PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

T R Pieber

Publications and source records attributed to T R Pieber.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Short acting insulin analogues versus regular human insulin in patients with diabetes mellitus.

BACKGROUND: Short acting insulin analogue use for diabetic patients is still controversial, as reflected in many scientific debates. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of short acting insulin analogues versus regular human insulin. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane Library (Issue 3, 2005), MEDLINE, EMBASE until September 2005. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials with an intervention duration of at least 4 weeks. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Trial selection and evaluation of study quality was done independently by two reviewers. MAIN RESULTS: Altogether 8274 participants took part in 49 randomised controlled studies. Most studies were of poor methodological quality. In patients with type 1 diabetes, the weighted mean difference (WMD) of HbA1c was -0.1% (95% CI: -0.2 to -0.1) in favour of insulin analogue, whereas in patients with type 2 diabetes the WMD was 0.0% (95% CI: -0.1 to 0.0). In subgroup analyses of different types of interventions in type 1 diabetic patients, the WMD in HbA1c was -0.2% (95% CI: -0.3 to -0.1) in favour of insulin analogue in studies using continuous subcutaneous insulin injections (CSII), whereas for conventional intensified insulin therapy (IIT) studies the WMD in HbA1c was -0.1% (95% CI: -0.1 to 0.0). The WMD of the overall mean hypoglycaemic episodes per patient per month was -0.2 (95% CI: -1.1 to 0.7) and -0.2 (95% CI: -0.5 to 0.1) for analogues in comparison to regular insulin in patients with type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes, respectively. For studies in type 1 diabetes patients the incidence of severe hypoglycaemia ranged from 0 to 247.3 (median 21.8) episodes per 100 person-years for insulin analogues and from 0 to 544 (median 46.1) for regular insulin, in type 2 the incidence ranged from 0 to 30.3 (median 0.3) episodes per 100 person-years for insulin analogues and from 0 to 50.4 (median 1.4) for regular insulin. No study was designed to investigate possible long term effects (e.g. mortality, diabetic complications), in particular in patients with diabetes related complications. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis suggests only a minor benefit of short acting insulin analogues in the majority of diabetic patients treated with insulin. Until long term efficacy and safety data are available we suggest a cautious response to the vigorous promotion of insulin analogues. For safety purposes, we need a long-term follow-up of large numbers of patients and well designed studies in pregnant women to determine the safety profile for both the mother and the unborn child.

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1↗
PubMed2006

Novel mutations in the HSN2 gene causing hereditary sensory and autonomic neuropathy type II.

Hereditary sensory and autonomic neuropathy type II (HSAN-II) is caused by recessive mutations in the HSN2 gene assigned to chromosome 12p13.33. The authors report three unrelated HSAN-II families with homozygous or compound heterozygous mutations resulting in the truncation of the HSN2 protein. Genotype-phenotype correlations indicated that HSN2 mutations are associated with an early childhood onset of a predominantly sensory neuropathy, complicated by acromutilations in both upper and lower limbs.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

On-line adaptive algorithm with glucose prediction capacity for subcutaneous closed loop control of glucose: evaluation under fasting conditions in patients with Type 1 diabetes.

AIMS: To evaluate an algorithm with glucose prediction capacity and continuous adaptation of patient parameters-a model predictive control (MPC) algorithm-to control blood glucose concentration during fasting conditions in patients with Type 1 diabetes. In the subcutaneous (sc) route within a closed loop system. METHODS: Paired experiments were performed in six patients. Over 8 h the MPC algorithm was used to control glucose with s.c. insulin administration and two different glucose monitoring protocols: first, the algorithm was provided with intravenous (i.v.) glucose values for insulin dosage calculation directly (i.v.-s.c. route). Then, in the second experiment, i.v. glucose values were fed to the MPC with a delay of 30 min to simulate s.c. glucose measurements ('s.c.'-s.c. route). In both experiments plasma glucose, insulin dosage, and serum insulin levels were analysed. RESULTS: Glucose concentration was brought from hyper- to normoglycaemia and kept in the physiological range (6-7 mmol/l) with both routes in all subjects. Mean glucose concentration reached the threshold of 7 mmol/l approximately 2 (i.v.-s.c. route) and 3 ('s.c.'-s.c. route) hours after the start of glucose control with the MPC. During the last 2 h of automated glucose control, mean glucose concentration was 6.3 +/- 0.2 mmol/l and 6.6 +/- 0.3 mmol/l for i.v.-s.c. and 's.c.'-s.c. route, respectively. Glucose concentration, insulin doses, and serum insulin levels did not differ significantly between routes (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The MPC algorithm is suitable for glucose control during fasting within an extracorporeal artificial beta-cell in the subcutaneous route Type 1 diabetic patients.

Administration, Cutaneous↗
PubMed2005

Comparison of three multiple injection regimens for Type 1 diabetes: morning plus dinner or bedtime administration of insulin detemir vs. morning plus bedtime NPH insulin.

AIMS: This trial investigated the efficacy and safety of two different administration-time regimens with insulin detemir (IDet) to that of a conventional basal insulin regimen with NPH insulin (NPH). METHODS: This multinational, 16-week, open, parallel group trial included 400 people with Type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM) randomized to IDet either morning and before dinner (IDetmorn+din) or morning and bedtime (IDetmorn+bed), or to NPH morning and bedtime (NPHmorn+bed), all in combination with mealtime insulin aspart (IAsp). RESULTS: HbA1c was comparable between the three groups after 16 weeks (P = 0.64), with reductions of 0.39-0.49% points. Lower fasting plasma glucose (FPG) was observed with IDetmorn+din and IDetmorn+bed compared with NPHmorn+bed (9.8 and 9.1 vs. 11.1 mmol/l, P = 0.006), whereas the IDet groups did not differ (P = 0.15). Within-person variation in self-measured FPG was significantly lower for both IDet regimens (sd IDetmorn+din 2.5, IDetmorn+bed 2.6 mmol/l) than for NPHmorn+bed (sd 3.1 mmol/l, P < 0.001), but was comparable between the IDet groups (P = 0.48). Ten-point plasma glucose profiles were lower between dinner and breakfast in the IDetmorn+din group (P = 0.043), compared with the two other groups. Risk of overall and nocturnal hypoglycaemia was similar for the three groups. Lower mean bodyweight was observed with IDet compared with NPH after 16 weeks (difference: (IDetmorn+din)-1.3 kg, P < 0.001, (IDetmorn+bed)-0.6 kg, P = 0.050). CONCLUSIONS: Both IDet regimens were well tolerated and provided lower and less variable glucose levels with no, or less, weight gain than NPH at comparable HbA1c. IDet can be administered either at dinner or bedtime, with similar glycaemic control according to the need of the individual person.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

Meta-analysis of short-acting insulin analogues in adult patients with type 1 diabetes: continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion versus injection therapy.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: This study aimed to compare the effect of treatment with short-acting insulin (SAI) analogues versus structurally unchanged short-acting insulin (regular insulin) on glycaemic control and on the risk of hypoglycaemic episodes in type 1 diabetic patients using different insulin treatment strategies. METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis of 27 randomised controlled trials that compared the effect of SAI analogues with regular insulin in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. The treatments were administered either via continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) or by conventional intensified insulin therapy (IIT) with short-acting insulin injections before meals and basal insulin administered once or twice daily in most cases. RESULTS: HbA(1)c levels were reported for 20 studies. For studies using CSII, the weighted mean difference between values obtained using SAI analogues and regular insulin was -0.19% (95% CI: -0.27 to -0.12), whereas the corresponding value for injection studies was -0.08% (95% CI: -0.15 to -0.02). For the analysis of overall hypoglycaemia, we used the results from nine studies that reported the mean frequency of hypoglycaemic episodes per patient per month. For studies using CSII, the standardised mean difference between SAI analogues and regular insulin was -0.07 (95% CI: -0.43 to 0.28), whereas for IIT studies the corresponding value was -0.04 (95% CI: -0.24 to 0.16). CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: Taking into consideration the low quality of the trials included, we can conclude that use of a short-acting insulin analogue in CSII therapy provides a small, but statistically significant improvement in glycaemic control compared with regular insulin. An even smaller effect was obtained with the use of ITT. The rate of overall hypoglycaemic episodes was not significantly reduced with short-acting insulin analogues in either injection regimen.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Short acting insulin analogues versus regular human insulin in patients with diabetes mellitus.

BACKGROUND: In short acting insulin analogues the dissociation of hexamers is facilitated, achieving peak plasma concentrations about twice as high and within approximately half the time compared to regular human insulin. According to these properties this profile resembles the shape of non-diabetic patients more than that of regular human insulins. Despite this theoretical superiority of short acting insulin analogues over regular human insulin, the risk-benefit ratio of short acting insulin analogues in the treatment of diabetic patients is still unclear. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect of treatment with short acting insulin analogues versus regular human insulin. SEARCH STRATEGY: A highly sensitive search for randomised controlled trials combined with key terms for identifying studies on short acting insulin analogues versus regular human insulin was performed using the Cochrane Library (issue 4, 2003), MEDLINE and EMBASE. Date of last search was December 2003. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials with diabetic patients of all ages that compared short acting insulin analogues to regular human insulin. Intervention duration had to be at least 4 weeks. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Trial selection as well as evaluation of study quality was done by two independent reviewers. The quality of reporting of each trial was assessed according to a modification of the quality criteria as specified by Schulz and Jadad. MAIN RESULTS: Altogether 7933 participants took part in 42 randomised controlled studies. Most studies were of poor methodological quality. In patients with type 1 diabetes, the weighted mean difference (WMD) of HbA1c was estimated to be -0.1% (95% CI: -0.2% to -0.1%) in favour of insulin analogue, whereas in patients with type 2 diabetes the WMD was estimated to be 0.0% (95% CI: -0.1% to 0.1%). In subgroup analyses of different types of interventions in type 1 diabetic patients, the WMD in HbA1c was -0.2% (95% CI: -0.3% to -0.1%) in favour of insulin analogue in studies using continuous subcutaneous insulin injections (CSII) whereas for conventional intensified insulin therapy (IIT) studies the WMD in HbA1c was -0.1% (95% CI: -0.2% to -0.0%). The WMD of the overall mean hypoglycaemic episodes per patient per month was -0.2 (95% CI: -1.2 to 0.9) and -0.2 (95%CI: -0.5 to 0.1) for analogues in comparison to regular insulin in patients with type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes, respectively. For studies in type 1 diabetic patients the incidence of severe hypoglycaemia ranged from 0 to 247.3 (median 20.3) episodes per 100 person-years for insulin analogues and from 0 to 544 (median 37.2) for regular insulin, in type 2 the incidence ranged from 0 to 30.3 (median 0.6) episodes per 100 person-years for insulin analogues and from 0 to 50.4 (median 2.8) for regular insulin. No study was designed to investigate possible long term effects (e.g. mortality, diabetic complications), in particular in patients with diabetes related complications. REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis suggests only a minor benefit of short acting insulin analogues in the majority of diabetic patients treated with insulin. Until long term efficacy and safety data are available we suggest a cautious response to the vigorous promotion of insulin analogues. Due to fears of potentially carcinogenic and proliferative effects, most studies to date have excluded patients with advanced diabetic complications. For safety purposes, we need a long-term follow-up of large numbers of patients who use short acting insulin analogues. Furthermore, we need well designed studies in pregnant women to determine the safety profile for both the mother and the unborn child.

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1↗
PubMed2004

Long-term evaluation of a structured outpatient education programme for intensified insulin therapy in patients with Type 1 diabetes: a 12-year follow-up.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: This study was conducted to evaluate the long-term outcome of a structured outpatient diabetes teaching and treatment programme (DTTP) for intensified insulin therapy in patients with Type 1 diabetes, which aims to improve metabolic control without increasing the risk of severe hypoglycaemia. METHODS: All 123 diabetic outpatients (age 41+/-14 years; 64 women; BMI 23.5+/-3.1; diabetes duration 17+/-11 years; HbA1c 7.9+/-1.6%; 32 patients with a history of severe hypoglycaemia; 18 with overt nephropathy; 22 with proliferative retinopathy) who participated in the DTTP between June 1989 and June 1990 were invited for follow-up visits after 3, 6 and 12 years. RESULTS: Out of the 123 patients, 11 died during the follow-up period, two were lost for follow-up, and one was not willing to participate in re-evaluation after 12 years. Mean HbA1c levels decreased from 7.9+/-1.6% to 7.1+/-1.2% (p<0.01) after 3 years, and were 7.8+/-1.5% (NS) and 7.8+/-1.2% (NS) after 6 and 12 years respectively. Frequency of hypoglycaemia decreased from 0.49 episodes per patient per year to 0.14 after 3 years (p<0.01), 0.19 after 6 years (p<0.01) and 0.16 after 12 years (p<0.01). Of the participants, 41% were able to lower HbA1c levels without episodes of severe hypoglycaemia and to maintain this improvement at all follow-up visits over the 12-year period. At follow-up, intensified insulin therapy was carried out by 94% of the patients. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: A sustained reduction of the incidence of severe hypoglycaemia was observed in patients with Type 1 diabetes after participation in a structured outpatient DTTP over a 12-year period.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Short acting insulin analogues versus regular human insulin in patients with diabetes mellitus.

BACKGROUND: In short acting insulin analogues the dissociation of hexamers is facilitated, achieving peak plasma concentrations about twice as high and within approximately half the time compared to regular human insulin. According to these properties this profile resembles the shape of non-diabetic patients more than that of regular human insulins. Despite this theoretical superiority of short acting insulin analogues over regular human insulin, the risk-benefit ratio of short acting insulin analogues in the treatment of diabetic patients is still unclear. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect of treatment with short acting insulin analogues versus regular human insulin. SEARCH STRATEGY: A highly sensitive search for randomised controlled trials combined with key terms for identifying studies on short acting insulin analogues versus regular human insulin was performed using the Cochrane Library (issue 1, 2003), MEDLINE and EMBASE. Date of last search was December 2003. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials with diabetic patients of all ages that compared short acting insulin analogues to regular human insulin. Intervention duration had to be at least 4 weeks. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Trial selection as well as evaluation of study quality was done by two independent reviewers. The quality of reporting of each trial was assessed according to a modification of the quality criteria as specified by Schulz and Jadad. MAIN RESULTS: Altogether 7933 participants took part in 42 randomised controlled studies. Most studies were of poor methodological quality. In patients with type 1 diabetes, the weighted mean difference (WMD) of HbA1c was estimated to be -0.1% (95% CI: -0.2% to -0.1%) in favour of insulin analogue, whereas in patients with type 2 diabetes the WMD was estimated to be 0.0% (95% CI: -0.1% to 0.1%). In subgroup analyses of different types of interventions in type 1 diabetic patients, the WMD in HbA1c was -0.2% (95% CI: -0.3% to -0.1%) in favour of insulin analogue in studies using continuous subcutaneous insulin injections (CSII) whereas for conventional intensified insulin therapy (IIT) studies the WMD in HbA1c was -0.1% (95% CI: -0.2% to -0.0%). The WMD of the overall mean hypoglycaemic episodes per patient per month was -0.2 (95% CI: -1.2 to 0.9) and -0.2 (95%CI: -0.5 to 0.1) for analogues in comparison to regular insulin in patients with type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes, respectively. For studies in type 1 diabetic patients the incidence of severe hypoglycaemia ranged from 0 to 247.3 (median 20.3) episodes per 100 person-years for insulin analogues and from 0 to 544 (median 37.2) for regular insulin, in type 2 the incidence ranged from 0 to 30.3 (median 0.6) episodes per 100 person-years for insulin analogues and from 0 to 50.4 (median 2.8) for regular insulin. No study was designed to investigate possible long term effects (e.g. mortality, diabetic complications), in particular in patients with diabetes related complications. REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis suggests only a minor benefit of short acting insulin analogues in the majority of diabetic patients treated with insulin. Until long term efficacy and safety data are available we suggest a cautious response to the vigorous promotion of insulin analogues. Due to fears of potentially carcinogenic and proliferative effects, most studies to date have excluded patients with advanced diabetic complications. For safety purposes, we need a long-term follow-up of large numbers of patients who use short acting insulin analogues. Furthermore, we need well designed studies in pregnant women to determine the safety profile for both the mother and the unborn child.

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1↗
PubMed2004

Angiotensin receptor blockers as anti-hypertensive treatment for patients with diabetes mellitus: meta-analysis of controlled double-blind randomized trials.

AIMS: To assess the evidence for possible reduction of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, and end-stage renal disease in diabetic patients treated with angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers (ARBs) as an anti-hypertensive treatment. METHODS: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, double-blind controlled trials of at least 1 year's duration. ARBs were used in the intervention group vs. placebo or standard anti-hypertensive treatment in the control group. The main outcome measures were all-cause mortality, cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, and end-stage renal disease. RESULTS: Three studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Separate analyses were conducted for comparisons of ARBs with groups given placebo and those given standard anti-hypertensive treatment. There was no significant difference in mortality between the ARBs and placebo groups, with an estimated odds ratio (OR) of 0.99 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.81, 1.20]. There was a non-significant difference in patients treated with ARBs compared with standard anti-hypertensive treatment, with an OR of 0.78 (95% CI 0.45, 1.36). No statistically significant difference in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality between the intervention and placebo groups was found, with an OR of 0.91 (95% CI 0.77, 1.08). When ARBs were compared with standard treatment, the OR was estimated at 0.85 (0.54, 1.33). Data on end-stage renal disease were available for two studies comparing ARBs vs. placebo and showed a statistically significant advantage of ARBs, with an OR of 0.73 (95% CI 0.6, 0.89). As only one study compared end-stage renal disease outcome for ARBs vs. standard treatment, a meta-analysis was not possible. This study reported a considerable benefit of ARBs [OR = 0.73 (0.54, 1.01)] compared with the calcium channel blocker amlodipine. CONCLUSIONS: ARBs failed to show significant reduction in total mortality and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in diabetic patients. The only statistical benefit was the reduction of end-stage renal disease compared with placebo. Therefore, at this time ARBs have not proved to be superior to standard anti-hypertensive treatment in diabetic patients.

Angiotensin II↗
PubMed2003

Plasma N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide in Type 1 diabetic patients with and without diabetic nephropathy.

AIMS: Plasma N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT proBNP) is produced and released from cardiac ventricles; it is elevated in patients with heart failure, hypertension and chronic renal failure. This study aimed to examine the plasma levels of NT proBNP and their relationship in Type 1 diabetic patients with and without diabetic nephropathy. METHODS: We developed a non-competitive immunoluminometric assay with in-house antibodies to the N- and C-terminal domains of NT proBNP. We compared NT proBNP levels between 47 normoalbuminuric patients (group 1), 12 microalbuminuric patients (group 2) and 12 patients with macroalbuminuria (group 3). RESULTS: There were significant differences in 24-h systolic and diastolic blood pressure, diabetes duration, serum creatinine, LDL-cholesterol and HbA1c between the three groups; other parameters did not differ significantly. NT proBNP (median and range) levels were 5 (0.75-68), 22 (0.75-82) and 23 (0.75-374) fmol/ml for groups 1-3, respectively. Log-transformed data of NT proBNP were used to compare all three groups (P=0.016). The Pearson correlation between NT proBNP and albuminuria (R=0.27; P=0.02) was positive; HbA1c (R=0.25; P=0.03) and age (R=0.33; P=0.005) correlated significantly as well. On the basis of multiple regression analysis, the adjusted difference remained significant between the three groups. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first demonstration that NT proBNP levels are significantly higher in Type 1 diabetic patients with albuminuria. This may be caused by a down-regulation of A-type guanylate cyclase-coupled natriuretic peptide receptors in renal tubules or by elevated NT proBNP levels leading to higher glomerular hydraulic pressure or higher capillary permeability and possibly increased albumin excretion. Further studies are required to investigate the potential role of NT proBNP in patients with diabetic nephropathy and such other co-morbidities as cardiovascular disease.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Dose-response relation of liquid aerosol inhaled insulin in type I diabetic patients.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: The AERx insulin Diabetes Management system (AERx iDMS) is a liquid aerosol device that enables insulin to be administered to the peripheral parts of the lung. This study aimed to compare the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of insulin which is inhaled using AERx iDMS with insulin which is subcutaneously administered. METHODS: In total, 18 C-peptide negative patients with Type I (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus participated in this randomised, open-label, 5-period crossover trial. Human regular insulin was administered subcutaneously (0.12 U/kg body weight) or inhaled by means of the AERx iDMS (dosages 0.3, 0.6, 1.2, and 1.8 U/kg body weight). Thereafter plasma glucose was kept constant at 7.2 mmol/l for a 10-h period (glucose clamp technique). RESULTS: Inhaled insulin provided a dose-response relation that was close to linear for both pharmacokinetic (AUC-Ins(0-10 h); Cmax-Ins) and pharmacodynamic (AUC-GIR(0-10 h); GIRmax) parameters. Time to maximum insulin concentration (Tmax-Ins) and time to maximum glucose infusion rate (TGIRmax) were shorter with inhaled insulin than with subcutaneous administration. The pharmacodynamic system efficiency of inhaled insulin (AUC-GIR(0-6 h) was 12.7% (95% C.I.: 10.2-15.6). CONCLUSION/INTERPRETATION: The inhalation of soluble human insulin using the AERx iDMS is feasible and provides a clear dose response. Further long-term studies are required to investigate safety aspects, HbA1c values, incidence of hypoglycaemic events and the quality of life.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed2001

Dissociation of leptin and body weight in hyperthyroid patients after radioiodine treatment.

OBJECTIVE: Leptin regulates energy production rates and body weight, which are frequently altered in hyperthyroidism. Data on a possible interaction between leptin and thyroid hormones are controversial. We assessed leptin serum concentrations, BMI, proportional fat tissue mass and thyroid hormones in hyperthyroid patients in a long-term follow-up after radioiodine therapy. DESIGN: The study included 28 hyperthyroid patients (mean age 66 y) before and up to one y after radioiodine therapy. Leptin and thyroid hormones, general parameters, BMI, proportional fat tissue (PFT) measurements by DEXA and thyroid morphology were recorded. Twenty-four age-matched euthyroid individuals (mean age 63 y) served as controls. RESULTS: At baseline, leptin concentrations were significantly decreased in all hyperthyroid patients as compared to controls. One year after radioiodine therapy, 71% of the patients were euthyroid (group A) and 29% remained hyperthyroid (group B). BMI and PFT increased in both groups. While leptin concentrations remained low in group B, they normalised in group A after 6 to 12 months. Changes in leptin and thyroid hormone concentrations were positively correlated in group A patients (r=0.49, P=0.03) but not in patients remaining hyperthyroid. CONCLUSION: Our data indicate a dissociation in the regulation of plasma leptin and BMI as well as proportional fat tissue in hyperthyroid patients which may be attributable to differences in lean and adipose mass weight gain after radioiodine therapy or direct influences of thyroid hormones on leptin regulation. International Journal of Obesity (2001) 25, 115-120

Absorptiometry, Photon↗
PubMed2001

Variability of glomerular filtration rate estimation using single injection methods in Type 1 diabetic patients.

AIM: Single-injection inulin clearance (SIIC) methods without urine collection have often been compared with classical constant-infusion inulin clearance methods. Therefore, we used repeated SIIC measurements to prove the hypothesis of a possible overestimation or variability of inulin clearance in Type 1 diabetic patients. METHODS: Two SIIC periods, glomerular filtration rate 1 and 2 (GFR 1, GFR 2) were performed consecutively on the same day. In diabetic patients, GFR 3 was measured several days later at the same time of day as the GFR 1 had been done. The calculation used a two-compartment modelling system (TCM) which showed excellent agreement to ratio of dose over area under the curve (D/AUC) calculation. RESULTS: Twelve normotensive Type 1 diabetic patients (mean and SD), age 39 (10.7) years, diabetes duration 20 (10.7) years, HbA1c 8.5% (0.82%), albuminuria 13.8 (15.7) mg/24 h and six controls, age 26 (2.6) years were examined. Healthy controls showed an excellent repeatability between GFR 1 111.8 (11.44) and GFR 2 110.8 (11.41) ml.min-1.1.73 m2-1. However, in diabetic patients there was a highly significant decrease between GFR 1 129.4 (11.86) and GFR 2 118.1 (13.05) ml.min-1.1.73 m2-1. GFR 1 with 129.4 (11.86) ml.min-1.1.73 m2-1 did not differ significantly from GFR 3 with 129.9 (12.40) ml.min-1.1.73 m2-1 in diabetic patients (P < 0.839). CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to normal subjects, in Type 1 diabetic patients single-injection inulin clearance technique showed a clinically relevant decrease in GFR on two repeated measurements on the same day. Overestimation of GFR by the first inulin clearance may be caused by incomplete inulin distribution in the slow compartment. Diabet. Med. 18, 464-468 (2001)

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Differences of subcutaneous adipose tissue topography in type-2 diabetic (NIDDM) women and healthy controls.

Women suffering from type-2 diabetes mellitus (non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus [NIDDM]) have more total body fat and upper body obesity compared with healthy controls. However, the standard measurement methods have disadvantages such as radiological burden, lack of precision, or high time consumption. A new optical device, the Lipometer, enables the noninvasive, quick, and save determination of the thickness of subcutaneous adipose tissue layers at any given site of the human body. The specification of 15 evenly distributed body sites allows the precise measurement of subcutaneous body fat distribution, so-called subcutaneous adipose tissue topography (SAT-Top). SAT-Tops of 20 women with clinically proven NIDDM and 122 healthy controls matched by age group were measured. In this paper, we describe the precise SAT-Top differences of these two groups and present the multidimensional SAT-Top information condensed in a two-dimensional factor plot and in a response plot of an artificial neural network. NIDDM women provide significantly lower leg SAT-Top and significantly higher upper trunk SAT-Top development ("apple"-type) compared with their healthy controls.

Adipose Tissue↗
PubMed2000

Post-prandial administration of the insulin analogue insulin aspart in patients with Type 1 diabetes mellitus.

AIMS: In intensified insulin therapy, the recent development of short-acting insulin analogues with a very rapid onset of action forces a new discussion in terms of the optimal injection-meal interval. This study evaluated prandial glycaemia in patients with Type 1 diabetes following the subcutaneous injection of soluble human insulin (HI) and the insulin analogue insulin aspart (IAsp) at different injection-meal intervals and investigated whether administration of IAsp after the meal might provide satisfactory metabolic control. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, four-period crossover study, 20 Type 1 diabetic patients were investigated. Prandial insulin was administered 15 min before the start of the meal (HI(-15min)), immediately before the meal (HI(0min); IAsp(0min)) and 15 min after the start of the meal (IAsp(+15min)). RESULTS: Plasma glucose excursions from baseline levels during the 4 h (PGexc) were highest with HI(0min) (17.9 mmol.l(-1).h; P < 0.05 vs. other treatments) and were not statistically different for HI(-15min), IAsp(0min) and IAsp(15min) (13.6, 11.9 and 14.2 mmol.l(-1).h, respectively). Maximum concentration of plasma glucose (PGmax) was lowest with IAsp(0min) (11.2 mmol/l; P < 0.05 vs. other treatments). PGmax was comparable with HI(-15min), HI(0min) and IAsp(+15min) (13.3, 14.1 and 13.2 mmol/l, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: With regard to prandial glycaemia IAsp(+15min) is as effective as HI(-5min) and superior to HI(0min). Thus, post-prandial dosing of the insulin analogue IAsp offers an attractive and feasible therapeutic option for well-controlled patients with Type 1 diabetes mellitus.

Adult↗