Biomedical subjects

T Liljefors

Publications and source records attributed to T Liljefors.

29 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

PubMed1994

Development of a receptor-interaction model for serotonin 5-HT2 receptor antagonists. Predicting selectivity with respect to dopamine D2 receptors.

A receptor-interaction model for serotonin 5-HT2 receptor antagonists has been developed by conformational analysis with molecular mechanics (MM2(91)) and superimposition studies of serotonin 5-HT2 receptor antagonists. Substituted 3-(4-piperidinyl)-,1-(4- piperidinyl)-,3-(1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridin-4-yl)-, and 1-(1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridin-4-yl)-1H-indoles, substituted 3-(4-fluorophenyl)-1-(4-piperazinyl)indans, cyprohepatadine derivatives, ritanserin, and danitracene have been used as bases for the model. Other serotonin 5-HT2 receptor antagonists, such as ketanserin and MDL 11,939, are well accommodated into the model. Comparison of the model with a recently described receptor-interaction model for dopamine D2 receptor antagonists suggests a common pharmacophore for dopamine D2 and serotonin 5-HT2 receptor antagonists. Important steric differences between 5-HT2 receptor antagonists with additional high affinity for dopamine D2 receptors and serotonin 5-HT2 receptor antagonists with high selectivity versus D2 receptors are described. The geometry of the receptor-interaction model described is significantly different from that of a recently reported receptor-interaction model for 5-HT2 receptor agonists and antagonists developed by use of (+)-LSD as a template, suggesting the existence of two binding modes at the 5-HT2 receptor.

Indans↗

PubMed1993

A structure-activity study of four dopamine D-1 and D-2 receptor antagonists, representing the phenylindan, -indene, and -indole structural classes of compounds.

Representatives of the phenylindan, -indene, and -indole classes of compounds (3-6) have been tested for affinity for the dopamine D-1 and D-2 receptors. The compounds all display high affinities for these receptors. Conformational analysis using MM2(87) and subsequent molecular least-squares superimpositions have been performed in order to determine if the affinities of the compounds can be rationalized by a recently proposed dopamine D-2 receptor-interaction model. In spite of the different geometric and conformational properties, the compounds can be well accommodated into the model in their calculated lowest energy conformations. The molecular superimpositions allow the absolute configurations of the active enantiomers of 4 and 5 to be predicted. The present structure-activity study extends the receptor-interaction model by suggesting that the receptor is not very sensitive to the orientation of the p-fluorophenyl ring in 1 and 3-6 or to the exact spatial location of the associated fluoro substituent.

Animals↗

PubMed1992

Conformational analysis of dopamine D-2 receptor antagonists of the benzamide series in relation to a recently proposed D-2 receptor-interaction model.

Conformational analysis using molecular mechanics calculations (MM2(87)) has been performed for four different types of benzamides which display high affinity for the dopamine D-2 receptor. In order to elucidate the conformation of the receptor-bound molecules, a previously described dopamine D-2 receptor-interaction model has been employed. We conclude that all four types of benzamides accommodated in the proposed receptor-interaction model are in low-energy conformations. An acyclic amide side chain is concluded to adopt an extended conformation in the receptor-bound benzamide. A phenylpyrrole analogue of the benzamides could similarly be fitted to the model. Using the receptor-interaction model, the enantioselectivity of benzamides with an N-ethyl-2-pyrrolidinylmethyl side chain could be rationalized in terms of different conformational energies of the receptor-bound enantiomers. Two different receptor sites for N-alkyl substituents are suggested.

Benzamides↗

PubMed1992

A study on the contribution of the 1-phenyl substituent to the molecular electrostatic potentials of some benzazepines in relation to selective dopamine D-1 receptor activity.

The molecular electrostatic potentials for a selective dopamine D-1 receptor antagonist, 7-chloro-8-hydroxy-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-methylbenzazepine (SCH 23390 (1], and a selective dopamine D-1 receptor agonist, 7,8-dihydroxy-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine (SK&F 38393 (2], have been calculated in order to obtain an understanding of the nature of the interactions between the phenyl ring and the receptor. Analogues of 1 with conformationally constrained phenyl rings have also been studied. Based on this study, the conclusion is drawn that an important part of the interaction between the phenyl ring in the benzazepines and the receptor is due to electrostatic forces, and that the phenyl ring interacts with the same receptor site as the oxygen atom of the 8-hydroxy group.

2,3,4,5-Tetrahydro-7,8-dihydroxy-1-phenyl-1H-3-ben↗

PubMed1991

Octoclothepin enantiomers. A reinvestigation of their biochemical and pharmacological activity in relation to a new receptor-interaction model for dopamine D-2 receptor antagonists.

Octoclothepin (1) was resolved into its R and S enantiomers via the diastereomeric tartaric acid salts. The enantiomers were shown to be of high optical purity by 1H NMR with use of the chiral shift reagent (R)-(-)-2,2,2-trifluoro-1-(9-anthryl)ethanol. Pharmacological and biochemical testing confirmed that (S)-1 is the more potent dopamine (DA) D-2 antagonist both in vitro and in vivo, although the R enantiomer still has significant D-2 antagonistic activity. In contrast, both enantiomers were equally active in test models detecting activity at D-1 receptors, serotonin-2 (5-HT2) receptors and alpha 1 adrenoceptors. Contrary to a previous prediction, it was found that norepinephrine (NE) uptake inhibition was confined solely to the S enantiomer. Overall, (S)-1 has a "classical" neuroleptic profile, while the R enantiomer has a more "atypical" profile. These pharmacological profiles seem to be in agreement with the reported clinical profiles of the two enantiomers. A previous conformational study was revised in light of the biochemical test results with enantiomers of known optical purity. Their relative D-2 receptor affinity corresponded well with the calculated conformational energy difference between their "active conformations" deduced from a previously reported new D-2 receptor model. Also the high enantioselectivity of (S)-1 at the NE uptake site could be explained after a detailed conformational analysis showing strict requirements for the orientation of the piperazine lone-pair direction at the NE uptake site.

Animals↗

PubMed1990

Pre- and postsynaptic dopaminergic activities of indolizidine and quinolizidine derivatives of 3-(3-hydroxyphenyl)-N-(n-propyl)piperidine (3-PPP). Further developments of a dopamine receptor model.

Pre- and postsynaptic dopaminergic activities of a series of indolizidine and quinolizidine analogues of 3-(3-hydroxyphenyl)-N-(n-propyl)piperidine (3-PPP) have been studied. The pharmacological data have been interpreted in terms of a previously reported model for interactions with dopamine pre- and postsynaptic D2-receptors and molecular mechanics (MM2(85] calculated geometries and conformational energies. The model has been further developed with respect to the receptor topography in the vicinity of the nitrogen binding site. In particular, a novel spatial orientation of the important "propyl cleft" has been proposed. This cleft is suggested to be located mainly above a plane through the receptor-bound substrate. The biologically active agonist and antagonist conformations of the enantiomers of 3-PPP have been reinvestigated.

3,4-Dihydroxyphenylacetic Acid↗

PubMed1990

Conformational analysis and structure-activity relationships of selective dopamine D-1 receptor agonists and antagonists of the benzazepine series.

Comprehensive conformational analysis using molecular mechanics calculations (MM2(85)) has been carried out for the potent and selective dopamine D-1 receptor agonist 7,8-dihydroxy-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine (1; SK&F 38393), the antagonist 7-chloro-8-hydroxy-3-methyl-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine (8; SCH 23390), and several analogues, including conformationally constrained ones. Calculated conformational energies have been related to pharmacological and biochemical data in an attempt to identify the biologically active conformations of 1 and 8. It is concluded that the most probable receptor-bound conformation in both cases is a chair conformation with an equatorial phenyl ring and for 8 an equatorial N-methyl group. It is suggested that the orientation of the phenyl ring in the receptor-bound molecule does not deviate in terms of dihedral angles by more than about 30 degrees from the preferred phenyl group rotamer in which the planes of two aromatic rings are essentially orthogonal.

2,3,4,5-Tetrahydro-7,8-dihydroxy-1-phenyl-1H-3-ben↗

PubMed1988

Conformational analysis and structural comparisons of (1R,3S)-(+)- and (1S,3R)-(-)-tefludazine, (S)-(+)- and (R)-(-)-octoclothepin, and (+)-dexclamol in relation to dopamine receptor antagonism and amine-uptake inhibition.

Conformational analysis with molecular mechanics (MM2(85] and molecular superimposition studies of (1R,3S)-(+)- and (1S,3R)-(-)-4-[3-(4-fluorophenyl)-6-(trifluoromethyl)indan-1-yl]-1- piperazineethanol (tefludazine) and (S)-(+)- and (R)-(-)-octoclothepin have been employed to identify biologically active conformations of these compounds with respect to dopamine receptor antagonism and amine-uptake inhibition. In contrast to what is commonly assumed, these studies indicate that the conformation of (S)-(+)-octoclothepin responsible for the dopamine receptor antagonism is different from the one observed in the crystal. From least-squares molecular superimpositions with the potent and stereoselective dopamine receptor antagonist (1R,3S)-tefludazine, biologically active conformations for the two compounds on the dopamine receptor have been deduced. This analysis also rationalizes the enantioselectivity of octoclothepin on the dopamine receptor. The X-ray structure of (S)-(+)-octoclothepin is shown to correspond structurally to the 1S,3R enantiomer of tefludazine, which is an amine-uptake inhibitor. This correspondence provides a structural basis for the norepinephrine (NE) uptake blocking properties of octoclothepin. It is predicted that the enantioselectivity of the NE-uptake inhibition of octoclothepin should be low with the S-(+) enantiomer as the more active optical isomer. A comparison of the deduced biologically active conformation of (S)-(+)-octoclothepin with (+)-dexclamol is also discussed on the basis of earlier derived superimposition studies with (+)-dexclamol.

Antipsychotic Agents↗

PubMed1987

Structure-activity relationships for apomorphine congeners. Conformational energies vs. biological activities.

A series of apomorphine congeners has been studied with respect to their ability to mimic the structural requirements of the dopamine pharmacophore in the potent and stereoselective dopamine receptor agonist (R)-apomorphine. Conformational energies of the mimicking structures calculated by molecular mechanics (MMP2) correlate well with the observed biological activities.

Apomorphine↗

PubMed1986

A molecular mechanics approach to the understanding of presynaptic selectivity for centrally acting dopamine receptor agonists of the phenylpiperidine series.

Molecular mechanics (MMP2) calculated geometries and conformational energies have been employed in an attempt to elucidate the molecular basis for presynaptic dopamine receptor selectivity of centrally acting agonists of the phenylpiperidine series. A receptor interaction model based on the McDermed receptor concept, on superimpositions of calculated structures, and on conformational analysis is presented. The model focuses on the interaction between N-alkyl substituents and the receptor. From comparisons with rigid structures having either agonistic or antagonistic properties it is concluded that the presynaptically selective compound (S)-3-(3-hydroxyphenyl)-N-n-propylpiperidine [S)-3PPP) is acting as an agonist in one rotameric form and as an antagonist in another one. The selectivity of (S)-3PPP and the nonselectivity of its enantiomer are suggested to be due to differences in the interactions between N-alkyl substituents and the receptor. The receptor model presented led to the hypothesis that the piperidine ring in the compounds studied should be equivalent to a N-methyl group in its receptor interactions. Examples are given in support of this idea. Presynaptic selectivity was predicted for an aminotetralin derivative and was also observed in subsequent testing.

Brain↗

PubMed1985

3-Phenyl-1-indanamines. Potential antidepressant activity and potent inhibition of dopamine, norepinephrine, and serotonin uptake.

A series of 3-phenyl-1-indanamines was synthesized and tested for potential antidepressant activity and for inhibition of dopamine (DA), norepinephrine (NE), and serotonin (5-HT) uptake. Trans isomers were generally potent inhibitors of DA, NE, and 5-HT uptake, while cis isomers preferentially inhibited the uptake of 5-HT. The affinity for the DA-uptake site was very dependent on the aromatic substitution pattern where highest potency was found for 3',4'-dichloro substituted compounds (45). This substitution pattern also resulted in high affinity for the NE-and 5-HT-uptake sites, but potent 5-HT-uptake inhibiting activity could also be obtained with other substitution patterns. Only small amines could be accommodated at the 5-HT-uptake site while larger amines such as piperazine could be accommodated both at the DA-and NE-uptake sites. The observed structure-activity relationships were explained from the results of superimpositions of a trans (45) and cis (72) isomer with 5-HT and DA, respectively, in relation to a proposed three-point binding of the uptake inhibitors at the uptake sites. Finally, comparison of the structures of the 3-phenyl-1-indanamines with other newer bicyclic catecholamine- and/or serotonin-uptake inhibitors revealed common structural elements important for potent DA-, NE-, and/or 5-HT-uptake inhibition.

Animals↗