. In one of the cases, DNA hypermethylation at one GSTP1 allele and deletion of the other GSTP1 allele were evident. In the other case, an unmethylated GSTP1 allele was detected, accompanied by abundant GSTP1 expression. GSTP1 CpG island DNA hypermethylation was responsible for lack of GSTP1 expression by LNCaP PCA cells: treatment of the cells with 5-azacytidine (5-aza-C), an inhibitor of DNA methyltransferases, reversed the GSTP1 promoter DNA hypermethylation, activated GSTP1 transcription, and restored GSTP1 expression. GSTP1 promoter activity, assessed via transfection of GSTP1 promoter-CAT reporter constructs in LNCaP cells, was inhibited by SssI-catalyzed CpG dinucleotide methylation. Remarkably, although selection for loss of GSTP1 function may be inferred for human PCA, GSTP1 did not act like a tumor suppressor gene, as LNCaP cells expressing GSTP1, either after 5-aza-C treatment or as a consequence of transfection with GSTP1 cDNA, grew well in vitro and in vivo. Perhaps, GSTP1 inactivation may render prostatic cells susceptible to additional genome alterations, caused by electrophilic or oxidant carcinogens, that provide a selective growth advantage.

Alleles↗

A structured debate: immediate versus deferred androgen suppression in prostate cancer-evidence for deferred treatment.

PURPOSE: We present a structured debate supporting the premise that immediate hormonal intervention has not been conclusively shown to provide a survival advantage in the management of advanced prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The literature emphasizing randomized trials was reviewed. Recommendations are based solely on a demonstrated advantage in survival. RESULTS: In patients with stage Tx Nx Mo or MI disease who did not receive other primary therapy there is no demonstrated survival advantage to immediate hormonal therapy. In men with positive lymph nodes who underwent radical prostatectomy a relatively small study showed a survival advantage in favor of immediate hormonal treatment compared to deferred treatment. This study did not reach the projected accrual of 240 patients and results have not been supported by other trials. In men with stages T2-4 Nx Mx disease who underwent primary treatment with radiotherapy a survival advantage for early hormonal therapy is primarily limited to high risk subgroups. In patients with biochemical relapse following primary treatment there are no trials. CONCLUSIONS: Because hormonal therapy is associated with the development of irreversible resistance in virtually all patients, it does not cure, there is usually a long interval from first prostate specific antigen elevation to the development of metastatic disease, and hormonal therapy has profound side effects and is expensive, delayed treatment is recommended in men with biochemical relapse following surgery or radiotherapy. Patients should be strongly encouraged to enter clinical trials to answer this question.

Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal↗

The molecular pathogenesis of prostate cancer: Implications for prostate cancer prevention.

Prostate cancer has become 1 of the most commonly diagnosed cancers in the United States and 1 of the leading causes of cancer death in North America and Western Europe. Survey studies of prostate tissues obtained at autopsy indicate that the development of life-threatening prostate cancer in the US likely occurs over decades. Insights from epidemiologic studies implicate environmental factors, principally dietary components, as major risk factors for prostate cancer development. An accumulating body of basic research data suggests that normal and neoplastic prostate cells may be subjected to a relentless barrage of genome-damaging stresses, and that dietary components and male sex steroids might modulate the level of genome threatening insults. Finally, over the past 5 years, analyses of somatic genome alterations in prostatic carcinoma cells have revealed that somatic inactivation of GSTP1, encoding the carcinogen-detoxification enzyme glutathione S-transferase pi, may serve as an initiating genome lesion for prostatic carcinogenesis. These diverse observations can be integrated into a transcendent mechanistic hypothesis for the pathogenesis of prostate cancer: normal prostate cells acquiring somatic GSTP1 defects may suffer chronic genome damage, influenced by dietary practices, that promote neoplastic transformation, while prostatic carcinoma cells, which characteristically contain defective GSTP1 alleles, remain susceptible to further genome-damaging stresses that promote malignant cancer progression. This hypothesized critical role for GSTP1 inactivation in the earliest steps of prostatic carcinogenesis provides several attractive opportunities for prostate cancer prevention strategies, including (1) restoration of GSTP1 function, (2) compensation for inadequate GSTP1 activity (via use of therapeutic inducers of other glutathione S-transferases (GST), and (3) abrogation or attenuation of genome-damaging stresses.

Atrophy↗

Oxidative stress in chemoprevention trials.

Prostate cancer continues to be the most frequently diagnosed cancer in men in the United States. Despite aggressive intervention, a significant number of men with prostate cancer will not be cured of their disease and will face the possibility of metastatic disease. Thus, development of potent prevention strategies to diminish or eliminate this threat is in order. Cellular exposure to chronic oxidative stress may be 1 possible etiologic factor in the development of many cancers, including prostate cancer. Oxygen radicals can attack DNA directly and result in the accumulation of potentially promutagenic oxidized DNA bases such as 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine. In addition, chronic oxidant stress may also result in lipid peroxidation and the subsequent generation of a range of reactive products that can damage DNA. Disruption of certain genes may result in cellular tolerance to oxidative genomic injury. GSTP1 is an enzyme that helps catalyze the conjugation reaction between potentially damaging electrophiles and glutathione. Inactivation of GSTP1 has been documented to occur in nearly 100% of human prostate cancers; it is also frequently inactivated in prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia lesions. This inactivation may leave the cell vulnerable to oxidative DNA damage and/or tolerant to accumulation of oxidized DNA base adducts. These base adducts can be measured by several quantitative methods, such as gas chromatography-mass spectrometry with selected ion monitoring. These sophisticated methods can be readily integrated into prostate cancer chemoprevention studies of new and developing prevention agents by providing quantitative assessment of oxidative DNA damage before and after administration of these candidate chemopreventive drugs. The combination of genetic information, state-of-the-art assessment tools, and novel agents will allow rational, directed prostate cancer chemoprevention studies to be performed and, together, will help determine the role of chronic oxidative stress in the carcinogenic process of prostate cancer.

8-Hydroxy-2'-Deoxyguanosine↗

Radiation therapy for the treatment of locally advanced and metastatic prostate cancer.

Radiation therapy for locally advanced PCa continues to evolve. A current treatment recommendation for nonmetastatic, high-risk disease includes AS combined with RT. The precise duration and sequencing of AS has not been established but most frequently includes treatment in the neoadjuvant, concomitant and, occasionally, adjuvant periods. As technology allows higher doses without significant increases in morbidity and as clinical data provide proof of a radiation dose response, RT doses continue to escalate. The goal of therapy for metastatic disease continues to focus on the relief of pain and the improvement in quality of life. Multiple studies document the significant role RT plays in achieving these goals. Focal RT and systemic radioisotopes have become the mainstay of management in this patient group and the development of newer isotopes that cause less marrow toxicity will improve the therapeutic ratio and provide an opportunity for their use with systemic chemotherapy. As molecular and genomic technologies advance, directed targeting of critical cellular radiation-response pathways hold the promise of improved radiation response and individualized, tailored therapy.

Adenocarcinoma↗

Multimodality therapy for the treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

In the United States, local management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer largely remains radical cystectomy with urinary diversion. However, this approach is undergoing transition. Organ-preserving approaches using a combination of multiple modalities have been successfully applied to the management of several types of cancer and clearly play an important role in the management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer as well. Since the 1980s, several single and multi-institutional trials have confirmed that a combined modality organ-preserving approach (chemotherapy administered in conjunction with radiation) consistently confers equivalent overall survival compared with survival following radical cystectomy. These trials are very encouraging and allow organ preservation to be considered an appropriate therapeutic option for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Combined Modality Therapy↗

Nuclear morphometry predicts disease-free interval for clinically localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate treated with definitive radiation therapy.

Men treated for prostate cancer often have unexpected outcomes despite predictive models based on stage, grade and prostate-specific antigen (PSA). Previous results have indicated that nuclear morphometry can predict patient outcome in urologic malignancies. Application of this analytical method in prostate cancer treated with radiation therapy is limited. We have evaluated the predictive ability of nuclear morphometry in such patients. Histologic sections from 23 men with clinically localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate treated with radiation therapy were studied. Nuclear morphometric parameters were assessed using a previously described and validated system. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses and a Cox proportional hazards model were used to assess the ability of nuclear morphometric parameters to predict recurrence and disease-free interval. Ten patients had no recurrence with median follow-up of 47. 5 months, while 13 had recurrence. Gleason grade was not predictive of treatment outcome. Pre-treatment PSA data, available for only 11 patients, were predictive of treatment outcome. Several nuclear morphometric parameters predicted recurrence, including upper quartile of suboptimal circle fit and upper quartile of feret-diameter ratio. A prognostic factor score incorporating these 2 parameters was derived, which predicted disease-free interval (p = 0.0014). Int. J. Cancer (Pred. Oncol.) 84:594-597, 1999.

Adenocarcinoma↗

Prostate-specific antigen and other markers of therapeutic response.

Several new agents and combinations demonstrate significant activity in the treatment of patients with hormone refractory prostate cancer. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is being used increasingly as the key marker of a therapeutic response in trials of new agents. This article reviews data that support this marker as a surrogate endpoint, and it discusses the issues around the appropriateness of PSA as an intermediate marker with evolving noncytotoxic agents. Other biomarkers of prostate cancer progression are not uniformly elevated in men with advanced disease; to date, they are of limited clinical use. This article also discusses the rationale and results of novel and alternative biomarkers of prostate cancer progression.

Biomarkers, Tumor↗

Radiation myositis.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Carcinoma, Transitional Cell↗

Mouse embryonic stem cells carrying one or two defective Msh2 alleles respond abnormally to oxidative stress inflicted by low-level radiation.

Chronic oxidative stress may play a critical role in the pathogenesis of many human cancers. Here, we report that mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells deficient in DNA mismatch repair responded abnormally when exposed to low levels of ionizing radiation, a stress known to generate oxidative DNA damage. ES cells derived from mice carrying either one or two disrupted Msh2 alleles displayed an increased survival following protracted exposures to low-level ionizing radiation as compared with wild-type ES cells. The increases in survival exhibited by ES cells deficient in DNA mismatch repair appeared to have resulted from a failure to efficiently execute cell death (apoptosis) in response to radiation exposure. For each of the ES cell types, prolonged low-level radiation treatment generated oxidative genome damage that manifested as an accumulation of oxidized bases in genomic DNA. However, ES cells from Msh2(+/-) and Msh2(-/-) mice accumulated more oxidized bases as a consequence of low-level radiation exposure than ES cells from Msh2(+/+) mice. The propensity for normal cells with mismatch repair enzyme deficiencies, including cells heterozygous for inactivating mismatch repair enzyme gene mutations, to survive promutagenic genome insults accompanying oxidative stresses may contribute to the increased cancer risk characteristic of the hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome.

Alleles↗

Impaired expression and function of signal-transducing zeta chains in peripheral T cells and natural killer cells in patients with prostate cancer.

Detection of functional, circulating T cells and NK cells may serve as a clinical test for the selection of individuals who can benefit from immunotherapy. Incidence of the T-cell receptor zeta (TCRdelta) chain within these populations appears to correlate with adequate effector cell function. In patients with advanced malignancy, the absence or reduced expression of delta chain has been documented. Flow cytometric analysis in the present study revealed a significant reduction in delta chain expression in peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL) of 14 of 22 prostate cancer patients (P < 0.000001) as compared to normal donors, apparent in both T cells (CD3+, CD4+, CD8+), and NK (CD16+) cells. Compared to normal donor PBL, patient PBL cultured in the presence of CD3 and CD28, also demonstrated reduced expression of CD69 and/or CD25, and in some cases, failed to activate at all. Furthermore, evidence of cell proliferation in activation-stimulated patient PBL was muted: average PCNA positivity equaled 14%, a marked difference from what was observed in normal donors (P < 0.0002). In 8 of 16 samples of PBL, where delta expression was originally low, delta levels returned to the normal range after 48 hour culture in serum-free medium, suggesting that the loss of delta is reversible and may be caused by a tumor-derived substance. These data support the premise that monitoring the expression of delta in a cancer patient may provide a unique insight into the immune status and functionality of the individual, with the potential to redirect or augment therapies and ultimately alter prognosis.

Adult↗

Sensitivity of human prostatic carcinoma cell lines to low dose rate radiation exposure.

PURPOSE: Low dose rate radioemitters, such as 125I, 103Pd, and 89Sr, have been used both for local and systemic treatment of prostate cancer. Most normal cells exposed to ionizing radiation characteristically activate cell cycle checkpoints, resulting in cell cycle arrest at the G1/S and G2/M transition points. Cancer cells are typically quite sensitive to radiation killing late in the G2 phase of the replicative cell cycle. Furthermore, most cancer cells accumulating at the G2/M transition point as a result of low dose rate radiation exposure appear to become sensitive to further low dose rate irradiation. For this reason, protracted exposure of cancer cells to low dose rate radiation has been proposed to result in increased cancer cell killing as compared with brief exposures of cancer cells to high dose rate radiation. Since many human prostatic carcinomas contain somatic genome alterations targeting genes which affect the cell cycle and radiation-associated cell cycle checkpoints, we evaluated the effects of low dose rate radiation exposure on the cell cycle and on clonogenic survival for various human prostatic carcinoma cell lines. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Human prostatic carcinoma cells from the LNCaP, DU 145, PC-3, PPC-1, and TSU-Pr1 cell lines were exposed to low dose rate (0.25 Gy/hour) or high dose rate (60 Gy/hour) radiation in vitro and then assessed for radiation cytotoxicity by clonogenic survival assay. Cell cycle perturbations following protracted exposure to low dose rate radiation were evaluated using flow cytometry. RESULTS: For LNCaP cells, low dose rate radiation exposure resulted in an accumulation of cells at both the G1/S and the G2/M cell cycle transition points. For DU 145, PC-3, PPC-1, and TSU-Pr1 cells, treatment with low dose rate radiation triggered G2/M cell cycle arrest, but not G1/S arrest. Unexpectedly, the cell cycle redistribution pattern phenotypes observed, G1/S and G2/M cell cycle arrest versus G2/M arrest alone, appeared to have little effect on low dose rate radiation survival. Furthermore, while PC-3, PPC-1, and TSU-Pr1 cells exhibited increased cytotoxic sensitivity to low dose rate versus fractionated high dose rate radiation treatment, DU 145 and LNCaP cells did not. CONCLUSIONS: Radiation-associated pertubations in replicative cell cycle progression were not dominant determinants of low dose rate radiation killing efficacy in human prostate cancer cell lines in vitro.

Humans↗

Long-term results of radiation therapy for prostate cancer recurrence following radical prostatectomy.

PURPOSE: Following radical prostatectomy, radiation therapy may be beneficial in select patients with isolated local recurrence. Pathological stage, Gleason score and the timing of prostate specific antigen (PSA) elevation are useful in distinguishing men with local recurrence from those with distant metastases. We test the ability of these criteria to predict long-term suppression of PSA recurrence following post-prostatectomy radiation therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Of 1,699 men treated with radical prostatectomy from 1982 to 1995, 82 with an isolated PSA elevation or local recurrence following surgery underwent radiation therapy to the prostatic bed and were followed for at least 2 years. No patient had evidence of metastases at the time of radiation. RESULTS: Of the men 17 (21%) had an undetectable PSA (less than 0.2 ng./ml.) for 2 or greater years following radiation. The 5-year actuarial PSA recurrence-free rate after radiation was 10%. PSA remained at undetectable levels for 2 or greater years in no patients with Gleason score 8 or greater (12 cases), positive seminal vesicles (12) or positive lymph nodes (3), and in only 1 of 16 men (6%) who had a PSA recurrence within 1 year of prostatectomy. As the interval to PSA recurrence increased, the likelihood of responding to radiotherapy increased to 44% if initial disease detection occurred 5 or more years after prostatectomy. There was no demonstrated advantage to radiating men with an isolated PSA elevation before a documented local recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with Gleason score 8 or greater, positive seminal vesicles or lymph nodes, or a PSA recurrence within the first year following surgery rarely benefit from radiation therapy. As the interval to PSA recurrence increases, the likelihood of responding to radiation therapy increases substantially. These parameters are useful in the selection of patients with prostate cancer recurrences who are likely to benefit from radiation to the prostatic bed.

Follow-Up Studies↗