PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

T L Gu

Publications and source records attributed to T L Gu.

7 recordsLinked to original sources

Auto-inhibition of Ets-1 is counteracted by DNA binding cooperativity with core-binding factor alpha2.

Auto-inhibition is a common transcriptional control mechanism that is well characterized in the regulatory transcription factor Ets-1. Autoinhibition of Ets-1 DNA binding works through an inhibitory module that exists in two conformations. DNA binding requires a change in the inhibitory module from the packed to disrupted conformation. This structural switch provides a mechanism to tightly regulate Ets-1 DNA binding. We report that the Ets-1 partner protein core-binding factor alpha2 (CBFalpha2; also known as AML1 or PEBP2) stimulates Ets-1 DNA binding and counteracts auto-inhibition. Support for this conclusion came from three observations. First, the level of cooperative DNA binding (10-fold) was similar to the level of repression by auto-inhibition (10- to 20-fold). Next, a region necessary for cooperative DNA binding mapped to the inhibitory module. Third, an Ets-1 mutant with a constitutively disrupted inhibitory module did not bind DNA cooperatively with CBFalpha2. Furthermore, two additional lines of evidence indicated that CBFalpha2 affects the structural switch by direct interactions with Ets-1. First, the retention of cooperative DNA binding on nicked duplexes eliminated a potential role of through-DNA effects. Second, cooperative DNA binding was observed on composite sites with altered spacing or reversed orientation. We suggest that only protein interactions can accommodate this observed flexibility. These findings provide a mechanism by which CBF relieves the auto-inhibition of Ets-1 and illustrates one strategy for the synergistic activity of regulatory transcription factors.

Animals↗

Auto-inhibition and partner proteins, core-binding factor beta (CBFbeta) and Ets-1, modulate DNA binding by CBFalpha2 (AML1).

Core-binding factor alpha2 (CBFalpha2; otherwise known as AML1 or PEBP2alphaB) is a DNA-binding subunit in the family of core-binding factors (CBFs), heterodimeric transcription factors that play pivotal roles in multiple developmental processes in mammals, including hematopoiesis and bone development. The Runt domain in CBFalpha2 (amino acids 51 to 178) mediates DNA binding and heterodimerization with the non-DNA-binding CBFbeta subunit. Both the CBFbeta subunit and the DNA-binding protein Ets-1 stimulate DNA binding by the CBFalpha2 protein. Here we quantify and compare the extent of cooperativity between CBFalpha2, CBFbeta, and Ets-1. We also identify auto-inhibitory sequences within CBFalpha2 and sequences that modulate its interactions with CBFbeta and Ets-1. We show that sequences in the CBFalpha2 Runt domain and sequences C terminal to amino acid 214 inhibit DNA binding. Sequences C terminal to amino acid 214 also inhibit heterodimerization with the non-DNA-binding CBFbeta subunit, particularly heterodimerization off DNA. CBFbeta rescinds the intramolecular inhibition of CBFalpha2, stimulating DNA binding approximately 40-fold. In comparison, Ets-1 stimulates CBFalpha2 DNA binding 7- to 10-fold. Although the Runt domain alone is sufficient for heterodimerization with CBFbeta, sequences N terminal to amino acid 41 and between amino acids 190 and 214 are required for cooperative DNA binding with Ets-1. Cooperative DNA binding with Ets-1 is less pronounced with the CBFalpha2-CBFbeta heterodimer than with CBFalpha2 alone. These analyses demonstrate that CBFalpha2 is subject to both negative regulation by intramolecular interactions, and positive regulation by two alternative partnerships.

Animals↗

Core-binding factor: a central player in hematopoiesis and leukemia.

Consistent chromosomal rearrangements are found in a large number of hematopoietic tumors. In many cases, these rearrangements disrupt genes whose normal function is required for the proper development of blood cells. Excellent examples are the chromosomal rearrangements t(8;21)(q22;q22), t(12;21)(p13;q22), and inv(16)(p13q22) that disrupt two of the genes encoding a small family of heterodimeric transcription factors, core-binding factors (CBFs). CBFs consist of a DNA-binding CBFalpha subunit and a non-DNA-binding CBFbeta subunit. The t(8;21), associated with de novo acute myeloid leukemias, disrupts the CBFA2 (AML1) gene, which encodes a DNA-binding CBFalpha subunit. The t(12;21), the most common translocation in pediatric acute lymphocytic leukemias, also disrupts CBFA2. The CBFB gene, which encodes the non-DNA-binding subunit of the CBFs, is disrupted by the inv(16) in de novo acute myeloid leukemias. All chromosomal rearrangements involving the CBFA2 and CBFB genes create chimeric proteins, two of which have been unequivocally demonstrated to function as transdominant negative inhibitors of CBF function. Both the Cbfa2 and Cbfb genes are essential for normal hematopoiesis in mice, because homozygous disruption of either gene blocks definitive hematopoiesis. Recent data suggest that Cbfa2 and Cbfb are required for the emergence of definitive hematopoietic stem cells in the embryo from a putative definitive hemangioblast precursor. The transdominant negative inhibitor of CBF created by the inv(16), when present from the beginning of embryogenesis, also blocks the emergence of definitive hematopoietic cells in the embryo. On the other hand, chromosomal translocations involving the CBFA2 and CBFB genes in leukemias block hematopoiesis at later steps. This may reflect a difference in the timing at which translocations are acquired in the leukemias, which presumably is subsequent to emergence of the definitive hematopoietic stem cell. The cumulative data suggest that although the earliest requirement for Cbfa2 and Cbfb is for emergence of definitive hematopoietic stem cells, both genes are also required at later stages in the differentiation of some hematopoietic lineages.

Animals↗

Cbfa2 is required for the formation of intra-aortic hematopoietic clusters.

Cbfa2 (AML1) encodes the DNA-binding subunit of a transcription factor in the small family of core-binding factors (CBFs). Cbfa2 is required for the differentiation of all definitive hematopoietic cells, but not for primitive erythropoiesis. Here we show that Cbfa2 is expressed in definitive hematopoietic progenitor cells, and in endothelial cells in sites from which these hematopoietic cells are thought to emerge. Endothelial cells expressing Cbfa2 are in the yolk sac, the vitelline and umbilical arteries, and in the ventral aspect of the dorsal aorta in the aorta/genital ridge/mesonephros (AGM) region. Endothelial cells lining the dorsal aspect of the aorta, and elsewhere in the embryo, do not express Cbfa2. Cbfa2 appears to be required for maintenance of Cbfa2 expression in the endothelium, and for the formation of intra-aortic hematopoietic clusters from the endothelium.

Animals↗

The CBFbeta subunit is essential for CBFalpha2 (AML1) function in vivo.

The CBFbeta subunit is the non-DNA-binding subunit of the heterodimeric core-binding factor (CBF). CBFbeta associates with DNA-binding CBFalpha subunits and increases their affinity for DNA. Genes encoding the CBFbeta subunit (CBFB) and one of the CBFalpha subunits (CBFA2, otherwise known as AML1) are the most frequent targets of chromosomal translocations in acute leukemias in humans. We and others previously demonstrated that homozygous disruption of the mouse Cbfa2 (AML1) gene results in embryonic lethality at midgestation due to hemorrhaging in the central nervous system and blocks fetal liver hematopoiesis. Here we demonstrate that homozygous mutation of the Cbfb gene results in the same phenotype. Our results demonstrate that the CBFbeta subunit is required for CBFalpha2 function in vivo.

Alleles↗

Acute health hazards of firefighters after fighting a department store fire.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the health hazards of firefighters after fighting a department store fire which lasted for 40 hours. Respiratory symptoms of 168 firefighters were collected and the pulmonary functions of 149 firefighters were measured by spirometer two days after fighting the fire and compared to 32 controls. The principal symptoms manifested by firefighters were burning eyes and mucous membrane irritation. Cross-sectional study of the pulmonary functions showed that FEV1.0, FEV1.0/FVC and the flow rates (MMF, FEF25%, and FEF75%) in smoking exposed firefighters were significantly lower than those in smoking controls. However, only FEV1.0 (%) was significantly lower in nonsmoking exposed firefighters than in nonsmoking controls. Both FVC and FEV1.0 showed a declining trend with the duration of fire fighting. This study provides further evidence that firefighters are exposed to irritants during fighting a fire. Exposure to the combustion products could lead to pulmonary function defects, especially in smoking firefighters.

Case-Control Studies↗

Hypersensitivity to mitomycin C-induced sister chromatid exchange as a biomarker of past exposure to arsenic.

The objective of this study was to determine if cytogenetic markers can be used as indicators of prior exposure to arsenic compounds. Baseline sister chromatid exchange (SCE) and mitomycin C-induced (MMC) SCE were measured in four study populations recruited from a blackfoot (BF) disease endemic area, including 22 patients with cancer (CA) only, 8 patients with both BF disease and CA (BF+CA), 10 patients with BF disease only, and 26 healthy residents (HRs). Another group of 23 healthy, nonarsenic-exposed workers were recruited as external healthy controls (HCs). Characteristics of study population were collected by questionnaire, and 10 ml of venous blood were drawn for lymphocyte culture. The results showed that the frequencies of baseline SCE did not differ among the five study groups. The frequencies of delta SCE (MMC-induced SCE minus baseline SCE) in CA only, BF disease only, and HRs, three arsenic-exposed groups, were significantly higher than in HCs. The frequency of delta SCE in the BF+CA group was nonsignificantly higher than in HCs, probably due to small sample size. The frequencies of both baseline SCE and delta SCE did not differ among CA only, BF disease only, BF+CA, and HR groups. The observation that baseline SCE did not increase in the arsenic-exposed populations indicates either that exposures were insufficiently high to change this marker or that lesions did not persist. The increased SCE response to MMC in arsenic-exposed populations suggests that previous arsenic exposure may result in hypersensitivity of human lymphocytes to carcinogens and/or mutagens. Both baseline SCE and delta SCE were not different among patients with arsenic-induced diseases and healthy normal residents, indicating that hypersensitivity may have been due to previous arsenic exposure but was not associated with disease status.

Aged↗