Universal access: its potential impact on emergency medicine.
The nation's current economic conditions, the first time in 60 years that a recession has adversely affected the middle class, might well be the actual trigger mechanism in the passage of a US universal access plan. When enacted, it would provide emergency medicine and other basic physician and hospital benefits to the currently uninsured patients now seen in hospital EDs, in doctors' offices, and as inpatients. It will, thereby, enhance current physician-patient relationships and enable many of the working poor and their dependents to receive medical care. Conventional widsom suggests that such a social insurance plan could significantly reduce the number of routine visits to hospital EDs, assuming that additional, accessible, and high-quality alternative primary-care services are developed. In any case, a universal access plan should improve the percentage of billed charges collected by emergency physicians. The nation's 1,500 third-party payers, with their managed care strategy, will have difficulty (for the reasons outlined) in micromanaging such external pressures as ensuring high-quality patient care, more benefits (including tertiary services), and less cost to the private and public sectors. As there is more micromanaging by third-party payers to reduce expenditures, it will be increasingly difficult for emergency physicians to find specialists willing to accept previously uninsured patients, except at public or teaching environments where the delivery of services to uncompensated patients has been the pattern for several decades.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)