PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

T Roderick Hester

Publications and source records attributed to T Roderick Hester.

7 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

The role of muscle flaps in wound salvage after vascular graft infections: the Emory experience.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of prosthetic graft infection is 1 to 6 percent, and the mortality rate of infected aortoiliac or aortofemoral bypass is 25 to 75 percent. The goal of this study was to report the use of muscle flaps in the management of patients presenting with infected vascular grafts. METHODS: A total of 22 patients required 26 muscle flaps to cover 24 infected vascular grafts. Muscle flaps were used for local wound control in all patients regardless of the fate of the graft. The vascular surgeons elected for graft salvage in eight of the 24 grafts. All of the muscle flaps survived. RESULTS: The average time interval between the bypass and infection was 371 days. One-month follow-up revealed an 88 percent salvage rate, but this decreased to 50 percent during the mean follow-up of 23 months. None of the patients originally managed with a salvaged graft lost a limb, and overall, 14 of 22 limbs in this series remained viable (64.0 percent). The mortality rate during the index hospitalization was 9 percent. In this series, suprainguinal grafts had a higher mortality rate. In addition, infection occurring more than 1 month postoperatively, culture-positive Pseudomonas and methicillin-resistant species, and exposure of the arterial-graft anastomosis were poor prognostic indicators of graft preservation. CONCLUSIONS: Management of infected vascular grafts remains a challenging problem. Muscle flap coverage should have a high priority, as the chance of a good outcome is highly favorable in early infections.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Preliminary (3 years) experience with smooth wall silicone gel implants for primary breast augmentation.

The goal of this study is to obtain data concerning the incidence of capsular contracture and reoperation rates in patients having primary breast augmentation utilizing modern low-bleed smooth-wall silicone gel implants. Data were collected retrospectively and consisted of 44 patients who underwent primary breast augmentation using smooth silicone gel implants (Mentor Corporation) in the period between 2001 and 2003. Of the 131 patients identified, 44 patients fit the criteria of primary breast augmentation. Secondary cases and primary augmentation with mastopexy were excluded from this study. This group of patients is still followed, and the data are being updated periodically. A total of 44 patients underwent primary breast augmentation. Average age was 32 years (range, 19-57). Average follow-up was 34 months (range, 28-40). Average operative time was 52 minutes. The inframammary incision was used in 65% of patients and the areolar incision in 35%. The subglandular position was used in 35% of patients versus the submuscular position in 65%. Nine patients (20%) developed capsular contracture. Six patients (13.6%) had Baker 3 capsular contracture, which required revision. Four of the 9 patients with capsular contracture had implants placed in the submuscular space and 5 in the subglandular position. Relative to the implant position, 4 patients (9%) with implants placed in the submuscular position developed capsular contracture. Relative to the subglandular position, 5 patients (11.3%) with implants placed in the subglandular position developed capsular contracture. Eight patients (19%) required implant revision, 6 patients for capsular contracture, and 2 patients requested size change. Preliminary data from this study indicate that the use of the new generation of gel implants yields less capsular contracture, as well as decreased revision rates. Subglandular placement of gel implants did not significantly increase the risk of capsular contracture. Longer follow-up and multicenter studies are still needed to confirm these findings. This cumulative data could challenge the current status of gel implant moratorium imposed by the incidence of capsular contracture and revision rates.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Endoscopic-assisted face lift: review of 200 cases.

The use of endoscopic techniques in facial esthetic surgery has gained increasing popularity in the last decade. Endoscopic forehead rejuvenation became a reliable technique and an attractive option for both the surgeon and the patient. The use of the endoscope in face and neck lift surgery did not gain the same popularity, as explained by the relative few indications for this technique. In this study, we retrospectively review a series of 200 patients who underwent endoscopic-assisted face-lifts alone or in combination with other esthetic procedures. We divided the patients into 4 groups according to the type of incisions and the surgical approach used in each of them. We also reviewed the current status of using the endoscope in face and neck lift surgery. The technique described in this study uses limited access incisions (limited postauricular, submental, and temporal scalp) to reposition the ptotic facial elements, while avoiding the preauricular and postauricular scarring when indicated. Under endoscopic visualization, the composite face-lift flap elevates the malar fat pad above the zygomaticus muscle to the nasolabial fold. The lower-lid orbicularis oculi muscle is incorporated and lifted with composite flap through the lower blepharoplasty incision. The jowl area is contoured by tangential excision and tightening of the lateral platysma. Pretunneling and hydrodissection defines the plane of dissection and helps to reduce the bleeding during facial and cervical flap elevation. In this study, endoscopic techniques were applicable in selected patients undergoing facial rejuvenation with goals of decreased scarring. Indications for using the technique include young patients (eg, less than 50 years) with a relatively small amount of skin excess or older patients with thick skin and minimal skin redundancy. The technique is particularly attractive to the male patient, by avoiding the preauricular incision and the disruption of the beard line. Patients with excess skin underwent the standard cervicofacial incision. In this group the endoscope was used as a tool for better magnification and illumination.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Factors that influence the completion of breast reconstruction.

Post mastectomy breast reconstruction continues to evolve in both timing and technique; however, multiple surgical procedures are usually required. The purpose of this report was to determine the number of secondary procedures required to complete the breast reconstruction and factors that influence this process. All patients who underwent breast reconstruction at Emory University Hospital between 1975 and 2000 were reviewed. The end point and inclusion criterion was completion to nipple reconstruction. Secondary procedures were determined per patient for either unilateral or bilateral reconstructions, and defined as any surgical manipulation of the reconstructed breast, contralateral breast, or donor site. The cohort was stratified by timing and method of reconstruction. Additional variables included risk factors, radiation therapy, and complications. A total of 888 patients completed the reconstructive process (738 unilateral and 150 bilateral). The average number of secondary procedures was 3.99 for unilateral, and 5.54 for bilateral. Delayed reconstructions had a higher number of secondary procedures in both groups. Transverse rectus abdominus musculocutaneous flap reconstruction tended to have more secondary procedures than implant or latissimus dorsi with or without implant reconstructions. Radiation therapy increased the number of secondary procedures in unilateral (3.9 versus 4.6, P < 0.001) and in bilateral reconstructions (5.7 versus 6.4, P = 0.032). The number of secondary procedures also increased exponentially with the number of risk factors (0-4), and patients with any complication had a higher number of secondary procedures for unilateral (4.5 versus 3.6, P < 0.001) and bilateral reconstructions (6.4 versus 4.5, P < 0.001). Secondary breast and donor site procedures were used as an outcome measure to formulate comparisons. Autologous tissue reconstruction required more secondary procedures, likely in part to donor site revisions. Delayed reconstruction, the need for radiation therapy, any complication, and more risk factors significantly increased the number of secondary procedures required to complete the reconstructive process.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Lateral canthal anchoring.

LEARNING OBJECTIVES: After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Understand the principles involved in canthal support for patients undergoing cosmetic and reconstructive surgery. 2. Understand the variations in surgical techniques required to perform canthal anchoring in differing patients. 3. Describe the significance and techniques of canthal anchoring (canthoplasty and canthopexy) as they relate to cosmetic and reconstructive lower lid surgery. 4. Describe the effect of canthal anchoring on the function of the upper and lower lids and eyelid fissure shape. Any surgeon performing cosmetic or reconstructive surgery procedures on the lower lid or midface through the lower lid should be comfortable with canthal anchoring procedures. Appropriate canthal anchoring is effective in preventing postoperative lower-lid malposition, in ensuring eyelid closure, and in improving or maintaining proper eye shape. In many patients, a canthopexy (nonlysis canthal anchoring) is effective. However, in patients with significant horizontal laxity, cantholysis with appropriate lid shortening is required. It should be remembered that canthal anchoring, no matter how well performed, will not prevent severe lower-lid complications in cases of over-resection of lower-lid skin and of poorly performed midface procedures that do not support the lower lid and cheek.

Blepharoplasty↗
PubMed2002

Prominent eye: operative management in lower lid and midfacial rejuvenation and the morphologic classification system.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate a standard method for the identification of eye prominence and to review operative modifications necessary in patients with prominent eyes. A Hertel exophthalmometer was used to define a classification system according to the degree of eye prominence. A total of 43 patients undergoing lower lid or midfacial rejuvenation were included in the study. Preoperative parameters, including vector analysis, laxity, scleral show, rotational deformity, lateral canthus-to-lateral orbital rim distance, lateral-to-medial canthal distance, and exophthalmometry measurement, were documented. Intraoperatively, techniques including horizontal shortening and lateral canthoplasty placement were documented. Postoperative evaluation included scleral show, rotational deformity, and lateral-to-medial canthal distance. The proposed morphologic classification system divided patients into four groups on the basis of their degree of prominence, as measured by exophthalmometry, defined as deep-set (<14 mm), normal (15 to 17 mm), moderately prominent (18 to 19 mm), and very prominent (>20 mm). Operative techniques were different between the groups, with correction of laxity in the deep-set eyes and accentuated overcorrection of scleral show in the prominent eyes. The use of an exophthalmometer to classify patients before blepharoplasty may help reduce the risk of complications by identifying high-risk patients.

Adult↗