T Laurila | PubMed Health

PubMed2006

Interface equations for capillary rise in random environment.

We consider the influence of quenched noise upon interface dynamics in two-dimensional (2D) and 3D capillary rise with rough walls by using a phase-field approach, where the local conservation of mass in the bulk is explicitly included. In the 2D case, the disorder is assumed to be in the effective mobility coefficient, while in the 3D case we explicitly consider the influence of locally fluctuating geometry along a solid wall using a generalized curvilinear coordinate transformation. To obtain the equations of motion for meniscus and contact lines, we develop a systematic projection formalism that allows inclusion of disorder. Using this formalism, we derive linearized equations of motion for the meniscus and contact line variables, which become local in the Fourier space representation. These dispersion relations contain effective noise that is linearly proportional to the velocity. The deterministic parts of our dispersion relations agree with results obtained from other similar studies in the proper limits. However, the forms of the noise terms derived here are quantitatively different from the other studies.

Journal Article↗

PubMed1999

Local tissue damage in cows after intramuscular administration of preparations containing phenylbutazone, flunixin, ketoprofen and metamizole.

Tissue irritation after intramuscular injections of 4 nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents was studied in 5 lactating cows. Preparations containing phenylbutazone, flunixin, metamizole (dipyrone) and ketoprofen were investigated; physiological saline was used as a control substance. Tissue reactions at the injection sites were examined by palpation and by determining serum creatine kinase. A kinetic method based on creatine kinase released from the injured muscle tissue was used, which allowed estimation of the amount of damaged muscle. The metamizole preparation clearly provoked signs of pain all the cows. After flunixin and phenylbutazone injections slight reactions were observed, and ketoprofen and saline did not cause any clinical signs. Some palpatory findings after injections were found for all the preparations except saline. Based on serum creatine kinase, the 2 most irritating preparations were the ones containing flunixin and phenylbutazone. After injections of these 2 substances, the estimated amount of damaged muscle was about 80 grams. The statistical difference between flunixin and phenylbutazone and the other 2 preparations was significant. Physiological saline had no effect on serum creatine kinase. For preparations containing phenylbutazone and flunixin, intravenous administration is recommended.

Animals↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Pharmacokinetics of sulphadoxine and trimethoprim and tissue irritation caused by two sulphadoxine-trimethoprim containing products after subcutaneous administration in pre-ruminant calves.

The pharmacokinetics of sulphadoxine-trimethoprim was studied in 6 pre-ruminant calves using two different products. Product A, which contained 200 mg sulphadoxine and 40 mg trimethoprim per mL, was administered intravenously or subcutaneously at a dosage of 25 mg sulphadoxine and 5 mg trimethoprim.kg-1 bodyweight. Product B, containing 62.5 mg sulphadoxine and 12.5 mg trimethoprim per mL plus lidocaine (1 mg.mL-1), was given subcutaneously at the same dosage. After intravenous administration of product A the mean time of half-life of elimination phase (t1/2) for sulphadoxine was 12.9 h, steady-state volume of distribution (Vd(ss)) was 0.44 L.kg-1 and clearance was 0.024 L.kg-1.h-1. Respective values for trimethoprim were 1.9 h, 2.0 L.kg-1 and 0.9 L.kg-1.h-1. After subcutaneous administration, the bioavailability of sulphadoxine was 96% and 98% and the time to reach a maximum concentration was 6.3 and 8.0 h for products A and B, respectively. The Cmax for trimethoprim was higher for product A (0.49 microgram.mL-1) than for product B (0.32 microgram.mL-1) (p = 0.014). Slow absorption from the injection site appeared to delay the elimination of trimethoprim after subcutaneous administration when compared to that after intravenous administration: apparent elimination t1/2 for trimethoprim after intravenous administration of product A was 1.9 h compared to 3.9 h and 3.6 h after subcutaneous administration of products A and B, respectively. The difference between intravenous and subcutaneous administrations was statistically significant (p < 0.05). Also the mean residence time was significantly shorter (p < 0.05) after intravenous administration (2.4 h) than that after subcutaneous administration of product A (6.9 h) and B (7.1 h). The bioavailability of trimethoprim was lower than that of sulphadoxine: 76% and 74% for products A and B, respectively. All 6 calves showed pain after subcutaneous administration of product A and the injection sites were warm and showed soft oedematous reactions 5-8 cm in diameter. Three of the calves also showed some pain after subcutaneous administration of product B; the local reactions were less severe. A marked increase was seen in creatine kinase activity after subcutaneous administration of both products. Product A caused a more pronounced increase but the difference was not statistically significant. We suggest 30 mg.kg-1 at 24-h intervals or alternatively 15 mg.kg-1 at 12-h intervals as the minimum dosage of sulphadoxine-trimethoprim combination for pre-ruminant calves. Extravascular routes of administration should be avoided due to marked tissue irritation at the injection site.

Animals↗