PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

T Monoson

Publications and source records attributed to T Monoson.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Domains of differential cell proliferation suggest hinged folding in avian gut endoderm.

A profile of proliferative growth assessed with tritium autoradiograms from White Leghorn embryo stages Hamburger-Hamilton 6-21 labeled in ovo presents evidence of hinged folding driven by localized differential cell proliferation in endoderm. There is a significant, bilateral pattern, and differences are most pronounced in axial levels that are folding and rotating. Highest proliferation is in cells producing folds; lowest proliferation is in median cells. Localized changes in cell shape are lacking, as are TUNEL markers and cell morphology that would suggest involvement of apoptosis. Folding endoderm to form gut tube appears to be a process that is driven by domains of high cell proliferation flanking a domain of significantly lower proliferation. When considered in the context of an epithelium attached to subjacent mesoderm, these differentials could produce a forced and directed buckling of endoderm into lateral folds that join and enclose a tube. Patterns suggest that endoderm folds about a median hinge. In the light of this new information, we suggest it is more precise to refine the term, median hinge point (MHP), to neural hinge point (NHP) and gut hinge point (GHP).

Analysis of Variance↗

Reproducible measurements to quantify cutaneous involvement in scleroderma.

BACKGROUND AND DESIGN: Because the current assessment of scleroderma through clinical skin scoring is subjective and imprecise, we devised fully quantitative measures of cutaneous involvement. First, we developed image analysis software for calculating the density of dermal collagen from 58 scleroderma and 327 control biopsy specimens. Second, using a durometer gauge, we obtained measurements of skin hardness over 12 body regions for 13 patients with scleroderma and 100 controls. We obtained serial durometer measurements at 2-cm intervals over the arms of four patients with scleroderma, correlating them with blinded assessments of skin score. Third, we produced two-dimensional laser Doppler maps of cutaneous blood flow over the dorsal aspect of the hands of 10 patients with scleroderma and 16 controls and, with software, we determined the mean red blood cell flux, density of arteriolar islands, and percentage of avascular area at each measured site. RESULTS: Average collagen density was significantly higher in patients with scleroderma (88.5% +/- 6.9%) compared with that in controls (75% +/- 9.3%) (P < .001). Durometer measurements were significantly greater for patients with scleroderma (P < .05) over the finger, hand, wrist, forearm, and ventral aspect of the arm. In individual patients, the measurements paralleled with skin score. In patients with scleroderma, mean red blood cell flux (483.2 +/- 421.2 mV) and arteriolar island density (1.4 +/- 0.5/cm2) were significantly greater than were the control averages (276.3 +/- 146.3 mV [P < .03] and 1.0 +/- 0.5/cm2 [P < .013], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Dermal collagen density and durometer measurements of skin hardness accurately quantify skin sclerosis in scleroderma and permit the determination of sclerotic borders, respectively. Increased cutaneous red blood cell flux and greater use of microvascular reserve reflect defects in vascular regulation inherent to the disease. These reproducible measurements will allow us to more precisely monitor the progression of scleroderma, evaluate its response to experimental treatments, and investigate its pathogenetic origins.

Adult↗