Are HCV-infected individuals candidates for hepatitis A vaccine?
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to T L Wright.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Hepatitis G virus (HGV) is prevalent in patients with chronic liver disease and has been previously detected in liver specimens. However, it is unknown whether the virus is replicating in the liver or is simply a contaminant from serum. We sought to determine whether HGV was hepatotropic and to determine whether coinfection with HGV and hepatitis C virus (HCV) influenced the level of either virus. Virus was quantitated using branched DNA (bDNA) assay for both HGV and HCV in the liver explants and pretransplant serum samples from 30 transplant recipients: Group I, HGV/HCV coinfection (n = 10); group II, HCV infection alone, (n = 8); group III, HGV alone (n = 12). In patients with coinfection HCV (RNA) titers in liver were consistently higher than those for HGV RNA (median 1.13 x 10(8) and 360,000 Eq/g respectively, P < .01). The ratio of liver/serum viral RNA was significantly higher for HCV than for HGV (median 129 and 0.3 respectively, P < .01). Levels of HCV RNA were similar in patients with HCV infection alone versus those with HGV/HCV coinfection (median; liver = 1.15 x 10(7) vs. 1.13 x 10(8) Eq/g, serum = 500,000 vs. 200,000 Eq/mL) and levels of HGV RNA in liver and serum were similar in patients with HGV infection alone compared to those with HGV/HCV coinfection (median; liver = 1.2 x 10(6) vs. 4.0 x 10(5) Eq/g, serum = 4.5 x 106 vs. 2.6 x 10(6) Eq/mL). Levels of either virus appeared unaffected by the presence of an additional virus. The high ratio of HCV RNA levels in liver compared to serum is consistent with its known hepatotropism, but this pattern was not observed for HGV. The median liver/serum ratio of HGV RNA was less than unity, a finding consistent with serum contamination of liver tissue. Thus we conclude that the liver is not the main site of HGV replication.
Mutations in the "a" determinant of the surface gene have been associated with failure of hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIg) prophylaxis. We compared sequences from the surface and polymerase regions of hepatitis B virus (HBV) from 4 patients who failed high-dose HBIg therapy with two control groups: HBIg-treated patients who remained hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-negative (n = 4) and HBV-infected transplant recipients who never received HBIg (n = 4). Mutations within the surface and overlapping polymerase region were more common in patients failing HBIg than controls (P = .03), and mutations in the region of the "a" determinant were present only in patients failing HBIg. To examine the relationship between HBIg failure and duration of therapy, five additional treatment failures from a second transplantation center were sequenced (total with HBIg failure = 9). Mutations in the "a" determinant developed in 1 of 3 patients receiving HBIg for less than 6 months compared with 5 of 6 patients failing HBIg after 6 months of therapy (P = .23). The most frequently identified amino acid substitution was glycine to arginine at position 145 (present in 4 of 6 patients who failed HBIg after at least 6 months of treatment). A unique mutation within the YMDD motif (methionine to leucine) was present in 1 patient who failed HBIg treatment and who received a short course of ganciclovir. We conclude that the emergence of mutations in the "a" determinant accounts for some, but not all, treatment failures in patients receiving HBIg prophylaxis. Mutations in other regions of the S gene were more common in patients failing HBIg than controls, suggesting that domains other than the "a" determinant may be important.
Some liver allograft recipients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection develop hyperbilirubinemia, which might be the result of a cholestatic variant of hepatitis C. We evaluated all liver biopsy samples from 6 liver transplant recipients who had polymerase chain reaction-positive HCV infection and histologic evidence of hepatitis and jaundice and compared them with liver biopsy samples from a control group of transplant recipients with HCV hepatitis without jaundice. Patients with known ductopenic rejection, biliary obstruction, or co-infection with hepatitis A or B were excluded from the study. Measurement of viral titers and genomic typing were performed when possible. Six patients developed hepatitis and jaundice, with maximum bilirubin levels ranging from 5.8 to 47.6 mg/dL. In this group, 5 (83%) had moderate interface hepatitis (control group, 15%), 6 (100%) had confluent necrosis (control group, 12%), 5 (83%) had bridging fibrosis (control group, 18%), 4 (67%) had significant hepatocyte swelling (control group, 9%), 4 (67%) had prominent ductular proliferation (control group, 3%), and 6 (100%) had mild duct damage and inflammation (control group, 53%). All 6 of the patients with cholestasis had allograft failure. Of these, three allografts were available for review, which did not reveal occult obstruction, rejection, or duct loss. All patients in the control group have retained their allografts. In 4 patients with cholestasis, the median HCV RNA titer was 93.97 mEq/mL, with a mean of 54.19 mEq/mL (control mean = 5.2 mEq/mL). Five patients also underwent viral genomic typing: 2 with type 1a, 2 with type 1b, and 1 with mixed type 1a and 1b. Cholestasis in patients with posttransplantation hepatitis C may be caused by an aggressive HCV infection that exhibits histologic features of confluent necrosis, hepatocyte swelling, and/or ductular proliferation. Viral titers are often increased in such patients.
This study was designed to determine the cause of posttransplantation hepatitis in patients undergoing transplantation for liver disease of nonviral cause; the role of acquired hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), and hepatitis G virus (HGV) in posttransplantation hepatitis; and the course of posttransplantation hepatitis of unknown cause. Two hundred forty-three patients underwent transplantation for nonviral liver diseases (mean age, 48 years; 103 men, 140 women). Serological and virological assays for HBV and HCV were performed pretransplantation to exclude preexisting infection and posttransplantation to investigate the cause of posttransplantation hepatitis. Histology was graded on all available biopsy specimens; posttransplantation hepatitis was assessable in 150 patients. Posttransplantation hepatitis was present in 29% (44 of 150) of the patients after a median follow-up of 47 months (range, 1 to 101 months). Actuarial survival was significantly lower in patients with posttransplantation hepatitis compared with patients without (71% v 89% at 5-year follow-up; P = .03). HCV and HBV were identified posttransplantation in 14% and 9% of patients with hepatitis, respectively. After the exclusion of HCV and HBV infection, 22% (33 of 150) of the patients had posttransplantation hepatitis of unknown cause. HGV was present in 58% of these patients, but HGV was equally prevalent in patients without posttransplantation hepatitis. When patients with HBV and HCV were excluded, there was no difference in survival between patients with posttransplantation hepatitis compared with patients without (P = .08, log-rank test). Posttransplantation hepatitis was present in approximately 30% of the patients undergoing transplantation for nonviral diseases, with a median follow-up of 47 months. Known hepatitis viruses (HBV, HCV) were present in one fourth of the patients with posttransplantation hepatitis; 22% (33 of 150) of the patients had hepatitis of unknown cause, suggesting that other, as yet undiscovered, hepatitis viruses may exist.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
An assay for the detection of antibody against the second envelope (E2) protein of GB virus type C (GBV-C) has been developed. Early reports suggested that this antibody was a marker of viral clearance, yet it is unknown whether anti-E2 is protective against further GBV-C infection. The primary aims were to determine (1) if posttransplantation immunosuppression alters the prevalence of anti-E2; and (2) if anti-E2 positivity pretransplantation protects against acquisition of GBV-C infection posttransplantation. Fifty-four recipients who underwent orthotopic liver transplantation for end-stage liver disease of nonviral etiologies were tested for GBV-C RNA using a PCR-based assay and anti-E2 antibodies by an enzyme-linked immunoassay. Anti-E2 was present in 35% and in 46% of patients pre- and posttransplantation, respectively. Anti-E2 positivity pretransplantation was strongly associated with anti-E2 positivity after transplantation (P < 0.001); 83% of patients with anti-E2 prior to transplantation remained anti-E2-positive after transplantation. A negative association between presence of GBV-C viremia and presence of anti-E2 was found in all patients tested either prior to or following transplantation (P=0.03). Acquisition of GBV-C infection was significantly lower in patients who were anti-E2-positive prior to transplantation (2/13) compared to those who were anti-E2-negative (12/26) (P=0.05). It is concluded that immunosuppression does not reduce the prevalence of anti-E2 after transplantation in those who are seroreactive prior to transplantation. Anti-E2 appears to be a neutralizing antibody whose presence at the time of liver transplantation protects against acquisition of GBV-C infection in the peritransplantation period.
The presence of anti-GOR was determined in paired pre-orthotopic liver transplantation (pre-OLT) and post-OLT sera from 87 OLT patients with hepatitis C virus infection. Before OLT, 48/87 patients were seropositive for anti-GOR, but this marker had no relationship with the clinical and biochemical parameters, or viremia level. Anti-GOR was less commonly detected in patients infected with genotype 3a, compared with genotypes 1 and 2, which might be related to the less conserved nature of the proposed shared epitope (amino acid sequence 9-18) in genotype 3a isolates. After OLT (median follow-up 16 months), anti-GOR was detected in 31/87 patients and it had no correlation with the clinical and biochemical parameters, viremia level, histologic disease activity, and clinical outcome. Changes in anti-GOR status (before OLT versus after OLT) were also not related to any of the clinical parameters. Although anti-GOR is commonly detected in OLT patients infected with hepatitis C virus genotypes 1 and 2, it has no clinical or prognostic significance.
Mutations in 11 of the more than 20 keratin intermediate filaments cause several epidermal and oral associated diseases. No disease-associated mutations have been described in keratin 8 or 18 (K8/18) which are the major keratin pair in simple-type epithelia, as found in the liver, pancreas, and intestine. However, transgenic mice that express mutant keratin 18 develop chronic hepatitis, and have an increased susceptibility to drug-induced hepatotoxicity. Also, ectopic expression of epidermal K14 in mouse liver results in chronic hepatitis, and disruption of mouse K8 leads to embryo lethality with extensive liver hemorrhage. We tested if patients with liver disease of unknown cause may harbor mutations in K18. We describe a his127-->leu (H127L) K18 mutation in a patient with cryptogenic cirrhosis that is germline transmitted. The K18 H127L isolated from the liver explant, or after expression in bacteria, showed an altered migration on two-dimensional gel analysis as compared with normal human liver or bacterially expressed K18. Electron microscopy of in vitro assembled K18 H127L and wild type K8 showed an assembly defect as compared with normal K8/18 assembly. Our results suggest that mutations in K18 may be predispose to, or result in cryptogenic cirrhosis in humans.
To examine the prevalence of hepatitis G virus (HGV) in end-stage liver disease of unknown cause and the role of HGV infection in posttransplantation hepatitis, we studied 46 patients undergoing liver transplantation (mean age, 50 years; M:F, 18:28) with cryptogenic cirrhosis. HGV RNA was detected by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and was quantified by a branched DNA (bDNA) assay. The prevalence of HGV RNA was determined in samples collected before and after liver transplantation and was found to be 22% and 67%, respectively. We evaluated the prevalence of posttransplantation hepatitis in 25 patients, 16 of whom were HGV-positive and 9 were HGV-negative. The proportion of patients with hepatitis was not significantly different in the two groups (38% in HGV-positive and 22% in HGV-negative patients). The median histological scores were significantly higher in liver biopsies from patients with HGV infection than in those without HGV infection (2 [range, 0-14] and 1 [range, 0-3]; P = .01), but the histological scores were low overall. The duration of follow-up was similar in the two groups. HGV RNA levels were not correlated with the severity of liver disease based on histological score (r = -.08). Graft survival and patient survival were not significantly different. We concluded that liver disease was frequent (32%) after transplantation in patients with a pretransplantation diagnosis of cryptogenic cirrhosis, although the disease was generally mild. Although HGV RNA was demonstrable in the majority (67%) of patients after transplantation, there was no relationship between the presence of HGV RNA and the presence of posttransplantation liver disease. The finding of posttransplantation hepatitis in the absence of known viruses (A-G), suggests that other, as-yet-unidentified viruses may be important.
Transmission of hepatitis B infection from hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-negative antibody to hepatitis B core (anti-HBc)-positive liver donors has been previously described. The long-term outcome of these transplant-associated de novo hepatitis B patients has not been well described and may affect future use of donor organs that are anti-HBc-positive. We describe the experience in our first 332 transplants, performed before exclusion of anti-HBc-positive liver donors. Nine of these 332 (3%) donors were anti-HBc positive. Three of these 9 (33%) recipients developed transplant-associated de novo hepatitis B infections compared with only 2 of 323 (0.5%) recipients who received anti-HBc-negative donor livers (P = .00014). Of our 9 recipients of anti-HBc-positive livers, 6 (67%) are alive, and no deaths or allograft failures have been related to complications of hepatitis B. Only 1 of 5 patients (20%) with de novo hepatitis B has developed significant graft dysfunction with an average follow-up of more than 7 years (range 63-124 months). The 1 recipient with allograft dysfunction related to de novo hepatitis B has significantly elevated viremia levels (average HBV DNA 460 pg/mL) compared with the other de novo hepatitis B recipients (average HBV DNA 23-58 pg/mL). In summary, anti-HBc-positive donors are more likely to transmit hepatitis B infections to recipients, but these de novo infections usually have a mild clinical course and do not seem to adversely affect long-term patient survival. Hepatitis B-related allograft dysfunction, when it occurs, is associated with higher levels of viral replication. With our current donor shortage, perhaps anti-HBc-positive donors could be used in very selected recipient populations.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Subgingival bacteria exist within a biofilm consisting of cells and extracellular matrix which may afford organisms protection from both antibiotics and components of the host immune system. MIC values for planktonic Porphyromonas gingivalis treated with metronidazole were compared with those obtained for the same strain in biofilms associated with hydroxyapatite (HA) surfaces. The treated biofilms were examined for growth and studied by scanning electron microscopy. A broth assay resulted in an MIC of 0.125 microgram/ml for metronidazole against P. gingivalis, P. gingivalis biofilms exhibited growth after treatment with 20 micrograms/ml metronidazole, which was 160 times the MIC for planktonic organisms. The results of this study indicate that biofilm-associated P. gingivalis may be resistant to metronidazole at concentrations which are usually attained by systemic administration.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The optimal method for viral quantitation and the most appropriate site for determining viral load in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection are unknown. We developed a method for measuring HCV RNA in the liver with the following features: 1) efficient extraction of RNA from tissue (89% of RNA recovered); 2) accurate amplification using branched DNA with strong concordance between a single sample tested on multiple occasions either in the same or in different runs; 3) good sensitivity (95%) and specificity (100%). HCV RNA was detected in as little as 2 mg of tissue, and viral load determined in a needle biopsy was representative of viral load in other parts of the liver. Within individual livers, 68% of the samples quantitated were within 1.5-fold of the geometric mean, and 95% were within 2.2-fold of the geometric mean. The mean ratio of virus in the liver and serum was 103, range 17.4-286. A delay of 30 minutes before freezing the liver tissue resulted in a reduction in the measured viral load in some, but not all instances. A sensitive, specific and reproducible method for quantitating HCV RNA in the liver has been developed. Measurement of viral load at one site was representative of viral load at other sites. While hepatic HCV RNA levels are consistently greater than serum levels, the ratio of liver of serum viral load varies widely. The clinical use of measurement of viral load in the liver remains to be defined.
The clinical significance of GB virus C (GBV-C E2) antibody is under investigation. The prevalence rates of GBV-C RNA and antibody to GBV-C E2 glycoprotein were determined in a population of 123 Egyptian anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV)-positive patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) who had not been treated previously with interferon. Sera were tested for GBV-C RNA by the LCx assay (Abbott Laboratories, North Chicago, IL), and for GBV-C E2 antibody by enzyme immunoassay. GBV-C RNA was present in 11.4% of patients. GBV-C E2 antibody was detected in 55.9% of GBV-C RNA-negative patients and in 2.2% of GBV-C RNA-positive patients (P = 0.006). GBV-C RNA was associated significantly with a history of schistosomiasis (relative risk [RR] = 5.83, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.99-17.14, P < 0.005) but not with parenteral risk factors. The presence of GBV-C E2 antibody was not associated with age, gender, parenteral risk factors, schistosomal infection, or HCV viremia. The HCV genotype and level of viremia were similar in GBV-C anti-E2-positive and negative patients. There was a trend toward more severe histological disease with anti-E2 seropositivity (RR = 1.45, 95% CI 0.89-2.45, P = 0.11), an association which was independent of the evidence of schistosomiasis. It is concluded that GBV-C infection is common among HCV-infected Egyptian patients with CLD due to HCV infection. A significant negative correlation between the GBV-C viremia and GBV-C E2 antibody suggests that an antibody response is associated with viral clearance. This antibody response presumably occurs spontaneously, as none of the patients had received antiviral therapy. The unexpected association between GBV-C RNA and schistosomiasis suggests that nonparenteral or occult parenteral routes of GBV-C infection are likely to be important.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.