Biomedical subjects
T Macuda
Publications and source records attributed to T Macuda.
The retinal ganglion cell layer and visual acuity of the camel.
We examined the retinal ganglion cell layer of the dromedary camel, Camelus dromedarius. We have estimated that there are 8 million neurons in the ganglion cell layer of this large retina (mean area of 2,300 mm(-2)). However, only approximately 1 million are considered to be ganglion cells. The ganglion cells are arranged as two areas of high cell density, one in the temporal and one in the nasal retina. Densities of ganglion cells between these two high density regions is much lower, often less than 100 per mm(-2). In between these two high density regions, on the nasal side of the optic nerve head, is a unique and dense vertical streak of mostly non-ganglion cells; the function of this specialization is unknown. On the basis of ganglion cell density we estimate that the peak acuity in the dromedary camel is about 10 and 9.5 cycles per degree in the temporal and nasal high density regions respectively and falls to 2-3 cycles per degree in the central retina. Behavioral acuity was estimated for one bactrian camel and was found to be approximately 10 cyc deg(-1). The camel has a retina with a mean thickness of 104 microm, less than the 143 microm thickness that has previously been thought to be necessary for a retinal vasculature. Nevertheless, there is an extensive vitreal vasculature that does not appear to spare any retinal region.
Behavioural assessment of visual acuity in bumblebees (Bombus impatiens).
The present study used previously developed techniques to measure resolution acuity in bumblebees (Bombus impatiens). Bees were required to discriminate between horizontal and vertical gratings in a Y-maze apparatus. The gratings had a mean luminance of 9 cd m(-)(2) and a Michelson contrast of 84 %. For different bees, either the horizontal or vertical grating was rewarded. Rewarded gratings were associated with a sucrose and water solution (30 % sucrose by volume) and unrewarded gratings with plain water. Acuity estimates were established at several different viewing distances over several sessions using a method of constant stimuli. Visual acuity functions were generated from the performance data, and acuity thresholds were interpolated at a performance level of 65 % correct. When corrected for viewing distance, best angular acuity obtained for horizontal and vertical gratings was 0.35 and 0.36 cycles degree(-)(1), respectively. These results are compared with those of the honeybee and discussed in the context of the bumblebee's foraging behaviour.
Intraocular transfer and simultaneous processing of stimuli presented in different visual fields of the pigeon.
Differences in neuroanatomy, optics, and function indicate the operation of 2 visual systems in pigeons, a frontal field system and a lateral field system. Communication between these systems was examined with a delayed matching-to-sample task in which sample stimuli could be presented in either the frontal or lateral fields. In Experiment 1, matching acquired with the lateral field transferred to the frontal field but did not transfer from the frontal field to the lateral field. When different samples were presented simultaneously to the frontal and lateral fields in Experiment 2, pigeons preferred to match the sample in the frontal field, but lateral field information interfered to some extent with frontal field matching. The 3rd experiment showed left lateral field dominance when the left and right fields were simultaneously presented with different sample stimuli; left field dominance was not complete, as pigeons sometimes matched the right-field sample.
Further evidence for hierarchical chunking in rat spatial memory.
In Experiment 1, rats were given a test to determine the order of preference among 3 types of food. Two groups of rats then were trained on a 12-arm radial maze in Experiment 2, with the 3 foods placed in fixed-arm locations for 1 group and in locations that varied randomly across sessions for the other group. The results replicated those of Dallal and Meck (1990) by showing faster learning and more clustering of arm choices by food type in the fixed-locations group than in the random-locations group. Two further experiments were performed to test the chunking hypothesis. Observations of working memory in Experiment 3 and the reorganization of reference memory in Experiment 4 both supported the chunking hypothesis by showing superior spatial memory and arm chunking by food type when chunk integrity was maintained than when it was compromised.