PubMed HealthSearch

Biomedical subjects

T M Biggs

Publications and source records attributed to T M Biggs.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Augmentation mammaplasty: a comparative analysis.

With the continuation of augmentation mammaplasty as a desirable operation for a large segment of the female population in the United States, the problem of fibrous capsular contracture that has been present since the inception of the operation has persisted. Various approaches to the problem have been entertained, and a lessening of the incidence has occurred as reviewed in our earlier report, which follows augmentation mammaplasty in our clinic from 1962 through 1979. In this retrospective study, no significant difference in contracture rate was seen based on patient smoking habits, operative approach used, or implant type. It is important to note that the total experience with the low-bleed implant was significantly lower in terms of number of patients meeting the criteria of this retrospective study than the standard gel mammary implant. Greater follow-up time and number of patients will be evaluated in future retrospective studies. We have demonstrated in this study that placement of the implant beneath the pectoral muscle has significantly diminished the incidence of capsular contracture both as Baker grades II, III, and IV and as Baker grades III and IV. The retropectoral site has become the preferred location for the prosthesis in our clinic. There is no appreciable alteration in the overall shape of the breasts from this approach, and therefore, it will continue to be the preferred method. Rates of incidence of hematoma, the most frequent adverse reaction after contracture, were not significantly different between the retropectoral and retromammary implant sites.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Breast

Augmentation mammaplasty: retropectoral versus retromammary implantation.

Although the weight of evidence generally indicates that improved contracture rates with retropectoral placement of the prosthesis and excellent aesthetic results can be obtained with this approach, there remains a significant cadre of surgeons who believe their own retromammary results are equal to or better than the alternative. Our experience with retromammary augmentation since 1963 indicates that fibrous capsular contracture around the implant is a persistent sequela. By placing the prosthesis behind the pectoral muscle, we believe we have achieved a significant decrease in this occurrence. Whereas there are a variety of hypothetical explanations for this observation, it may be that interposition of additional soft tissue between the implant and the observer may disguise the otherwise apparent problem, thus making its correction more apparent than real. Whatever the explanation, however, we have had fewer patients requiring fibrous capsule release and a higher incidence of patient satisfaction by placing the prosthesis behind the pectoral muscle.

Breast

Breast reconstruction after mastectomy.

The mastectomy patient presenting to the plastic surgeon often relates a profound sense of deformity. The current state of the art in breast reconstruction allows the plastic surgeon to intelligently address this deformity with procedures capable of achieving pleasing aesthetic results. If adequate soft tissue is present, implantation in the submuscular plane has proved satisfactory. However, if soft tissue deficiencies exist, highly acceptable results have been consistently achieved using the latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap.

Breast