PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

T S Field

Publications and source records attributed to T S Field.

24 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1993

Potential impact of pulmonary artery catheter placement on short-term management decisions in the medical intensive care unit.

The purpose of this study was to examine the potential impact of pulmonary artery (PA) catheter placement on short-term management decisions in the medical intensive care unit (ICU). One hundred three patients were examined over an 18-month period. The predominant indications for PA-catheter placement included refractory congestive heart failure, airspace disease, uncertain cardiac filling pressures, or hypotension. In 58 (56%) of the 103 patients, management recommendations changed as a direct result of knowledge gained by PA catheter placement. These changes involved fluid therapy recommendations in 41 patients, vasopressor use in 17 patients, intravenous vasodilator use in 24 patients, and recommendations for the use of inotropic agents in 15 patients. Although 18 patients experienced early or late complications, major events were limited to a single pneumothorax requiring chest tube insertion and four episodes of bacteremia. No deaths were directly attributable to the catheter insertion. In critically ill patients in the medical intensive care unit, PA-catheter placement leads to changes in recommendations for management in a substantial portion of patients with little risk of life-threatening complications in those who receive such invasive monitoring.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1992

Usefulness of dipyridamole-thallium scanning for preoperative evaluation of cardiac risk for nonvascular surgery.

The ability to stratify cardiac risk before nonvascular surgery using clinical markers and dipyridamole-thallium scanning (DTS) was assessed for patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease unable to exercise. Of 100 consecutively studied patients who proceeded to nonvascular surgery, 9 (9%) experienced greater than or equal to 1 perioperative cardiac ischemic event, including death in 2 patients (2%) and nonfatal myocardial infarction in 2 (2%). Logistic regression identified 2 clinical predictors (age greater than 70 years and history of heart failure), and 1 DTS (thallium redistribution) predictor of events. Of 45 patients with neither clinical variable, none (0%; 95% confidence intervals [CI] 0 to 8%) had events. Of 55 patients with greater than or equal to 1 clinical marker, 9 (16.4%; 95% CI 7 to 26%) had events. Within this subgroup, 1 of 31 patients (3.2%; 95% CI 0 to 16%) without thallium redistribution had events compared with 8 of 24 (33.3%; 95% CI 14 to 52%) with redistribution. An algorithm combining 5 independent clinical and 2 DTS predictors, derived previously in vascular surgery patients, was validated in the 100 nonvascular surgery patients. It is concluded that preoperative planar DTS is most useful to stratify selected nonvascular surgery patients at intermediate or high risk by clinical assessment. However, for almost half of those patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease, DTS may be unnecessary because of sufficiently low predictive value based on simple clinical descriptors.

Aged↗
PubMedDate not supplied

The diffusion of a novel therapy into clinical practice: the case of sildenafil.

BACKGROUND: Erectile dysfunction is a common condition, yet in the past most affected men did not seek medical treatment. OBJECTIVE: To examine how sildenafil (Viagra), a new medication for the treatment of erectile dysfunction, has been incorporated into general medical practice. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The study population consisted of all male members of a group-model Massachusetts health maintenance organization (HMO) whose first prescription for sildenafil was dispensed during the first 24 weeks of its availability through the HMO as a plan benefit (April 24, 1998, through October 8, 1998). Data collected on each member in the study population included age, specialty of the prescribing physician, initial dose, use of prior treatments for erectile dysfunction, receipt of medications known to predispose to impotence, filling of a second prescription for sildenafil, and concomitant medical conditions (including hypertension, ischemic heart disease, hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus, and history of radical prostatectomy). Cross tabulations and logistic regression models were constructed to evaluate the potential associations between filling a second prescription for sildenafil and other characteristics of sildenafil users. RESULTS: We identified 899 members who filled a first-time sildenafil prescription in the 24-week period of interest. The majority of sildenafil prescriptions that were filled for the first time (85%) occurred in the first 12 weeks of its availability. Most sildenafil users (84%) were between 45 and 74 years of age (average age, 61 years; age range, 23 to 90 years), and approximately 40% had documentation of prior treatment for erectile dysfunction. Use was highest among those aged 55 to 64 years, with almost 5% of all male HMO members in that age group having received at least 1 sildenafil prescription. Our cohort of sildenafil users was significantly more likely to have hypertension (P<.01), hyperlipidemia (P<.01), and diabetes mellitus (P<.01) than persons who participated in a widely publicized clinical trial of the medication. Prescribing physicians were predominantly primary care physicians (78% were internists, and 11% were family practitioners). More than 60% of sildenafil users filled a second prescription within 3 months of the first prescription; in multivariate analyses, factors associated with filling a second prescription included younger age and prior treatment for erectile dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: Sildenafil was rapidly adopted into the clinical practice of primary care physicians for the treatment of erectile dysfunction in the managed care setting. The patients for whom the drug was prescribed in the general practice setting differed across many medical characteristics from study subjects who participated in clinical trials of the drug. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:3401-3405.

Adult↗