PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

T Rabenstein

Publications and source records attributed to T Rabenstein.

24 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Benefits and risks of needle-knife papillotomy.

BACKGROUND: The objective of the present investigation was to assess the risks and benefits of pre-cutting with the needle knife at the papilla of Vater and to compare the findings with the results of classic endoscopic sphincterotomy. METHODS: From January 1973 to December 1993, 2752 endoscopic cutting procedures-biliary or pancreatic sphincterotomy (EST) or needle-knife papillotomy (NKP)-were performed. Since 1981 the pre-cut technique with the needle knife has been used alone or in combination with standard sphincterotomy. Indications, success, and complications of NKP and EST were analyzed retrospectively. To demonstrate changes in indications and technique, the study period was divided into two time periods: period A, 1981 to 1987; and period B, 1988 to 1993. RESULTS: Between 1981 and 1993, diagnostic or therapeutic access to the biliary or pancreatic duct system was attempted in 2105 patients by means of EST or related procedures (period A 1093 patients; period B 1012 patients). The overall success rate was 95.1% (2001 of 2105). In 694 of 2105 cases (33.0%) an EST was not possible or not attempted and an NKP was performed (period A 31.9%; period B 34.1%). This was successful in 590 of 694 cases (85.2%). The rate of NKP in relation to EST varied depending on the different indications for EST: 22.8% NKP in classic indications like choledocholithiasis and over 40% in newer indications such as chronic pancreatitis. In these novel indications NKP alone was often sufficient, and EST to complete the procedure was not necessary (151 patients). In period B, NKP (63 patients) and EST (23 patients) were also used to achieve endoscopic retrograde imaging of the biliary or pancreatic duct system when primary cannulation was not possible. Visualization was achieved in 81.4% (70 of 86) and pathologic findings were noted in 68.6% (59 of 86). The total complication rate of primary EST was 6.8% (96 of 1411) and 7.3% (51 of 694) for all procedures in which NKP was involved (NS). In period B the complication rate was 4.6% for NKP without subsequent EST and 7.6% for NKP in combination with EST. Compared with the complication rate of primary standard EST (6.1%) there was no statistically significant difference. CONCLUSIONS: Needle-knife papillotomy increases the success of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures at the papilla of Vater. This pre-cut technique is safe and does not increase the overall complication risk of sphincterotomy.

Aged↗

[Technical and clinical success with extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in pancreatic duct calculi].

BACKGROUND: Chronic pancreatitis is often complicated by concrements obstructing the main pancreatic duct. Duct obstruction is discussed as potential mechanism responsible for recurrent and persistent pain. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 75 symptomatic patients (15 female, 60 male; 46 +/- 12 years) with stones in the main pancreatic duct (solitary n = 23; multiple n = 52) primarily not endoscopically extractable even after sphincterotomy of the pancreatic orifice were treated by means of a piezoelectric lithotripter (Piezolith 2500). Fragmentation and stone clearance were documented by ERP. The clinical benefit was evaluated in 35 patients (9 female, 26 male; 45 +/- 12 years) followed up meanwhile for more than 12 (29 +/- 14) months. RESULTS: After 3 +/- 2 (1 to 10) ESWL-sessions/patient the concrements were fragmented successfully in 80% of the patients. Focussing of the stones was achieved sonographically (15%), fluoroscopically (45%) or using both imaging techniques (40%). In total, 61% of the patients became stone free, 44% spontaneously, in further 17% all remaining fragments could be removed endoscopically. In 39% of the patients only a partial extraction was achieved. Severe complications due to shockwave application did not occur. The majority of the patients (stonefree n = 22, remaining fragments n = 13) followed up > or = 12 months kept free of pain (51%) or reported on pain relief (26%). Nine patients developed 13 recurrent calculi, which were again treated successfully by interventional measures in 8/9 patients. CONCLUSIONS: The data confirm the value of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy as an important tool in the interventional therapy of chronic pancreatitis. Even if recurrent calculi may occur, the majority of patients will experience at least a medium-term profit by those measures due to pain relief.

Adult↗

[20 years of endoscopic papillotomy. Analysis of 2752 patients at Erlangen Hospital].

Following the development and introduction of endoscopic papillotomy (EPT), 2752 procedures were performed at Erlangen University Hospitals between 1973 and 1993. All papillotomies were evaluated with regard to indications, technique, results, complications and mortality. To show the development process clearly, results for the periods 1973-1980 (A), 1981-1987 (B) and 1988-1993 (C) were summarised separately. The proportion of patients with common bile duct stones was 91% in group A, 60% in group B and 41% in group C. By contrast the number of papillotomies for malignant disease rose from 1% (A) to 26% (B) and 29% (C). More recent indications such as chronic pancreatitis (11%), biliary pancreatitis (5%) and others (for example sphincter of Oddi dysfunction) (11%) were first seen in group C. While the Erlangen standard papillotomy was used in almost all cases in group A (96%), the precut technique was used (mostly with needle knife) in one-third of all papillotomies in groups B and C (32%). The success rate for EPT in all three periods was highest for common bile duct stones (from 96% for group A to 98% for groups B and C). For malignancies, the success rate was lower (89% in groups B and C). The complication rate fell significantly with time (P < 0.05) from 11% (A) to 7.6% (B) and 6.3% (C). Precut techniques did not increase the complication rate. While 71% of all complications were treated surgically in period A, the proportions fell to 28% (B) and then to 7.5% (C). Method-related mortality fell from 1.1% (A) to 0.4% (B) and 0.5% (C).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Acute Disease↗

Does acute ingestion of large amounts of alcohol cause pancreatic injury? A prospective study.

The contribution of ethanol to the pathogenesis of acute pancreatitis has been questioned for a long time. The authors asked whether acute ingestion of large amounts of alcohol may lead to pancreatic injury, as assessed by serum amylase levels, clinical picture, and abdominal ultrasound. Therefore, all patients (N = 122) admitted to our medical emergency ward with the diagnosis of alcohol intoxication were evaluated prospectively during a 12-mo period. Of these, 78 (56 M, 22 F; mean age 36 +/- 15) could be evaluated. The other 44 were excluded because of incomplete data (n = 18), mixed intoxications (n = 8), repeated admission (n = 9), incorrect diagnosis on admission (n = 7), and chronic pancreatitis (n = 2). Serum ethanol, amylase, and GOT were measured. Serum ethanol was 246 +/- 122 mg/dL (3-500 mg/dL), amylase 83 +/- 44 U/L (27-361 U/L), and GOT 25 +/- 37 U/L (5-271 U/L) without significant differences among the genders. No correlation between serum ethanol and serum amylase levels could be detected.

Acute Disease↗

Piezoelectric shock wave lithotripsy of pancreatic duct stones.

OBJECTIVES: The efficacy of extracorporeal piezoelectric shock wave lithotripsy in patients with obstructing pancreatic duct stones was investigated. METHODS: Fifty patients suffering from chronic pancreatitis and obstructing pancreatolithiasis were treated by ESWL (Piezolith 2500). Shock wave treatment was administered, inasmuch as the stones were not extractable by initially applied endoscopic measures. RESULTS: A total of 119 (2.4 +/- 1.4, range 1-7) lithotripsy sessions were conducted; only mild sedation/analgesia was used. Optimum targeting of the concrements in the shock wave focus was achieved in 17 (14%) treatment sessions with ultrasonography only; it was achieved in 65 (55%) cases by fluoroscopy and, in further 37 (31%) sessions by using both localization systems. Stone fragmentation was successful in 43 (86%) patients. Nineteen (38%) patients achieved spontaneous stone discharge after shock wave lithotripsy. In 11 (22%) cases, it was possible to remove all fragments endoscopically; residual fragments remained in 20 (40%) patients. Severe complications attributable to shock wave application did not occur. During follow-up, six patients had to be referred to surgery; two male patients died of specific diabetic complications and pleural mesothelioma, respectively. Thirty-five (90%) of 39 patients whose conditions were followed for 2-50 (20 +/- 14) months reported improvement of their pain sensations. Six (15%) patients required endoscopic treatment, including ESWL in five of those patients, to be repeated due to recurrent formation of calculi in the main pancreatic duct, which was again successful in five of the six patients. CONCLUSIONS: Piezoelectric shock wave lithotripsy offers a basis for safe and effective fragmentation of pancreatic stones and facilitates endoscopic procedures. Most of the patients with obstructing pancreatic stones became stonefree and showed a significant reduction of pain.

Calculi↗

[The piezoelectric lithotripsy of gallstones. The acute- and long-term results].

Extracorporeal piezoelectric lithotripsy (PEL) with oral lysis (about 7.5 mg/kg urso- and chenodeoxycholic acid as single dose in the evening) was performed, according to a standardized treatment and follow-up protocol, in 219 patients (177 women, 42 men; aged 47 +/- 14 years) with symptoms of gallbladder stones. The average number of treatment sessions per patient was 2.0 +/- 0.8. Significantly fewer sessions with fewer shockwave charges were required in solitary gallstones of less than or equal to 20 mm diameter than in those of greater than 20 mm diameter and in multiple concrements (P less than 0.01). Fragmentation was successful in 99% of patients. Sedation and/or analgesia during PEL were required in only 2% of patients. There were no marked side effects during the treatment. The stone-free rate 12 months after the start of treatment was 76% in the group with solitary stones less than or equal to 20 mm, 75% with solitary stones greater than 20 mm and 64% for multiple stones. During the follow-up period 36% of patients had biliary colics and 3% had fragments impacted in the common bile duct. Biliary pancreatitis occurred in 1% of patients. PEL is an effective and sparing procedure in the treatment of selected patients with gallbladder stones.

Adult↗