T M Hofstede | PubMed Health

PubMed2000

Influence of metal surface finishing on porcelain porosity and beam failure loads at the metal-ceramic interface.

STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM: Investigators suggest that metals should be finished in 1 direction before porcelain application to minimize metal irregularities and trapped contaminants. These irregularities are thought to be focal points for porosity and crack propagation. PURPOSE: This study investigated the influence of metal finishing and sandblasting on (1) porosity production at the porcelain-metal interface, and (2) porcelain-metal beam failure load. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eighty cast metal samples were divided into 4 test groups: (A) bidirectional finish/sandblasting; (B) unidirectional finish/sandblasting (C) bidirectional finish only; and (D) unidirectional finish only. The porcelain applied was 1.5 mm thick. Samples were sectioned longitudinally. Half of the samples were subjected to a 3-point flexural test. The remaining samples were sectioned into 4 slices and were examined with a light microscope (x500). Number and diameter of porosities at the metal-porcelain interface were recorded. RESULTS: Mean loads at failure (lbs) were as follows: A, 11.1 +/- 1.3 (5.03 +/- 0.58 Kg); B, 11.2 +/- 1.7 (5. 08 +/- 0.77 Kg); C, 4.0 +/- 1.8 (1.81 +/- 0.81 Kg); and D, 5.0 +/- 2. 1 (2.26 +/- 0.95 Kg). Groups A and B were significantly different from groups C and D (P<.0001). Nonsandblasted samples (C and D) exhibited a separation at the ceramometal interface, which prevented quantification of porosity size and number. Average interface porosity sizes (microm) (A, 8.99 +/- 1.92; B, 10.03 +/- 1.86) showed no significant difference. The mean interface porosity number (A, 62. 3 +/- 16.02; B, 67.4 +/- 10.01) showed no significant difference. CONCLUSION: Direction of metal finishing did not affect the porosity number and size at the ceramometal interface or the beam failure loads. Sandblasting increased the beam failure loads. Nonsandblasted samples showed detachment of the porcelain from the metal.

Aluminum Oxide↗

PubMed1999

Alternative complete-arch cement-retained implant-supported fixed partial denture.

Early implant prostheses designs, which used screw-retained metal and acrylic resin structures, frequently left a space between the prosthesis and the soft tissue. Common deficiencies of this design included phonetic and esthetic problems and screw loosening. Cement-retained implant prostheses are also used in partially and completely edentulous patients, and are thought to have optimal occlusion and esthetics. Moreover, cement-retained prostheses may induce less stress on the implant, thereby maximizing the possibility of a passive fit. Porcelain fused to metal prostheses have been used mostly in partially edentulous situations. Recently, complete-arch porcelain fused to metal prostheses that replace hard and soft tissue have been used and, although this restoration can have excellent esthetics, there are disadvantages such as high cost, potential framework distortion during fabrication, and difficulty in repairing fractures of in-service porcelain. This article describes an alternative technique for the fabrication of a complete-arch, cement-retained, metal-acrylic resin implant-supported fixed partial denture. When compared with porcelain fused to metal complete-arch restorations, this prostheses is esthetic, has excellent retention and stability, yet is relatively inexpensive to fabricate, and requires less laboratory skill.

Acrylic Resins↗